Weiner, J. Plant Reproductive Ecology: Patterns and Strategies (Oxford Univ. Press, 1988).
Ashman, T. L. & Schoen, D. J. How long should flowers live? Nature 371, 788–791 (1994).
Google Scholar
Donald, C. M. The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica 17, 385–403 (1968).
Google Scholar
Unkovich, M., Baldock, J. & Forbes, M. Variability in harvest index of grain crops and potential significance for carbon accounting: examples from Australian agriculture. Adv. Agron. 105, 173–219 (2010).
Google Scholar
Tamagno, S., Sadras, V. O., Ortez, O. A. & Ciampitti, I. A. Allometric analysis reveals enhanced reproductive allocation in historical set of soybean varieties. Field Crop Res. 248, 107717 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hector, A. et al. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286, 1123–1127 (1999).
Google Scholar
Grace, J. B. et al. Integrative modelling reveals mechanisms linking productivity and plant species richness. Nature 529, 390–393 (2016).
Google Scholar
Huang, Y. et al. Impacts of species richness on productivity in a large-scale subtropical forest experiment. Science 362, 80–83 (2018).
Google Scholar
Letourneau, D. K. et al. Does plant diversity benefit agroecosystems? A synthetic review. Ecol. Appl. 21, 9–21 (2011).
Google Scholar
Li, C. et al. Syndromes of production in intercropping impact yield gains. Nat. Plants 6, 653–660 (2020).
Google Scholar
McConnaughay, K. D. M. & Coleman, J. S. Biomass allocation in plants: ontogeny or optimality? A test along three resource gradients. Ecology 80, 2581–2593 (1999).
Google Scholar
Bonser, S. P. & Aarssen, L. W. Allometry and plasticity of meristem allocation throughout development in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Ecol. 89, 72–79 (2001).
Google Scholar
Reekie, E. G. & Bazzaz, F. A. Reproductive Allocation in Plants (Elsevier Academic Press, 2005).
Wang, T. H., Zhou, D. W., Wang, P. & Zhang, H. X. Size-dependent reproductive effort in Amaranthus retroflexus: the influence of planting density and sowing date. Can. J. Bot. 84, 485–492 (2006).
Google Scholar
Gurr, G. M. et al. Multi-country evidence that crop diversification promotes ecological intensification of agriculture. Nat. Plants 2, 16014 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, C. et al. Yield gain, complementarity and competitive dominance in intercropping in China: a meta-analysis of drivers of yield gain using additive partitioning. Eur. J. Agron. 113, 125987 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tilman, D. et al. Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 294, 843–845 (2001).
Google Scholar
Loreau, M. & Hector, A. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412, 72–76 (2001).
Google Scholar
Li, L., Tilman, D., Lambers, H. & Zhang, F. S. Plant diversity and overyielding: insights from belowground facilitation of intercropping in agriculture. New Phytol. 203, 63–69 (2014).
Google Scholar
Brooker, R. W. et al. Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. New Phytol. 206, 107–117 (2015).
Google Scholar
Martin-Guay, M. O., Paquette, A., Dupras, J. & Rivest, D. The new green revolution: sustainable intensification of agriculture by intercropping. Sci. Total Environ. 615, 767–772 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bazzaz, F. A., Chiariello, N. R., Coley, P. D. & Pitelka, L. F. Allocating resources to reproduction and defense. Bioscience 37, 58–67 (1987).
Google Scholar
Hartnett, D. C. Size-dependent allocation to sexual and vegetative reproduction in 4 clonal composites. Oecologia 84, 254–259 (1990).
Google Scholar
Vega, C. R. C., Sadras, V. O., Andrade, F. H. & Uhart, S. A. Reproductive allometry in soybean, maize and sunflower. Ann. Bot. 85, 461–468 (2000).
Google Scholar
Gifford, R. M., Thorne, J. H., Hitz, W. D. & Giaquinta, R. T. Crop productivity and photoassimilate partitioning. Science 225, 801–808 (1984).
Google Scholar
Andrade, F. H. et al. Kernel number determination in maize. Crop Sci. 39, 453–459 (1999).
Google Scholar
Milla, R., Osborne, C. P., Turcotte, M. M. & Violle, C. Plant domestication through an ecological lens. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 463–469 (2015).
Google Scholar
Niklas, K. J. Plant Allometry: The Scaling of Form and Process (Univ. of Chicago Press, 1994).
Echarte, L. & Andrade, F. H. Harvest index stability of Argentinean maize hybrids released between 1965 and 1993. Field Crop Res. 82, 1–12 (2003).
Google Scholar
Weiner, J., Campbell, L. G., Pino, J. & Echarte, L. The allometry of reproduction within plant populations. J. Ecol. 97, 1220–1233 (2009).
Google Scholar
Sugiyama, S. & Bazzaz, F. A. Size dependence of reproductive allocation: the influence of resource availability, competition and genetic identity. Funct. Ecol. 12, 280–288 (1998).
Google Scholar
Weiner, J. Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants. Perspect. Plant Ecol. 6, 207–215 (2004).
Google Scholar
Weiner, J. et al. Is reproductive allocation in Senecio vulgaris plastic? Botany 87, 475–481 (2009).
Google Scholar
Schmid, B. & Weiner, J. Plastic relationships between reproductive and vegetative mass in Solidago altissima. Evolution 47, 61–74 (1993).
Google Scholar
Schmid, B. & Pfisterer, A. B. Species vs community perspectives in biodiversity experiments. Oikos 100, 620–621 (2003).
Google Scholar
Lipowsky, A. et al. Plasticity of functional traits of forb species in response to biodiversity. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 17, 66–77 (2015).
Google Scholar
Abakumova, M., Zobel, K., Lepik, A. & Semchenko, M. Plasticity in plant functional traits is shaped by variability in neighbourhood species composition. New Phytol. 211, 455–463 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhu, J. Q., van der Werf, W., Anten, N. P. R., Vos, J. & Evers, J. B. The contribution of phenotypic plasticity to complementary light capture in plant mixtures. New Phytol. 207, 1213–1222 (2015).
Google Scholar
Niklaus, P. A., Baruffol, M., He, J. S., Ma, K. P. & Schmid, B. Can niche plasticity promote biodiversity-productivity relationships through increased complementarity? Ecology 98, 1104–1116 (2017).
Google Scholar
Eziz, A. et al. Drought effect on plant biomass allocation: a meta-analysis. Ecol. Evol. 7, 11002–11010.
Joshi, J. et al. Local adaptation enhances performance of common plant species. Ecol. Lett. 4, 536–544 (2001).
Google Scholar
Li, J. et al. Variations in maize dry matter, harvest index, and grain yield with plant density. Agron. J. 107, 829–834 (2015).
Google Scholar
Gou, F., van Ittersum, M. K., Wang, G. Y., van der Putten, P. E. L. & van der Werf, W. Yield and yield components of wheat and maize in wheat-maize intercropping in the Netherlands. Eur. J. Agron. 76, 17–27.
Isbell, F. et al. Quantifying effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning across times and places. Ecol. Lett. 21, 763–778.
Roscher, C. & Schumacher, J. Positive diversity effects on productivity in mixtures of arable weed species as related to density–size relationships. J. Plant Ecol. 9, 792–804 (2016).
Google Scholar
Roscher, C. et al. Overyielding in experimental grassland communities – irrespective of species pool or spatial scale. Ecol. Lett. 8, 419–429.
Isbell, F. et al. High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 477, 199–202 (2011).
Google Scholar
Schmid, B., Baruffol, M., Wang, Z. & Niklaus, P. A. A guide to analyzing biodiversity experiments. J. Plant Ecol. 10, 91–110.
Rosenthal, R. & Rosnow, R. L. Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).
Díaz-Sierra, R., Verwijmeren, M., Rietkerk, M., de Dios, V. R. & Baudena, M. A new family of standardized and symmetric indices for measuring the intensity and importance of plant neighbour effects. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 580–591 (2017).
Google Scholar
Poorter, H. & Garnier, E. in Handbook of Functional Plant Ecology (eds Pugnaire, F. I. & Valladares, F.) 81–120 (Marcel Dekker, 1999).
Grime, J. P. Evidence for existence of 3 primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am. Nat. 111, 1169–1194 (1977).
Google Scholar
Wilson, P. J., Thompson, K. & Hodgson, J. G. Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies. New Phytol. 143, 155–162 (1999).
Google Scholar
Poorter, H., Niinemets, U., Poorter, L., Wright, I. J. & Villar, R. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. New Phytol. 182, 565–588 (2009).
Google Scholar
Lavorel, S. & Grigulis, K. How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale-up to trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services. J. Ecol. 100, 128–140 (2012).
Google Scholar
Conti, G. & Díaz, S. Plant functional diversity and carbon storage – an empirical test in semi‐arid forest ecosystems. J. Ecol. 101, 18–28 (2013).
Google Scholar
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019); https://www.r-project.org/
Lüdecke, D. ggeffects: Tidy data frames of marginal effects from regression models. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 772 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lüdecke, D. sjPlot: data visualization for statistics in social science. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1308157 (2018).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
