in

The transboundary nature of the world’s exploited marine species

  • 1.

    Hutchinson, G. E. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 22, 415–427 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Nelson, J. S., Grande, T. C. & Wilson, M. V. H. Fishes of the World (Wiley, Hoboken, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Song, A. M., Scholtens, J., Stephen, J., Bavinck, M. & Chuenpagdee, R. Transboundary research in fisheries. Mar. Policy 76, 8–18 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Fredston-Hermann, A., Gaines, S. D. & Halpern, B. S. Biogeographic constraints to marine conservation in a changing climate. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 367, 49–13 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Østhagen, A. Maritime boundary disputes: what are they and why do they matter?. Mar. Policy 120, 104118 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    United Nations. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)—Part V. (1986).

  • 7.

    Munro, G., Van Houtte, A. & Willmann, R. The Conservation and Management of Shared Fish Stocks: Legal and Economic Aspects. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 456. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome (2004).

  • 8.

    Miller, K. & Munro, G. Cooperation and Conflicts in the Management of Transboundary Fishery Resources. (Proceeding of the Second World Conference of the Second World Congress of the American; European Associations of Environmental; Resource Economics, 2002).

  • 9.

    Englander, G. Property rights and the protection of global marine resources. Nature Sustainability 2, 981–987 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Spijkers, J. & Boonstra, W. J. Environmental change and social conflict: the northeast Atlantic mackerel dispute. Reg. Environ. Change 17, 1835–1851 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Pinsky, M. L. et al. Preparing ocean governance for species on the move. Science 360, 1189–1191 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Miller, K. A., Munro, G. R., Sumaila, U. R. & Cheung, W. W. L. Governing marine fisheries in a changing climate: a game-theoretic perspective. Can J Agric Econ 61, 309–334 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    United Nations. Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 Relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks. (1995).

  • 14.

    Caddy, J. Establishing a consultative mechanism or arrangement for managing shared stocks within the jurisdiction of contiguous states. In Taking stock Defining and Managing Shared Resources (ed. Hancock, D. A.) 80–123 (Australian Society for Fish Biology, Adelaide, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Teh, L. S. L. & Sumaila, U. R. Trends in global shared fisheries. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 530, 243–254 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Diario Oficial de la Federación (DOF). Carta Nacional Pesquera. Poder Ejecutivo—Secreataría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca (SAGARPA). Diario Oficial de la Federación DOF, 1–268 (2018).

  • 17.

    MAP. Dictamen de Extracción No Perjudicial (DENP) de la población de “tiburón martillo” Sphyrna zygaena. Oficio N. 1038–2017-PRODUCE/DGPCHDI (Tra. N. 18254–2017). Ministerio del Ambiente, Viceministerio de Desarrollo Estratégico de los Recursos Naturales, Peru (2017).

  • 18.

    Ramesh, N., Rising, J. A. & Oremus, K. L. The small world of global marine fisheries: The cross-boundary consequences of larval dispersal. Science 364, 1192–1196 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Levin, N., Beger, M., Maina, J., McClanahan, T. & Kark, S. Evaluating the potential for transboundary management of marine biodiversity in the Western Indian Ocean. Australas. J. Environ.Manag. 25, 62–85 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Popova, E. et al. Ecological connectivity between the areas beyond national jurisdiction and coastal waters: safeguarding interests of coastal communities in developing countries. Mar. Policy 104, 90–102 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Dunn, D. C. et al. The importance of migratory connectivity for global ocean policy. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 286, 20191472 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Kaplan, D. M. et al. Uncertainty in empirical estimates of marine larval connectivity. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 74, 1723–1734 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Archambault, B. et al. Adult-mediated connectivity affects inferences on population dynamics and stock assessment of nursery-dependent fish populations. Global Environ. Change 181, 198–213 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Cashion, T. et al. Establishing company level fishing revenue and profit losses from fisheries: A bottom-up approach. Journals Plos.Org 13, e0207768 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture: Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals. 1–227 (2018).

  • 26.

    UNDP. Chile and Peru sign Landmark Agreement to Sustain world’s Largest Single Species Fishery (2016).

  • 27.

    NOAA FIsheries. Bilateral Agreement Between the United States and Russia (2019).

  • 28.

    Kleisner, K. & Pauly, D. Stock-Status Plots of Fisheries for Regional Seas. in The State of Biodiversity and Fisheries in Regional Seas (eds. Christensen, V., Lai, S., Palomares, M. L. D., Zeller, D. & Pauly, D.) 37–40 (The Fisheries Center, University of British Columbia; Fisheries Centre Research Reports, 2011).

  • 29.

    Jensen, F., Frost, H., Thogersen, T., Andersen, P. & Andersen, J. L. Game theory and fish wars: the case of the Northeast Atlantic mackerel fishery. Fisheries 172, 7–16 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Munro, G. R. The management of shared fishery resources under extended jurisdiction. Mar. Resour. Econ. 3, 271–296 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Eide, A., Heen, K., Armstrong, C., Flaaten, O. & Vasiliev, A. Challenges and successes in the management of a shared fish stock—the case of the Russian-Norwegian barents sea cod fishery. Acta Borealia 30, 1–20 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Sumaila, U. R., Ninnes, C. & Oelofsen, B. Management of Shared Hake Stocks in the Benguela Marine Ecosystem. In Papers presented at the norway-fao expert consultation on the management of shared fish stocks, 143–159 (2003).

  • 33.

    Clark, C. W. Restricted Access to Common-Property Fishery Resources: A Game-Theoretic Analysis. In Dynamic optimization and mathematical economics, 117–132 (Springer, Boston, MA, 1980).

  • 34.

    Spijkers, J. et al. Global patterns of fisheries conflict: forty years of data. Global Environ. Change 57, 101921 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Oremus, K. L. et al. Governance challenges for tropical nations losing fish species due to climate change. Nat. Sustain. 6, 1–4 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Palacios-Abrantes, J., Rashid Sumaila, U. & Cheung, W. W. L. Challenges to transboundary fisheries management in North America under climate change. Ecol. Soc. (in press).

  • 37.

    Sumaila, U. R., Palacios-Abrantes, J. & Cheung, W. W. L. Climate change, shifting threat points and the management of transboundary fish stocks. Ecol. Soc. (in press).

  • 38.

    Reygondeau, G. Current and future biogeography of marine exploited groups under climate change. In Predicting Future Oceans Sustainability of Ocean and Human Systems Amidst Global Environmental Change (eds. Cheung, W. W. L., Ota, Y. & Cisneros-Montemayor, A. M.) 87–99 (2019).

  • 39.

    Schill, S. R. et al. No reef is an island: integrating coral reef connectivity data into the design of regional-scale marine protected area networks. PLoS ONE 10, e0144199 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Perez, A. U., Schmitter-Soto, J. J., Adams, A. J. & Heyman, W. D. Connectivity mediated by seasonal bonefish (Albula vulpes) migration between the Caribbean Sea and a tropical estuary of Belize and Mexico. Environ. Biol. Fishes 102, 197–207 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Cisneros-Montemayor, A. M., Pauly, D., Weatherdon, L. V. & Ota, Y. A Global estimate of seafood consumption by coastal indigenous peoples. PLoS ONE 11, e0166681 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Hanich, Q. et al. Small-scale fisheries under climate change in the Pacific Islands region. Mar. Policy 88, 279–284 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Cabral, R. B. & Geronimo, R. C. How important are coral reefs to food security in the Philippines? Diving deeper than national aggregates and averages. Mar. Policy 91, 136–141 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Zeller, D. et al. Still catching attention: Sea Around Us reconstructed global catch data, their spatial expression and public accessibility. Mar. Policy 70, 145–152 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Thuiller, W., Lafourcade, B., Engler, R. & Araújo, M. B. BIOMOD—a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography 32, 369–373 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P. & Schapire, R. E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 190, 231–259 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Beaugrand, G., Lenoir, S., Ibanez, F. & Manté, C. A new model to assess the probability of occurrence of a species, based on presence-only data. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 424, 175–190 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Asch, R. G., Cheung, W. W. L. & Reygondeau, G. Future marine ecosystem drivers, biodiversity, and fisheries maximum catch potential in Pacific Island countries and territories under climate change. Mar. Policy 88, 285–294 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Close, C. et al. Distribution ranges of commercial fishes and invertebrates. In Fisheries Centre Research Reports. Fishes in Databases and Ecosystems (eds. Palomares, M. D., Stergiou, K. I. & Pauly, D.) 27–37 (2006).

  • 50.

    Pauly, D. & Zeller, D. Global Atlas of Marine Fisheries 1–520 (Island Press, Washington, D.C., 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Kaschner, K. et al. AquaMaps: Predicted range maps for aquatic species www.aquamaps.org (2016).

  • 52.

    Pauly, D. & Zeller, D. Catch reconstructions reveal that global marine fisheries catches are higher than reported and declining. Nat. Commun. 7:10244,1–9 (2019).

  • 53.

    Pebesma, E. et al. Package sf; Simple Features for R. R (>= 3.3.0), (2018).

  • 54.

    Tai, T. C., Cashion, T., Lam, V. W. Y. & Sumaila, U. R. Ex-vessel fish price database: disaggregating prices for low-priced species from reduction fisheries. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 1–10 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    Sumaila, U. R., Teh, L., Zeller, D. & Pauly, D. The global ex-vessel fish price database. In Catch Reconstructions: Concepts, Methods and Data Sources (eds. Pauly D., & Zeller, S.) www.searoundus.org (2015).

  • 56.

    Grainger, R. J. R. & Garcia, S. M. Chronicles of Marine Fishery Landings (1950 1994) Trend Analysis and Fisheries Potential (1996).

  • 57.

    Pauly, D., Hilborn, R. & Branch, T. A. Fisheries: does catch reflect abundance?. Nature 494, 303–306 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    Branch, T. A. Not all fisheries will be collapsed in 2048. Mar. Policy 32, 38–39 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    Dowle, M. et al. Package data.table; Extension of ‘data.frame‘. R (>= 3.1.0), MPL–2.0 | file LICENSE (2019).

  • 60.

    Firke, S., Haid, C., Knight, R. & Denney, B. Package janitor; Simple tools for examining and cleaning dirty data. R (>= 3.1.2), (2018).

  • 61.

    Ram, K., Wickham, H., Richards, C. & Baggett, A. Package wesanderson; A Wes Anderson Palette Generator. R (>= 3.0), MIT + file LICENSE (2018).

  • 62.

    Boettiger, C., Chamberlain, S., Lang, D. T. & Wainwright, P. Package rfishbase; R Interface to ’FishBase’. R (>= 3.0), (2019).

  • 63.

    Bengtsson, H., Jacobson, A. & Riedy, J. Package R.matlab: Read and Write MAT Files and Call MATLAB from Within R. R ( 2.14.0), LGPL–2.1 | LGPL–3 (2018).

  • 64.

    Pebesma, E. et al. Package sp; Classes and methods for Spatial Data. R ( 3.0.0), GPL–2 | GPL–3 (2019).

  • 65.

    Wickham, H. Package tidyverse; Easily Install and Load the ’Tidyverse’. R (3.5.0), MIT + file LICENSE (2017).

  • 66.

    De Queiroz, G. et al. Package tidytext; Text Mining using ’dplyr’, ’ggplot2’, and Other Tidy Tools. R ( 2.10), MIT (2019).

  • 67.

    Zeileis, A., Grothendieck, G., Ryan, J. A., Ulrich, J. M. & Andrews, F. Package zoo; S3 Infrastructure for Regular and Irregular Time Series (Z’s Ordered Observations). R (>= 3.1.0), GPL–2 | GPL–3 (2019).

  • 68.

    Chambers, J. M., Freeny, A. E. & Heiberger, R. M. Analysis of Variance; Designed Experiments. In Statistical models in s (eds Chambers, J. M. & Hastie, T. J.) 145–193 (Routledge, London, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • 69.

    Krzanowski, W. J. Principles of Multivariate Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • 70.

    Hollander, M. & Wolfe, D. A. Nonparametric Statistical Methods (Wiley, Hoboken, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • 71.

    Moore, B. R. et al. Defining the stock structures of key commercial tunas in the Pacific Ocean I: current knowledge and main uncertainties. Global Environ. Change 230, 105525 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 72.

    Sepulveda, C. A., Wang, M., Aalbers, S. A. & Alvarado-Bremer, J. R. Insights into the horizontal movements, migration patterns, and stock affiliation of California swordfish. Fish. Oceanogr. 29, 152–168 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 73.

    Vandeperre, F. et al. Movements of Blue Sharks (Prionace glauca) across Their Life History. PLoS ONE 9, e103538–e103614 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 74.

    Chavez, F. P., Ryan, J., Lluch-Cota, S. E. & Niquen, C. M. From anchovies to sardines and back: multidecadal change in the Pacific Ocean. Science 299, 217–221 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Deep learning-assisted comparative analysis of animal trajectories with DeepHL

    Environmental and microbial controls on microbial necromass recycling, an important precursor for soil carbon stabilization