in

Colony co-founding in ants is an active process by queens

  • 1.

    Bourke, A. F. G. & Heinze, J. The ecology of communal breeding: The case of multiple-queen Leptothoracine ants. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.345, 359–372 (1994).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Bourke, A. F. G. Principles of Social Evolution. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution (2011).

  • 3.

    Cockburn, A. Evolution of helping behavior in cooperatively breeding birds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.29, 141–177 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Jennions, M. Cooperative breeding in mammals. Trends Ecol. Evol.9, 89–93 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Lukas, D. & Clutton-Brock, T. Life histories and the evolution of cooperative breeding in mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B279, 4065–4070 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Purcell, J. Geographic patterns in the distribution of social systems in terrestrial arthropods. Biol. Rev.86, 475–491 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Wong, M. & Balshine, S. The evolution of cooperative breeding in the African cichlid fish, Neolamprologus pulcher. Biol. Rev.86, 511–530 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Dugatkin, L. Animal cooperation among unrelated individuals. Naturwissenschaften89, 533–541 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Emlen, S. The evolution of helping. An ecological constraints model. Am. Nat.119, 29–39 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Nichols, H. J. et al. Food availability shapes patterns of helping effort in a cooperative mongoose. Anim. Behav.83, 1377–1385 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Riehl, C. & Strong, M. J. Stable social relationships between unrelated females increase individual fitness in a cooperative bird. Proc. R. Soc. B285, 20180130 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Sharp, S. P., English, S. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. Maternal investment during pregnancy in wild meerkats. Evol. Ecol.27, 1033–1044 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Taborsky, M. Broodcare helpers in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi: Their costs and benefits. Anim. Behav.32, 1236–1252 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Hamilton, W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. J. Theor. Biol.7, 1–52 (1964).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Bshary, R. Cooperation between unrelated individuals—a game theoretic approach. In Animal Behaviour: Evolution and Mechanisms (ed. Kappeler, P.) 213–240 (Springer, Berlin, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Dugatkin, L. A. & Mesterton-Gibbons, M. Cooperation among unrelated individuals: Reciprocal altruism, by-product mutualism and group selection in fishes. Biosystems37, 19–30 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Keller, L. Queen Number and Sociality in Insects (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Matsuura, K., Fujimoto, M., Goka, K. & Nishida, T. Cooperative colony foundation by termite female pairs: Altruism for survivorship in incipient colonies. Anim. Behav.64, 167–173 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Mesterton-Gibbons, M. & Dugatkin, L. A. Cooperation among unrelated individuals: Evolutionary factors. Q. Rev. Biol.67, 267–281 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Bernasconi, G. & Strassmann, J. E. Cooperation among unrelated individuals: The ant foundress case. Trends Ecol. Evol.14, 477–482 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Itô, Y. Behaviour and Social Evolution of Wasps (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Packer, L. Multiple-foundress associations in sweat bees. In Queen Number and Sociality in Insects (ed. Keller, L.) 215–233 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Schwarz, M. P., Bull, N. J. & Hogendoorn, K. Evolution of sociality in the allodapine bees: A review of sex allocation, ecology and evolution. Insectes Soc.45, 349–368 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Shellman-Reeve, J. S. The spectrum of eusociality in termites. In The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids (eds Choe, J. C. & Crespi, B. J.) 52–93 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Thorne, B. L. Evolution of eusociality in termites. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.28, 27–54 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. The Ants (Springer, Berlin, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Schmid-Hempel, P. Parasites in Social Insects (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Tschinkel, W. R. The Fire Ants (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Cole, B. J. The ecological setting of social evolution. In Organization of Insect Societies (eds Gadau, J. & Fewell, J.) 74–104 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Johnson, R. A. Colony founding by pleometrosis in the semi-claustral seed-harvester ant Pogonomyrmex calfornicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Anim. Behav.68, 1189–1200 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Tschinkel, W. R. An experimental study of pleometrotic colony founding in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta: What is the basis for association?. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.43, 247–257 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Jerome, C. A., McInnes, D. A. & Adams, E. S. Group defense by colony-founding queens in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Behav. Ecol.9, 301–308 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Helms Cahan, S. & Julian, G. E. Fitness consequences of cooperative colony founding in the desert leaf-cutter ant Acromyrmex versicolor. Behav. Ecol.10, 585–591 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Adams, E. S. & Tschinkel, W. R. Effects of foundress number on brood raids and queen survival in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.37, 233–242 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Clark, R. M. & Fewell, J. H. Social dynamics drive selection in cooperative associations of ant queens. Behav. Ecol.25, 117–123 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Offenberg, J., Peng, R. & Nielsen, M. Development rate and brood production in haplo- and pleometrotic colonies of Oecophylla smaragdina. Insectes Soc.59, 307–311 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Rissing, S. W. & Pollock, G. B. An experimental analysis of pleometric advantage in the desert seed-harvester ant Messor pergandei (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Insectes Soc.38, 205–211 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Sasaki, K., Jibiki, E., Satoh, T. & Obara, Y. Queen phenotype and behaviour during cooperative colony founding in Polyrhachis moesta. Insectes Soc.52, 19–25 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Waloff, N. The effect of the number of queens of the ant Lasius flavus (Fab.) (Hym. Formicidae) on their survival and on the rate of development of the first brood. Insectes Soc.4, 391–408 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Bartz, S. H. & Hölldobler, B. Colony founding in Myrmecocystus mimicus Wheeler (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) and the evolution of foundress associations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol10, 137–147 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Helms Cahan, S. Ecological variation across a transition in colony-founding behavior in the ant Messor pergandei. Oecologia129, 629–635 (2001).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Sommer, K. & Hölldobler, B. Colony founding by queen association and determinants of reduction in queen number in the ant Lasius niger. Anim. Behav.50, 287–294 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Tschinkel, W. R. & Howard, D. F. Colony founding by pleometrosis in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol12, 103–113 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Herbers, J. M. Nest site limitation and facultative polygyny in the ant Leptothorax longispinosus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol19, 115–122 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Nonacs, P. Queen condition and alate density affect pleometrosis in the ant Lasius pallitarsis. Insectes Soc.39, 3–13 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Masoni, A. et al. Pleometrotic colony foundation in the ant Crematogaster scutellaris (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Better be alone than in bad company. Myrmecol. News25, 51–59 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Sommer, K. & Hölldobler, B. Pleometrosis in Lasius niger. In Biology and Evolution of Social Insects (ed. Billen, J.) 47–50 (Leuven University Press, Leuven, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Pfennig, D. W. Absence of joint nesting advantage in desert seed harvester ants: Evidence from a field experiment. Anim. Behav.49, 567–575 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Tschinkel, W. R. Brood raiding and the population dynamics of founding and incipient colonies of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Ecol. Entomol.17, 179–188 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Helms Cahan, S. & Fewell, J. H. Division of labor and the evolution of task sharing in queen associations of the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.56, 9–17 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Helmkampf, M., Mikheyev, A. S., Kang, Y., Fewell, J. & Gadau, J. Gene expression and variation in social aggression by queens of the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus. Mol. Ecol.25, 3716–3730 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Overson, R. P., Gadau, J., Clark, R. M., Pratt, S. C. & Fewell, J. H. Behavioral transitions with the evolution of cooperative nest founding by harvester ant queens. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.68, 21–30 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Shaffer, Z. et al. The foundress’s dilemma: Group selection for cooperation among queens of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus. Sci. Rep.6, 29828 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Aron, S., Steinhauer, N. & Fournier, D. Influence of queen phenotype, investment and maternity apportionment on the outcome of fights in cooperative foundations of the ant Lasius niger. Anim. Behav.77, 1067–1074 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    Brütsch, T., Avril, A. & Chapuisat, M. No evidence for social immunity in co-founding queen associations. Sci. Rep.7, 16262 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Chérasse, S. & Aron, S. Measuring inotocin receptor gene expression in chronological order in ant queens. Horm. Behav.96, 116–121 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    Dreier, S. & d’Ettorre, P. Social context predicts recognition systems in ant queens. J. Evol. Biol.22, 644–649 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    Holman, L., Dreier, S. & d’Ettorre, P. Selfish strategies and honest signalling: Reproductive conflicts in ant queen associations. Proc. R. Soc. B277, 2007–2015 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    Pull, C. D. & Cremer, S. Co-founding ant queens prevent disease by performing prophylactic undertaking behaviour. BMC Evol. Biol.17, 219 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 60.

    Pull, C. D., Hughes, W. H. O. & Brown, M. J. F. Tolerating an infection: An indirect benefit of co-founding queen associations in the ant Lasius niger. Naturwissenschaften100, 1125–1136 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 61.

    Bernasconi, G. & Keller, L. Phenotype and individual investment in cooperative foundress associations of the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Behav. Ecol9, 478–485 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • 62.

    Bernasconi, G. & Keller, L. Effect of queen phenotype and social environment on early queen mortality in incipient colonies of the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Anim. Behav.57, 371–377 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    3 Questions: Asegun Henry on five “grand thermal challenges” to stem the tide of global warming

    MIT researchers and Wyoming representatives explore energy and climate solutions