in

Recovery of fen peatland microbiomes and predicted functional profiles after rewetting

  • 1.

    Gorham E. Northern peatlands: role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecol Appl. 1991;1:182–95.

  • 2.

    Yu Z. Northern peatland carbon stocks and dynamics: a review. Biogeosciences. 2012;9:4071–85.

  • 3.

    Knox SH, Sturtevant C, Matthes JH, Koteen L, Verfaillie J, Baldocchi D. Agricultural peatland restoration: effects of land-use change on greenhouse gas (CO2 and CH4) fluxes in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Glob Change Biol. 2015;21:750–65.

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 4.

    Fenner N, Freeman C. Drought-induced carbon loss in peatlands. Nat Geosci. 2011;4:895–900.

  • 5.

    Freeman C, Ostle N, Kang H. An enzymic ‘latch’ on a global carbon store – a shortage of oxygen locks up carbon in peatlands by restraining a single enzyme. Nature. 2001;409:149.

  • 6.

    Kwon MJ, Haraguchi A, Kang H. Long-term water regime differentiates changes in decomposition and microbial properties in tropical peat soils exposed to the short-term drought. Soil Biol Biochem. 2013;60:33–44.

  • 7.

    Laine J, Vasander H, Sallantaus T. Ecological effects of peatland drainage for forestry. Environ Rev. 1995;3:286–303.

  • 8.

    Minayeva TY, Bragg O, Sirin A. Towards ecosystem-based restoration of peatland biodiversity. Mires Peat. 2017;19:1–36.

    • Google Scholar
  • 9.

    Mälson K, Backéus I, Rydin H. Long-term effects of drainage and initial effects of hydrological restoration on rich fen vegetation. Appl Veg Sci. 2007;11:99–106.

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 10.

    Juottonen H, Hynninen A, Nieminen M, Tuomivirta TT, Tuittila ES, Nousiainen H, et al. Methane-cycling microbial communities and methane emission in natural and restored peatlands. Appl Environ Micro. 2012;78:6386–9.

  • 11.

    Lamers LP, Vile MA, Grootjans AP, Acreman MC, van Diggelen R, Evans MG, et al. Ecological restoration of rich fens in Europe and North America: from trial and error to an evidence‐based approach. Biol Rev. 2015;90:182–203.

  • 12.

    Joosten H. The Global Peatland CO2 Picture: peatland status and drainage related emissions in all countries of the world. Ede: Wetlands International; 2009.

    • Google Scholar
  • 13.

    Bardgett RD, Van Der Putten WH. Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature. 2014;515:505.

  • 14.

    Andersen R, Francez A-J, Rochefort L. The physicochemical and microbiological status of a restored bog in Québec: Identification of relevant criteria to monitor success. Soil Biol Biochem. 2006;38:1375–87.

  • 15.

    Putkinen A, Tuittila E-S, Siljanen HM, Bodrossy L, Fritze H. Recovery of methane turnover and the associated microbial communities in restored cutover peatlands is strongly linked with increasing Sphagnum abundance. Soil Biol Biochem. 2018;116:110–9.

  • 16.

    Wen X, Unger V, Jurasinski G, Koebsch F, Horn F, Rehder G, et al. Predominance of methanogens over methanotrophs in rewetted fens characterized by high methane emissions. Biogeosciences. 2018;15:6519–36.

  • 17.

    Potter C, Freeman C, Golyshin PN, Ackermann G, Fenner N, McDonald JE, et al. Subtle shifts in microbial communities occur alongside the release of carbon induced by drought and rewetting in contrasting peatland ecosystems. Sci Rep. 2017;7:11314.

  • 18.

    Sinsabaugh RL, Hill BH, Shah JJF. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. Nature. 2009;462:795–U117.

  • 19.

    Larmola T, Leppänen SM, Tuittila E-S, Aarva M, Merilä P, Fritze H, et al. Methanotrophy induces nitrogen fixation during peatland development. PNAS. 2014;111:734–9.

  • 20.

    Liebner S, Zeyer J, Wagner D, Schubert C, Pfeiffer EM, Knoblauch C. Methane oxidation associated with submerged brown mosses reduces methane emissions from Siberian polygonal tundra. J Ecol. 2011;99:914–22.

  • 21.

    Aggenbach CJ, Backx H, Emsens WJ, Grootjans AP, Lamers LP, Smolders AJ, et al. Do high iron concentrations in rewetted rich fens hamper restoration. Preslia. 2013;85:405–20.

    • Google Scholar
  • 22.

    Myers B, Webster KL, Mclaughlin JW, Basiliko N. Microbial activity across a boreal peatland nutrient gradient: the role of fungi and bacteria. Wetl Ecol Manag. 2012;20:77–88.

  • 23.

    Ellenberg H, Leuschner C. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen: in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht. Stuttgart: Ulmer Verlag; 2010. Vol. 8104.

  • 24.

    Schaffers AP, Sýkora KV. Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: a comparison with field measurements. J Veg Sci. 2000;11:225–44.

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 25.

    Rowland A, Roberts J. Lignin and cellulose fractionation in decomposition studies using acid‐detergent fibre methods. Commun Soil Sci Plan. 1994;25:269–77.

  • 26.

    Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. PNAS. 2011;108:4516–22.

  • 27.

    Frostegard A, Baath E. The use of phospholipid fatty acid analysis to estimate bacterial and fungal biomass in soil. Biol Fert Soils. 1996;22:59–65.

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 28.

    Oravecz O, Elhottová D, Krištůfek V, Šustr V, Frouz J, Tříska J, et al. Application of ARDRA and PLFA analysis in characterizing the bacterial communities of the food, gut and excrement of saprophagous larvae ofPenthetria holosericea (Diptera: Bibionidae): a pilot study. Folia microbiologica. 2004;49:83.

  • 29.

    Šnajdr J, Valášková V, Merhautová V, Cajthaml T, Baldrian P. Activity and spatial distribution of lignocellulose-degrading enzymes during forest soil colonization by saprotrophic basidiomycetes. Enzym Micro Tech. 2008;43:186–92.

  • 30.

    Edgar RC. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods. 2013;10:996.

  • 31.

    Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7:335–6.

  • 32.

    Langille MG, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:814.

  • 33.

    Douglas GM, Maffei VJ, Zaneveld J, Yurgel SN, Brown JR, Taylor CM et al. PICRUSt2: an improved and extensible approach for metagenome inference. 2019. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/672295v1.

  • 34.

    Luton PE, Wayne JM, Sharp RJ, Riley PW. The mcrA gene as an alternative to 16S rRNA in the phylogenetic analysis of methanogen populations in landfill. Microbiology. 2002;148:3521–30.

  • 35.

    Galand PE, Saarnio S, Fritze H, Yrjälä K. Depth related diversity of methanogen Archaea in Finnish oligotrophic fen. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002;42:441–9.

  • 36.

    Lüdemann H, Arth I, Liesack W. Spatial changes in the bacterial community structure along a vertical oxygen gradient in flooded paddy soil cores. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:754–62.

  • 37.

    Andersen R, Chapman SJ, Artz RRE. Microbial communities in natural and disturbed peatlands: a review. Soil Biol Biochem. 2013;57:979–94.

  • 38.

    Morales SE, Mouser PJ, Ward N, Hudman SP, Gotelli NJ, Ross DS, et al. Comparison of bacterial communities in New England Sphagnum bogs using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP). Micro Ecol. 2006;52:34–44.

  • 39.

    Eilers KG, Debenport S, Anderson S, Fierer N. Digging deeper to find unique microbial communities: the strong effect of depth on the structure of bacterial and archaeal communities in soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 2012;50:58–65.

  • 40.

    Jackson CR, Liew KC, Yule CM. Structural and functional changes with depth in microbial communities in a tropical malaysian peat swamp forest. Micro Ecol. 2009;57:402–12.

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 41.

    Brune A, Frenzel P, Cypionka H. Life at the oxic–anoxic interface: microbial activities and adaptations. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2000;24:691–710.

  • 42.

    Basiliko N, Henry K, Gupta V, Moore T, Driscoll B, Dunfield P. Controls on bacterial and archaeal community structure and greenhouse gas production in natural, mined, and restored Canadian peatlands. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:215.

  • 43.

    Hooijer A, Page S, Jauhiainen J, Lee WA, Lu XX, Idris A, et al. Subsidence and carbon loss in drained tropical peatlands. Biogeosciences. 2012;9:1053–71.

  • 44.

    Minkkinen K, Laine J. Effect of forest drainage on the peat bulk density of pine mires in Finland. Can J For Res. 1998;28:178–86.

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 45.

    Pérez J, Munoz-Dorado J, De la Rubia T, Martinez J. Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: an overview. Int Microbiol. 2002;5:53–63.

  • 46.

    Borren W, Bleuten W, Lapshina ED. Holocene peat and carbon accumulation rates in the southern taiga of western Siberia. Quat Res. 2004;61:42–51.

  • 47.

    Succow M, Joosten H. landschaftsökologische Moorkunde. Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung; 2012.

    • Google Scholar
  • 48.

    Raghoebarsing AA, Smolders AJ, Schmid MC, Rijpstra WIC, Wolters-Arts M, Derksen J, et al. Methanotrophic symbionts provide carbon for photosynthesis in peat bogs. Nature. 2005;436:1153.

  • 49.

    Eilers KG, Lauber CL, Knight R, Fierer N. Shifts in bacterial community structure associated with inputs of low molecular weight carbon compounds to soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 2010;42:896–903.

  • 50.

    Cleveland CC, Nemergut DR, Schmidt SK, Townsend AR. Increases in soil respiration following labile carbon additions linked to rapid shifts in soil microbial community composition. Biogeochemistry. 2007;82:229–40.

  • 51.

    Hiraishi T, Krug T, Tanabe K, Srivastava N, Baasansuren J, Fukuda M et al. 2013 supplement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: Wetlands. Switzerland: IPCC; 2014.


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Genetically similar temperate phages form coalitions with their shared host that lead to niche-specific fitness effects

    Explained: Cement vs. concrete — their differences, and opportunities for sustainability