in

Spatial distribution of stygobitic crustacean harpacticoids at the boundaries of groundwater habitat types in Europe

  • 1.

    Griebler, C., Avramov, M. & Hose, G. Groundwater Ecosystems and Their Services: Current Status and Potential Risks. In Atlas of Ecosystem Services (eds Schröter, M. et al.) 197–203 (Springer, Berlin, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Di Lorenzo, T., Cifoni, M., Lombardo, P., Fiasca, B. & Galassi, D. M. P. Ammonium threshold values for groundwater quality in the EU may not protect groundwater fauna: evidence from an alluvial aquifer in Italy. Hydrobiologia 743, 139–150 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Banks, E., Simmons, C., Love, A. & Shand, P. Assessing spatial and temporal connectivity between surface water and groundwater in a regional catchment: Implications for regional scale water quantity and quality. J. Hydrol. 404, 30–49 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Di Lorenzo, T., Stoch, F. & Galassi, D. M. P. Incorporating the hyporheic zone within the river discontinuum: longitudinal patterns of subsurface copepod assemblages in an Alpine stream. Limnologica 43, 288–296 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Hose, G. C. & Stumpp, C. Architects of the underworld: bioturbation by groundwater invertebrates influences aquifer hydraulic properties. Aquat. Sci. 81, 20 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Di Lorenzo, T. & Galassi, D. M. P. Effect of temperature rising on the stygobitic crustacean species Diacyclops belgicus: Does global warming affect groundwater populations?. Water 9, 951 (2017).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Strona, G. et al. AQUALIFE software: a new tool for a standardized ecological assessment of groundwater dependent ecosystems. Water 11, 2574 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Mammola, S. et al. Scientists’ warning on the conservation of subterranean ecosystems. Bioscience 69, 641–650 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Castellarini, F., Malard, F., Dole-Olivier, M.-J. & Gibert, J. Modelling the distribution of stygobionts in the Jura Mountains (eastern France). Implications for the protection of ground waters. Divers. Distrib. 13, 213–224 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Deharveng, L. et al. Groundwater biodiversity in Europe. Freshw. Biol. 54, 709–726 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Fattorini, S., Fiasca, B., Di Lorenzo, T., Di Cicco, M. & Galassi, D. M. P. A new protocol for assessing the conservation priority of groundwater dependent ecosystems. Aquat. Conserv. 30, 1483–1504 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Pipan, T., Culver, D. C., Papi, F. & Kozel, P. Partitioning diversity in subterranean invertebrates: the epikarst fauna of Slovenia. PLoS ONE 13, e0195991 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Iannella, M. et al. Jumping into the grids: mapping biodiversity hotspots in groundwater habitat types across Europe. Ecography 43, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05323 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Cantonati, M. et al. Characteristics, main impacts, and stewardship of natural and artificial freshwater environments: consequences for biodiversity conservation. Water 12, 260 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Galassi, D. M. P., Huys, R. & Reid, J. W. Diversity, ecology and evolution of groundwater copepods. Freshw. Biol. 54, 691–708 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Galassi, D. M. P. Groundwater copepods: diversity patterns over ecological and evolutionary scales. Hydrobiologia 453, 227–253 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Fiasca, B. et al. The dark side of springs: what drives small-scale spatial patterns of subsurface meiofaunal assemblages. J. Limnol. 73, 71–80 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Galassi, D. M. P. et al. Earthquakes trigger the loss of groundwater biodiversity. Sci. Rep. 4, 6273 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Fattorini, S., Di Lorenzo, T. & Galassi, D. M. P. Earthquake impacts on microcrustacean communities inhabiting groundwater-fed springs alter species-abundance distribution patterns. Sci. Rep. 8, 1501 (2018).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Boxshall, G. A., Kihara, T. C. & Huys, R. Collecting and processing non-planktonic copepods. J. Crustacean Biol. 36, 576–583 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Korbel, K. L., Stephenson, S. & Hose, G. C. Sediment size influences habitat selection and use by groundwater macrofauna and meiofauna. Aquat. Sci. 81, 39 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Giere, O. Meiobenthology: The Microscopic motile Fauna of Aquatic Sediments 2nd edn. (Springer, Berlin, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Galassi, D. M. P. et al. Groundwater biodiversity in a chemoautotrophic cave ecosystem: how geochemistry regulates microcrustacean community structure. Aquat. Ecol. 51, 75–90 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Lamoreux, J. Stygobites are more wide-ranging than troglobites. J. Cave Karst. Stud. 66, 18–19 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Kubisch, A., Holt, R. D., Poethke, H. J. & Fronhofer, E. A. Where am I and why? Synthesizing range biology and the eco-evolutionary dynamics of dispersal. Oikos 123, 5–22 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Strayer, D. L., Power, M. E., Fagan, W. F., Pickett, S. T. & Belnap, J. A classification of ecological boundaries. Bioscience 53, 723–729 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Mazzucco, R., Doebeli, M. & Dieckmann, U. The influence of habitat boundaries on evolutionary branching along environmental gradients. Evol. Ecol. 32, 563–585 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Potts, J. R., Hillen, T. & Lewis, M. A. The, “edge effect” phenomenon: deriving population abundance patterns from individual animal movement decisions. Theor. Ecol. 9, 233–247 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Ries, L., Fletcher, R. J. Jr., Battin, J. & Sisk, T. D. Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 491–522 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Cornu, J.-F., Eme, D. & Malard, F. The distribution of groundwater habitats in Europe. Hydrogeol. J. 21, 949–960 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Margules, C. R. & Pressey, R. L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405, 6783 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Eme, D. et al. Multi-causality and spatial non-stationarity in the determinants of groundwater crustacean diversity in Europe. Ecography 38, 531–540 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Brunetti, M., Magoga, G., Iannella, M., Biondi, M. & Montagna, M. Phylogeography and species distribution modelling of Cryptocephalus barii (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): is this alpine endemic species close to extinction?. ZooKeys 856, 3 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Iannella, M., Liberatore, L. & Biondi, M. The effects of a sudden urbanization on micromammal communities: a case study of post-earthquake L’Aquila (Abruzzi Region, Italy). Ital. J. Zool. 83, 255–262 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Shen, X. et al. Effectiveness of management zoning designed for flagship species in protecting sympatric species. Conserv. Biol. 34, 158–167 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Zagmajster, M. et al. Geographic variation in range size and beta diversity of groundwater crustaceans: insights from habitats with low thermal seasonality. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 1135–1145 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Stoch, F. & Galassi, D. M. P. Stygobiotic crustacean species richness: a question of numbers, a matter of scale. Hydrobiologia 653, 217–234 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Stein, H. et al. Stygoregions—a promising approach to a bioregional classification of groundwater systems. Sci. Rep. 2, 673 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Council of the European Communities. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. O. J. L. 206, 7–50 (1992).

  • 40.

    Galassi, D. M. P., Stoch, F., Fiasca, B., Di Lorenzo, T. & Gattone, E. Groundwater biodiversity patterns in the Lessinian Massif of northern Italy. Freshw. Biol. 54, 830–847 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Rouch, R. Sur la répartition spatiale des Crustacés dans le sous-écoulement d’un ruisseau des Pyrénées. Ann. Limnol. 24, 213–234 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Gibert, J., Malard, F., Turquin, M. J. & Laurent, R. Karst Ecosystems in the Rhône River Basin. In Subterranean Ecosystems. Ecosystems of the World (eds Wilkens, H. et al.) 533–558 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Boulton, A. J. Conservation of groundwaters and their dependent ecosystems: Integrating molecular taxonomy, systematic reserve planning and cultural values. Aquat. Conserv. 30, 1–7 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Smith, T. B., Kark, S., Schneider, C. J., Wayne, R. K. & Moritz, C. Biodiversity hotspots and beyond: the need for preserving environmental transitions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 431 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Álvarez-Martínez, J. M. et al. Modelling the area of occupancy of habitat types with remote sensing. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 580–593 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Armstrong, D. P. Integrating the metapopulation and habitat paradigms for understanding broad-scale declines of species. Conserv. Biol. 19, 1402–1410 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Malard, F. et al. Diversity patterns of stygobiotic crustaceans across multiple spatial scales in Europe. Freshw. Biol. 54, 756–776 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Stoch, F. et al. Exploring copepod distribution patterns at three nested spatial scales in a spring system: Habitat partitioning and potential for hydrological bioindication. J. Limnol. 75, 1–13 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Di Lorenzo, T., Cipriani, D., Fiasca, B., Rusi, S. & Galassi, D. M. P. Groundwater drift monitoring as a tool to assess the spatial distribution of groundwater species into karst aquifers. Hydrobiologia 813, 137–156 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Illies, J. Limnofauna Europaea (Fischer, Stuttgart, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Botosaneanu, L. Stygofauna Mundi (Brill, Leiden, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Knight, L. Hypogean Crustacea Recording Scheme. (Accessed 1 October 2020); https://hcrs.freshwaterlife.org (2012).

  • 54.

    Ruffo, S. & Stoch, F. Checklist e distribuzione della fauna italiana. (2005).

  • 55.

    ESRI. ArcMap 10.0. ESRI, Redlands, California (2010).

  • 56.

    Wang, Y. et al. Comparing the performance of approaches for testing the homogeneity of variance assumption in one-factor ANOVA models. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 77, 305–329 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    Holm, S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6, 65–70 (1979).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Transatlantic research and study partnership continues amid the pandemic

    Transcriptomic and life history responses of the mayfly Neocloeon triangulifer to chronic diel thermal challenge