Rasher, D. B., Hoey, A. S. & Hay, M. E. Cascading predator effects in a Fijian coral reef ecosystem. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–10 (2017).
Google Scholar
Roff, G. et al. The ecological role of sharks on coral reefs. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 395–407 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ruppert, J. L. W., Travers, M. J., Smith, L. L., Fortin, M.-J. & Meekan, M. G. Caught in the middle: Combined impacts of shark removal and coral loss on the fish communities of coral reefs. PLoS ONE 8, e74648 (2013).
Google Scholar
Dulvy, N. K. et al. Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays. Elife 3, e00590 (2014).
Google Scholar
Field, I. C., Meekan, M. G., Buckworth, R. C. & Bradshaw, C. J. A. Chapter 4 susceptibility of sharks, rays and chimaeras to global extinction. In Advances in Marine Biology vol. 56 275–363 (Elsevier, 2009).
MacNeil, M. A. et al. Global status and conservation potential of reef sharks. Nature 583, 801–806 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ward-Paige, C. A. et al. Large-scale absence of sharks on reefs in the Greater-Caribbean: A footprint of human pressures. PLoS ONE 5(8), e11968 (2010).
Robbins, W. D., Hisano, M., Connolly, S. R. & Choat, J. H. Ongoing collapse of coral-reef shark populations. Curr. Biol. 16, 2314–2319 (2006).
Google Scholar
Juhel, J.-B. et al. Reef accessibility impairs the protection of sharks. J. Appl. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13007 (2017).
Google Scholar
Nadon, M. O. et al. Re-creating missing population baselines for pacific reef sharks. Conserv. Biol. 26, 493–503 (2012).
Google Scholar
Ferretti, F., Curnick, D., Liu, K., Romanov, E. V. & Block, B. A. Shark baselines and the conservation role of remote coral reef ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq0333 (2018).
Ferretti, F., Worm, B., Britten, G. L., Heithaus, M. R. & Lotze, H. K. Patterns and ecosystem consequences of shark declines in the ocean: Ecosystem consequences of shark declines. Ecol. Lett. 13, 1055–1071 (2010).
Google Scholar
Cinner, J. E. et al. Gravity of human impacts mediates coral reef conservation gains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, E6116–E6125 (2018).
Google Scholar
Davidson, L. N. K. & Dulvy, N. K. Global marine protected areas to prevent extinctions. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0040 (2017).
Google Scholar
O’Leary, B. C. et al. Effective coverage targets for ocean protection: Effective targets for ocean protection. Conserv. Lett. 9, 398–404 (2016).
Google Scholar
Sala, E. et al. Assessing real progress towards effective ocean protection. Mar. Policy 91, 11–13 (2018).
Google Scholar
D’agata, S. et al. Marine reserves lag behind wilderness in the conservation of key functional roles. Nat. Commun. 7, 12000 (2016).
Google Scholar
MacKeracher, T., Diedrich, A. & Simpfendorfer, C. A. Sharks, rays and marine protected areas: A critical evaluation of current perspectives. Fish Fish. 20, 255–267 (2019).
Google Scholar
Juhel, J.-B. et al. Isolation and no-entry marine reserves mitigate anthropogenic impacts on grey reef shark behavior. Sci. Rep. 9, 2897 (2019).
Google Scholar
Robbins, W. D. Abundance, demography and population structure of the grey reef shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) and the white tip reef shark (Triaenodon obesus) (Fam. Charcharhinidae). (James Cook University, 2006).
Kellner, J. B., Tetreault, I., Gaines, S. D. & Nisbet, R. M. Fishing the line near marine reserves in single and multispecies fisheries. Ecol. Appl. 17, 1039–1054 (2007).
Google Scholar
Nillos Kleiven, P. J. et al. Fishing pressure impacts the abundance gradient of European lobsters across the borders of a newly established marine protected area. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 286, 20182455 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gerber, L. R. et al. Population models for marine reserve design: A retrospective and prospective synthesis. Ecol. Appl. 13, 47–64 (2003).
Google Scholar
Grüss, A., Kaplan, D. M., Guénette, S., Roberts, C. M. & Botsford, L. W. Consequences of adult and juvenile movement for marine protected areas. Biol. Conserv. 144, 692–702 (2011).
Google Scholar
Edgar, G. J. et al. Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features. Nature 506, 216–220 (2014).
Google Scholar
Abecasis, D., Afonso, P. & Erzini, K. Combining multispecies home range and distribution models aids assessment of MPA effectiveness. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 513, 155–169 (2014).
Google Scholar
Di Franco, A. et al. Linking home ranges to protected area size: The case study of the Mediterranean Sea. Biol. Conserv. 221, 175–181 (2018).
Google Scholar
Krueck, N. C. et al. Reserve sizes needed to protect coral reef fishes: reserve sizes to protect coral reef fishes. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12415 (2018).
Pittman, S. J. et al. Fish with chips: Tracking reef fish movements to evaluate size and connectivity of Caribbean marine protected areas. PLoS ONE 9, e96028 (2014).
Google Scholar
Weeks, R., Green, A. L., Joseph, E., Peterson, N. & Terk, E. Using reef fish movement to inform marine reserve design. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 145–152 (2017).
Google Scholar
Dwyer, R. G. et al. Individual and population benefits of marine reserves for reef sharks. Curr. Biol. 30, 117–118 (2020).
Friedlander, A., Sandin, S., DeMartini, E. & Sala, E. Spatial patterns of the structure of reef fish assemblages at a pristine atoll in the central Pacific. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 410, 219–231 (2010).
Google Scholar
Clarke, C., Lea, J. & Ormond, R. Comparative abundance of reef sharks in the Western Indian Ocean. In Proceedings of the 12th International Coral Reef Symposium, Cairns, Australia, 9-13 July 2012 (2012).
Bonnin, L. et al. Repeated long-range migrations of adult males in a common Indo-Pacific reef shark. Coral Reefs https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-019-01858-w (2019).
Google Scholar
Speed, C. W. et al. Reef shark movements relative to a coastal marine protected area. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 3, 58–66 (2016).
Google Scholar
Udyawer, V. et al. A standardised framework for analysing animal detections from automated tracking arrays. Anim. Biotelem. 6, 17 (2018).
Google Scholar
Brodie, S. et al. Continental-scale animal tracking reveals functional movement classes across marine taxa. Sci. Rep. 8, 3717 (2018).
Google Scholar
Espinoza, M., Heupel, M. R., Tobin, A. J. & Simpfendorfer, C. A. Residency patterns and movements of grey reef sharks (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) in semi-isolated coral reef habitats. Mar. Biol. 162, 343–358 (2015).
Google Scholar
Vianna, G. M. S., Meekan, M. G., Meeuwig, J. J. & Speed, C. W. Environmental influences on patterns of vertical movement and site fidelity of grey reef sharks (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) at aggregation sites. PLoS ONE 8, e60331 (2013).
Google Scholar
Barnett, A., Abrantes, K. G., Seymour, J. & Fitzpatrick, R. Residency and spatial use by reef sharks of an isolated seamount and its implications for conservation. PLoS ONE 7, e36574 (2012).
Google Scholar
Field, I. C., Meekan, M. G., Speed, C. W., White, W. & Bradshaw, C. J. A. Quantifying movement patterns for shark conservation at remote coral atolls in the Indian Ocean. Coral Reefs 30, 61–71 (2010).
Google Scholar
Heupel, M. R. & Simpfendorfer, C. A. Long-term movement patterns of a coral reef predator. Coral Reefs 34, 679–691 (2015).
Google Scholar
Andréfouët, S., Torres-Pulliza, D., Dosdane, M., Kranenburg, C. & Murch, B. Atlas des récifs coralliens de Nouvelle-Calédonie. IFRECOR Nouv.-Caléd. IRD Nouméa 26 (2004).
Lea, J. S. E., Humphries, N. E., von Brandis, R. G., Clarke, C. R. & Sims, D. W. Acoustic telemetry and network analysis reveal the space use of multiple reef predators and enhance marine protected area design. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 283, 20160717 (2016).
Google Scholar
Benhamou, S. & Cornélis, D. Incorporating movement behavior and barriers to improve kernel home range space use estimates. J. Wildl. Manag. 74, 1353–1360 (2010).
Google Scholar
Fieberg, J. & Börger, L. Could you please phrase “home range” as a question?. J. Mammal. 93, 890–902 (2012).
Google Scholar
Heupel, M. R. & Simpfendorfer, C. A. Importance of environmental and biological drivers in the presence and space use of a reef-associated shark. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 496, 47–57 (2014).
Google Scholar
Dwyer, R. G. et al. Using individual-based movement information to identify spatial conservation priorities for mobile species. Conserv. Biol. 33, 1426–1437 (2019).
Google Scholar
IUCN, UNEP-WCMC. The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). [01/2019]. (UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge (UK), 2014). Available at: https://www.protectedplanet.net.
UNEP-WCMC. Global Distribution of Warm-Water Coral Reefs, Compiled from Multiple Sources Including the Millennium Coral Reef Mapping Project. Version 4.0. (WorldFish Centre, WRI, TNC, 2018).
Graham, N. A. J., Spalding, M. D. & Sheppard, C. R. C. Reef shark declines in remote atolls highlight the need for multi-faceted conservation action. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 20, 543–548 (2010).
Google Scholar
Davis, K. L. F., Russ, G. R., Williamson, D. H. & Evans, R. D. Surveillance and poaching on inshore reefs of the Great Barrier Reef marine park. Coast. Manag. 32, 373–387 (2004).
Google Scholar
D’agata, S. et al. Human-mediated loss of phylogenetic and functional diversity in coral reef fishes. Curr. Biol. 24, 555–560 (2014).
Google Scholar
Gaines, S. D., White, C., Carr, M. H. & Palumbi, S. R. Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 18286–18293 (2010).
Google Scholar
Bessa-Gomes, C., Legendre, S. & Clobert, J. Allee effects, mating systems and the extinction risk in populations with two sexes. Ecol. Lett. 7, 802–812 (2004).
Google Scholar
Rankin, D. J. & Kokko, H. Do males matter? The role of males in population dynamics. Oikos 116, 335–348 (2007).
Google Scholar
Pratt, H. L. & Carrier, J. C. A review of elasmobranch reproductive behavior with a case study on the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum. Environ. Biol. Fish. 60, 157–188 (2001).
Google Scholar
Momigliano, P., Harcourt, R., Robbins, W. D. & Stow, A. Connectivity in grey reef sharks (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) determined using empirical and simulated genetic data. Sci. Rep. 5, 13229 (2015).
Google Scholar
Momigliano, P. et al. Genetic structure and signatures of selection in grey reef sharks (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos). Heredity 119(3), 142–153 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bradley, D. et al. Resetting predator baselines in coral reef ecosystems. Sci. Rep. 5, 43131 (2017).
Williams, J. J., Papastamatiou, Y. P., Caselle, J. E., Bradley, D. & Jacoby, D. M. P. Mobile marine predators: An understudied source of nutrients to coral reefs in an unfished atoll. Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20172456 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mourier, J., Vercelloni, J. & Planes, S. Evidence of social communities in a spatially structured network of a free-ranging shark species. Anim. Behav. 83, 389–401 (2012).
Google Scholar
Mourier, J. et al. Extreme inverted trophic pyramid of reef sharks supported by spawning groupers. Curr. Biol. 26, 2011–2016 (2016).
Google Scholar
Robbins, W. D. & Renaud, P. Foraging mode of the grey reef shark, Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos, under two different scenarios. Coral Reefs 35, 253–260 (2015).
Google Scholar
Devillers, R. et al. Reinventing residual reserves in the sea: Are we favouring ease of establishment over need for protection?. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 25, 480–504 (2015).
Google Scholar
Boerder, K., Miller, N. A. & Worm, B. Global hot spots of transshipment of fish catch at sea. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat7159 (2018).
Kroodsma, D. A. et al. Tracking the global footprint of fisheries. Science 359, 904–908 (2018).
Google Scholar
Watson, R. A. et al. Marine foods sourced from farther as their use of global ocean primary production increases. Nat. Commun. 6, 7365 (2015).
Google Scholar
Januchowski-Hartley, F. A., Vigliola, L., Maire, E., Kulbicki, M. & Mouillot, D. Low fuel cost and rising fish price threaten coral reef wilderness. Conserv. Lett. 13, e12706 (2020).
Google Scholar
Dent, F. & Clarke, S. State of the global market for shark products. FAO Fish. Aquac. Tech. Pap. 590, 37 (2015).
Schofield, G. et al. Evidence-based marine protected area planning for a highly mobile endangered marine vertebrate. Biol. Conserv. 161, 101–109 (2013).
Botsford, L. W., Micheli, F. & Hastings, A. Principles for the design of marine reserves. Ecol. Appl. 13, 25–31 (2003).
Google Scholar
Hastings, A. & Botsford, L. W. Comparing designs of marine reserves for fisheries and for biodiversity. Ecol. Appl. 13, 65–70 (2003).
Google Scholar
Green, A. L. et al. Larval dispersal and movement patterns of coral reef fishes, and implications for marine reserve network design. Biol. Rev. 90, 1215–1247 (2015).
Google Scholar
CBD. Decisions Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its Eighth Meeting (Decision VIII/15, Annex IV). (2006).
Giakoumi, S. et al. Revisiting “success” and “failure” of marine protected areas: A conservation scientist perspective. Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 223 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gill, D. A. et al. Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally. Nature 543, 665–669 (2017).
Google Scholar
Rife, A. N., Erisman, B., Sanchez, A. & Aburto-Oropeza, O. When good intentions are not enough … Insights on networks of “paper park” marine protected areas. Conserv. Lett. 6, 200–212 (2013).
Google Scholar
Heupel, M. R., Simpfendorfer, C. A. & Fitzpatrick, R. Large-scale movement and reef fidelity of grey reef sharks. PLoS ONE 5, e9650 (2010).
Google Scholar
Heupel, M. R., Reiss, K. L., Yeiser, B. G. & Simpfendorfer, C. A. Effects of biofouling on performance of moored data logging acoustic receivers. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 6, 327–335 (2008).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
