in

Nest boxes do not cause a shift in bat community composition in an urbanised landscape

  • 1.

    Remm, J. & Lõhmus, A. Tree cavities in forests – the broad distribution pattern of a keystone structure for biodiversity. For. Ecol. Manage. 262, 579–585 (2011).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 2.

    Manning, A. D., Gibbons, P., Fischer, J., Oliver, D. L. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Hollow futures? Tree decline, lag effects and hollow-dependent species. Anim. Conserv. 16, 395–403 (2013).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 3.

    Lindenmayer, D. B. et al. The anatomy of a failed offset. Biol. Conserv. 210, 286–292 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 4.

    Berthier, K., Leippert, F., Fumagalli, L. & Arlettaz, R. Massive nest-box supplementation boosts fecundity, survival and even immigration without altering mating and reproductive behaviour in a rapidly recovered bird population. PLoS One 7, e36028 (2012).

  • 5.

    Brazill-Boast, J., Pryke, S. R. & Griffith, S. C. S. C. Provisioning habitat with custom-designed nest-boxes increases reproductive success in an endangered finch. Austral Ecol. 38, 405–412 (2013).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 6.

    Harley, D. An overview of actions to conserve Leadbeater’s Possum (Gymnobelideus leadbeateri). Vic. Nat. 133, 85–97 (2016).

    • Google Scholar
  • 7.

    Charter, M., Izhaki, I., Ben Mocha, Y. & Kark, S. Nest-site competition between invasive and native cavity nesting birds and its implication for conservation. J. Environ. Manage. 181, 129–134 (2016).

  • 8.

    Olah, G., Vigo, G., Heinsohn, R. & Brightsmith, D. J. Nest site selection and efficacy of artificial nests for breeding success of Scarlet Macaws Ara macao macao in lowland Peru. J. Nat. Conserv. 22, 176–185 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 9.

    Mering, E. D. & Chambers, C. L. Thinking outside the box: a review of artificial roosts for bats. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 38, 741–751 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 10.

    Stebbings, R. E. & Walsh, S. T. Bat Boxes: A Guide to the History, Function, Construction and use in the Conservation of Bats. (Bat Conservation Trust, 1991).

  • 11.

    Tuttle, M. D., Kiser, M. & Kiser, S. The Bat House Builder’s Hand-book. (Bat Conservation International, 2013).

  • 12.

    Mering, E. D. & Chambers, C. L. Artificial roosts for tree-roosting bats in northern Arizona. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 36, 765–772 (2012).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 13.

    Kerth, G., Weissmann, K. & Konig, B. Day roost selection in female Bechstein’s bats (Myotis bechsteinii): a field experiment to determine the influence of roost temperature. Oecologia 126, 1–9 (2001).

  • 14.

    Agnelli, P., Maltagliati, G., Ducci, L. & Cannicci, S. Artificial roosts for bats: education and research. The ‘be a bat’s friend’ project of The Natural History Museum of The University of Florence. Hystrix-Italian. J. Mammal. 22, 215–223 (2011).

    • Google Scholar
  • 15.

    López-Baucells, A. et al. Bat boxes in urban non-native forests: a popular practice that should be reconsidered. Urban Ecosyst. 20, 217–225 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 16.

    Griffiths, S. R. et al. Bat boxes are not a silver bullet conservation tool. Mamm. Rev. 47, 261–265 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 17.

    van der Ree, R. & McCarthy, M. A. Inferring persistence of indigenous mammals in response to urbanisation. Anim. Conserv. 8, 309–319 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 18.

    Jung, K. & Kalko, E. K. V. Where forest meets urbanization: foraging plasticity of aerial insectivorous bats in an anthropogenically altered environment. J. Mammal. 91, 144–153 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 19.

    Russo, D. & Ancillotto, L. Sensitivity of bats to urbanization: a review. Mamm. Biol. 80, 205–212 (2015).

  • 20.

    Jung, K. & Threlfall, C. G. Urbanisation and Its Effects on Bats—A Global Meta-Analysis. in Bats in the Anthropocene: Conservation of Bats in a Changing World (eds. Voigt, C. C. & Kingston, T.) 13–33 (Springer International Publishing, 2016).

  • 21.

    Evans, L. N. & Lumsden, L. F. A comparison of the roosting behaviour of Gould’s wattled bats Chalinolobus gouldii using bat boxes and tree hollows in suburban Melbourne. in Biology and Conservation of Australasian Bats (eds. Law, B., Eby, P., Lunney, D. & Lumsden, L.) 288–296 (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, 2011).

  • 22.

    Rhodes, M. & Jones, D. The use of bat boxes by insectivorous bats and other fauna in the greater Brisbane region. in Biology and Conservation of Australasian Bats (eds. Law, B., Eby, P., Lunney, D. & Lumsden, L.) 424–442 (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, 2011).

  • 23.

    Irvine, R. & Bender, R. Initial results from bat roosting boxes at Organ Pipes National Park. Vic. Nat. 112, 212–218 (1995).

    • Google Scholar
  • 24.

    Evans, L. N. Roosting behaviour of urban microbats: the influence of ectoparasites, roost microclimate and sociality. Faculty of Veterinary Science (PhD Thesis. The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 2009).

  • 25.

    Straka, T. M., Lentini, P. E., Lumsden, L. F., Wintle, B. A. & van der Ree, R. Urban bat communities are affected by wetland size, quality, and pollution levels. Ecol. Evol. 6, 4761–4774 (2016).

  • 26.

    Griffiths, S. R. et al. Long-term monitoring suggests bat boxes alter local bat community structure. Aust. Mammal. 41, 273–278 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 27.

    Larson, D. J. & Hayes, J. P. Variability in sensitivity of Anabat II bat detectors and a method of calibration. Acta Chiropterologica 2, 209–213 (2000).

    • Google Scholar
  • 28.

    Stebbings, R. E. & Walsh, S. T. Bat Boxes. (Fauna & Flora Preservation Society, 1985).

  • 29.

    Hines, J. The ‘Tanglewood Wedge’ bat-box. Batchat 1, 5–6 (1985).

    • Google Scholar
  • 30.

    Gonsalves, L. & Law, B. S. Seasonal activity patterns of bats in North Sydney, New South Wales: implications for urban bat monitoring programs. Aust. Mammal. 40, 220–229 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 31.

    Milne, D. J., Fisher, A., Rainey, I. & Pavey, C. R. Temporal patterns of bats in the Top End of the Northern Territory, Australia. J. Mammal. 86, 909–920 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 32.

    Hayes, J. P. Temporal variation in activity of bats and the design of echolocation-monitoring studies. J. Mammal. 78, 514–524 (1997).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 33.

    Kuenzi, A. J. & Morrison, M. L. Temporal patterns of bat activity in southern Arizona. J. Wildl. Manage. 67, 52–64 (2003).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 34.

    Fenton, M. B., Boyle, N. G. H., Harrison, T. M. & Oxley, D. J. Activity patterns, habitat use, and prey selection by some African insectivorous bats. Biotropica 9, 73–85 (1977).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 35.

    Law, B. S., Gonsalves, L., Tap, P., Penman, T. & Chidel, M. Optimizing ultrasonic sampling effort for monitoring forest bats. Austral Ecol. 40, 886–897 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 36.

    Fischer, J., Stott, J., Law, B. S., Adams, M. D. & Forrester, R. I. Designing effective habitat studies: quantifying multiple sources of variability in bat activity. Acta Chiropterologica 11, 127–137 (2009).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 37.

    Lumsden, L. F. & Bennett, A. F. Scattered trees in rural landscapes: foraging habitat for insectivorous bats in south-eastern Australia. Biol. Conserv. 122, 205–222 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 38.

    Adams, M. D., Law, B. S. & Gibson, M. S. Reliable automation of bat call identification for eastern New South Wales, Australia, using classification trees and AnaScheme software. Acta Chiropterologica 12, 231–245 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 39.

    Gibson, M. S. & Lumsden, L. F. The AnaScheme automated bat call identification system. Australas. Bat Soc. Newsl. 20, 24–27 (2003).

    • Google Scholar
  • 40.

    Caryl, F. M., Lumsden, L. F., van der Ree, R. & Wintle, B. A. Functional responses of insectivorous bats to increasing housing density support ‘land-sparing’ rather than ‘land-sharing’ urban growth strategies. J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 191–201 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 41.

    Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package version 2.5-2′. (2018).

  • 42.

    R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna vol. 1 (2011).

  • 43.

    Australian Bureau of Meteorology. Climate Data Online, http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/ (2018).

  • 44.

    Valera, F., Václav, R., Calero‐Torralbo, Á. M., Martínez, T. & Veiga, J. Natural cavity restoration as an alternative to nest box supplementation. Restor. Ecol. 27, 220–227 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 45.

    Stone, E. L., Jones, G. & Harris, S. Street lighting disturbs commuting bats. Curr. Biol. 19, 1123–1127 (2009).

  • 46.

    Stone, E. L., Harris, S. & Jones, G. Impacts of artificial lighting on bats: a review of challenges and solutions. Mamm. Biol. 80, 213–219 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 47.

    Rodríguez-Aguilar, G., Orozco-Lugo, C. L., Vleut, I. & Vazquez, L. B. Influence of urbanization on the occurrence and activity of aerial insectivorous bats. Urban Ecosyst. 20, 477–488 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 48.

    Threlfall, C. G., Law, B. S. & Banks, P. B. Sensitivity of insectivorous bats to urbanization: implications for suburban conservation planning. Biol. Conserv. 146, 41–52 (2012).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 49.

    Gaisler, J., Zukal, J., Rehak, Z. & Homolka, M. Habitat preference and flight activity of bats in a city. J. Zool. 244, 439–445 (1998).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 50.

    Treby, D. L. & Castley, J. G. Determinants of microbat communities in urban forest remnants: a rapid landscape scale assessment. Urban Ecosyst. 19, 1351–1371 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 51.

    Gehrt, S. D. & Chelsvig, J. E. Bat activity in an urban landscape: patterns at the landscape and microhabitat scale. Ecol. Appl. 13, 939–950 (2003).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 52.

    Lesinski, G., Sikora, A. & Olszewski, A. Bat casualties on a road crossing a mosaic landscape. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 57, 217–223 (2011).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 53.

    Berthinussen, A. & Altringham, J. The effect of a major road on bat activity and diversity. J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 82–89 (2012).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 54.

    Kerth, G. & Melber, M. Species-specific barrier effects of a motorway on the habitat use of two threatened forest-living bat species. Biol. Conserv. 142, 270–279 (2009).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 55.

    Lintott, P. R., Bunnefeld, N. & Park, K. J. Opportunities for improving the foraging potential of urban waterways for bats. Biol. Conserv. 191, 224–233 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 56.

    Ancillotto, L., Bosso, L., Salinas-Ramos, V. B. & Russo, D. The importance of ponds for the conservation of bats in urban landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 190, 103607 (2019).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 57.

    Threlfall, C. G., Law, B. S. & Banks, P. B. Influence of landscape structure and human modifications on insect biomass and bat foraging activity in an urban landscape. PLoS One 7, 10 (2012).

  • 58.

    Galbraith, J. A., Jones, D. N., Beggs, J. R., Parry, K. & Stanley, M. C. Urban bird feeders dominated by a few species and individuals. Front. Ecol. Evol. 5, 81 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 59.

    Galbraith, J. A., Beggs, J. R., Jones, D. N. & Stanley, M. C. Supplementary feeding restructures urban bird communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, E2648–E2657 (2015).

  • 60.

    von Post, M. & Smith, H. G. Effects on rural House Sparrow and Tree Sparrow populations by experimental nest-site addition. J. Ornithol. 156, 231–237 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 61.

    Lentini, P. E., Bird, T. J., Griffiths, S. R., Godinho, L. N. & Wintle, B. A. A global synthesis of survival estimates for microbats. Biol. Lett. 11, 20150371 (2015).

  • 62.

    Godinho, L. N., Lumsden, L. F., Coulson, G. & Griffiths, S. R. Network analysis reveals cryptic seasonal patterns of association in Gould’s wattled bats (Chalinolobus gouldii) roosting in bat-boxes. Behaviour 152, 2079–2105 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 63.

    Martin Bideguren, G. et al. Bat boxes and climate change: testing the risk of over-heating in the Mediterranean region. Biodivers. Conserv. 28, 21–35 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 64.

    Rueegger, N., Goldingay, R. L., Law, B. S. & Gonsalves, L. Limited use of bat boxes in a rural landscape: Implications for offsetting the clearing of hollow-bearing trees. Restor. Ecol. 27, 901–911 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 65.

    Griffiths, S. R. et al. Chainsaw-carved cavities better mimic the thermal properties of natural tree hollows than nest boxes and log hollows. Forests 9, 235 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 66.

    Stagoll, K., Lindenmayer, D. B., Knight, E., Fischer, J. & Manning, A. D. Large trees are keystone structures in urban parks. Conserv. Lett. 5, 115–122 (2012).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 67.

    ESRI. AM v. 10.7. ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA (2019).

  • 68.

    The State of Victoria, Department of Environment, Land, W. and Planning. Planning scheme Urban Growth Boundary – Vicmap Planning, http://www.data.vic.gov.au/data/dataset/planning-scheme-urban-growth-boundary-vicmap-planning (2017).

  • 69.

    Geosciences Australia. Geodata Coast 100K 2004, http://www.ga.gov.au/metadata-gateway/metadata/record/gcat_61395 (2004).


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Direct evidence of Neanderthal fibre technology and its cognitive and behavioral implications

    Reducing delays in wireless networks