in

Ant social foraging strategies along a Neotropical gradient of urbanization

  • 1.

    Fischer, J. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: A synthesis. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16, 265–280 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    McKinney, M. L. Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst. 11, 161–176 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    McDonnell, M. J. & MacGregor-Fors, I. The ecological future of cities. Science 352, 936–938 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    McKinney, M. L. Urbanizartion, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52, 883–890 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Santos, M. N. Research on urban ants: Approaches and gaps. Insectes Soc. 63, 359–371 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. The Ants (Harvard University Press, Harvard, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Angilletta, M. J. et al. Urban physiology: City ants possess high heat yolerance. PLoS ONE 2, e258 (2007).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Holway, D. A., Lach, L., Suarez, A. V., Tsutsui, N. D. & Case, T. J. The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 181–233 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    McIntyre, N. E., Rango, J., Fagan, W. F. & Faeth, S. H. Ground arthropod community structure in a heterogeneous urban environment. Landsc. Urban Plan. 52, 257–274 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Lessard, J. P. & Buddle, C. M. The effects of urbanization on ant assemblages (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) associated with the Molson Nature Reserve Quebec. Can. Entomol. 137, 215–225 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Buczkowski, G. & Richmond, D. S. The effect of urbanization on ant abundance and diversity: A temporal examination of factors affecting biodiversity. PLoS ONE 7, e41729 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    McKinney, M. L. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol. Conserv. 127, 247–260 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Morini, M. S. C., Munhae, C. B., Leung, R., Candiani, D. F. & Voltolini, J. C. Comunidades de formigas (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) em fragmentos de Mata Atlântica situados em áreas urbanizadas. Iheringia 97, 246–252 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    MacGregor-Fors, I. & Schondube, J. E. Gray vs. green urbanization: Relative importance of urban features for urban bird communities. Basic Appl. Ecol. 12, 372–381 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Uno, S., Cotton, J. & Philpott, S. M. Diversity, abundance, and species composition of ants in urban green spaces. Urban Ecosyst. 13, 425–441 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Rocha-Ortega, M. & Castaño-Meneses, G. Effects of urbanization on the diversity of ant assemblages in tropical dry forests, Mexico. Urban Ecosyst. 18, 1373–1388 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Sol, D., Lapiedra, O. & González-Lagos, C. Behavioural adjustments for a life in the city. Anim. Behav. 85, 1101–1112 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Fellers, J. H. Interference and exploitation in a guild of woodland ants. Ecology 68, 1466–1478 (1987).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Parr, C. L. & Gibb, H. The discovery–dominance trade-off is the exception, rather than the rule. J. Anim. Ecol. 81, 233–241 (2012).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Davidson, D. W. Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants: A functional mechanism for breaking the trade-off. Ecol. Entomol. 23, 484–490 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Camarota, F., Vasconcelos, H. L., Koch, E. B. & Powell, S. Discovery and defense define the social foraging strategy of Neotropical arboreal ants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 72, id110 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Parr, C. L. & Gibb, H. Competition and the role of dominant ants. In Book: Ant Ecology (eds Lach, L. et al.) 77–96 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI). Compendio de Información Geográfica Municipal. http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/topografia/compendio.aspx. (2009).

  • 24.

    Falfán, I., Muñoz-Robles, C. A., Bonilla-Moheno, M. & MacGregor-Fors, I. Can you really see ‘green’? Assessing physical and self-reported measurements of urban greenery. Urban For. Urban Green. 36, 13–21 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Davidson, D. W. The role of resource imbalances in the evolutionary ecology of tropical arboreal ants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 61, 153–181 (1997).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Flores-Flores, R. V. et al. Food source quality and ant dominance hierarchy influence the outcomes of ant-plant interactions in an arid environment. Acta Oecol. 87, 13–19 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Wittman, S. E., O’Dowd, D. J. & Green, P. T. Carbohydrate supply drives colony size, aggression, and impacts of an invasive ant. Ecosphere 9, e02403 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    O’Dowd, D. J., Green, P. T. & Lake, P. S. Invasional ‘meltdown’ on an oceanic island. Ecol. Lett. 6, 812–817 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Abbott, K. L. & Green, P. T. Collapse of an ant–scale mutualism in a rainforest on Christmas Island. Oikos 116, 1238–1246 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Dáttilo, W. et al. Mexico ants: Incidence and abundance along the Nearctic-Neotropical interface. Ecology 101, e02944 (2020).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    MacGregor-Fors, I. Misconceptions or misunderstandings? On the standardization of basic terms and definitions in urban ecology. Landsc. Urban Plan. 100, 347–349 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Oksanen, J. et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. (2017).

  • 33.

    Dáttilo, W., Díaz-Castelazo, C. & Rico-Gray, V. Ant dominance hierarchy determines the nested pattern in ant–plant networks. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 113, 405–414 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018).

  • 35.

    Yamaguchi, T. Influence of urbanization on ant distribution in parks of Tokyo and Chiba City, Japan I. Analysis of ant species richness. Ecol. Res. 19, 209–216 (2004).

  • 36.

    Pacheco, R. & Vasconcelos, H. L. Invertebrate conservation in urban areas: Ants in the Brazilian Cerrado. Landsc. Urban Plan. 81, 193–199 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Dáttilo, W., Sibinel, N., Falcão, J. C. F. & Nunes, R. V. Mirmecofauna em um fragmento de Floresta Atlântica urbana no município de Marília, Brasil. Biosci. J. 27, 494–504 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Thompson, B. & McLachlan, S. The effects of urbanization on ant communities and myrmecochory in Manitoba, Canada. Urban Ecosyst. 10, 43–52 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Ribeiro, F. M., Sibinel, N., Ciocheti, G. & Campos, A. E. C. Analysis of ant communities comparing two methods for sampling ants in an urban park in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Sociobiology 59, 971–984 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Sanford, M. P., Manley, P. N. & Murphy, D. D. Effects of urban development on ant communities: Implications for ecosystem services and management. Conserv. Biol. 23, 131–141 (2009).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Holway, D. A. & Suarez, A. V. Homogenization of ant communities in mediterranean California: The effects of urbanization and invasion. Biol. Conserv. 127, 319–326 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Albrecht, M. & Gotelli, N. J. Spatial and temporal niche partitioning in grassland ants. Oecologia 126, 134–141 (2001).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Campos, R. B. & Schoereder, J. H. Dominance and resource temporal partitioning in pasture ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 38, 539–550 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Santini, G., Tucci, L., Ottonetti, L. & Frizzi, F. Competition trade-offs in the organisation of a Mediterranean ant assemblage. Ecol. Entomol. 32, 319–326 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    MacGregor-Fors, I. et al. Multi-taxonomic diversity patterns in a neotropical green city: A rapid biological assessment. Urban Ecosyst. 18, 633–647 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Wetterer, J. K. Worldwide spread of the longhorn crazy ant, Paratrechina longicornis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 11, 137–149 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Wetterer, J. K. Worldwide spread of the tropical fire ant, Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 14, 21–35 (2011).

    Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    How to prevent short-circuiting in next-gen lithium batteries

    How coal’s decline impacts county and school funding