in

Great tit response to climate change

[adace-ad id="91168"]
  • 1.

    Parmesan, C. & Yohe, G. Nature 421, 37–42 (2003).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Charmantier, A. & Gienapp, P. Evol. Appl. 7, 15–28 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Merilä, J. & Hendry, A. P. Evol. Appl. 7, 1–14 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Gienapp, P., Teplitsky, C., Alho, J. S., Mills, J. A. & Merilä, J. Mol. Ecol. 17, 167–178 (2008).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Bonamour, S., Chevin, L.-M., Charmantier, A. & Teplitsky, C. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 374, 20180178 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Visser, M. E., Caro, S. P., van Oers, K., Schaper, S. V. & Helm, B. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 365, 3113–3127 (2010).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Caro, S. P., Schaper, S. V., Hut, R. A., Ball, G. F. & Visser, M. E. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001517 (2013).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Visser, M. E. & Gienapp, P. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 879–885 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Cole, E. F., Regan, C. E. & Sheldon, B. C. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01140-4 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Radchuk, V. et al. Nat. Commun. 10, 3109 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Charmantier, A. et al. Science 320, 800–803 (2008).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Dewitt, T. J., Sih, A. & Wilson, D. S. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 77–81 (1998).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Díaz, S. et al. (eds) Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES Secretariat, 2019).


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Dynamic carbon flux network of a diverse marine microbial community

    Genetic purging in captive endangered ungulates with extremely low effective population sizes