in

Cooperation-based concept formation in male bottlenose dolphins

  • 1.

    Gross, J. & De Dreu, C. K. W. The rise and fall of cooperation through reputation and group polarization. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–10 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 393, 573–577 (1998).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Melis, A. P. & Semmann, D. How is human cooperation different? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 365, 2663–2674 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Tibbetts, E. A. & Dale, J. Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 529–537 (2007).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Tebbich, S., Bshary, R. & Grutter, A. Cleaner fish Labroides dimidiatus recognise familiar clients. Anim. Cogn. 5, 139–145 (2002).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Seyfarth, R. M. & Cheney, D. L. in Conceptual Mind: New Directions in the Study of Concepts (eds Margolis, E. & Laurence, S.) 57–76 (MIT Press, 2015).

  • 7.

    Cheney, D. L. & Seyfarth, R. M. Recognition of other individuals’ social relationships by female baboons. Anim. Behav. 58, 67–75 (1999).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M. & Silk, J. B. The responses of female baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) to anomalous social interactions: evidence for causal reasoning? J. Comp. Psychol. 109, 134–141 (1995).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Borgeaud, C., van de Waal, E. & Bshary, R. Third-party ranks knowledge in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops pygerythrus). PLoS ONE 8, 8–11 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Paz-Y-Miño, C. G., Bond, A. B., Kamil, A. C. & Balda, R. P. Pinyon jays use transitive inference to predict social dominance. Nature 430, 778–781 (2004).

    ADS 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Massen, J. J. M., Pašukonis, A., Schmidt, J. & Bugnyar, T. Ravens notice dominance reversals among conspecifics within and outside their social group. Nat. Commun. 5, 1–7 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Engh, A. L., Siebert, E. R., Greenberg, D. A. & Holekamp, K. E. Patterns of alliance formation and postconflict aggression indicate spotted hyaenas recognize third-party relationships. Anim. Behav. 69, 209–217 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Bergman, T. J., Beehner, J. C., Cheney, D. L. & Seyfarth, R. M. Hierarchical classification by-rank and kinship in baboons. Science 302, 1234–1236 (2003).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Schino, G., Tiddi, B. & Di Sorrentino, E. P. Simultaneous classification by rank and kinship in Japanese macaques. Anim. Behav. 71, 1069–1074 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Connor, R. C. Dolphin social intelligence: complex alliance relationships in bottlenose dolphins and a consideration of selective environments for extreme brain size evolution in mammals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 362, 587–602 (2007).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Randić, S., Connor, R. C., Sherwin, W. B. & Krützen, M. A novel mammalian social structure in Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.): complex male alliances in an open social network. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279, 3083–3090 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Connor, R. C. & Krützen, M. Male dolphin alliances in Shark Bay: changing perspectives in a 30-year study. Anim. Behav. 103, 223–235 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Connor, R., Wells, R., Mann, J. & Read, A. in Cetacean Societies: Field Studies of Dolphins and Whales (eds Mann, J., Connor, R. C., Tyack, P. L. & Whitehead, H.) 91–126 (The University of Chicago Press, 2000).

  • 19.

    Frère, C. H. et al. Home range overlap, matrilineal and biparental kinship drive female associations in bottlenose dolphins. Anim. Behav. 80, 481–486 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Gerber, L. et al. Affiliation history and age similarity predict alliance formation in adult male bottlenose dolphins. Behav. Ecol. 31, 361–370 (2020).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Connor, R. C., Smolker, R. A. & Richards, A. F. Two levels of alliance formation among male bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 987–990 (1992).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Connor, R. C., Heithaus, M. R. & Barre, L. M. Superalliance of bottlenose dolphins. Nature 397, 571–572 (1999).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Connor, R. C., Heithaus, M. R. & Barre, L. M. Complex social structure, alliance stability and mating access in a bottlenose dolphin ‘super-alliance’. Proc. Biol. Sci. 268, 263–267 (2001).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Whitehead, H. SOCPROG programs: analysing animal social structures. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 765–778 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Connor, R. C., Watson-Capps, J. J., Sherwin, W. B. & Krützen, M. A new level of complexity in the male alliance networks of Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.). Biol. Lett. 7, 623–626 (2011).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    King, S. L. & Janik, V. M. Bottlenose dolphins use learned vocal labels to address each other. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13216–13221 (2013).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Bruck, J. N. Decades-long social memory in bottlenose dolphins. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280, 20131726 (2013).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Janik, V. M., Sayigh, L. S. & Wells, R. S. Signature whistle shape conveys identity information to bottlenose dolphins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8293–8297 (2006).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Janik, V. M. & Sayigh, L. S. Communication in bottlenose dolphins: 50 years of signature whistle research. J. Comp. Physiol. A 199, 479–489 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Sayigh, L. S. et al. Individual recognition in wild bottlenose dolphins: a field test using playback experiments. Anim. Behav. 57, 42–50 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    King, S. L. et al. Bottlenose dolphins retain individual vocal labels in multi-level alliances. Curr. Biol. 28, 1993–1999 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Cheney, D. L. & Seyfarth, R. M. Recognition of individuals within and between groups of free-ranging vervet monkeys. Am. Zool. 22, 519–529 (1982).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Boeckle, M. & Bugnyar, T. Long-term memory for affiliates in ravens. Curr. Biol. 22, 801–806 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Kern, J. M. & Radford, A. N. Social-bond strength influences vocally mediated recruitment to mobbing. Biol. Lett. 12, 20160648 (2016).

  • 35.

    Micheletta, J. et al. Social bonds affect anti-predator behaviour in a tolerant species of macaque, Macaca nigra. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279, 4042–4050 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Connor, R. C. Pseudo-reciprocity: investing in mutualism. Anim. Behav. 34, 1562–1566 (1986).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Connor, R. C. Cooperation beyond the dyad: on simple models and a complex society. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 365, 2687–2697 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Trivers, R. L. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q. Rev. Biol. 46, 35–57 (1971).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Taborsky, M., Frommen, J. G. & Riehl, C. Correlated pay-offs are key to cooperation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 371, 20150084 (2016).

  • 40.

    Dakin, R., Clunis, P. & Ryder, T. Reciprocal social ties drive stable cooperation within a social network. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.06.371567 (2020).

  • 41.

    Carter, G. G. et al. Development of new food-sharing relationships in vampire bats. Curr. Biol. 30, 1275.e3–1279.e3 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Kokko, H., Johnstone, R. A. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 268, 187–196 (2001).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Kern, J. M. & Radford, A. N. Experimental evidence for delayed contingent cooperation among wild dwarf mongooses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6255–6260 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Wittig, R. M., Crockford, C., Langergraber, K. E. & Zuberbühler, K. Triadic social interactions operate across time: a field experiment with wild chimpanzees. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 281, 20133155 (2014).

  • 45.

    Carter, G. G. & Wilkinson, G. S. Food sharing in vampire bats: reciprocal help predicts donations more than relatedness or harassment. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 280, 20122573 (2013).

  • 46.

    Choleris, D., Pfaff, W. & Kavaliers, M. Oxytocin, Vasopressin and Related Peptides in the Regulation of Behavior (Cambridge University Press, 2013).

  • 47.

    Brunnlieb, C. et al. Vasopressin increases human risky cooperative behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2051–2056 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Spengler, F. B. et al. Oxytocin facilitates reciprocity in social communication. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12, 1325–1333 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    De Dreu, C. K. W., Greer, L. L., Van Kleef, G. A., Shalvi, S. & Handgraaf, M. J. J. Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1262–1266 (2011).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    De Dreu, C. K. W. et al. The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science 328, 1408–1411 (2010).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Connor, R. C., Smolker, R. & Bejder, L. Synchrony, social behaviour and alliance affiliation in Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus. Anim. Behav. 72, 1371–1378 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Moore, B. M., Connor, R. C., Allen, S. J., Krützen, M. & King, S. L. Acoustic coordination by allied male dolphins in a cooperative context. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.287, 20192944 (2020).

  • 53.

    Madden, J. R. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. Experimental peripheral administration of oxytocin elevates a suite of cooperative behaviours in a wild social mammal. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 278, 1189–1194 (2011).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Crockford, C. et al. Urinary oxytocin and social bonding in related and unrelated wild chimpanzees. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 280, 20122765 (2013).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    Robinson, K. J. et al. Positive social behaviours are induced and retained after oxytocin manipulations mimicking endogenous concentrations in a wild mammal. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 284, 20170554 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Zentall, T. R., Wasserman, E. A. & Urcuioli, P. J. Associative concept learning in animals. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 101, 130–151 (2014).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    Bhatt, R. S., Wasserman, E. A., Reynolds, W. F. & Knauss, K. S. Conceptual behavior in pigeons: categorization of both familiar and novel examples from four classes of natural and artificial stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 14, 219–234 (1988).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    Magnotti, J. F., Katz, J. S., Wright, A. A. & Kelly, D. M. Superior abstract-concept learning by Clark’s nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). Biol. Lett. 11, 1–4 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    Byosiere, S. E., Feng, L. C., Chouinard, P. A., Howell, T. J. & Bennett, P. C. Relational concept learning in domestic dogs: performance on a two-choice size discrimination task generalises to novel stimuli. Behav. Process. 145, 93–101 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 60.

    Miller, N. & Dollard, J. Social Learning and Imitation (Yale University Press, 1941).

  • 61.

    Wild, S., Hoppitt, W. J. E., Allen, S. J. & Krützen, M. Integrating genetic, environmental, and social networks to reveal transmission pathways of a dolphin foraging innovation. Curr. Biol. 30, 3024–3030.e4 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 62.

    Krützen, M. et al. Cultural transmission of tool use by Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) provides access to a novel foraging niche. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 281, 20140374 (2014).

  • 63.

    Carter, G. G. & Wilkinson, G. S. Common vampire bat contact calls attract past food-sharing partners. Anim. Behav. 116, 45–51 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 64.

    King, S., Allen, S., Krützen, M. & Connor, R. Vocal behaviour of allied male dolphins during cooperative mate guarding. Anim. Cogn. 22, 991–1000 (2019).

  • 65.

    Quick, N. J. & Janik, V. M. Bottlenose dolphins exchange signature whistles when meeting at sea. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279, 2539–2545 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 66.

    Richards, D. G., Wolz, J. P. & Herman, L. M. Vocal mimicry of computer-generated sounds and vocal labeling of objects by a bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus. J. Comp. Psychol. 98, 10–28 (1984).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 67.

    Herman, L. M. in Rational Animals? (eds Hurley, S. & Nudds, M.) 439–467 (Oxford University Press, 2006).

  • 68.

    Herman, L. M., Pack, A. A. & Wood, A. M. Bottlenose dolphins can generalize rules and develop abstract concepts. Mar. Mammal. Sci. 10, 70–80 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 69.

    Galizio, M. & Bruce, K. E. Abstraction, multiple exemplar training and the search for derived stimulus relations in animals. Perspect. Behav. Sci. 41, 45–67 (2018).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 70.

    Hayes, S. C. & Sanford, B. T. Cooperation came first: evolution and human cognition. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 101, 112–129 (2014).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 71.

    Allen, S. J. et al. Genetic isolation between coastal and fishery-impacted, offshore bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops spp.) populations. Mol. Ecol. 25, 2735–2753 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 72.

    Smolker, R. A., Richards, A. F., Connor, R. C. & Pepper, J. W. Sex differences in patterns of association among Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins. Behaviour 123, 38–69 (1992).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 73.

    Hoppitt, W. J. E. & Farine, D. R. Association indices for quantifying social relationships: How to deal with missing observations of individuals or groups. Anim. Behav. 136, 227–238 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 74.

    Cairns, S. & Schwager, S. A comparison of association indices. Anim. Behav. 35, 1454–1469 (1987).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 75.

    Farine, D. R. Animal social network inference and permutations for ecologists in R using asnipe. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 1187–1194 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 76.

    Galezo, A. A., Foroughirad, V., Krzyszczyk, E., Frère, C. H. & Mann, J. Juvenile social dynamics reflect adult reproductive strategies in bottlenose dolphins. Behav. Ecol. 31, 1159–1171 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 77.

    Whitehead, H. Analysing Animal Societies: Quantitative Methods for Vertebrate Social Analysis (Chicago University Press, 2008).

  • 78.

    Connor, R. C. et al. Male alliance behaviour and mating access varies with habitat in a dolphin social network. Sci. Rep. 7, 46354 (2017).

  • 79.

    Deecke, V. B. & Janik, V. M. Automated categorization of bioacoustic signals: avoiding perceptual pitfalls. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 645–653 (2006).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 80.

    Janik, V. M., King, S. L., Sayigh, L. S. & Wells, R. S. Identifying signature whistles from recordings of groups of unrestrained bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Mar. Mammal. Sci. 29, 109–122 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 81.

    Quick, N. J., Rendell, L. E. & Janik, V. M. A mobile acoustic localisation system for the study of free-ranging dolphins during focal follows. Mar. Mammal. Sci. 24, 979–989 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • 82.

    Wahlberg, M., Møhl, B. & Madsen, P. T. Estimating source position accuracy of a large-aperture hydrophone array for bioacoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 397–406 (2001).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 83.

    Schulz, T. M., Whitehead, H. & Rendell, L. E. A remotely-piloted acoustic array for studying sperm whale vocal behaviour. Can. Acoust. 34, 54–55 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • 84.

    Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N. & Elphick, C. S. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 3–14 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 85.

    Nieuwenhuis, R., te Grotenhuis, M. & Pelzer, B. Influence.ME: tools for detecting influential data in mixed effects models. R J. 4, 38–47 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    The serotonin transporter gene and female personality variation in a free-living passerine

    Keeping humanity central to solving climate change