Winemiller, K. O. et al. Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong. Science 351, 128–129 (2016).
Google Scholar
Latrubesse, E. M. et al. Damming the rivers of the Amazon basin. Nature 546, 363–369 (2017).
Google Scholar
ICOLD. International Commission on Large Dams. http://www.icold-cigb.org/ (2016).
Zarfl, C., Lumsdon, A. E., Berlekamp, J., Tydecks, L. & Tockner, K. A global boom in hydropower dam construction. Aquat. Sci. 77, 161–170 (2015).
Gibson, L., Wilman, E. N. & Laurance, W. F. How green is ‘green’energy? Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 922–935 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wu, H. et al. Effects of dam construction on biodiversity: a review. J. Clean. Prod. 221, 480–489 (2019).
Palmeirim, A. F., Peres, C. A. & Rosas, F. C. Giant otter population responses to habitat expansion and degradation induced by a mega hydroelectric dam. Biol. Conserv. 174, 30–38 (2014).
Fearnside, P. M. Decision making on amazon dams: politics trumps uncertainty in the Madeira River sediments controversy. Water Altern. 6, 313–325 (2013).
Fearnside, P. M. Greenhouse gas emissions from Brazil’s Amazonian hydroelectric dams. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 011002 (2016).
Finer, M. & Jenkins, C. N. Proliferation of hydroelectric dams in the Andean Amazon and implications for Andes-Amazon connectivity. PLoS ONE 7, e35126 (2012).
Google Scholar
Chen, G., Powers, R. P., de Carvalho, L. M. & Mora, B. Spatiotemporal patterns of tropical deforestation and forest degradation in response to the operation of the Tucuruí hydroelectric dam in the Amazon basin. Appl. Geogr. 63, 1–8 (2015).
Hunter, W. C., Anderson, B. W. & Ohmart, R. D. Avian community structure changes in a mature floodplain forest after extensive flooding. J. Wildl. Manag. 51, 495–502 (1987).
Andriolo, A. et al. Severe population decline of marsh deer, Blastocerus dichotomus (Cetartiodactyla: Cervidae), a threatened species, caused by flooding related to a hydroelectric power plant. Zool. Curitiba 30, 630–638 (2013).
Irving, G. J., Round, P. D., Savini, T., Lynam, A. J. & Gale, G. A. Collapse of a tropical forest bird assemblage surrounding a hydroelectric reservoir. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 16, e00472 (2018).
Carbone, C. & Gittleman, J. L. A common rule for the scaling of carnivore density. Science 295, 2273–2276 (2002).
Google Scholar
Quigley, H. et al. Panthera onca (errata version published in 2018). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T15953A123791436 (2017).
Dinerstein, E. et al. The fate of wild tigers. BioScience 57, 508–514 (2007).
Goodrich, J. et al. Panthera tigris. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T15955A50659951 (2015).
Dirzo, R. et al. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345, 401–406 (2014).
Google Scholar
Roberge, J. & Angelstam, P. Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conserv. Biol. 18, 76–85 (2004).
Jędrzejewski, W. et al. Estimating large carnivore populations at global scale based on spatial predictions of density and distribution—application to the jaguar (Panthera onca). PLoS ONE 13, e0194719 (2018).
Google Scholar
GTRP. Global Tiger Recovery Program. Glob. Tiger Initiat. Secr. (World Bank, 2010).
Desbiez, A. L. & de Paula, R. C. Species conservation planning: the jaguar National Action Plan for Brazil. Cat News 7, 4–7 (2012).
Achard, F. et al. Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests. Science 297, 999–1002 (2002).
Google Scholar
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000).
Google Scholar
Terborgh, J. et al. Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments. Science 294, 1923–1926 (2001).
Google Scholar
Gibson, L. et al. Near-complete extinction of native small mammal fauna 25 years after forest fragmentation. Science 341, 1508–1510 (2013).
Google Scholar
Sollmann, R., Torres, N. M. & Silveira, L. Jaguar conservation in Brazil: the role of protected areas. Cat News 4, 15 (2008).
Cullen Junior, L., Sana, D. A., Lima, F., de Abreu, K. C. & Uezu, A. Selection of habitat by the jaguar, Panthera onca (Carnivora: Felidae), in the upper Paraná River, Brazil. Zool. Curitiba 30, 379–387 (2013).
Eriksson, C. E. et al. Extensive aquatic subsidies lead to territorial breakdown and high density of an apex predator. Ecology https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3543 (2021).
Sanderson, E. W. How many animals do we want to save? The many ways of setting population target levels for conservation. BioScience 56, 911–922 (2006).
Luskin, M. S., Albert, W. R. & Tobler, M. W. Sumatran tiger survival threatened by deforestation despite increasing densities in parks. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–9 (2017).
Wikramanayake, E. et al. A landscape‐based conservation strategy to double the wild tiger population. Conserv. Lett. 4, 219–227 (2011).
Sunarto, S. et al. Tigers need cover: multi-scale occupancy study of the big cat in Sumatran forest and plantation landscapes. PLoS ONE 7, e30859 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hyde, J. L., Bohlman, S. A. & Valle, D. Transmission lines are an under-acknowledged conservation threat to the Brazilian Amazon. Biol. Conserv. 228, 343–356 (2018).
Espinosa, S., Celis, G. & Branch, L. C. When roads appear jaguars decline: Increased access to an Amazonian wilderness area reduces potential for jaguar conservation. PLoS ONE 13, e0189740 (2018).
Google Scholar
Thompson, P. L., Rayfield, B. & Gonzalez, A. Loss of habitat and connectivity erodes species diversity, ecosystem functioning, and stability in metacommunity networks. Ecography 40, 98–108 (2017).
Linkie, M., Haidir, I. A., Nugroho, A. & Dinata, Y. Conserving tigers Panthera tigris in selectively logged Sumatran forests. Biol. Conserv. 141, 2410–2415 (2008).
Sharma, S. et al. Forest corridors maintain historical gene flow in a tiger metapopulation in the highlands of central India. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 280, 20131506 (2013).
Kinnaird, M. F., Sanderson, E. W., O’Brien, T. G., Wibisono, H. T. & Woolmer, G. Deforestation trends in a tropical landscape and implications for endangered large mammals. Conserv. Biol. 17, 245–257 (2003).
Ramesh, K. et al. Status of tiger and prey species in Panna Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh: capture-recapture and distance sampling estimates. Technical Report (Wildlife Institute of India, 2013).
Romero‐Muñoz, A. et al. Habitat loss and overhunting synergistically drive the extirpation of jaguars from the Gran Chaco. Divers. Distrib. 25, 176–190 (2019).
Alho, C. J. Hydropower dams and reservoirs and their impacts on Brazil’s biodiversity and natural habitats: a review. World J. Adv. Res. Rev. 6, 205–215 (2020).
Dobson, A. et al. Habitat loss, trophic collapse, and the decline of ecosystem services. Ecology 87, 1915–1924 (2006).
Google Scholar
Estes, J. A. et al. Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science 333, 301–306 (2011).
Google Scholar
Fearnside, P. M. Brazil’s Balbina Dam: environment versus the legacy of the pharaohs in Amazonia. Environ. Manag. 13, 401–423 (1989).
Fearnside, P. M. Dams in the Amazon: Belo Monte and Brazil’s hydroelectric development of the Xingu River Basin. Environ. Manag. 38, 16–27 (2006).
Milder, J. C., Scherr, S. J. & Bracer, C. Trends and future potential of payment for ecosystem services to alleviate rural poverty in developing countries. Ecol. Soc. 15, 4 (2010).
Ceballos, G. et al. Jaguar distribution, biological corridors and protected areas in Mexico: from science to public policies. Landsc. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01264-0 (2021).
Le Saout, S. et al. Protected areas and effective biodiversity conservation. Science 342, 803–805 (2013).
Google Scholar
Sabu, M. M., Pasha, S. V., Reddy, C. S., Singh, R. & Jaishanker, R. The effectiveness of tiger conservation landscapes in decreasing deforestation in South Asia: a remote sensing-based study. Spat. Inf. Res. 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-021-00411-8 (2021).
Joshi, A. R. et al. Tracking changes and preventing loss in critical tiger habitat. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501675 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ritter, C. D. et al. Environmental impact assessment in Brazilian Amazonia: challenges and prospects to assess biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 206, 161–168 (2017).
Thompson, J. J. et al. Environmental and anthropogenic factors synergistically affect space use of jaguars. Curr. Biol. 31, 3457–3466 (2021).
Google Scholar
Food and agriculture organization of the united nations. AQUASTAT – FAO’s global information system on water and agriculture. https://www.fao.org/aquastat/en/databases/dams (2016).
Tortato, F. R. et al. Infanticide in a jaguar (Panthera onca) population—does the provision of livestock carcasses increase the risk? Acta Ethol. 20, 69–73 (2017).
Chanchani, P., Gerber, B. D. & Noon, B. R. Elevated potential for intraspecific competition in territorial carnivores occupying fragmented landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 227, 275–283 (2018).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
