Gibbs, J. P. Importance of small wetlands for the persistence of local populations of wetland-associated animals. Wetlands 13(1), 25–31 (1993).
Muneepeerakul, R. et al. Neutral metacommunity models predict fish diversity patterns in Mississippi–Missouri basin. Nature 453(7192), 220–222 (2008).
Kinlan, B. P. & Gaines, S. D. Propagule dispersal in marine and terrestrial environments: A community perspective. Ecology 84(8), 2007–2020 (2003).
Niebuhr, B. B. et al. Survival in patchy landscapes: The interplay between dispersal, habitat loss and fragmentation. Sci. Rep. 5, 11898 (2015).
Deal, E., Braun, J. & Botter, G. Understanding the role of rainfall and hydrology in determining fluvial erosion efficiency. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 123(4), 744–778 (2018).
Kadoya, T. Assessing functional connectivity using empirical data. Popul. Ecol. 51(1), 5–15 (2009).
Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. Metapopulation dynamics: Brief history and conceptual domain. Biol. J. Lin. Soc. 42(1–2), 3–16 (1991).
Cadotte, M. W. Dispersal and species diversity: A meta-analysis. Am. Nat. 167(6), 913–924 (2006).
Koelle, K. & Vandermeer, J. Dispersal-induced desynchronization: From metapopulations to metacommunities. Ecol. Lett. 8(2), 167–175 (2005).
Foltête, J. C., Clauzel, C., Vuidel, G. & Tournant, P. Integrating graph-based connectivity metrics into species distribution models. Landsc. Ecol. 27(4), 557–569 (2012).
Tournant, P., Afonso, E., Roué, S., Giraudoux, P. & Foltête, J. C. Evaluating the effect of habitat connectivity on the distribution of lesser horseshoe bat maternity roosts using landscape graphs. Biol. Cons. 164, 39–49 (2013).
Wellborn, G. A., Skelly, D. K. & Werner, E. E. Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27(1), 337–363 (1996).
Creed, I. F. et al. Enhancing protection for vulnerable waters. Nat. Geosci. 10(11), 809–815 (2017).
Rains, M. C. et al. Geographically isolated wetlands are part of the hydrological landscape. Hydrol. Process. 30(1), 153–160 (2016).
Levins, R. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Am. Entomol. 15(3), 237–240 (1969).
Gilpin, M. (ed.) Metapopulation Dynamics: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations (Academic Press, New York, 2012).
Gibbs, J. P. Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 14(1), 314–317 (2000).
Boughton, E. H., Quintana-Ascencio, P. F., Bohlen, P. J., Jenkins, D. G. & Pickert, R. Land-use and isolation interact to affect wetland plant assemblages. Ecography 33(3), 461–470 (2010).
Smith, L. L. et al. Biological connectivity of seasonally ponded wetlands across spatial and temporal scales. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 55(2), 334–353 (2019).
Le, P. V. & Kumar, P. Power law scaling of topographic depressions and their hydrologic connectivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41(5), 1553–1559 (2014).
Bertassello, L. E. et al. Wetlandscape fractal topography. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45(14), 6983–6991 (2018).
Hurst, H. E. (1965). Long term storage. An experimental study.
Mandelbrot, B. B. (1975). Les objets fractals: forme, hasard et dimension.
Keitt, T. H. Spectral representation of neutral landscapes. Landsc. Ecol. 15(5), 479–494 (2000).
Park, J., Botter, G., Jawitz, J. W. & Rao, P. S. C. Stochastic modeling of hydrologic variability of geographically isolated wetlands: Effects of hydro-climatic forcing and wetland bathymetry. Adv. Water Resour. 69, 38–48 (2014).
Bertassello, L. E., Rao, P. S. C., Jawitz, J. W., Aubeneau, A. F. & Botter, G. Wetlandscape hydrologic dynamics driven by shallow groundwater and landscape topography. Hydrol. Process. 2, 2 (2019).
Wu, Q. et al. Efficient delineation of nested depression hierarchy in digital elevation models for hydrological analysis using level-set method. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 55(2), 354–368 (2019).
Saura, S. & Pascual-Hortal, L. A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landsc. Urban Plan. 83(2–3), 91–103 (2007).
Bunn, A. G., Urban, D. L. & Keitt, T. H. Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory. J. Environ. Manag. 59(4), 265–278 (2000).
Urban, D. & Keitt, T. Landscape connectivity: A graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82(5), 1205–1218 (2001).
Fortuna, M. A., Gómez-Rodríguez, C. & Bascompte, J. Spatial network structure and amphibian persistence in stochastic environments. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 273(1592), 1429–1434 (2006).
Hayashi, M. & Van der Kamp, G. Simple equations to represent the volume–area–depth relations of shallow wetlands in small topographic depressions. J. Hydrol. 237(1–2), 74–85 (2000).
Rittenhouse, T. A. & Semlitsch, R. D. Distribution of amphibians in terrestrial habitat surrounding wetlands. Wetlands 27(1), 153–161 (2007).
Osher, S. & Fedkiw, R. P. Level set methods: an overview and some recent results. J. Comput. Phys. 169(2), 463–502 (2001).
National Map Viewer. Available online: https://viewer.nationalmap.gov (accessed on July 2018).
Gallant, J. C., Moore, I. D., Hutchinson, M. F. & Gessler, P. Estimating fractal dimension of profiles: A comparison of methods. Math. Geol. 26(4), 455–481 (1994).
Voss, R. F. Fractals in nature: from characterization to simulation. In The Science of Fractal Images 21–70 (Springer, New York, 1988).
Russ, J. C. Fractal Surfaces (Plenum, New York, 1994).
Baguette, M., Blanchet, S., Legrand, D., Stevens, V. M. & Turlure, C. Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks. Biol. Rev. 88(2), 310–326 (2013).
Zamberletti, P., Zaffaroni, M., Accatino, F., Creed, I. F. & De Michele, C. Connectivity among wetlands matters for vulnerable amphibian populations in wetlandscapes. Ecol. Model. 384, 119–127 (2018).
Barabási, A. L. & Albert, R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439), 509–512 (1999).
Cox, D. & Lewis, P. The statistical analysis of series of events. Popul. Sci https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7801-3 (1966).
Diggle, P. J. Statistical methods for spatial point patterns in ecology. Spat. Tempor. Anal. Ecol. 2, 99–150 (1979).
Diggle, P. J. Statistical analysis of spatial and spatio-temporal point patterns (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2013).
Cohen, M. J. et al. Do geographically isolated wetlands influence landscape functions?. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 1978–1986. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1512650113 (2016).
Galpern, P., Manseau, M. & Fall, A. Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: a guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation. Biol. Cons. 144(1), 44–55 (2011).
Gustafson, E. J. How has the state of art for quantification of landscape patterns advanced in the twenty first century?. Landscape Ecol. 34, 2065–2202 (2019).
Shreevastava, A., Bhalachandran, S., McGrath, G. S., Huber, M. & Rao, P. S. C. Paradoxical impact of sprawling intra-Urban Heat Islets: Reducing mean surface temperatures while enhancing local extremes. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 1–10 (2019).
Werner, E. E., Skelly, D. K., Relyea, R. A. & Yurewicz, K. L. Amphibian species richness across environmental gradients. Oikos 116, 1697–1712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299 (2007).
Kantrud, H. A. & Stewart, R. E. Use of natural basin wetlands by breeding waterfowl in North Dakota. J. Wildlife Manag. 2, 243–253 (1977).
Euliss, N. H. et al. The wetland continuum: A conceptual framework for interpreting biological studies. Wetlands 24, 448–458. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024 (2004).
Leibold, M. A. et al. The metacommunity concept: A framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7(7), 601–613 (2004).
Kuefler, D., Hudgens, B., Haddad, N. M., Morris, W. F. & Thurgate, N. The conflicting role of matrix habitats as conduits and barriers for dispersal. Ecology 91(4), 944–950 (2010).
Winter, T. C. Relation of streams, lakes, and wetlands to groundwater flow systems. Hydrogeol. J. 7(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100400050178 (1999).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
