Popper, A. N., Ramcharitar, J. & Campana, S. E. Why otoliths? Insights from inner ear physiology and fisheries biology. Mar. Freshw. Res. 56, 497–504. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04267 (2005).
Starrs, D., Ebner, B. C. & Fulton, C. J. All in the ears: Unlocking the early life history biology and spatial ecology of fishes. Biol. Rev. 91, 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12162 (2016).
Schulz-Mirbach, T., Ladich, F., Plath, M. & Heß, M. Enigmatic ear stones: what we know about the functional role and evolution of fish otoliths. Biol. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12463 (2018).
Campana, S. E. Photographic Atlas of Fish Otoliths of the Northwest Atlantic Ocean. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Vol. 133 (NRC Research Press, Ottawa, 2004).
Tuset, V. M., Lombarte, A., González, J. A., Pertusa, J. F. & Lorente, M. J. Comparative morphology of the sagittal otolith in Serranus spp. J. Fish Biol. 63, 1491–1504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.00262.x (2003).
Tuset, V. M. et al. Otolith patterns of rockfishes from the northeastern pacific. J. Morphol. 276, 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20353 (2015).
Campana, S. E. & Casselman, J. M. Stock discrimination using otolith shape analysis. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50, 1062–1083. https://doi.org/10.1139/f93-123 (1993).
Bose, A. P. H., Adragna, J. B. & Balshine, S. Otolith morphology varies between populations, sexes and male alternative reproductive tactics in a vocal toadfish Porichthys notatus. J. Fish Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13187 (2016).
Mille, T., Mahe, K., Villanueva, M. C., De Pontual, H. & Ernande, B. Sagittal otolith morphogenesis asymmetry in marine fishes. J. Fish Biol. 87, 646–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12746 (2015).
Bose, A. P. H., Mccallum, E. S., Raymond, K., Marentette, J. R. & Balshine, S. Growth and otolith morphology vary with alternative reproductive tactics and contaminant exposure in the round goby Neogobius melanostomus. J. Fish Biol. 93, 674–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13756 (2018).
Lombarte, A. & Castellón, A. Interspecific and intraspecific otolith variability in the genus Merluccius as determined by image analysis. Can. J. Zool. 69, 2442–2449. https://doi.org/10.1139/z91-343 (1991).
Vignon, M. & Morat, F. Environmental and genetic determinant of otolith shape revealed by a non-indigenous tropical fish. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 411, 231–241. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08651 (2010).
Gagliano, M. & McCormick, M. I. Feeding history influences otolith shape in tropical fish. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 278, 291–296. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps278291 (2004).
Hoff, G. R. & Fuiman, L. A. Morphometry and composition of red drum otoliths: Changes associated with temperature, somatic growth rate, and age. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 106, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(93)90502-U (1993).
Tuset, V. M. et al. Otolith shape lends support to the sensory drive hypothesis in rockfishes. J. Evol. Biol. 29, 2083–2097. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12932 (2016).
Gauldie, R. W. Function, form and time-keeping properties of fish otoliths. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 91, 395–402 (1988).
Popper, A. N., Fay, R. R., Platt, C. & Sand, O. Sound detection mechanisms and capabilities of teleost fishes. In Sensory Processing in Aquatic Environments (eds Collin, S. P. & Marshall, N. J.) 3–38 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003).
Krysl, P., Hawkins, A. D., Schilt, C. & Cranford, T. W. Angular oscillation of solid scatterers in response to progressive planar acoustic waves: Do fish otoliths rock?. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042591 (2012).
Duftner, N. et al. Distinct population structure in a phenotypically homogeneous rock-dwelling cichlid fish from Lake Tanganyika. Mol. Ecol. 15, 2381–2395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02949.x (2006).
Koblmüller, S., Sefc, K. M., Duftner, N., Warum, M. & Sturmbauer, C. Genetic population structure as indirect measure of dispersal ability in a Lake Tanganyika cichlid. Genetica 130, 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-006-0027-0 (2007).
Sefc, K. M., Baric, S., Salzburger, W. & Sturmbauer, C. Species-specific population structure in rock-specialized sympatric cichlid species in Lake Tanganyika. East Afr. J. Mol. Evol. 64, 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-006-0011-4 (2007).
Wagner, C. E. & McCune, A. R. Contrasting patterns of spatial genetic structure in sympatric rock-dwelling cichlid fishes. Evolution 63, 1312–1326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00612.x (2009).
Sefc, K. M. et al. Shifting barriers and phenotypic diversification by hybridisation. Ecol. Lett. 20, 651–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12766 (2017).
Koblmüller, S. et al. Separated by sand, fused by dropping water: Habitat barriers and fluctuating water levels steer the evolution of rock-dwelling cichlid populations in Lake Tanganyika. Mol. Ecol. 20, 2272–2290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05088.x (2011).
Kohda, M. et al. Geographical colour variation in cichlid fishes at the southern end of Lake Tanganyika. Environ. Biol. Fishes 45, 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00003091 (1996).
Widmer, L. et al. Point-Combination Transect (PCT): Incorporation of small underwater cameras to study fish communities. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 891–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13163 (2019).
McGlue, M. M. et al. Seismic records of late Pleistocene aridity in Lake Tanganyika, tropical East Africa. J. Paleolimnol. 40, 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-007-9187-x (2008).
Duftner, N. et al. Parallel evolution of facial stripe patterns in the Neolamprologus brichardi/pulcher species complex endemic to Lake Tanganyika. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 45, 706–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.08.001 (2007).
Sefc, K. M., Mattersdorfer, K., Hermann, C. M. & Koblmüller, S. Past lake shore dynamics explain present pattern of unidirectional introgression across a habitat barrier. Hydrobiologia 791, 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2791-x (2017).
Winkelmann, K., Rüber, L. & Genner, M. J. Lake level fluctuations and divergence of cichlid fish ecomorphs in Lake Tanganyika. Hydrobiologia 791, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2839-y (2017).
Koblmüller, S. et al. Phylogeny and phylogeography of Altolamprologus: Ancient introgression and recent divergence in a rock-dwelling Lake Tanganyika cichlid genus. Hydrobiologia 791, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2896-2 (2017).
Balshine, S. et al. Correlates of group size in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish (Neolamprologus pulcher). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50, 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650100343 (2001).
Heg, D., Bachar, Z. & Taborsky, M. Cooperative breeding and group structure in the Lake Tanganyika cichlid Neolamprologus savoryi. Ethology 111, 1017–1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01135.x (2005).
Bose, A. P. H., Zimmermann, H., Henshaw, J. M., Fritzsche, K. & Sefc, K. M. Brood—tending males in a biparental fish suffer high paternity losses but rarely cuckold. Mol. Ecol. 27, 4309–4321. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14857 (2018).
Schaedelin, F. C., Van Dongen, W. F. D. & Wagner, R. H. Mate choice and genetic monogamy in a biparental, colonial fish. Behav. Ecol. 26, 782–788. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv011 (2015).
Konings, A. Tanganyika Cichlids in Their Natural Habitat 4th edn. (Hollywood Import & Export Inc., Gainesville, 2019).
Ota, K., Hori, M. & Kohda, M. Testes investment along a vertical depth gradient in an herbivorous fish. Ethology 118, 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2012.02056.x (2012).
Sturmbauer, C. et al. Abundance, distribution, and territory areas of rock-dwelling Lake Tanganyika cichlid fish species. Hydrobiologia 615, 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9582-5_5 (2008).
Heg, D., Brouwer, L., Bachar, Z. & Taborsky, M. Large group size yields group stability in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher. Behaviour 1, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853905774831891 (2005).
Spinks, R. K., Muschick, M., Salzburger, W. & Gante, H. F. Singing above the chorus: Cooperative Princess cichlid fish (Neolamprologus pulcher) has high pitch. Hydrobiologia 791, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2921-5 (2016).
Bigirimana, C. Neolamprologus pulcher. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2006: e.T60604A12382292. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2006.RLTS.T60604A12382292.en (2006). Accessed 8 March 2020.
Bigirimana, C. Neolamprologus caudopunctatus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2006: e.T60591A12373751. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2006.RLTS.T60591A12373751.en (2006). Accessed 8 March 2020.
Bigirimana, C. Neolamprologus savoryi. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2006: e.T60605A12382585. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2006.RLTS.T60605A12382585.en (2006). Accessed 8 March 2020.
Bigirimana, C. Neolamprologus moorii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2006: e.T60613A12384127. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2006.RLTS.T60613A12384127.en (2006). Accessed 8 March 2020.
Iwata, H. & Ukai, Y. SHAPE: A computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. J. Hered. 93, 384–385. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/93.5.384 (2002).
Crampton, J. S. Elliptic Fourier shape analysis of fossil bivalves: Some practical considerations. Lethaia 28, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3931.1995.tb01611.x (1995).
Jackson, D. A. Stopping rules in principal component analysis: A comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology 74, 2204–2214. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939574 (1993).
Bolles, K. L. & Begg, G. A. Distinction between silver hake (Merluccius bilinearis) stocks in US waters of the northwest Atlantic based on whole otolith morphometrics. Fish. Bull. 98, 451–462 (2000).
Lenth, R. emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.4.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (2020).
Richlen, M. L. & Barber, P. H. A technique for the rapid extraction of microalgal DNA from single live and preserved cells. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5, 688–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01032.x (2005).
McCusker, M. R. & Bentzen, P. Positive relationships between genetic diversity and abundance in fishes. Mol. Ecol. 19, 4852–4862. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04822.x (2010).
Karl, S. A., Toonen, R. J., Grant, W. S. & Bowen, B. W. Common misconceptions in molecular ecology: Echoes of the modern synthesis. Mol. Ecol. 21, 4171–4189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05576.x (2012).
Excoffier, L., Laval, G. & Schneider, S. Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinform. Online 1, 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/117693430500100003 (2005).
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E. & Quattro, J. M. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131, 497–591 (1992).
Leigh, J. W. & Bryant, D. POPART: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1110–1116. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12410 (2015).
Templeton, A. R., Crandall, K. A. & Sing, C. F. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132, 619–633 (1992).
Sefc, K. M., Payne, R. B. & Sorenson, M. D. Genetic differentiation after founder events: An evaluation of FST estimators with empirical and simulated data. Evol. Ecol. Res. 9, 21–39 (2007).
Sturmbauer, C., Salzburger, W., Duftner, N., Schelly, R. & Koblmüller, S. Evolutionary history of the Lake Tanganyika cichlid tribe Lamprologini (Teleostei: Perciformes) derived from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 57, 266–284 (2010).
Chung, Y., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Dorie, V., Gelman, A. & Liu, J. A nondegenerate penalized likelihood estimator for variance parameters in multilevel models. Psychometrika 78, 685–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-013-9328-2 (2013).
Solt, F. & Hu, Y. dotwhisker: Dot-and-whisker plots of regression results. R package version 0.5.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dotwhisker (2018).
Wilson, R. R. Jr. Depth-related changes in sagitta morphology in six Macrourid fishes of the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. Copeia 4, 1011–1017. https://doi.org/10.2307/1445256 (1985).
Lombarte, A. & Lleonart, J. Otolith size changes related with body growth, habitat depth and temperature. Environ. Biol. Fishes 37, 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00004637 (1993).
Mérigot, B., Letourneur, Y. & Lecomte-Finiger, R. Characterization of local populations of the common sole Solea solea (Pisces, Soleidae) in the NW Mediterranean through otolith morphometrics and shape analysis. Mar. Biol. 151, 997–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0549-0 (2007).
Hüssy, K. Otolith shape in juvenile cod (Gadus morhua): Ontogenetic and environmental effects. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 364, 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2008.06.026 (2008).
Volpedo, A. V. & Fuchs, D. V. Ecomorphological patterns of the lapilli of Paranoplatense Siluriforms (South America). Fish. Res. 102, 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2009.11.007 (2010).
Vignon, M. Disentangling and quantifying sources of otolith shape variation across multiple scales using a new hierarchical partitioning approach. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 534, 163–177. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11376 (2015).
Sand, O. & Michelsen, A. Vibration measurements of the perch saccular otolith. J. Comp. Physiol. A 123, 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00657346 (1978).
Schulz-Mirbach, T. et al. In-situ visualization of sound-induced otolith motion using hard X-ray phase contrast imaging. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21367-0 (2018).
Castonguay, M., Simard, P. & Gagnon, P. Usefulness of Fourier analysis of otolith shape for Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) stock discrimination. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 48, 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1139/f91-041 (1991).
Friedland, K. D. & Reddin, D. G. Use of otolith morphology in stock discriminations of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1139/f94-011 (1994).
Turan, C. Otolith shape and meristic analysis of herring (Clupea harengus) in the North-East Atlantic. Arch. Fish. Mar. Res. 48, 283–295 (2000).
Reichenbacher, B., Feulner, G. R. & Schulz-Mirbach, T. Geographic variation in otolith morphology among freshwater populations of Aphanius dispar (Teleostei, Cyprinodontiformes) from the southeastern Arabian Peninsula. J. Morphol. 484, 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10702 (2009).
Libungan, L. A., Slotte, A., Huseb, Å & Godiksen, J. A. Latitudinal gradient in otolith shape among local populations of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus L.) in Norway. PLoS ONE 10, e0130847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130847 (2015).
Hedrick, P. W. Sex: Differences in mutation, recombination, selection, gene flow, and genetic drift. Evolution 61, 2750–2771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00250.x (2007).
Cardinale, M., Doering-Arjes, P., Kastowsky, M. & Mosegaard, H. Effects of sex, stock, and environment on the shape of known-age Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) otoliths. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 61, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1139/f03-151 (2004).
Parmentier, E., Boistel, R., Bahri, M. A., Plenevaux, A. & Schwarzhans, W. Sexual dimorphism in the sonic system and otolith morphology of Neobythites gilli (Ophidiiformes). J. Morphol. 4, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12561 (2018).
Sopinka, N. M. et al. Liver size reveals social status in the African cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher. J. Fish Biol. 75, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02234.x (2009).
Irisarri, I. et al. Phylogenomics uncovers early hybridization and adaptive loci shaping the radiation of Lake Tanganyika cichlid fishes. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05479-9 (2018).
Breheny, P. & Burchett, W. Visualization of regression models using visreg. R. J. 9, 56–71 (2017).
Source: Ecology - nature.com