in

Cities should respond to the biodiversity extinction crisis

  • 1.

    IPBES. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (eds. Brondizio, E.S., Settele, j., Díaz, s. & Ngo, H.T.) (IPBES Secretariat, Bonn, Germany, 2019).

  • 2.

    Champness, B. S., Palmer, G. C. & Fitzsimons, J. A. Bringing the city to the country: relationships between streetscape vegetation type and bird assemblages in a major regional centre. J. Urban Ecol. 5, juz018 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Frantzeskaki, N. et al. Nature-based solutions for urban climate change adaptation: linking the science, policy and practice communities for evidence based decision-making. BioScience 69, 455–566 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Willeme, A. Rotterdam drops €233 million on green spaces—and they look INCREDIBLE. DutchReview. https://dutchreview.com/cities/rotterdam-drops-233-million-on-green-spaces-and-they-look-incredible/ (18 June 2020).

  • 5.

    Díaz, S. et al. The IPBES Conceptual Framework – connecting nature and people. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14, 1–16 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Elmqvist, T. et al. (eds). Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities. A Global Assessment (Springer, Dordrecht, 2013).

  • 7.

    Ives, C. et al. Cities are hotspots for threatened species. Glob. Ecol. Biogeograph. 25, 117–126 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Parris, K. M. & Hazell, D. L. Biotic effects of climate change in urban environments: the case of the grey-headed flying-fox (Pteropus poliocephalus) in Melbourne, Australia. Biol. Conserv. 124, 267–276 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Prévot, A. C., Cheval, H., Raymond, R. & Cosquer, A. Routine experiences of nature in cities can increase personal commitment toward biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 226, 1–8 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    ICLEI CBC. Edinburgh Process for Subnational and Local Governments on the Development of the Post 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (ICLEI, 2020). https://cbc.iclei.org/edinburgh-process-for-subnational-and-local-governments-on-the-development-of-the-post-2020-global-biodiversity-framework/.

  • 11.

    Nilon, C. et al. Planning for the future of urban biodiversity: a global review of city-scale initiatives. BioScience 67, 332–342 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Garrard, G. E., Williams, N. S. G., Mata, L., Thomas, J. & Bekessy, S. A. Biodiversity sensitive urban design. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12411 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Bush, J. & Doyon, A. Building urban resilience with nature-based solutions: how can urban planning contribute? Cities 95, 102483 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Prober, S. M., Doerr, V. A. J., Broadhurst, L. M., Williams, K. J. & Dickson, F. Shifting the conservation paradigm: a synthesis of options for renovating nature under climate change. Ecol. Monog. 89, e01333 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Canaway, J. Unveiling the misunderstood magical mistletoes of Australia. ABC Life. https://www.abc.net.au/life/the-misunderstood-magical-mistletoes-of-australia/11505510 (20 December 2019).

  • 16.

    Burgin, S. What about biodiversity? Redefining urban sustainable management to incorporate endemic fauna with particular reference to Australia. Urban Ecosys. 19, 669–678 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Rigolon, A. A complex landscape of inequity in access to urban parks: a literature review. Landsc. Urban Plann. 153, 160–169 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Fuller, R. A. et al. Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol. Lett. 3, 390–394 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Sugiyama, T., Carver, A., Koohsari, M. J. & Veitch, J. Advantages of public green spaces in enhancing population health. Landsc. Urban Plann. 178, 12–17 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Hockings, M. et al. COVID-19 and protected and conserved areas. Parks 26.1, 7–24 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Frantzeskaki, N. Seven lessons for planning nature-based solutions in cities. Environ.Sci. Pol. 93, 101–111 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Ahern, J. From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landsc. Urban Plann. 100, 341–343 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Kabisch, N., van den Bosch, M. & Lafortezza, R. The health benefits of nature-based solutions to urbanization challenges for children and the elderly—a systematic review. Environ. Res. 159, 362–373 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Tengö, M. et al. Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 26–27, 17–25 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Davies, C. & Lafortezza, R. Transitional path to the adoption of nature-based solutions. Land Use Pol. 80, 406–409 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Mumaw, L. M. & Bekessy, S. A. Wildlife gardening for collaborative public–private biodiversity conservation. Austral. J. Environ. Manage. 24, 242–246 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Eilam, E. & Garrard, G. E. Perception of space among children studying their local grasslands: examining attitudes and behavioural intentions. Sustainability 9, 1660 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    ICLEI. 6th Global Biodiversity Summit of Local and Subnational Governments. Event Report (2018) https://cbc.iclei.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Egypt-Summit-EVENT-REPORT-FINAL-digital_compressed.pdf.


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Keeping an eye on the fusion future

    Improving sanitation for the world’s most vulnerable people