in

Effects of family planning on fertility behaviour across the demographic transition

  • 1.

    Becker, G. S. & Lewis, H. G. On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy 81(2, pt2), s279–s288 (1973).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Bulatao, R. A. & Lee, R. D. Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries (Academic Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Caldwell, J. C. The mechanisms of demographic change in historical perspective. Popul. Stud. 35(1), 1–27 (1981).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Carlsson, G. The decline of fertility: innovation or adjustment process. Popul. Stud. 20(2), 149–174 (1966).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Easterlin, R. A. & Crimmins, E. M. The Fertility Revolution (University of Chicago Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Winterhalder, B. & Leslie, P. Risk-sensitive fertility: The variance compensation hypothesis. Evol. Hum. Behav. 23(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00089-7 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Sear, R., Lawson, D. W., Kaplan, H. & Shenk, M. K. Understanding Variation in Human Fertility: What Can We Learn from Evolutionary Demography? (The Royal Society, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Wood, J. W. Dynamics of Human Reproduction (Aldine de Gruyter, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Hruschka, D. J. & Burger, O. How does variance in fertility change over the demographic transition?. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150155. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0155 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Henry, L. Some data on natural fertility. Eugen. Q. 8(2), 81–91 (1961).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Campbell, K. L. & Wood, J. W. Fertility in traditional societies. In Natural Human Fertility Social and Biological Determinants (eds Diggory, P. et al.) 39–61 (MacMillan Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Ellison, P. T. On Fertile Ground (Harvard University Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Colleran, H., Jasienska, G., Nenko, I., Galbarczyk, A. & Mace, R. 2015 Fertility decline and the changing dynamics of wealth, status and inequality. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 282, 20150287 (1806).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Colleran, H. The cultural evolution of fertility decline. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 371(1692), 20150152 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Knight, F. H. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit (Houghton Mifflin, 1921).

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Ellison, P. T. Energetics and reproductive effort. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 15, 342–351 (2003).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Jasienska, G. & Ellison, P. Energetic factors and seasonal changes in ovarian function in women from rural Poland. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 16, 563–580 (2004).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Jasienska, G. & Ellison, P. T. Physical work causes suppression of ovarian function in women. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 1847–1851 (1998).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Kramer, K. L. & McMillan, G. P. The effect of labor saving technology on longitudinal fertility changes. Curr. Anthropol. 47(1), 165–172 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Panter-Brick, C. Lactation, birth spacing and maternal workloads among two cases in rural Nepal. J. Biosoc. Sci. 23, 137–154 (1991).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Sear, R., Steele, F., McGregor, I. A. & Mace, R. The effects of kin on child mortality in Gambia. Demography 39(1), 43–63 (2002).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Valeggia, C. R. & Ellison, P. T. Lactation, energetics, and postpartum fecundity. In Reproductive Ecology and Human Evolution (ed. Ellison, P. T.) 85–105 (Aldine de Gruyter, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Gibson, M. & Mace, R. An energy-saving development initiative increases birth rate and childhood malnutrition in rural Ethiopia. PloS Med. 3, 476–484 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Kramer, K. L. & McMillan, G. P. Women’s labor, fertility, and the introduction of modern technology in a rural Maya village. J. Anthropol. Res. 55(4), 499–520 (1999).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Low, B., Simon, C. & Anderson, K. An evolutionary ecological perspective on demographic transitions: modeling multiple currencies. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 14(2), 149–167 (2002).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Low, B. S., Simon, C. S. & Anderson, K. G. The biodemography of modern women: tradeoffs when resources become limiting. In The Biodemography of Human Reproduction and Fertility (ed. Rodgers, J. L.) 105–134 (Kuwer Academic Publishers, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Dyson, T. & Murphy, M. The onset of fertility transition. Popul. Dev. Rev. 11(3), 399–440 (1985).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Early, J. & Headland, T. N. Population Dynamics of a Philippine Rain Forest People (University of Florida Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Hill, K. & Hurtado, A. M. Ache Life History (Aldine de Gruyter, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Kramer, K. L. & Greaves, R. D. Changing patterns of infant mortality and fertility among Pumé foragers and horticulturalists. Am. Anthropol. 109(4), 713–726 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Goldstein, J. R. & Klüsener, S. Spatial analysis of the causes of fertility decline in Prussia. Popul. Dev. Rev. 40(3), 497–525 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Montgomery, M. R. & Casterline, J. B. The diffusion of fertility control in Taiwan: Evidence from pooled cross-section time-series models. Popul. Stud. 47(3), 457–479 (1993).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Schmertmann, C. P., Assunção, R. M. & Potter, J. E. Knox meets Cox: Adapting epidemiological space-time statistics to demographic studies. Demography 47(3), 629–650 (2010).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Galloway, P. R., Hammel, E. A. & Lee, R. D. Fertility decline in Prussia, 1875–1910: A pooled cross-section time series analysis. Popul. Stud. 48(1), 135–158 (1994).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Schmertmann C. P., Potter J. E. & Assunção R. M. 2011 An innovative methodology for space-time analysis with an application to the 1960–2000 Brazilian mortality transition. In Navigating Time and Space in Population Studies 19–36 (Dordrecht, 2011).

  • 36.

    Bongaarts, J., Cleland, J., Townsend, J. W., Bertrand, J. T. & Gupta, M. D. Family Planning Programs for the 21st Century (Population Council, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Casterline J. B. Diffusion processes and fertility transition: Introduction. In Diffusion processes and fertility transition: Selected perspectives (ed. Population N.R.C.C.o.) (National Academies Press, US, 2011).

  • 38.

    Cleland, J. The effects of improved survival on fertility: A reassessment. In Global Fertility Transitions Population and Development Review Supplement to Vol 27 (eds. Bulatao R.A., Casterline J.B.) (Population Council, 2001).

  • 39.

    Cleland, J. & Wilson, C. Demand theories of the fertility transition: an iconoclastic view. Popul. Stud. 41(1), 5–30 (1987).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Montgomery, M. R. & Casterline, J. B. Social learning, social influence, and new models of fertility. Popul. Dev. Rev. 22, 151–175 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Sear, R. Evolutionary contributions to the study of human fertility. Popul. Stud. 69(sup1), S39–S55 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Knodel, J. & Van de Walle, E. Lessons from the past: Policy implications of historical fertility studies. Popul. Dev. Rev. 5(2), 217–245 (1979).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Watkins, S. C. From local to national communities: The transformation of demographic regimes in Western Europe, 1870–1960. Popul. Dev. Rev. 16(2), 241–272 (1990).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Bongaarts, J. & Watkins, S. C. Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Popul. Dev. Rev. 22(4), 639–682 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. Culture and the Evolutionary Process (Univ. Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. & Feldman, M. W. Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach (Princeton University Press, 1981).

    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Colleran, H., Jasienska, G., Nenko, I., Galbarczyk, A. & Mace, R. Community-level education accelerates the cultural evolution of fertility decline. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2732 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Conrad, C., Lechner, M. & Werner, W. East German fertility after unification: crisis or adaptation?. Popul. Dev. Rev. 22(2), 331–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137438 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Easterlin, R. A. Towards a socio-economic theory of fertility: a survey of recent research on economic factors in American fertility. In Fertility and Family Planning: A World View (ed. Behrman, S. J.) 127–156 (University of Michigan Press, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Easterlin, R. A. An economic framework for fertility analysis. Stud. Fam. Plann. 6, 54–63 (1975).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Galloway, P. R., Lee, R. D. & Hammel, E. A. Infant mortality and the fertility transition: Macro evidence from Europe and new findings from Prussia. In From Death to Birth Mortality Decline and Reproductive Change (eds Montgomery, M. R. & Cohen, B.) 182–226 (National Academy Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Kaplan, H. A theory of fertility and parental investment in traditional and modern human societies. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 39, 91–135 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Lee, R. D. & Bulatao, R. A. The demand for children: a critical essay. In Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries (eds Bulatao, R. A. & Lee, R. D.) 233–287 (Academic Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Lesthaeghe R. & Wilson C. Modes of production secularization and the pace of the fertility decline in Western Europe 1870–1930 (1986).

  • 55.

    Turke, P. Evolution and demand for children. Popul. Dev. Rev. 15(1), 61–90 (1989).

    MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Colleran, H. Farming in transition: land and property inheritance in a rural Polish population. Soc. Biol. Hum. Aff. 78, 7–19 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    González-Bailón, S. & Murphy, T. E. The effects of social interactions on fertility decline in nineteenth-century France: an agent-based simulation experiment. Popul. Stud. 67(2), 135–155 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    Shenk, M. K., Towner, M. C., Kress, H. C. & Alam, N. A model comparison approach shows stronger support for economic models of fertility decline. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110(20), 8045–8050. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217029110 (2013).

    ADS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    Alvergne, A., Gurmu, E., Gibson, M. A. & Mace, R. Social transmission and the spread of modern contraception in rural Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 6, e22515. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022515 (2011).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 60.

    Mace, R. & Colleran, H. Kin influence on the decision to start using modern contraception: a longitudinal study from rural Gambia. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 21, 472–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.20940 (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 61.

    Montgomery, M., Casterline, J. B. & Heiland, F. Social Networks and the Diffusion of Fertility Control (Population Council, 1998).

    Book 

    Google Scholar 

  • 62.

    Veile, A. & Kramer, K. L. Pregnancy, birth and babies: motherhood and modernization in a Yucatec village. In Maternal Health, Pregnancy-Related Morbidity and Death among Indigenous Women of Mexico & Central America (ed. Schwartz, D.) 205–224 (Springer, Berlin, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 63.

    Snopkowski, K., Towner, M. C., Shenk, M. K. & Colleran, H. Pathways from education to fertility decline: a multi-site comparative study. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 371(1692), 20150156 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 64.

    Schultz T. P. The Fertility Transition: Economic Explanations. Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper No. 833. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=286291 (2001).

  • 65.

    Becker, S. O., Cinnirella, F. & Woessmann, L. Does women’s education affect fertility? Evidence from pre-demographic transition Prussia. Eur. Rev. Econ. Hist. 17(1), 24–44 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 66.

    Gandrud, C. simPH: an R package for illustrating estimates from cox proportional hazard models including for interactive and nonlinear effects. J. Stat. Softw. 65(3), 1–20 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 67.

    Seiber, E. E., Bertrand, J. T. & Sullivan, T. M. Changes in contraceptive method mix in developing countries. Int. Fam. Plan. Perspect. 33(3), 117–123 (2007).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 68.

    Leite, I. D. C., Gupta, N. & Rodrigues, R. D. Female sterilization in Latin America: cross-national perspectives. J. Biosoc. Sci. 36(6), 683 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 69.

    Bertrand, J. T., Sullivan, T. M., Knowles, E. A., Zeeshan, M. F. & Shelton, J. D. Contraceptive method skew and shifts in method mix in low-and middle-income countries. Int. Perspect. Sexual Reprod. Health 40(3), 144–153 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 70.

    Leslie, P. & Winterhalder, B. Demographic consequences of unpredictability in fertility outcomes. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 14(2), 168–183 (2002).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 71.

    Gibson, M. & Mace, R. Labor-saving technology and fertility increase in rural Africa. Curr. Anthropol. 43(4), 631–637 (2002).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 72.

    Alvergne, A., Lawson, D. W., Clarke, P. M. R., Gurmu, E. & Mace, R. Fertility, parental investment, and the early adoption of modern contraception in rural Ethiopia. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 25(1), 107–115 (2013).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 73.

    Mace, R., Allal, N., Sear, R. & Prentice, A. M. The uptake of modern contraception in a Gambian community: the diffusion of an innovation over 25 years. In Social Information Transmission and Human Biology (eds Wells, J. C. K. et al.) 191–206 (Taylor & Francis Group, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • 74.

    Lerner, I.M. Heredity, evolution and society. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman (1968)

  • 75.

    Lewontin, R. C. & Levins, R. Biology Under the Influence (Monthly Review Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • 76.

    Donaldson-Matasci, M. C., Lachmann, M. & Bergstrom, C. T. Phenotypic diversity as an adaptation to environmental uncertainty. Evol. Ecol. Res. 10(4), 493–515 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • 77.

    Meyers, L. A. & Bull, J. J. Fighting change with change: adaptive variation in an uncertain world. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17(12), 551–557 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 78.

    Sermonti, G. The butterfly and the lion. In Organisms, Genes and Evolution: Evolutionary Theory at the Crossroads; Proceedings of the 7th International Senckenberg Conference (eds Peters, S. T. & Weingarten, M.) 103 (Franz Steiner Verlag, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • 79.

    Boone, J. L. & Kessler, K. L. More status or more children? Social status, fertility reduction and long-term fitness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 20, 257–277 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 80.

    Nolin, D. A. & Ziker, J. P. Reproductive responses to economic uncertainty. Hum. Nat. 27(4), 351–371 (2016).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 81.

    Jensen, R. The (perceived) returns to education and the demand for schooling. Q. J. Econ. 125(2), 515–548 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 82.

    Borgerhoff, M. M. The demographic transition: are we any closer to an evolutionary explanation?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 266–270 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 83.

    Skirbekk, V. Fertility trends by social status. Demogr. Res. 18, 145–180 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 84.

    Vining, D. R. J. Social verses reproductive success: the central theoretical problem of human sociobiology. Behav. Brain Sci. 9(167), 216 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • 85.

    Kramer, K. L. Maya Children: Helpers at the Farm (Harvard University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • 86.

    Kramer, K. L. & Boone, J. L. Why intensive agriculturalists have higher fertility: a household labor budget approach to subsistence intensification and fertility rates. Curr. Anthropol. 43(3), 511–517 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 87.

    Lee, R. D. & Kramer, K. L. Children’s economic roles in the Maya family life cycle: Cain, Caldwell and Chayanov revisited. Popul. Dev. Rev. 28(3), 475–499 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 88.

    Kramer, K. L. Reconsidering the cost of childbearing: the timing of children’s helping behavior across the life cycle of Maya families. In SocioEconomic Aspects of Human Behavioral Ecology (ed. Alvard, M.) 335–353 (Elsevier, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • 89.

    Kramer, K. L., Veile, A. & Otárola-Castillo, E. Sibling competition, growth tradeoffs. Biological vs. statistical significance. PLoS ONE 11(3), e0150126. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150126 (2016).

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 90.

    Veile, A. & Kramer, K. L. Shifting weanling’s optimum: breastfeeding ecology and infant health in Yucatan. In Anthropology and Breastfeeding (eds Tomori, C. et al.) Chapter 12 (Routledge Press, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 91.

    Feltz, C. J. & Miller, G. E. An asymptotic test for the equality of coefficients of variation from k populations. Stat. Med. 15(6), 647–658 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 92.

    Marwick, B. & Krishnamoorthy. K. Cvequality: Tests for the Equality of Coefficients of Variation from Multiple Groups. R software package version 0.1.3 (2019). Retrieved from https://github.com/benmarwick/cvequality, on 05/01/2019.

  • 93.

    Cahoy, D. O. A bootstrap test for equality of variances. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 54(10), 2306–2316 (2010).

    MathSciNet 
    MATH 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 94.

    Therneau, T. A Package for Survival Analysis in S. version 2.38 (2015), https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival.


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Spencer Compton, Karna Morey, Tara Venkatadri, and Lily Zhang named 2021-22 Goldwater Scholars

    Navigating beneath the Arctic ice