in

Social value shift in favour of biodiversity conservation in the United States

  • 1.

    Bell, D. The coming of the post-industrial society. Educ. Forum 40, 574–579 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Veenhoven, R. Life is getting better: societal evolution and fit with human nature. Soc. Indic. Res. 97, 105–122 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Ripple, W. J. et al. World scientists’ warning to humanity: a second notice. BioScience 67, 1026–1028 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Pimm, S. L. et al. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344, 1246752 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Ceballos, G. et al. Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400253 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Ehrlich, P. R. & Kennedy, D. Millennium assessment of human behavior. Science 309, 562–563 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Crompton, T. Common Cause: The Case for Working with Our Cultural Values (World Wildlife Fund, 2010).

  • 9.

    What is the Great Transition? Great Transition Initiative https://greattransition.org/about/what-is-the-great-transition (2020).

  • 10.

    Wilson, D. S. Intentional cultural change. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 8, 190–193 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Gelfand, M. J. et al. Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study. Science 332, 1100–1104 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Oishi, S. & Graham, J. Social ecology: lost and found in psychological science. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5, 356–377 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Mace, G. M. Whose conservation? Science 345, 1558–1560 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Teel, T. L. & Manfredo, M. J. Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conserv. Biol. 24, 128–139 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Manfredo, M. J., Teel, T. L. & Dietsch, A. M. Implications of human value shift and persistence for biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 30, 287–296 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Manfredo, M. J., Berl, R. E. W., Teel, T. L., & Brusktotter, J. T. Bringing social values to wildlife conservation decisions. Front. Ecol. Environ. (in the press).

  • 17.

    Simberloff, D. Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passé in the landscape era? Biol. Conserv. 83, 247–257 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Meine, C., Soulé, M. & Noss, R. F. “A mission‐driven discipline”: the growth of conservation biology. Conserv. Biol. 20, 631–651 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Ives, C. D. & Kendal, D. The role of social values in the management of ecological systems. J. Environ. Manag. 144, 67–72 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Manfredo, M. J. et al. Why social values cannot be changed for the sake of conservation. Conserv. Biol. 31, 772–780 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Schwartz, S. H. A theory of cultural value orientations: explication and applications. Int. J. Comp. Sociol. 5, 136–182 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Bruskotter, J. T. et al. Conservationists’ moral obligations toward wildlife: values and identity promote conservation conflict. Biol. Conserv. 240, 108296 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Smolicz, J. Core values and cultural identity. Ethn. Racial Stud. 4, 75–90 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Geels, F. W. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res. Policy 31, 1257–1274 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Kitayama, S., Conway, L. G. III, Pietromonaco, P. R., Park, H. & Plaut, V. C. Ethos of independence across regions in the United States: the production-adoption model of cultural change. Am. Psychol. 65, 559–574 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Inglehart, R. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society (Princeton Univ. Press, 2018).

  • 27.

    Tormos, R. The Rhythm of Modernization: How Values Change Over Time (Brill, 2019).

  • 28.

    Bardi, A., Lee, J. A., Hofmann-Towfigh, N. & Soutar, G. The structure of intraindividual value change. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 97, 913–929 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Gouveia, V. V., Vione, K. C., Milfont, T. L. & Fischer, R. Patterns of value change during the life span: some evidence from a functional approach to values. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41, 1276–1290 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Bardi, A. & Goodwin, R. The dual route to value change: individual processes and cultural moderators. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 42, 271–287 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Hitlin, S. & Piliavin, J. A. Values: reviving a dormant concept. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30, 359–393 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Inglehart, R. Aggregate stability and individual-level flux in mass belief systems: the level of analysis paradox. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 79, 97–116 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Molloy, R., Smith, C. L. & Wozniak, A. Internal migration in the United States. J. Econ. Perspect. 25, 173–196 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Oishi, S., Trawalter, S. & Nosek, B. A. How ideological migration geographically segregates groups. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 51, 1–14 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Kluckholn, C. in Toward a General Theory of Action (eds T. Parsons. T. & Shils, E. A.) 388–433 (Harvard Univ. Press, 1951).

  • 36.

    Manfredo, M. J., Teel, T. L. & Henry, K. L. Linking society and environment: a multilevel model of shifting wildlife value orientations in the western United States. Soc. Sci. Quart. 90, 407–427 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Bruskotter, J. T. et al. Modernization, risk, and conservation of the world’s largest carnivores. BioScience 67, 646–655 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Manfredo, M. J., Urquiza-Haas, E. G., Carlos, A. W. D., Bruskotter, J. T. & Dietsch, A. M. How anthropomorphism is changing the social context of modern wildlife conservation. Biol. Conserv. 241, 108297 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Inglehart, R. & Welzel, C. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).

  • 40.

    Jacobson, C. A. & Decker, D. J. Governance of state wildlife management: reform and revive or resist and retrench? Soc. Nat. Resour. 21, 441–448 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences 2nd edn (Routledge, 1988).

  • 42.

    Fisher, P. A political outlier: the distinct politics of the millennial generation. Society 55, 35–40 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Tormos, R., Vauclair, C. M. & Dobewall, H. Does contextual change affect basic human values? A dynamic comparative multilevel analysis across 32 European countries. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 48, 490–510 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Schuster, C., Pinkowski, L. & Fischer, D. Intra-individual value change in adulthood: a systematic literature review of longitudinal studies assessing Schwartz’s value orientations. Z. Psychol. 227, 42–52 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Bruskotter, J. T., Vucetich, J. A. & Nelson, M. P. Animal rights and wildlife conservation: conflicting or compatible. Wildl. Prof. 11, 40–43 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Wildes, F. T. Recent themes in conservation philosophy and policy in the United States. Environ. Conserv. 22, 143–150 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Manfredo, M. J. et al. America’s Wildlife Values: The Social Context of Wildlife Management in the U.S. (Colorado State Univ., 2018).

  • 48.

    Duffin, E. Forecast on Urbanization in the U.S., 2000-2050 (Statistica, 2019).

  • 49.

    Oishi, S. et al. Does a major earthquake change job preferences and human values? Eur. J. Pers. 31, 258–265 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Diamond, J. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed (Penguin, 2011).

  • 51.

    Kenter, J. O. et al. Loving the mess: navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability. Sustain. Sci. 14, 1439–1461 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D. & Christian L. M. Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (John Wiley & Sons, 2014).

  • 53.

    Scheaffer, R. L., Mendenhall, W. & Ott, L. Elementary Survey Sampling 5th edn (Duxbury, 1996).

  • 54.

    Keeter, S. et al. What Low Response Rates Mean for Telephone Surveys (Pew Research Center, 2017).

  • 55.

    Stedman, R. C. et al. The end of the (research) world as we know it? Understanding and coping with declining response rates to mail surveys. Soc. Nat. Resour. 32, 1139–1154 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    American Community Survey 2016 5-Year Estimates (US Census Bureau, 2017).

  • 57.

    National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation (US Census Bureau, 2011).

  • 58.

    Urban and Rural (US Census Bureau, 2018); https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/guidance/geo-areas/urban-rural.html

  • 59.

    SAGDP2S: Annual Gross Domestic Product by State (US Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2010); https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/index_regional.cfm

  • 60.

    Kerlinger, F. N. & Lee, H. B. Foundations of Behavioral Research 4th edn (Wadsworth, 2000).

  • 61.

    Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 57, 289–300 (1995).

    Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Mismatch of thermal optima between performance measures, life stages and species of spiny lobster

    Field geology at a distance