Turner, M. G. Landscape ecology: The effects of pattern on process. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 171–197 (1989).
Noss, R. F. Wildlife corridors. in Ecology of Greenways (eds. Smith, D. & Hellmund, P.) 43–98 (University of Minesota Press, Minesota, 1993).
Brooks, T. M. et al. Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 16, 909–923 (2002).
Hanski, I. The Shrinking World: Ecological Consequences of Habitat Loss, Vol. 14 (International Ecology Institute, Philadelphia, 2005).
IUCN. The World Conservation Strategy. (IUCN, UNEP, 1980).
IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3. (2014).
Dirnböck, T., Dullinger, S. & Grabherr, G. A regional impact assessment of climate and land-use change on alpine vegetation. J. Biogeogr. 30, 401–417 (2003).
Gonçalves, J., Honrado, J. P., Vicente, J. R. & Civantos, E. A model-based framework for assessing the vulnerability of low dispersal vertebrates to landscape fragmentation under environmental change. Ecol. Complex. 28, 174–186 (2016).
Saunders, D. A., Hobbs, R. J. & Margules, C. R. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review. Conserv. Biol. 5, 18–32 (1991).
Fahrig, L. & Merriam, G. Conservation of fragmented populations. Conserv. Biol. 8, 50–59 (1994).
Wiens, J. A. Habitat fragmentation: Island v landscape perspectives on bird conservation. Ibis 137, S97–S104 (1994).
Diamond, J. M. ‘Normal’ extinctions of isolated populations. In extinctions (ed. Nitecki, M. H.) 191–246 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984).
Laurance, W. F. Comparative responses of five arboreal marsupials to tropical forest fragmentation. J. Mammal. 71, 641–653 (1990).
Bennett, A. F. Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation. (IUCN, 2003).
Opdam, P. Metapopulation theory and habitat fragmentation: a review of holarctic breeding bird studies. Landsc. Ecol. 5, 93–106 (1991).
Thomas, C. D. & Jones, T. M. Partial recovery of a skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) from population refuges: Lessons for conservation in a fragmented landscape. J. Anim. Ecol. 62, 472–481 (1993).
Haddad, N. M. et al. Corridor use by diverse taxa. Ecology 84, 609–615 (2003).
Grab, H. et al. Habitat enhancements rescue bee body size from the negative effects of landscape simplification. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 2144–2154 (2019).
Smeraldo, S. et al. Modelling risks posed by wind turbines and power lines to soaring birds: The black stork (Ciconia nigra) in Italy as a case study. Biodivers. Conserv. 29, 1959–1976 (2020).
Noss, R. F. A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity. Bioscience 33, 700–706 (1983).
Noss, R. F. & Harris, L. D. Nodes, networks and MUMS: Preserving diversity at all scales. Environ. Manag. 10, 299–309 (1986).
Grumbine, R. E. What is ecosystem management?. Conserv. Biol. 8, 27–38 (1994).
Forman, R. T. T. Land Mosaics. The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions ( Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
Jongman, R. H. G. Nature conservation planning in Europe: Developing ecological networks. Landsc. Urban Plan. 32, 169–183 (1995).
Kubeš, J. Biocentres and corridors in a cultural landscape. A critical assessment of the ‘territorial system of ecological stability’. Landsc. Urban Plan. 35, 231–240 (1996).
Diamond, J. M. The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves. Biol. Cons. 7, 129–146 (1975).
Wilson, E. O. & Willis, E. O. Applied biogeography. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities (eds Cody, M. L. & Diamond, J. M.) 522–534 (Belknap Press, New York, 1975).
Soulé, M. E. Land use planning and wildlife maintainance: Guidelines for conserving wildlife in an urban landscape. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 3, 313–323 (1991).
Opdam, P., Van Apeldoorn, R., Schotman, A. & Kalkhoven, J. Population responses to landscape fragmentation. In Landscape Ecology of A Stressed Environment (eds Vos, C. C. & Opdam, P.) 147–171 (Chapman and Hall, London, 1993).
Beier, P. & Noss, R. F. Do habitat corridors provide connectivity?. Conserv. Biol. 12, 1241–1252 (1998).
Brown, J. H. & Kodric-Brown, A. Turnover rates in insular biogeography: Effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58, 445–449 (1977).
Barrett, G. W. & Bohlen, P. J. Landscape Ecology Landscape Linkages and Biodiversity (Island Press, New York, 1991).
Forman, R. T. T. & Godron, M. Landscape Ecology (Wiley, New York, 1986).
Gilbert-Norton, L., Wilson, R., Stevens, J. R. & Beard, K. H. A meta-analytic review of corridor effectiveness. Conserv. Biol. 24, 660–668 (2010).
Mech, S. G. & Hallett, J. G. Evaluating the effectiveness of corridors: A genetic approach. Conserv. Biol. 15, 467–474 (2001).
Harris, L. D. & Scheck, J. From implications to applications: the dispersal corridor principle applied to the conservation of biological diversity. in Nature Conservation 2: The Role of Corridors (eds. Saunders, D. A. & Hobbs, R. J.) 189–220 (Surrey Beatty & Sons, 1991).
Hobbs, R. J. & Hopkins, A. J. M. The role of conservation corridors in a changing climate. In The Role of Corridors (eds Saunders, D. A. & Hobbs, R. J.) 281–290 (Surrey Beaty & Sons, New York, 1991).
McLaughlin, J. F., Hellmann, J. J., Boggs, C. L. & Ehrlich, P. R. Climate change hastens population extinctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99, 6070–6074 (2002).
Bennett, G. & Mulongoy, K. J. Review of Experience with Ecological Networks, Corridors and Buffer Zones (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2006).
MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution 17, 373–387 (1963).
MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. The Theory of Island Biogeography (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1967).
Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. Metapopulation dynamics: Brief history and conceptual domain. Biol. J. Lin. Soc. 42, 3–16 (1991).
Bosso, L., Mucedda, M., Fichera, G., Kiefer, A. & Russo, D. A gap analysis for threatened bat populations on Sardinia. Hystrix Ital. J. Mammal. 27, 11788. https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix-27.2-11788 (2016).
Deus, E. et al. Current and future conflicts between eucalypt plantations and high biodiversity areas in the Iberian Peninsula. J. Nat. Conserv. 45, 107–117 (2018).
Johovic, I., Gama, M., Banha, F., Tricarico, E. & Anastácio, P. M. A potential threat to amphibians in the European Natura 2000 network: Forecasting the distribution of the American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus. Biol. Conserv. 245, 108–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108551 (2020).
van der Sluis, T. et al. How much Biodiversity is in Natura 2000? The “Umbrella Effect” of the European Natura 2000 protected area network. 147 (Alterra, Wageningen, 2016).
Natura 2000 https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/index_en.htm (2019).
European Comission. Green Infrastructure (GI)—Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital. 11 (Brussels, 2013).
European Comission. Technical information on Green Infrastructure (GI). 24 (Brussels, 2013).
Araújo, M. B., Thuiller, W. & Pearson, R. G. Climate warming and the decline of amphibians and reptiles in Europe. J. Biogeogr. 33, 1712–1728 (2006).
Bennett, A. F. & Saunders, D. A. Habitat fragmentation and landscape change. In Conservation Biology for All (eds Sodhi, N. S. & Ehrlich, P. R.) 88–106 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010).
Cushman, S. A. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: A review and prospectus. Biol. Cons. 128, 231–240 (2006).
Keinath, D. A. et al. A global analysis of traits predicting species sensitivity to habitat fragmentation. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 115–127 (2017).
Blaustein, A. R. et al. Amphibian breeding and climate change. Conserv. Biol. 15, 1804–1809 (2001).
Gibbons, W. J. et al. The Global Decline of Reptiles Déjà Vu Amphibians. Bioscience 50, 653–666 (2000).
Rivera-Ortiz, F. A., Aguilar, R., Arizmendi, M. D. C., Quesada-Avendaño, M. & Oyama, K. Habitat fragmentation and genetic variability of tetrapod populations. Anim. Conserv. 18, 249–258 (2015).
Andrews, K. M., Gibbons, J. W. & Jochimsen, D. M. Ecological effects of roads on amphibians and reptiles: A literature review. In Urban Herpetology (eds Mitchell, J. C. et al.) 121–143 (Society for the Study of Amphibians & Reptiles, London, 2008).
Hansen, N. A., Sato, C. F., Michael, D. R., Lindenmayer, D. B. & Driscoll, D. A. Predation risk for reptiles is highest at remnant edges in agricultural landscapes. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 31–43 (2019).
McCallum, M. L. Tropical Herpetology: A drop in the bucket. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 289–290 (2005).
Bonnet, X., Shine, R. & Lourdais, O. Taxonomic chauvinism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 1–3 (2002).
Tingley, R., Meiri, S. & Chapple, D. G. Addressing knowledge gaps in reptile conservation. Biol. Cons. 204, 1–5 (2016).
Beier, P., Majka, D. & Jenness, J. Conceptual Steps for Designing Wildlife Corridors. www.corridordesign.org (2007).
Valencia-Aguilar, A., Cortés-Gómez, A. M. & Ruiz-Agudelo, C. A. Ecosystem services provided by amphibians and reptiles in Neotropical ecosystems. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 9, 257–272 (2013).
Hager, H. A. Area-sensitivity of reptiles and amphibians: Are there indicator species for habitat fragmentation?. Écoscience 66, 139–147 (1998).
Almasieh, K., Mirghazanfari, S. M. & Mahmoodi, S. Biodiversity hotspots for modeled habitat patches and corridors of species richness and threatened species of reptiles in central Iran. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 65, 92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-019-1335-x (2019).
Albert, C., Luque, G. M. & Courchamp, F. The twenty most charismatic species. PLoS ONE 13, e0199149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199149 (2018).
Brooke, Z. M., Bielby, J., Nambiar, K. & Carbone, C. correlates of research effort in carnivores: Body size, range size and diet matter. PLoS ONE 9, e93195. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093195 (2014).
Rozylowicz, L., Popescu, V. D., Pătroescu, M. & Chișamera, G. The potential of large carnivores as conservation surrogates in the Romanian Carpathians. Biodivers. Conserv. 20, 561–579 (2011).
Beier, P., Majka, D. R. & Spencer, W. D. Forks in the road choices in procedures for designing wildland linkages. Conserv. Biol. 22, 836–851 (2008).
Burbrink, F. T., Phillips, C. A. & Heske, E. J. A riparian zone in southern Illinois as a potential dispersal corridor for reptiles and amphibians. Biol. Cons. 86, 107–115 (1998).
Dixo, M. & Metzger, J. P. Are corridors, fragment size and forest structure important for the conservation of leaf-litter lizards in a fragmented landscape?. Oryx 43, 435–442 (2009).
ArcGIS Release 10.4 (Redlands, CA, 2013).
Hamer, A. J. & McDonnell, M. J. The response of herpetofauna to urbanization: Inferring patterns of persistence from wildlife databases. Austral Ecol. 35, 568–580 (2010).
Vignoli, L., Mocaer, I., Luiselli, L. & Bologna, M. A. Can a large metropolis sustain complex herpetofauna communities? An analysis of the suitability of green space fragments in Rome. Anim. Conserv. 12, 456–466 (2009).
Strugariu, A., Gherghel, I., Huțuleac-Volosciuc, M. V. & Pușcașu, C. M. Preliminary aspects concerning the herpetofauna from urban and peri-urban environments from North-Eastern Romania: A case study in the city of Suceava. Herpetol. Roman. 1, 53–61 (2007).
Gherghel, I., Strugariu, A., Sahlean, T. C. & Zamfirescu, O. Anthropogenic impact or anthropogenic accommodation? Distribution range expansion of the common wall lizard (Podarcis muralis) by means of artificial habitats in the north-eastern limits of its distribution range. Acta Herpetol. 4, 183–189 (2009).
Gherghel, I. & Tedrow, R. Manmade structures are used by an invasive species to colonize new territory across a fragmented landscape. Acta Oecol. 101, 103479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2019.103479 (2019).
Ward, M. et al. Just ten percent of the global terrestrial protected area network is structurally connected via intact land. Nat. Commun. 11, 4563. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18457-x (2020).
Watson, J. E. M. et al. The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 599–610 (2018).
Fitzgerald, L. A. et al. The future for reptiles: advances and challenges in the anthropocene. Encycl. Anthropocene 3, 163–174 (2018).
Hof, C., Araújo, M. B., Jetz, W. & Rahbek, C. Additive threats from pathogens, climate and land-use change for global amphibian diversity. Nature 480, 516–519 (2011).
Meta-Analysis, A. Rey Benayas, J. M., Newton, A. C., Diaz, A. & Bullock, J. M. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration. Science 325, 1121–1124 (2009).
Van Der Windt, H. J. & Swart, J. A. A. Ecological corridors, connecting science and politics: the case of the Green River in the Netherlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 124–132 (2008).
Hilty, J. et al. Guidelines for conserving connectivity through ecological networks and corridors (International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2020).
Gregory, A. J. & Beier, P. Response variables for evaluation of the effectiveness of conservation corridors. Conserv. Biol. 28, 689–695 (2014).
Mráz, P. & Ronikier, M. Biogeography of the Carpathians: Evolutionary and spatial facets of biodiversity. Biol. J. Lin. Soc. 119, 528–559 (2016).
Deodatus, F. et al. Creation of ecological corridors in the Ukrainian Carpathians. In The Carpathians: Integrating Nature and Society Towards Sustainability Environmental Science and Engineering (eds Kozak, J. et al.) 701–717 (Springer, Berlin, 2013).
Favilli, F., Hoffmann, C., Elmi, M., Ravazzoli, E. & Streifeneder, T. The BioREGIO Carpathians project: Aims, methodology and results from the “Continuity and Connectivity” analysis. Nat. Conserv. 11, 95–111 (2015).
Csagoly, P., Magnin, G. & Hulea, O. Lower Danube Green Corridor. in The Wetland Book: II: Distribution, Description and Conservation (eds. Finlayson, M. C., Milton, R. G., Prentice, C. R. & Davidson, N. C.) 1–6 (Springer, Netherlands, 2016).
Belote, R. T. et al. Identifying corridors among large protected areas in the United States. PLoS ONE 11, e0154223. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154223 (2016).
Breckheimer, I. et al. Defining and evaluating the umbrella species concept for conserving and restoring landscape connectivity. Conserv. Biol. 28, 1584–1593 (2014).
Meurant, M., Gonzales, A., Doxa, A. & Albert, C. H. Selecting surrogate species for connectivity conservation. Biol. Cons. 227, 326–334 (2018).
Dondina, O., Orioli, V., Chiatante, G. & Bani, L. Practical insights to select focal species and design priority areas for conservation. Ecol. Indic. 108, 105767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105767 (2020).
Churko, G., Kienast, F. & Bolliger, J. A multispecies assessment to identify the functional connectivity of amphibians in a human-dominated landscape. Int. J. Geo-Inf. 9, 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9050287 (2020).
Cushman, S. A. & Landguth, E. L. Multi-taxa population connectivity in the Northern Rocky Mountains. Ecol. Model. 231, 101–112 (2012).
Krosby, M. et al. Focal species and landscape “naturalness” corridor models offer complementary approaches for connectivity conservation planning. Landsc. Ecol. 30, 2121–2132 (2015).
Wiens, J. A., Hayward, G. D., Holthausen, R. S. & Wisdom, M. J. Using surrogate species and groups for conservation planning and management. Bioscience 58, 241–252 (2008).
Macdonald, E. A. et al. Identifying ambassador species for conservation marketing. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 12, 204–214 (2017).
Fleury, A. M. & Brown, R. D. A framework for the design of wildlife conservation corridors with specific application to southwestern Ontario. Landsc. Urban Plan. 37, 163–186 (1997).
Cogălniceanu, D. et al. Diversity and distribution of amphibians in Romania. ZooKeys 296, 35–57 (2013).
Cogălniceanu, D. et al. Diversity and distribution of reptiles in Romania. ZooKeys 341, 49–76 (2013).
LaRue, M. A. & Nielsen, C. K. Modelling potential dispersal corridors for cougars in midwestern North America using least-cost path methods. Ecol. Model. 212, 372–381 (2008).
Adriaensen, F. et al. The application of ‘least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model. Landsc. Urban Plan. 64, 233–247 (2003).
Correa Ayram, C. A., Mendoza, M. E., Etter, A. & Salicrup, D. R. P. Habitat connectivity in biodiversity conservation: a review of recent studies and applications. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 1, 1–32 (2015).
Ribeiro, J. W. et al. LandScape Corridors (LSCORRIDORS): A new softwarepackage for modelling ecological corridors based onlandscape patterns and species requirements. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 1425–1432 (2017).
Linkage Mapper Connectivity Analysis Software v. 2.0.0 (The Nature Conservancy, Seattle, 2011).
Popescu, V. D., Rozylowicz, L., Cogălniceanu, D., Niculae, I. M. & Cucu, A. L. Moving into protected areas? Setting conservation priorities for Romanian Reptiles and Amphibians at risk from climate change. PLoS ONE 8, e79330. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079330 (2014).
Lambeck, R. J. Focal species: A multispecies umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv. Biol. 11, 849–856 (1997).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
