in

Sexual dimorphism in size and shape of the head in the sea snake Emydocephalus annulatus (Hydrophiinae, Elapidae)

[adace-ad id="91168"]
  • 1.

    Andersson, M. Sexual Selection (Princeton University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Clutton-Brock, T. H. The Evolution of Parental Care (Princeton University Press, 1991).

    Book 

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Olsson, M., Shine, R., Wapstra, E., Ujvari, B. & Madsen, T. Sexual dimorphism in lizard body shape: The roles of sexual selection and fecundity selection. Evolution 56, 1538–1542 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    McPherson, F. J. & Chenoweth, P. J. Mammalian sexual dimorphism. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 131, 109–122 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Shine, R. The evolution of large body size in females: A critique of Darwin’s “fecundity advantage” model. Am. Nat. 131, 124–131 (1988).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Fairbairn, D. J. et al. (eds) Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism (Oxford University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Slatkin, M. Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38, 622–630 (1984).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Shine, R. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: A review of the evidence. Q. Rev. Biol. 64, 419–461 (1989).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Herrel, A., Spithoven, L., Van Damme, R. & De Vree, F. Sexual dimorphism of head size in Gallotia galloti: Testing the niche divergence hypothesis by functional analyses. Funct. Ecol. 13, 289–297 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Pearson, D., Shine, R. & How, R. Sex-specific niche partitioning and sexual size dimorphism in Australian pythons (Morelia spilota imbricata). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 77, 113–125 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Hierlihy, C. A., Garcia-Collazo, R., Chavez Tapia, C. B. & Mallory, F. F. Sexual dimorphism in the lizard Sceloporus siniferus: Support for the intraspecific niche divergence and sexual selection hypotheses. Salamandra 49, 1–6 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Vitt, L. J. & Cooper, W. E. Jr. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in the skink Eumeces laticeps: An example of sexual selection. Can. J. Zool. 63, 995–1002 (1985).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Shine, R. Intersexual dietary divergence and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in snakes. Am. Nat. 138, 103–122 (1991).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Fitzgerald, M. & Shine, R. Mate-guarding in free-ranging Carpet Pythons (Morelia spilota). Aust. Zool. 39, 434–439 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Cundall, D. & Greene, H. W. Feeding in snakes. In Feeding: Form, Function, and Evolution in Tetrapod Vertebrates (ed. Schwenk, K.) 293–333 (Academic Press, 2000).

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Goiran, C., Dubey, S. & Shine, R. Effects of season, sex and body size on the feeding ecology of turtle-headed sea snakes (Emydocephalus annulatus) on IndoPacific inshore coral reefs. Coral Reefs 32, 527–538 (2013).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Shine, R., Bonnet, X., Elphick, M. J. & Barrott, E. G. A novel foraging mode in snakes: Browsing by the sea snake Emydocephalus annulatus (Serpentes, Hydrophiidae). Funct. Ecol. 18, 16–24 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Lynch, T. P. The Behavioural Ecology of the Olive Sea Snake, Aipysurus laevis. PhD thesis, James Cook University (2000).

  • 19.

    Borczyk, B., Paśko, Ł, Kusznierz, J. & Bury, S. Sexual dimorphism and skull size and shape in the highly specialized snake species, Aipysurus eydouxii (Elapidae: Hydrophiinae). PeerJ 9, e11311 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Queral-Regil, A. & King, R. B. Evidence for phenotypic plasticity in snake body size and relative head dimensions in response to amount and size of prey. Copeia 1998, 423–429 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Bonnet, X., Shine, R., Naulleau, G. & Thiburce, C. Plastic vipers: influence of food intake on the size and shape of Gaboon vipers (Bitis gabonica). J. Zool. 255, 341–351 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Sanders, K. L., Lee, M. S., Leys, R., Foster, R. & Keogh, J. S. Molecular phylogeny and divergence dates for Australasian elapids and sea snakes (Hydrophiinae): Evidence from seven genes for rapid evolutionary radiations. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 682–695 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Aubret, F. & Shine, R. Genetic assimilation and the postcolonization erosion of phenotypic plasticity in island tiger snakes. Curr. Biol. 19, 1932–1936 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    McCarthy, C. J. Adaptations of sea snakes that eat fish eggs; with a note on the throat musculature of Aipysurus eydouxi (Gray, 1849). J. Nat. Hist. 21, 1119–1128 (1987).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Shine, R., Shine, T. G., Brown, G. P. & Goiran, C. Life history traits of the sea snake Emydocephalus annulatus, based on a 17-yr study. Coral Reefs 39, 1407–1414 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Segall, M., Cornette, R., Fabre, A. C., Godoy-Diana, R. & Herrel, A. Does aquatic foraging impact head shape evolution in snakes? Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20161645 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Avolio, C., Shine, R. & Pile, A. J. The adaptive significance of sexually dimorphic scale rugosity in sea snakes. Am. Nat. 167, 728–738 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Sherratt, E., Rasmussen, A. R. & Sanders, K. L. Trophic specialization drives morphological evolution in sea snakes. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 172141 (2018).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Frédérich, B. & Parmentier, E. (eds) Biology of Damselfishes (CRC Press, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Heatwole, H. Sea Snakes 2nd edn. (Krieger Publishing Company, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Lukoschek, V. & Shine, R. Sea snakes rarely venture far from home. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1113–1121 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Shine, R., Shine, T. & Shine, B. Intraspecific habitat partitioning by the sea snake Emydocephalus annulatus (Serpentes, Hydrophiidae): The effects of sex, body size, and colour pattern. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 80, 1–10 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Goiran, C., Brown, G. P. & Shine, R. Niche partitioning within a population of sea snakes is constrained by ambient thermal homogeneity and small prey size. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 129, 644–651 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Rover images confirm Jezero crater is an ancient Martian lake

    Inter-species interactions alter antibiotic efficacy in bacterial communities