in

A preliminary study of mirror-induced self-directed behaviour on wildlife at the Royal Belum Rainforest Malaysia

  • 1.

    Gallup, G. G. Jr. Chimpanzees: self-recognition. Science 167, 86–87 (1970).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Gallup, G. G. Jr., McClure, M. K., Hill, S. D. & Bundy, R. A. Capacity for self-recognition in differentially reared chimpanzees. Psychol. Rec. 21, 69–74 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Gallup, G. G. Jr. et al. Further reflections on self-recognition in primates. Anim. Behav. 50, 1525–1532 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Prior, H., Schwarz, A. & Gunturkun, O. Mirror-induced behaviour in the magpie (pica pica): evidence of self-recognition. PLoS Biol. 6, e202 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    De Groot, B. & Cheyne, S. M. Does mirror enrichment improve primate well-being?. Anim. Welf. 25(2), 163–170 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Ma, X. et al. Giant pandas failed to show mirror self-recognition. Anim. Cogn. 18(3), 713–721 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Plotnik, J. M., de Waal, F. B. M. & Reiss, D. Self-recognition in an Asian elephant. PNAS 103(45), 17053–17057 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Reiss, D. & Marino, L. Mirror self-recognition in the bottlenose dolphin: a case of cognitive convergence. PNAS 98, 5937–5942 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Leavens, D. A., Aureli, F. & Hopkins, W. D. Scratching and cognitive stress: performance and reinforcement effects on hand use, scratch type, and afferent cutaneous pathways during computer cognitive testing by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Am. J. Primatol. 42, 126–127 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Leavens, D. A., Aureli, F., Hopkins, W. D. & Hyatt, C. W. Effects of cognitive challenge on self-directed behaviors by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Am. J. Primatol. 55(1), 1–14 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Heschl, A. & Burkart, J. A new mark test for mirror self-recognition in non-human primates. Primates 47, 187–198 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Hecht, E. E., Mahovetz, L. M., Preuss, T. M. & Hopkins, W. D. A neuroanatomical predictor of mirror self-recognition in chimpanzees. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12(1), 37–48 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Parker, S. T. A developmental approach to the origins of self- recognition in great apes. Hum. Evol. 6, 435–449 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Hafandi, A. et al. The preliminary study of mirror self-recognition (MSR) on Malayan sunbear (Helarctos malayanus). J. Vet. Malaysia 30(1), 23–25 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Povinelli, D. J. Failure to find self-recognition in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in contrast to their use of mirror cues to discover hidden food. J. Comp. Psychol. 103(2), 122–131 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Cammaerts, M.-C. & Cammaerts, R. Are ants (hymenoptera, formicidae) capable of selfrecognition?. J. Sci. 5, 521–532 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Kohda, M. et al. If a fish can pass the mark test, what are the implications for consciousness and self-awareness testing in animals?. PLoS Biol. 17(2), e3000021 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Buniyaadi, A., Taufque, S. K. T. & Kumar, V. Self-recognition in corvids: evidence from the mirror-mark test in Indian house crows (Corvus splendens). J. Ornithol. 161, 341–350 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Schwabe, K. A. et al. Creation of Malaysia’s Royal Belum State Park: a case study of conservation in a developing country. J. Environ. Dev. 24(1), 54–81 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Matsubayashi, H. et al. Importance of natural licks for mammals in Bornean Inland tropical rainforest. Ecol. Res. 22, 742 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Lazarus, B. A. et al. Topographical differences impacting wildlife dynamics at natural saltlicks in the Royal Belum rainforest. Asian J. Conserv. Biol. 8(2), 97–101 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Oli, M. K. & Jacobson, H. A. Vocalizations of barking deer (Muntiacus muntjac). Mammalia 59(2), 179–186 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Odden, M. & Wegge, P. Predicting spacing behavior and mating systems of solitary cervids: a study of hog deer and Indian muntjac. Zoology 110, 261–270 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Pokharel, K. & Chalise, M. K. Status and distribution pattern of barking deer (Muntiacus muntjac Zimmermann) in Hemja VDC, Kaski. Nepal J. Sci. Technol. 11, 223–228 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    de Waal, F. B. M., Dindo, M., Freeman, C. A. & Hall, M. J. The monkey in the mirror: hardly a stranger. PNAS 102(32), 11140–11147 (2005).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Morgan, K. N. & Tromborg, C. T. Sources of stress in captivity. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 102(3), 262–302 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Tobler, M. W., Carrillo-Percategui, S. E. & Powell, G. Habitat use, activity patterns and use of mineral licks by five species of ungulate in south-eastern Peru. J. Trop. Ecol. 25, 261–270 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Cruz, P., Paviolo, A., Bo, R. F., Thompson, J. J. & Di Bitetti, M. S. Daily activity patterns and habitat use of the lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris) in the Atlantic Forest. Mamm. Biol. 79, 376–383 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Houpt, K. A. & McDonnell, S. M. Equine stereotypies. Comp. Cont. Educ. Pract. Vet. 15, 1265–1271 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Arumugam, K. A., Buesching, C. D. & Annavi, G. Lip licking behavior in captive Malayan tapirs (Tapirus indicus): Manifestation of a stereotypic or stress related response?. Int. J. Recent Adv. Multidiscip. Res. 6(3), 4724–4727 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Hranchuk, K. B. & Webster, W. G. Interocular transfer of lateral mirror-image discrimination by cats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 88(1), 368–372 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Rayan, M. D. & Linkie, M. Conserving tigers in Malaysia: a science-driven approach for eliciting conservation policy change. Biol. Cons. 184, 18–26 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Breton, G. & Barrot, S. Influence of enclosure size on the distances covered and paced by captive tigers (Panthera tigris). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 154, 66–75 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Biolatti, C. et al. Behavioural analysis of captive tigers (Panthera tigris): a water pool makes the difference. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 174, 173–180 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Williams, E., Carter, A., Hall, C. & Bremner-Harrison, S. Social interactions in zoo-housed elephants: factors affecting social relationships. Animals 9, 747 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Williams, M. F. Primate encephalization and intelligence. Med. Hypotheses 58(4), 284–290 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Anderson, J. R. & Gallup, G. G. Jr. Mirror self-recognition: a review and critique of attemps to promote and engineer self-recognition in primates. Primates 56, 317–326 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Deaner, R. O., Isler, K., Burkart, J. & van Schaik, C. Overall brain size and not encephalization quotient, best predicts cognitive ability across non-human primates. Brain Behav. Evol. 70, 115–124 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Matiju, J. et al. Absolute, not relative brain size correlates with sociality in ground squirrels. Proc. Biol. Sci. 30(283), 1827 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Caravaggi, A. et al. A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour research. Conservation 3(3), 109–122 (2017).

    Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    MIT News – Food | Water

    Increasing the broad-leaved tree fraction in European forests mitigates hot temperature extremes