Sunagawa, S. et al. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science 348, 1261359 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zou, Y. et al. 1,520 reference genomes from cultivated human gut bacteria enable functional microbiome analyses. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 179–185 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mohammad, B. F. et al. Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome. Nature 560 233–237 (2018).
Qin, J. et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464, 59–65 (2010).
Google Scholar
Xiao, L. et al. A catalog of the mouse gut metagenome. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1103–1108 (2015).
Google Scholar
Coelho, L. P. et al. Similarity of the dog and human gut microbiomes in gene content and response to diet. Microbiome 6, 72 (2018).
Google Scholar
Pasolli, E. et al. Extensive unexplored human microbiome diversity revealed by over 150,000 genomes from metagenomes spanning age, geography, and lifestyle. Cell 176, 649–662.e20 (2019).
Google Scholar
Partridge, S. R., Kwong, S. M., Firth, N. & Jensen, S. O. Mobile genetic elements associated with antimicrobial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 31, (2018).
Mende, D. R. et al. ProGenomes2: An improved database for accurate and consistent habitat, taxonomic and functional annotations of prokaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D621–D625 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jain, C., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Phillippy, A. M., Konstantinidis, K. T. & Aluru, S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 9, 5114 (2018).
Google Scholar
Steinegger, M. & Söding, J. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 1026–1028 (2017).
Google Scholar
Daniel H. et al. RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Nuc. Acids Res. 46, D851–D860 (2018).
Mering, C. von et al. Quantitative phylogenetic assessment of microbial communities in diverse environments. Science 315, 1126–1130 (2007).
Google Scholar
Richardson, E. J. et al. Gene exchange drives the ecological success of a multi-host bacterial pathogen. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1468–1478 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nielsen, H. B. et al. Identification and assembly of genomes and genetic elements in complex metagenomic samples without using reference genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 822–828 (2014).
Google Scholar
Mende, D. R., Sunagawa, S., Zeller, G. & Bork, P. Accurate and universal delineation of prokaryotic species. Nat. Methods 10, 881–884 (2013).
Google Scholar
Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-mapper. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 2115–2122 (2017).
Google Scholar
Louca, S. et al. Function and functional redundancy in microbial systems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 936–943 (2018).
Google Scholar
Maistrenko, O. M. et al. Disentangling the impact of environmental and phylogenetic constraints on prokaryotic within-species diversity. ISME J. 14, 1247–1259 (2020).
Google Scholar
Baumdicker, F., Hess, W. R. & Pfaffelhuber, P. The diversity of a distributed genome in bacterial populations. Ann. Appl. Probab. 20, 1567–1606 (2010).
Google Scholar
Sela, I., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. Theory of prokaryotic genome evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11399–11407 (2016).
Google Scholar
Dandekar, T., Snel, B., Huynen, M. & Bork, P. Conservation of gene order: a fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 324–328 (1998).
Google Scholar
Nei, M., Suzuki, Y. & Nozawa, M. The neutral theory of molecular evolution in the genomic era. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 11, 265–289 (2010).
Google Scholar
Iranzo, J., Cuesta, J. A., Manrubia, S., Katsnelson, M. I. & Koonin, E. V. Disentangling the effects of selection and loss bias on gene dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E5616–E5624 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wolf, Y. I., Makarova, K. S., Lobkovsky, A. E. & Koonin, E. V. Two fundamentally different classes of microbial genes. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 16208 (2016).
Google Scholar
Rasko, D. A. et al. The pangenome structure of Escherichia coli: comparative genomic analysis of E. coli commensal and pathogenic isolates. J. Bacteriol. 190, 6881–6893 (2008).
Google Scholar
Koskella, B., Hall, L. J. & Metcalf, C. J. E. The microbiome beyond the horizon of ecological and evolutionary theory. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1606–1615 (2017).
Google Scholar
Liu, R. et al. Gut microbiome and serum metabolome alterations in obesity and after weight-loss intervention. Nat. Med. 23, 859–868 (2017).
Google Scholar
Metcalf, J. L. et al. Microbial community assembly and metabolic function during mammalian corpse decomposition. Science 351, 158–162 (2015).
Google Scholar
Vincent, C. et al. Bloom and bust: intestinal microbiota dynamics in response to hospital exposures and Clostridium difficile colonization or infection. Microbiome 4, 12 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zeller, G. et al. Potential of fecal microbiota for early‐stage detection of colorectal cancer. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 766 (2014).
Google Scholar
Gibson, M. K. et al. Developmental dynamics of the preterm infant gut microbiota and antibiotic resistome. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16024 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. The oral and gut microbiomes are perturbed in rheumatoid arthritis and partly normalized after treatment. Nat. Med. 21, 895–905 (2015).
Google Scholar
Brito, I. L. et al. Mobile genes in the human microbiome are structured from global to individual scales. Nature 535, 435–439 (2016).
Google Scholar
Vatanen, T. et al. Variation in microbiome LPS immunogenicity contributes to autoimmunity in humans. Cell 165, 842–853 (2016).
Google Scholar
Turnbaugh, P. J. et al. The human microbiome project. Nature 449, 804–810 (2007).
Google Scholar
Hannigan, G. D. et al. The human skin double-stranded DNA virome: topographical and temporal diversity, genetic enrichment, and dynamic associations with the host microbiome. MBio 6, e01578-15 (2015).
Google Scholar
Taft, D. H. et al. Intestinal microbiota of preterm infants differ over time and between hospitals. Microbiome 2, 36 (2014).
Google Scholar
Zeevi, D. et al. Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses. Cell 163, 1079–1094 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wilhelm, R. C. et al. Biogeography and organic matter removal shape long-term effects of timber harvesting on forest soil microbial communities. ISME J. 11, 2552–2568 (2017).
Google Scholar
Xie, H. et al. Shotgun metagenomics of 250 adult twins reveals genetic and environmental impacts on the gut microbiome. Cell Syst. 3, 572–584.e3 (2016).
Google Scholar
The MetaSUB International Consortium. The metagenomics and metadesign of the subways and urban biomes (metasub) international consortium inaugural meeting report. Microbiome 4, 24 (2016).
Chatelier, E. L. et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature 500, 541–546 (2013).
Google Scholar
Li, J. et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis contributes to the development of hypertension. Microbiome 5, (2017).
Pehrsson, E. C. et al. Interconnected microbiomes and resistomes in low-income human habitats. Nature 533, 212–216 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, J. et al. An integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 834–841 (2014).
Google Scholar
Feng, Q. et al. Gut microbiome development along the colorectal adenoma–carcinoma sequence. Nat. Commun. 6, 6528 (2015).
Google Scholar
Gu, Y. et al. Analyses of gut microbiota and plasma bile acids enable stratification of patients for antidiabetic treatment. Nat. Commun. 8, 1785 (2017).
Google Scholar
Karlsson, F. H. et al. Gut metagenome in european women with normal, impaired and diabetic glucose control. Nature 498, 99–103 (2013).
Google Scholar
Yu, J. et al. Metagenomic analysis of faecal microbiome as a tool towards targeted non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Gut 66, 70–78 (2017).
Google Scholar
Youngster, I. et al. Fecal microbiota transplant for relapsing clostridium difficile infection using a frozen inoculum from unrelated donors: a randomized, open-label, controlled pilot study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 58, 1515–1522 (2014).
Google Scholar
Guittar, J., Shade, A. & Litchman, E. Trait-based community assembly and succession of the infant gut microbiome. Nat. Commun. 10, 512 (2019).
Google Scholar
Vogtmann, E. et al. Colorectal cancer and the human gut microbiome: reproducibility with whole-genome shotgun sequencing. PLoS ONE 11, e0155362 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chng, K. R. et al. Whole metagenome profiling reveals skin microbiome-dependent susceptibility to atopic dermatitis flare. Nat Microbiol 1, 16106 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chu, D. M. et al. Maturation of the infant microbiome community structure and function across multiple body sites and in relation to mode of delivery. Nat. Med. 23, 314–326 (2017).
Google Scholar
Van Rossum, T. et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of river viruses, bacteria and microeukaryotes. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/259861 (2018).
Feng, Q. et al. Integrated metabolomics and metagenomics analysis of plasma and urine identified microbial metabolites associated with coronary heart disease. Sci. Rep. 6, 22525 (2016).
Google Scholar
Oh, J., Byrd, A. L., Park, M., Kong, H. H. & Segre, J. A. Temporal stability of the human skin microbiome. Cell 165, 854–866 (2016).
Google Scholar
Xiao, L. et al. A reference gene catalogue of the pig gut microbiome. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16161 (2016).
Google Scholar
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014).
Coelho, L. P. et al. NG-meta-profiler: Fast processing of metagenomes using ngless, a domain-specific language. Microbiome 7, 84 (2019).
Google Scholar
Li, D., Liu, C.-M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K. & Lam, T.-W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct De Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31, 1674–1676 (2015).
Google Scholar
Besemer, J. & Borodovsky, M. GeneMark: web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W451–W454 (2005).
Google Scholar
Coelho, L. P. Jug: Software for parallel reproducible computation in Python. J. Open Res. Softw. 5, 30 (2017).
Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using diamond. Nat. Methods 12, 59–60 (2015).
Google Scholar
Eberhardt, R. Y. et al. AntiFam: A tool to help identify spurious ORFs in protein annotation. Database 2012, bas003 (2012).
Google Scholar
Kang, D. et al. MetaBAT 2: An adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7, e7359 (2019).
Google Scholar
Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with bwa-mem. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997 (2013).
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
Google Scholar
Bowers, R. M. et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 725–731 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhou, W., Gay, N. & Oh, J. ReprDB and panDB: minimalist databases with maximal microbial representation. Microbiome 6, 15 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hingamp, P. et al. Exploring nucleo-cytoplasmic large DNA viruses in tara oceans microbial metagenomes. ISME J. 7, 1678–1695 (2013).
Google Scholar
Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).
Google Scholar
Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. eggNOG 5.0: A hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D309–D314 (2019).
Google Scholar
Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002195 (2011).
Google Scholar
Smyshlyaev, G., Barabas, O. & Bateman, A. Sequence analysis allows functional annotation of tyrosine recombinases in prokaryotic genomes. Mol. Syst. Biol. 17, e9880 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jia, B. et al. CARD 2017: Expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D566–D573 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gibson, M. K., Forsberg, K. J. & Dantas, G. Improved annotation of antibiotic resistance determinants reveals microbial resistomes cluster by ecology. ISME J. 9, 207–216 (2015).
Google Scholar
Li, T., Fan, K., Wang, J. & Wang, W. Reduction of protein sequence complexity by residue grouping. Protein Eng. 16, 323–330 (2003).
Google Scholar
Zhao, M., Lee, W.-P., Garrison, E. P. & Marth, G. T. SSW library: an SIMD Smith–Waterman C/C++ library for use in genomic applications. PLoS ONE 8, e82138 (2013).
Google Scholar
Li, H. Minimap2: Pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2017).
Milanese, A. et al. Microbial abundance, activity and population genomic profiling with mOTUs2. Nat. Commun. 10, 1014 (2019).
Google Scholar
Salter, S. J. et al. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol. 12, 87 (2014).
Google Scholar
Kumar, R., Acharya, V., Singh, D. & Kumar, S. Strategies for high-altitude adaptation revealed from high-quality draft genome of non-violacein producing Janthinobacterium lividum ERGS5:01. Stand. Genomic Sci. 13, 11 (2018).
Google Scholar
Patijanasoontorn, B. et al. Hospital acquired Janthinobacterium lividum septicemia in srinagarind hospital. J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 75 Suppl 2, 6–10 (1992).
Google Scholar
Harris, C. R. et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585, 357–362 (2020).
Google Scholar
Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Google Scholar
Collins, R. E. & Higgs, P. G. Testing the infinitely many genes model for the evolution of the bacterial core genome and pangenome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 3413–3425 (2012).
Google Scholar
Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using clustal omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).
Google Scholar
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2—approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010).
Google Scholar
Huerta-Cepas, J., Serra, F. & Bork, P. ETE 3: reconstruction, analysis, and visualization of phylogenomic data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1635–1638 (2016).
Google Scholar
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).
Google Scholar
Suyama, M., Torrents, D. & Bork, P. PAL2NAL: robust conversion of protein sequence alignments into the corresponding codon alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W609–12 (2006).
Google Scholar
Murrell, B. et al. FUBAR: a fast, unconstrained Bayesian approximation for inferring selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 1196–1205 (2013).
Google Scholar
Smith, M. D. et al. Less is more: an adaptive branch-site random effects model for efficient detection of episodic diversifying selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 1342–1353 (2015).
Google Scholar
Washietl, S. et al. RNAcode: robust discrimination of coding and noncoding regions in comparative sequence data. RNA 17, 578–594 (2011).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
