in

The politics of biodiversity offsetting across time and institutional scales

  • 1.

    Bull, J. W., Gordon, A., Watson, J. E. M. & Maron, M. Seeking convergence on the key concepts in ‘no net loss’ policy. J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 1686–1693 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Maron, M. et al. The many meanings of no net loss in environmental policy. Nat. Sustain 1, 19–27 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Bull, J. W. & Strange, N. The global extent of biodiversity offset implementation under no net loss policies. Nat. Sustain 1, 790–798 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    von Hase, A. & ten Kate, K. Correct framing of biodiversity offsets and conservation: a response to Apostolopoulou & Adams. Oryx 51, 32–34 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Standard on Biodiversity Offsets (BBOP, Forest Trends, 2012).

  • 6.

    Zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. The ecological outcomes of biodiversity offsets under “no net loss” policies: a global review. Conserv. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12664 (2019).

  • 7.

    Moreno-Mateos, D., Maris, V., Béchet, A. & Curran, M. The true loss caused by biodiversity offsets. Biol. Conserv. 192, 552–559 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Bonneuil, C. Tell me where you come from, I will tell you who you are: a genealogy of biodiversity offsetting mechanisms in historical context. Biol. Conserv. 192, 485–491 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Boon, P. I. & Prahalad, V. Ecologists, economics and politics: problems and contradictions in applying neoliberal ideology to nature conservation in Australia. Pac. Conserv. Biol. 23, 115–132 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Penca, J. Marketing the market: the ideology of market mechanisms for biodiversity conservation. Transnatl Environ. Law 2, 235–257 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Lapeyre, R., Froger, G. & Hrabanski, M. Biodiversity offsets as market-based instruments for ecosystem services? From discourses to practices. Ecosyst. Serv. 15, 125–133 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Hackett, R. Market-based environmental governance and public resources in Alberta, Canada. Ecosyst. Serv. 15, 174–180 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Zero Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (CBD, 2020).

  • 14.

    Feindt, P. H. & Oels, A. Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 7, 161–173 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Leipold, S., Feindt, P. H., Winkel, G. & Keller, R. Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: traditions, trends, perspectives. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 21, 445–463 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Hajer, M. & Versteeg, W. A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: achievements, challenges, perspectives. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 7, 175–184 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Bacchi, C. & Goodwin, S. Poststructural Policy Analysis: A Guide to Practice (Springer, 2016).

  • 18.

    Dryzek, J. S. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses (Oxford Univ. Press, 2013).

  • 19.

    Foucault, M. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction Vol. 1(Penguin Group, 2008).

  • 20.

    Hajer, M. A. in Words Matter in Policy and Planning: Discource Theory and Method in the Social Sciences (eds Van den Brink, M. & Metze, T.) 65–76 (Netherlands Graduate School of Urban and Regional Research, 2006).

  • 21.

    Hajer, M. A. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process (Clarendon Press, 1995).

  • 22.

    Hopwood, B., Mellor, M. & O’Brien, G. Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustain. Dev. 13, 38–52 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Carson, R. Silent Spring (Houghton Mifflin, 1962).

  • 24.

    Our Common Future (United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford Univ. Press, 1987).

  • 25.

    Robertson, M. M. The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum 35, 361–373 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Clapp, J. & Dauvergne, P. in Paths to a Green World: The Political Economy of the Global Environment (eds Clapp, J. & Dauvergne, P.) 161–191 (MIT Press, 2011).

  • 27.

    Werksman, J. The clean development mechanism: unwrapping the Kyoto surprise. Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 7, 147–158 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Christoff, P. Ecological modernisation, ecological modernities. Environ. Polit. 5, 476–500 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Breaking New Ground: The Report of the Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development Project (International Institute for Environment and Development, World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Earthscan Publications, 2002).

  • 30.

    Hrabanski, M. The biodiversity offsets as market-based instruments in global governance: origins, success and controversies. Ecosyst. Serv. 15, 143–151 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Our Human Planet: Summary for Decision Makers (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005); http://millenniumassessment.org/en/Global.html

  • 32.

    The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB (TEEB, 2010); http://teebweb.org/publications/teeb-for/synthesis/

  • 33.

    Bassey, N. et al. IUCN Withdrawal (Friends of the Earth International, 2009).

  • 34.

    WWC 10 Final Resolution 12: Building a Global Alliance to Assert ‘No-Go Areas’ for Mining and Other Extractive Industries and Destructive Activities Threatening World Heritage Sites, and Protected Areas, including Indigenous Peoples’ and Local Communities Conserved Areas and Territories (ICCAs) and Sacred Natural Sites and Territories (WWC, 2013).

  • 35.

    WCC-2012-Res-110-EN: Biodiversity Offsets and Related Compensatory Approaches (WCC, 2012).

  • 36.

    IUCN Resolutions, Recommendations and Other Decisions (IUCN, 2016).

  • 37.

    Permitted Clearing of Native Vegetation: Biodiversity Assessment Guidelines (The Victorian Government, Department of Environment and Primary Industries, 2013).

  • 38.

    NSW Biodiversity Offsets Policy for Major Projects (State of NSW, Office of Environment and Heritage, 2014).

  • 39.

    Our Evolving Approach to Biodiversity: The Next Chapter in Biodiversity Management (Rio Tinto, 2017); http://www.riotinto.com/ourcommitment/spotlight-18130_21621.aspx

  • 40.

    Konisky, D. M. & Woods, N. D. Environmental federalism and the Trump presidency: a preliminary assessment. Publius 48, 345–371 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Working for Biodiversity Net Gain: An Overview of the Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme (BBOP) 2004–2018 (BBOP, Forest Trends, 2018).

  • 42.

    Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES Secretariat, 2019).

  • 43.

    Leipold, S. & Winkel, G. Discursive agency: (re-)conceptualizing actors and practices in the analysis of discursive policymaking. Policy Stud. J. 45, 510–534 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Foucault, M. The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge Vol. I (Penguin Group, 2008).

  • 45.

    Walker, S., Brower, A. L., Stephens, R. T. T. & Lee, W. G. Why bartering biodiversity fails. Conserv. Lett. 2, 149–157 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Bäckstrand, K. & Lövbrand, E. The road to Paris: contending climate governance discourses in the post-Copenhagen era. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 21, 519–532 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Griggs, S. & Howarth, D. Discourse, policy and the environment: hegemony, statements and the analysis of UK airport expansion. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 21, 464–478 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Reflections on the Zero Draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (BirdLife International, 2020).

  • 49.

    IUCN Position: Zero Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (IUCN, 2020); https://go.nature.com/3kEA4rP

  • 50.

    Dingler, J. The discursive nature of nature: towards a post-modern concept of nature. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 7, 209–225 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Sharp, L. & Richardson, T. Reflections on Foucauldian discourse analysis in planning and environmental policy research. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 3, 193–209 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Moon, K. & Blackman, D. A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists. Conserv. Biol. 28, 1167–1177 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Fairclough, N. Critical discourse analysis. Marges Linguist. 9, 76–94 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    NVivo qualitative data analysis software (QSR International, 2019); https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo/home

  • 55.

    Calvet, C., Ollivier, G. & Napoleone, C. Tracking the origins and development of biodiversity offsetting in academic research and its implications for conservation: a review. Biol. Conserv. 192, 492–503 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Darier, É. (ed.) Discourses of the Environment (Blackwell, 1999).

  • 57.

    Bäckstrand, K. & Lövbrand, E. in The Social Construction of Climate Change: Power, Knowledge, Norms, Discourses (ed. Pettenger, M. E.) 123–147 (Taylor & Francis Group, 2007).

  • 58.

    Mol, A. P. J., Spaargaren, G. & Sonnenfeld, D. A. in The Ecological Modernisation Reader. Environmental Reform in Theory and Practice (eds Mol, A. P. J. et al.) 3–14 (Routledge, 2009).

  • 59.

    Nilsen, H. R. The joint discourse ‘reflexive sustainable development’—from weak towards strong sustainable development. Ecol. Econ. 69, 495–501 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 60.

    Jacobs, M. in The Handbook of Global Climate and Environment Policy (ed. Falkner, R.) 197–214 (John Wiley & Sons, 2013); https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118326213.ch12

  • 61.

    Ferguson, P. The green economy agenda: business as usual or transformational discourse? Environ. Polit. 24, 17–37 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 62.

    Coffey, B. Unpacking the politics of natural capital and economic metaphors in environmental policy discourse. Environ. Polit. 25, 203–222 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 63.

    Bakker, K. The limits of ‘neoliberal natures’: debating green neoliberalism. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 34, 715–735 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Pushing the envelope with fusion magnets

    Environmental Solutions Initiative puts sustainability front and center at the MIT career fair