in

Methane-dependent selenate reduction by a bacterial consortium

  • 1.

    Trotsenko YA, Murrell JC. Metabolic aspects of aerobic obligate methanotrophy. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2008;63:183–229.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Knittel K, Boetius A. Anaerobic oxidation of methane: progress with an unknown process. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009;63:311–34.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Khmelenina VN, Murrell JC, Smith TJ, Trotsenko YA. Physiology and Biochemistry of the Aerobic Methanotrophs. In: Rojo F (editor) Aerobic Utilization of Hydrocarbons, Oils and Lipids. Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology. Springer; Cham; 2018;1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39782-5_4-1.

  • 4.

    Kalyuzhnaya MG, Yang S, Rozova ON, Smalley NE, Clubb J, Lamb A, et al. Highly efficient methane biocatalysis revealed in a methanotrophic bacterium. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2785.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Kits KD, Klotz MG, Stein LY. Methane oxidation coupled to nitrate reduction under hypoxia by the Gammaproteobacterium Methylomonas denitrificans, sp. nov type strain FJG1. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17:3219–32.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Kits KD, Campbell DJ, Rosana AR, Stein LY. Diverse electron sources support denitrification under hypoxia in the obligate methanotroph Methylomicrobium album strain BG8. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1072.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Gilman A, Fu Y, Hendershott M, Chu F, Puri AW, Smith AL, et al. Oxygen-limited metabolism in the methanotroph Methylomicrobium buryatense 5GB1C. PeerJ. 2017;5:5.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Ettwig KF, Butler MK, Le Paslier D, Pelletier E, Mangenot S, Kuypers MM, et al. Nitrite-driven anaerobic methane oxidation by oxygenic bacteria. Nature. 2010;464:543–8.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Devol AH, Ahmed SI. Are high-rates of sulfate reduction associated with anaerobic oxidation of methane. Nature. 1981;291:407–8.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Boetius A, Ravenschlag K, Schubert CJ, Rickert D, Widdel F, Gieseke A, et al. A marine microbial consortium apparently mediating anaerobic oxidation of methane. Nature 2000;407:623–6.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Orphan VJ, House CH, Hinrichs KU, McKeegan KD, DeLong EF. Methane-consuming archaea revealed by directly coupled isotopic and phylogenetic analysis. Science. 2001;293:484–7.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Ettwig KF, Zhu BL, Speth D, Keltjens JT, Jetten MSM, Kartal B. Archaea catalyze iron-dependent anaerobic oxidation of methane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:12792–6.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Cai C, Leu AO, Xie GJ, Guo J, Feng Y, Zhao JX, et al. A methanotrophic archaeon couples anaerobic oxidation of methane to Fe(III) reduction. ISME J. 2018;12:1929–39.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Leu AO, Cai C, McIlroy SJ, Southam G, Orphan VJ, Yuan Z, et al. Anaerobic methane oxidation coupled to manganese reduction by members of the Methanoperedenaceae. ISME J. 2020;14:1030–41.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Haroon MF, Hu S, Shi Y, Imelfort M, Keller J, Hugenholtz P, et al. Anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to nitrate reduction in a novel archaeal lineage. Nature. 2013;500:567–70.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Shi LD, Guo T, Lv PL, Niu ZF, Zhou YJ, Tang XJ, et al. Coupled anaerobic methane oxidation and reductive arsenic mobilization in wetland soils. Nat Geosci. 2020;13:799–805. -+

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Leu AO, McIlroy SJ, Ye J, Parks DH, Orphan VJ, Tyson GW. Lateral gene transfer drives metabolic flexibility in the anaerobic methane-oxidizing archaeal family Methanoperedenaceae. Mbio 2020;11:11.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Lemly AD. Aquatic selenium pollution is a global environmental safety issue. Ecotox Environ Safe. 2004;59:44–56.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Simmons DBD, Wallschlager D. A critical review of the biogeochemistry and ecotoxicology of selenium in lotic and lentic environments. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005;24:1331–43.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Reim A, Luke C, Krause S, Pratscher J, Frenzel P. One millimetre makes the difference: high-resolution analysis of methane-oxidizing bacteria and their specific activity at the oxic-anoxic interface in a flooded paddy soil. ISME J. 2012;6:2128–39.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Danilova OV, Suzina NE, Van De Kamp J, Svenning MM, Bodrossy L, Dedysh SN. A new cell morphotype among methane oxidizers: a spiral-shaped obligately microaerophilic methanotroph from northern low-oxygen environments. ISME J. 2016;10:2734–43.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Smith GJ, Angle JC, Solden LM, Borton MA, Morin TH, Daly RA, et al. Members of the genus methylobacter are inferred to account for the majority of aerobic methane oxidation in oxic soils from a freshwater wetland. Mbio 2018;9:9.

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Fernández-Martínez A, Charlet L. Selenium environmental cycling and bioavailability: a structural chemist point of view. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2009;8:81–110.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Chung J, Nerenberg R, Rittmann BE. Bioreduction of selenate using a hydrogen-based membrane biofilm reactor. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40:1664–71.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Lai CY, Wen LL, Shi LD, Zhao KK, Wang YQ, Yang X, et al. Selenate and nitrate bioreductions using methane as the electron donor in a membrane biofilm reactor. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50:10179–86.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Luo JH, Chen H, Hu S, Cai C, Yuan Z, Guo J. Microbial selenate reduction driven by a denitrifying anaerobic methane oxidation biofilm. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52:4006–12.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Shi LD, Lv PL, Wang M, Lai CY, Zhao HP. A mixed consortium of methanotrophic archaea and bacteria boosts methane-dependent selenate reduction. Sci Total Environ. 2020;732:139310.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil PA, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P. A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:1079–86.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Jakobs G, Labrenz M, Rehder G, Hietanen S, Kießlich K, Vogts A, et al. A bioreactor approach to investigate the linkage between methane oxidation and nitrate/nitrite reduction in the pelagic oxic-anoxic transition zone of the central baltic sea. Front Mar Sci. 2016;3:3.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Naqvi SWA, Lam P, Narvenkar G, Sarkar A, Naik H, Pratihary A, et al. Methane stimulates massive nitrogen loss from freshwater reservoirs in India. Nat Commun. 2018;9:9.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Martinez-Cruz K, Leewis MC, Herriott IC, Sepulveda-Jauregui A, Anthony KW, Thalasso F, et al. Anaerobic oxidation of methane by aerobic methanotrophs in sub-arctic lake sediments. Sci Total Environ. 2017;607:23–31.

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Zheng Y, Wang H, Liu Y, Zhu B, Li J, Yang Y, et al. Methane-dependent mineral reduction by aerobic methanotrophs under hypoxia. Environ Sci Tech Lett. 2020;7:606–12.

  • 33.

    Oswald K, Milucka J, Brand A, Hach P, Littmann S, Wehrli B, et al. Aerobic gammaproteobacterial methanotrophs mitigate methane emissions from oxic and anoxic lake waters. Limnol Oceanogr. 2016;61:S101–S118.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Schroder I, Rech S, Krafft T, Macy JM. Purification and characterization of the selenate reductase from Thauera selenatis. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:23765–8.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Ridley H, Watts CA, Richardson DJ, Butler CS. Resolution of distinct membrane-bound enzymes from Enterobacter cloacae SLD1a-1 that are responsible for selective reduction of nitrate and selenate oxyanions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5173–80.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Sabaty M, Avazeri C, Pignol D, Vermeglio A. Characterization of the reduction of selenate and tellurite by nitrate reductases. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001;67:5122–6.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Turner RJ, Weiner JH, Taylor DE. Selenium metabolism in Escherichia coli. Biometals 1998;11:223–7.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Hunter WJ. An Azospira oryzae (syn Dechlorosoma suillum) strain that reduces selenate and selenite to elemental red selenium. Curr Microbiol. 2007;54:376–81.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Li D, Pang HC, Sun LC, Fan JP, Li YY, Zhang JL. Pseudoxanthomonas wuyuanensis sp. nov., isolated from saline-alkali soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:799–804.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Harrison G, Curle C, Laishley EJ. Purification and characterization of an inducible dissimilatory type sulfite reductase from Clostridium pasteurianum. Arch Microbiol. 1984;138:72–8.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Basaglia M, Toffanin A, Baldan E, Bottegal M, Shapleigh JP, Casella S. Selenite-reducing capacity of the copper-containing nitrite reductase of Rhizobium sullae. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007;269:124–30.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Li DB, Cheng YY, Wu C, Li WW, Li N, Yang ZC, et al. Selenite reduction by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 is mediated by fumarate reductase in periplasm. Sci Rep. 2014;4:3735.

  • 43.

    Song DG, Li XX, Cheng YZ, Xiao X, Lu ZQ, Wang YZ, et al. Aerobic biogenesis of selenium nanoparticles by Enterobacter cloacae Z0206 as a consequence of fumarate reductase mediated selenite reduction. Sci Rep. 2017;7:3239.

  • 44.

    Hunter WJ. A rhizobium selenitireducens protein showing selenite reductase activity. Curr Microbiol. 2014;68:311–6.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Nancharaiah YV, Lens PNL. Selenium biomineralization for biotechnological applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33:323–30.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    McGlynn SE, Chadwick GL, Kempes CP, Orphan VJ. Single cell activity reveals direct electron transfer in methanotrophic consortia. Nature. 2015;526:531–U146.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Wegener G, Krukenberg V, Riedel D, Tegetmeyer HE, Boetius A. Intercellular wiring enables electron transfer between methanotrophic archaea and bacteria. Nature. 2015;526:587–U315.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Kleiner M, Dong X, Hinzke T, Wippler J, Thorson E, Mayer B, et al. Metaproteomics method to determine carbon sources and assimilation pathways of species in microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E5576–84.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Anthony C. How half a century of research was required to understand bacterial growth on C1 and C2 compounds; the story of the serine cycle and the ethylmalonyl-CoA pathway. Sci Prog. 2011;94:109–37.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Salem AR, Hacking AJ, Quayle JR. Cleavage of malyl-coenzyme-A into acetyl-coenzyme-A and glyoxylate by Pseudomonas AM1 and other C1-unit utilizing bacteria. Biochem J. 1973;136:89–96.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Large PJ, Peel D, Quayle JR. Microbial growth on C1 compounds. 3. Distribution of radioactivity in metabolites of methanol-grown Pseudomonas AM1 after incubation with 14C-methanol and 14C-bicarbonate. Biochem J 1962;82:483–8.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Shi LD, Wang Z, Liu T, Wu M, Lai CY, Rittmann BE, et al. Making good use of methane to remove oxidized contaminants from wastewater. Water Res. 2021;197:117082.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Chistoserdova L, Kalyuzhnaya MG. Current trends in methylotrophy. Trends Microbiol. 2018;26:703–14.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Karwautz C, Kus G, Stockl M, Neu TR, Lueders T. Microbial megacities fueled by methane oxidation in a mineral spring cave. ISME J. 2018;12:87–100.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    Hernandez ME, Beck DAC, Lidstrom ME, Chistoserdova L. Oxygen availability is a major factor in determining the composition of microbial communities involved in methane oxidation. PeerJ. 2015;3:3.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Oshkin IY, Beck DA, Lamb AE, Tchesnokova V, Benuska G, McTaggart TL, et al. Methane-fed microbial microcosms show differential community dynamics and pinpoint taxa involved in communal response. ISME J. 2015;9:1119–29.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    Hoehler TM, Alperin MJ, Albert DB, Martens CS. Field and laboratory studies of methane oxidation in an anoxic marine sediment—evidence for a methanogen-sulfate reducer consortium. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 1994;8:451–63.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    Nauhaus K, Treude T, Boetius A, Kruger M. Environmental regulation of the anaerobic oxidation of methane: a comparison of ANME-I and ANME-II communities. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:98–106.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    Meulepas RJW, Jagersma CG, Khadem AF, Stams AJM, Lens PNL. Effect of methanogenic substrates on anaerobic oxidation of methane and sulfate reduction by an anaerobic methanotrophic enrichment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010;87:1499–506.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 60.

    Sorensen KB, Finster K, Ramsing NB. Thermodynamic and kinetic requirements in anaerobic methane oxidizing consortia exclude hydrogen, acetate, and methanol as possible electron shuttles. Micro Ecol. 2001;42:1–10.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 61.

    Krukenberg V, Riedel D, Gruber-Vodicka HR, Buttigieg PL, Tegetmeyer HE, Boetius A, et al. Gene expression and ultrastructure of meso- and thermophilic methanotrophic consortia. Environ Microbiol. 2018;20:1651–66.

  • 62.

    Kaneko M, Poulson SR. Rate of oxygen isotope exchange between selenate and water. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:4539–45.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 63.

    Volant S, Lechat P, Woringer P, Motreff L, Campagne P, Malabat C, et al. Shaman: a user-friendly website for metataxonomic analysis from raw reads to statistical analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2020;21:345.

  • 64.

    Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA. Metaspades: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 2017;27:824–34.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 65.

    Li D, Luo R, Liu CM, Leung CM, Ting HF, Sadakane K, et al. Megahit v1.0: A fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices. Methods. 2016;102:3–11.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • 66.

    Dong XL, Strous M. An integrated pipeline for annotation and visualization of metagenomic contigs. Front Genet. 2019;10:999.

  • 67.

    Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, et al. Metabat 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7359.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 68.

    Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 69.

    Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. Drep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 2017;11:2864–8.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 70.

    Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:1925–7.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 71.

    Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. Mega6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 72.

    Huang WL, Wilks A. A rapid seamless method for gene knockout in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BMC Microbiol. 2017;17:199.

  • 73.

    Bru D, Sarr A, Philippot L. Relative abundances of proteobacterial membrane-bound and periplasmic nitrate reductases in selected environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:5971–4.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 74.

    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(t)(-delta delta c) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 75.

    Maeda H, Fujimoto C, Haruki Y, Maeda T, Kokeguchi S, Petelin M, et al. Quantitative real-time PCR using Taqman and SYBR green for Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, tetQ gene and total bacteria. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;39:81–6.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 76.

    Tyanova S, Temu T, Cox J. The maxquant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat Protoc. 2016;11:2301–19.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 77.

    Daims H, Stoecker K, Wagner M. “Fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of prokaryotes,”. In: Osborn AM, Smith cJ, editors. Molecular microbial ecology. New york: Taylor & francis; 2005. p. 213–39.

  • 78.

    Wallner G, Amann R, Beisker W. Optimizing fluorescent in situ hybridization with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for flow cytometric identification of microorganisms. Cytometry. 1993;14:136–43.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 79.

    Eller G, Stubner S, Frenzel P. Group-specific 16S rRNA targeted probes for the detection of Type I and Type II methanotrophs by fluorescence in situ hybridisation. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001;198:91–7.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 80.

    Lagkouvardos I, Joseph D, Kapfhammer M, Giritli S, Horn M, Haller D, et al. Imngs: a comprehensive open resource of processed 16S rRNA microbial profiles for ecology and diversity studies. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33721.

  • 81.

    Yarza P, Yilmaz P, Pruesse E, Glöckner FO, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, et al. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12:635–45.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 82.

    Vizcaíno JA, Csordas A, del-Toro N, Dianes JA, Griss J, Lavidas I, et al. 2016 update of the pride database and its related tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D447–D456.

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Engineered yeast could expand biofuels’ reach

    Insights into rumen microbial biosynthetic gene cluster diversity through genome-resolved metagenomics