Adding forests to the water–energy–food nexus

Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).

Google Scholar 

At the human-forest interface. Nat. Commun. 9, 1153 (2018).

Melo, F. P. L., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Fahrig, L., Martínez-Ramos, M. & Tabarelli, M. On the hope for biodiversity-friendly tropical landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 462–468 (2013).

Google Scholar 

Arroyo‐Rodríguez, V. et al. Designing optimal human-modified landscapes for forest biodiversity conservation. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1404–1420 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Castañeda, A. et al. A new profile of the global poor. World Dev. 101, 250–267 (2018).

Google Scholar 

DeFries, R. & Nagendra, H. Ecosystem management as a wicked problem. Science 356, 265–270 (2017).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. Global restoration opportunities in tropical rainforest landscapes. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav3223 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Meli, P. et al. Four approaches to guide ecological restoration in Latin America. Restor. Ecol. 25, 156–163 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Robertson, M., Nichols, P., Horwitz, P., Bradby, K. & MacKintosh, D. Environmental narratives and the need for multiple perspectives to restore degraded landscapes in Australia. Ecosyst. Health 6, 119–133 (2000).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Banks-Leite, C. et al. Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot. Science 345, 1041–1045 (2014).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Strassburg, B. B. N. et al. Strategic approaches to restoring ecosystems can triple conservation gains and halve costs. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 62–70 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. What makes ecosystem restoration expensive? A systematic cost assessment of projects in Brazil. Biol. Conserv. 240, 108274 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Simpson, G. B. & Jewitt, G. P. W. The development of the water-energy-food nexus as a framework for achieving resource security: a review. Front. Environ. Sci. 7, 8 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Biggs, E. M. et al. Sustainable development and the water–energy–food nexus: a perspective on livelihoods. Environ. Sci. Policy 54, 389–397 (2015).

Google Scholar 

Hoff, H. Understanding the Nexus: Background Paper for the Bonn2011 Nexus Conference (Stockholm Environment Institute, 2011).

Bazilian, M. et al. Considering the energy, water and food nexus: towards an integrated modelling approach. Energy Policy 39, 7896–7906 (2011).

Google Scholar 

Liu, J. et al. Nexus approaches to global sustainable development. Nat. Sustain. 1, 466–476 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Ibisch, R. B., Bogardi, J. J. & Borchardt, D. in Integrated Water Resources Management: Concept, Research and Implementation (eds Borchardt, D. et al.) 3–32 (Springer, 2016).

Díaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Ribot, J. C. & Peluso, N. L. A Theory of Access*. Rural Sociol. 68, 153–181 (2003).

Google Scholar 

Voluntary Guidelines for Agro-Environmental Policies in Latin Amrica and The Caribbean (FAO, 2018).

Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W. & Kropp, J. P. A systematic study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) interactions. Earth’s Future 5, 1169–1179 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Cole, L. E. S., Bhagwat, S. A. & Willis, K. J. Recovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance. Nat. Commun. 5, 3906 (2014).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Chazdon, R. & Brancalion, P. Restoring forests as a means to many ends. Science 365, 24–25 (2019).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Protecting and Restoring Forests: A Story of Large Commitments yet Limited Progress. New York Declaration on Forests Five-Year Assessment Report (NYDF Assessment Partners, 2019).

Holl, K. D. & Brancalion, P. H. S. Tree planting is not a simple solution. Science 368, 580–581 (2020).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Albrecht, T. R., Crootof, A. & Scott, C. A. The water-energy-food nexus: a systematic review of methods for nexus assessment. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 043002 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Townsend, P. V. et al. Multiple environmental services as an opportunity for watershed restoration. For. Policy Econ. 17, 45–58 (2012).

Google Scholar 

Vörösmarty, C. J. et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467, 555–561 (2010).

Google Scholar 

van Noordwijk, M. Integrated natural resource management as pathway to poverty reduction: innovating practices, institutions and policies. Agric. Syst. 172, 60–71 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Moreno-Mateos, D. et al. Anthropogenic ecosystem disturbance and the recovery debt. Nat. Commun. 8, 14163 (2017).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. A critical analysis of the Native Vegetation Protection Law of Brazil (2012): updates and ongoing initiatives. Nat. Conserv. 14, 1–15 (2016).

Google Scholar 

Soares-Filho, B. et al. Cracking Brazil’s Forest Code. Science 344, 363–364 (2014).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Pires, A. P. F., Rezende, C. L., Assad, E. D., Loyola, R. & Scarano, F. R. Forest restoration can increase the Rio Doce watershed resilience. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 15, 187–193 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Filoso, S., Bezerra, M. O., Weiss, K. C. B. & Palmer, M. A. Impacts of forest restoration on water yield: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 12, e0183210 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Ellison, D. et al. Trees, forests and water: cool insights for a hot world. Glob. Environ. Change 43, 51–61 (2017).

Google Scholar 

van der Ent, R. J., Savenije, H. H. G., Schaefli, B. & Steele‐Dunne, S. C. Origin and fate of atmospheric moisture over continents. Water Resour. Res. 46, W09525 (2010).

Google Scholar 

Sheil, D. Forests, atmospheric water and an uncertain future: the new biology of the global water cycle. For. Ecosyst. 5, 19 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Karabulut, A. et al. Mapping water provisioning services to support the ecosystem-water-food-energy nexus in the Danube river basin. Ecosyst. Serv. 17, 278–292 (2016).

Google Scholar 

Richards, R. C. et al. Governing a pioneer program on payment for watershed services: stakeholder involvement, legal frameworks and early lessons from the Atlantic forest of Brazil. Ecosyst. Serv. 16, 23–32 (2015).

Google Scholar 

Vincent, J. R. et al. Valuing water purification by forests: an analysis of Malaysian panel data. Environ. Resour. Econ. 64, 59–80 (2016).

Google Scholar 

Brancalion, P., Viani, R., Strassburg, B. & Rodrigues, R. Finding the money for tropical forest restoration. Unasylva 239, 41–50 (2012).

Google Scholar 

Zemp, D. C. et al. On the importance of cascading moisture recycling in South America. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 13337–13359 (2014).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Energy Access Outlook: From Poverty to Prosperity (International Energy Agency, 2017).

Specht, M. J., Pinto, S. R. R., Albuquerque, U. P., Tabarelli, M. & Melo, F. P. L. Burning biodiversity: fuelwood harvesting causes forest degradation in human-dominated tropical landscapes. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 3, 200–209 (2015).

Google Scholar 

The State of the World’s Forests 2018 – Forest Pathways to Sustainable Development (FAO, 2018).

Review of Woodfuel Biomass Production and Utilization in Africa: A Desk Study (United Nations Environment Programme, 2019).

Forests and Energy (FAO, 2017); https://go.nature.com/3aI4LYZ

Arias, M. E., Cochrane, T. A., Lawrence, K. S., Killeen, T. J. & Farrell, T. A. Paying the forest for electricity: a modelling framework to market forest conservation as payment for ecosystem services benefiting hydropower generation. Environ. Conserv. 38, 473–484 (2011).

Google Scholar 

Moomaw, W. R., Law, B. E. & Goetz, S. J. Focus on the role of forests and soils in meeting climate change mitigation goals: summary. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 045009 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Tesfaye, M. A. et al. Selection of tree species and soil management for simultaneous fuelwood production and soil rehabilitation in the Ethiopian Central highlands. Land Degrad. Dev. 26, 665–679 (2015).

Google Scholar 

Beddington, J. Food security: contributions from science to a new and greener revolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 61–71 (2010).

Google Scholar 

van Noordwijk, M. et al. SDG synergy between agriculture and forestry in the food, energy, water and income nexus: reinventing agroforestry? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 34, 33–42 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Vieira, D. L. M., Holl, K. D. & Peneireiro, F. M. Agro-successional restoration as a strategy to facilitate Tropical Forest recovery. Restor. Ecol 17, 451–459 (2009).

Google Scholar 

Dainese, M. et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax0121 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Biggs, R. et al. Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37, 421–448 (2012).

Google Scholar 

Munang, R. T., Thiaw, I. & Rivington, M. Ecosystem management: tomorrow’s approach to enhancing food security under a changing climate. Sustainability 3, 937–954 (2011).

Google Scholar 

de Souza, S. E. X. F., Vidal, E., Chagas, Gd. F., Elgar, A. T. & Brancalion, P. H. S. Ecological outcomes and livelihood benefits of community-managed agroforests and second growth forests in Southeast Brazil. Biotropica 48, 868–881 (2016).

Google Scholar 

Cawthorn, D. M. & Hoffman, L. C. The bushmeat and food security nexus: a global account of the contributions, conundrums and ethical collisions. Food Res. Int. 76, 906–925 (2015).

Google Scholar 

Parry, L., Barlow, J. & Peres, C. A. Hunting for sustainability in tropical secondary forests. Conserv. Biol. 23, 1270–1280 (2009).

Google Scholar 

Mbiba, M., Muvengwi, J. & Ndaimani, H. Environmental correlates of livestock depredation by spotted hyaenas and livestock herding practices in a semi-arid communal landscape. Afr. J. Ecol. 56, 984–992 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Calle, A. Partnering with cattle ranchers for forest landscape restoration. Ambio 49, 593–604 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Woolf, D., Solomon, D. & Lehmann, J. Land restoration in food security programmes: synergies with climate change mitigation. Clim. Policy 18, 1260–1270 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Miccolis, A., Peneireiro, F. M., Vieira, D. L. M., Marques, H. R. & Hoffmann, M. R. M. Restoration through agroforestry: options for reconciling livelihoods with onservation in the Cerrado and Caatinga biomes in Brazil. Exp. Agric. 55, 208–225 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Araujo, M. et al. The socio-ecological Nexus+ approach used by the Brazilian Research Network on Global Climate Change. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 39, 62–70 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Bastin, J.-F. et al. The global tree restoration potential. Science 365, 76–79 (2019).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Latawiec, A. E., Strassburg, B. B., Brancalion, P. H., Rodrigues, R. R. & Gardner, T. Creating space for large-scale restoration in tropical agricultural landscapes. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13, 211–218 (2015).

Google Scholar 

Chazdon, R. L. et al. A policy-driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conserv. Lett. 10, 125–132 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Possingham, H. P., Bode, M. & Klein, C. J. Optimal conservation outcomes require both restoration and protection. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002052 (2015).

Google Scholar 

Suding, K. et al. Committing to ecological restoration. Science 348, 638–640 (2015).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Calmon, M. et al. Emerging threats and opportunities for large-scale ecological restoration in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Restor. Ecol. 19, 154–158 (2011).

Google Scholar 

Adams, C., Rodrigues, S. T., Calmon, M. & Kumar, C. Impacts of large-scale forest restoration on socioeconomic status and local livelihoods: what we know and do not know. Biotropica 48, 731–744 (2016).

Google Scholar 

Andersson, K. & Agrawal, A. Inequalities, institutions, and forest commons. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 866–875 (2011).

Google Scholar 

Galabuzi, C. et al. Strategies for empowering the local people to participate in forest restoration. Agrofor. Syst. 88, 719–734 (2014).

Google Scholar 

Terrapon-Pfaff, J., Ortiz, W., Dienst, C. & Groene, M.-C. Energising the WEF nexus to enhance sustainable development at local level It. J. Environ. Manag. 223, 409–416 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Van Laerhoven, F. Governing community forests and the challenge of solving two-level collective action dilemmas: a large-N perspective. Glob. Environ. Change 20, 539–546 (2010).

Google Scholar 

Rizvi, A. R. Nature Based Solutions for Human Resilience (IUCN, 2014).

Cohen-Shacham, E., Janzen, C., Maginnis, S. & Walters, G. Nature-Based Solutions to Address Global Societal Challenges (IUCN, 2016); https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.en

Keesstra, S. et al. The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services. Sci.Total Environ. 610–611, 997–1009 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Peluso, N. L. & Vandergeest, P. Writing political forests. Antipode 52, 1083–1103 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Chazdon, R. L., Gutierrez, V., Brancalion, P. H. S., Laestadius, L. & Guariguata, M. R. Co-creating conceptual and working frameworks for implementing forest and landscape restoration based on core principles. Forests 11, 706 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Barrow, E. 300,000 hectares restored in Shinyanga, Tanzania — but what did it really take to achieve this restoration? SAPIENS 7, 1–8 (2014).

Google Scholar 

Reij, C. & Garrity, D. Scaling up farmer-managed natural regeneration in Africa to restore degraded landscapes. Biotropica 48, 834–843 (2016).

Google Scholar 

Paudyal, K., Baral, H., Lowell, K. & Keenan, R. J. Ecosystem services from community-based forestry in Nepal: realising local and global benefits. Land Use Policy 63, 342–355 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Viani, R. A. G., Braga, D. P. P., Ribeiro, M. C., Pereira, P. H. & Brancalion, P. H. S. Synergism between payments for water-related ecosystem services, ecological restoration, and Landscape Connectivity Within the Atlantic Forest hotspot. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 11, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082918790222 (2018).