in

Global forest restoration and the importance of prioritizing local communities

  • 1.

    Bastin, J. F. et al. The global tree restoration potential. Science 364, 76–79 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Lewis, S. L., Wheeler, C. E., Mitchard, E. T. A. & Koch, A. Regenerate natural forests to store carbon. Nature 568, 25–28 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Chazdon, R. L. & Brancalion, P. Restoring forests as a means to many ends. Science 365, 24–25 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Busch, J. et al. Potential for low-cost carbon dioxide removal through tropical reforestation. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 463–466 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. Global restoration opportunities in tropical rainforest landscapes. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav3223 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Strassburg, B. B. N. et al. Strategic approaches to restoring ecosystems can triple conservation gains and halve costs. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 62–70 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Friedlingstein, P., Allen, M., Canadell, J. G., Peters, G. P. & Seneviratne, S. I. Comment on “The global tree restoration potential”. Science 366, eaay8060 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Lewis, S. L. et al. Comment on “The global tree restoration potential”. Science 366, eaaz0388 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Veldman, J. W. et al. Comment on “The global tree restoration potential”. Science 366, eaay7976 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Anderson, C. M. et al. Natural climate solutions are not enough. Science 363, 933–934 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Maron, M. et al. Global no net loss of natural ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 46–49 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Schleicher, J. et al. Protecting half of the planet could directly affect over one billion people. Nat. Sustain. 2, 1094–1096 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Mappin, B. et al. Restoration priorities to achieve the global protected area target. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12646 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Pritchard, R. & Brockington, D. Forests: regrow with locals’ participation. Nature 569, 630 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Potapov, P., Laestadius, L. & Minnemeyer, S. Global map of forest landscape restoration opportunities. World Resources Institute https://www.wri.org/applications/maps/flr-atlas/#&init=y (2011).

  • 16.

    Oldekop, J. A., Holmes, G., Harris, W. E. & Evans, K. L. A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 30, 133–141 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Agrawal, A. & Redford, K. Conservation and displacement: an overview. Conservat. Soc. 7, 1–10 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Chazdon, R. L. Protecting intact forests requires holistic approaches. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 915 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    IPCC Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  • 20.

    Loft, L. et al. Risks to REDD+: potential pitfalls for policy design and implementation. Environ. Conserv. 44, 44–55 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Brancalion, P. H. S. & Chazdon, R. L. Beyond hectares: four principles to guide reforestation in the context of tropical forest and landscape restoration. Restor. Ecol. 25, 491–496 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Mansourian, S. in Forest Restoration in Landscapes: Beyond Planting Trees (eds Mansourian, S., Vallauri, D. & Dudley, N.) 8–13 (Springer, 2005).

  • 23.

    Sabogal, C., Besacier, C. & McGuire, D. Forest and landscape restoration: concepts, approaches and challenges for implementation. Unasylva 66, 3–10 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Stanturf, J. A. et al. Implementing forest landscape restoration under the Bonn Challenge: a systematic approach. Ann. For. Sci. 76, 50 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Sayer, J. et al. Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 8349–8356 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    S, Mansourian. In the eye of the beholder: reconciling interpretations of forest landscape restoration. Land. Degrad. Dev. 29, 2888–2898 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Fagan, M. E., Reid, J. L., Holland, M. B., Drew, J. G. & Zahawi, R. A. How feasible are global forest restoration commitments? Conserv. Lett. 13, e12700 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Mansourian, S., Stanturf, J. A., Derkyi, M. A. A. & Engel, V. L. Forest landscape restoration: increasing the positive impacts of forest restoration or simply the area under tree cover? Restor. Ecol. 25, 178–183 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Mansourian, S. et al. Putting the pieces together: integration for forest landscape restoration implementation. Land. Degrad. Dev. 31, 419–429 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Erbaugh, J. T. & Oldekop, J. A. Forest landscape restoration for livelihoods and well-being. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 32, 76–83 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Mansourian, S. & Parrotta, J. Forest landscape restoration: integrated approaches to support effective implementation (Routledge, 2018).

  • 32.

    Adams, C., Rodrigues, S. T., Calmon, M. & Kumar, C. Impacts of large-scale forest restoration on socioeconomic status and local livelihoods: what we know and do not know. Biotropica 48, 731–744 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Fox, H. & Cundill, G. Towards increased community-engaged ecological restoration: a review of current practice and future directions. Ecol. Restor. 36, 208–218 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Persha, L., Agrawal, A. & Chhatre, A. Social and ecological synergy: local rulemaking, forest livelihoods, and biodiversity conservation. Science 331, 1606–1608 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Brooks, J. S., Waylen, K. A. & Mulder, M. B. How national context, project design, and local community characteristics influence success in community-based conservation projects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 21265–21270 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Boedhihartono, A. K. & Sayer, J. in Forest Landscape Restoration Vol. 15 (eds Stanturf, J. et al.) 309–323 (Springer, 2012).

  • 37.

    Chazdon, R. L. et al. A policy-driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conserv. Lett. 10, 125–132 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Bennett, M. M. & Smith, L. C. Advances in using multitemporal night-time lights satellite imagery to detect, estimate, and monitor socioeconomic dynamics. Remote Sens. Environ. 192, 176–197 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Proville, J., Zavala-Araiza, D. & Wagner, G. Night-time lights: a global, long term look at links to socio-economic trends. PLoS ONE 12, e0174610 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Kyba, C. C. M. et al. Artificially lit surface of Earth at night increasing in radiance and extent. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701528 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Soares-Filho, B. S. et al. Modelling conservation in the Amazon basin. Nature 440, 520–523 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Oldekop, J. A., Sims, K. R. E., Karna, B. K., Whittingham, M. J. & Agrawal, A. Reductions in deforestation and poverty from decentralized forest management in Nepal. Nat. Sustain. 2, 421–428 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    At a Crossroads. Trends in Recognition of Community-Based Forest Tenure from 20022017 (Rights and Resources Initiative, 2018).

  • 44.

    Jones, K. R. et al. One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure. Science 360, 788–791 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Veldman, J. W. et al. Where tree planting and forest expansion are bad for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bioscience 65, 1011–1018 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Veldman, J. W. et al. Toward an old-growth concept for grasslands, savannas, and woodlands. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13, 154–162 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Gridded Population of the World, version 4 (GPWv4): Population Count Adjusted to Match 2015 Revision of UN WPP Country Totals, Revision 11 (CIESIN, 2018).

  • 49.

    Version 1 VIIRS Day/Night Band Nighttime Lights (NOAA, 2019).

  • 50.

    World Development Indicators (The World Bank, 2019).

  • 51.

    Schlager, E. & Ostrom, E. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Econ. 68, 249–262 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Sikor, T., He, J. U. N. & Lestrelin, G. Property rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis revisited. World Dev. 93, 337–349 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Who Owns the World’s Land? A Global Baseline of Formally Recognized Indigenous and Community Land Rights (Rights and Resources Initiative, 2015).


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    MIT News – Food | Water

    Increasing the broad-leaved tree fraction in European forests mitigates hot temperature extremes