in

Tracking the rising extinction risk of sharks and rays in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea

  • 1.

    McClenachan, L., Cooper, A. B., Carpenter, K. E. & Dulvy, N. K. Extinction risk and bottlenecks in the conservation of charismatic marine species. Conserv. Lett. 5, 1–8 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Dulvy, N. K., Jennings, S., Rogers, S. I. & Maxwell, D. L. Threat and decline in fishes: An indicator of marine biodiversity. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63, 1267–1275 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    CBD & UNEP. Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi Targets ‘Living in Harmony with Nature’. 2pp. https://www.cbd.int/doc/strategic-plan/2011-2020/Aichi-Targets-EN.pdf (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Quebec, 2011).

  • 4.

    Butchart, S. H. M. et al. Improvements to the Red List Index. PLoS ONE 2, 1–8 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Butchart, S. H. M. et al. Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: Red List Indices for birds. PLoS Biol. 2, 2294–2304 (2004).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Butchart, S. H. M. et al. Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 360, 255–268 (2005).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Hoffmann, M. et al. The changing fates of the world’s mammals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 366, 2598–2610 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Marler, P. N. & Marler, T. E. An assessment of Red List data for the cycadales. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 8, 1114–1125 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Carpenter, K. E. et al. One-third of reef-building corals face elevated extinction risk from climate change and local impacts. Science (80-. ) 321, 560–563 (2008).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Gärdenfors, U. Classifying threatened species at national versus global levels. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 511–516 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Szabo, J. K., Butchart, S. H. M., Possingham, H. P. & Garnett, S. T. Adapting global biodiversity indicators to the national scale: A Red List Index for Australian birds. Biol. Conserv. 148, 61–68 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Juslén, A., Hyvärinen, E. & Virtanen, L. K. Application of the Red-List Index at a national level for multiple species groups. Conserv. Biol. 27, 398–406 (2013).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Hoffmann, M. et al. The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science (80-. ) 330, 1503–1509 (2010).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    IPBES. Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 56pp. https://ipbes.net/document-library-catalogue/summary-policymakers-global-assessment-laid-out (IPBES Secretariat, Bonn, Germany, 2019).

  • 15.

    Dulvy, N. K., Sadovy, Y. & Reynolds, J. D. Extinction vulnerability in marine populations. Fish Fish. 4, 25–64 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Lawson, J. M. et al. Global extinction risk and conservation of Critically Endangered angel sharks in the Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea. Int. Counc. Explor. Seas J. Mar. Sci. 77, 12–29 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    WGEF. Report of the Working Group on Elasmobranch Fishes (WGEF). 671pp. https://www.ices.dk/community/groups/pages/wgef.aspx (ICES CM, Lisbon, Portugal, 2018).

  • 18.

    Dulvy, N. K., Allen, D. J., Ralph, G. M. & Walls, R. H. L. The conservation status of sharks, rays and chimaeras in the Mediterranean Sea. 14pp. https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/47636 (IUCN, Malaga, Spain, 2016)

  • 19.

    Cavanagh, R. D. & Gibson, C. Overview of the Conservation Status of Cartilaginous Fishes (Chondrichthyans) in the Mediterranean Sea (IUCN, 2007). https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2007.MRA.3.en.

    Book 

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Gibson, C., Valenti, S. V., Fowler, S. L. & Fordham, S. V. The Conservation Status of Northeast Atlantic Chondrichthyans: Report of the IUCN Shark Specialist Group Northeast Atlantic Regional Red List Workshop (IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Nieto, A. et al. European Red List of Marine Fishes. 88pp. https://doi.org/10.2779/082723 (Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2015).

  • 22.

    Barrett, J. H., Locker, A. M. & Roberts, C. M. The origins of intensive marine fishing in medieval Europe: The English evidence. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 271, 2417–2421 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Rousseau, Y., Watson, R. A., Blanchard, J. L. & Fulton, E. A. Evolution of global marine fishing fleets and the response of fished resources. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 12238–12243 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Fernandes, P. G. et al. Coherent assessments of Europe’s marine fishes show regional divergence and megafauna loss. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1–9 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Walls, R. H. L. & Dulvy, N. K. Eliminating the dark matter of data deficiency by predicting the conservation status of Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea sharks and rays. Biol. Conserv. 246, 1–14 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Kyne, P. M. et al. The thin edge of the wedge: Extremely high extinction risk in wedgefishes and giant guitarfishes. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 30, 1337–1361 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Jennings, S., Reynolds, J. D. & Mills, S. C. Life history correlates of responses to fisheries exploitation. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 265, 333–339 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Frisk, M. G., Miller, T. J. & Fogarty, M. J. Estimation and analysis of biological parameters in elasmobranch fishes: A comparative life history study. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58, 969–981 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Hutchings, J. A., Myers, R. A., García, V. B., Lucifora, L. O. & Kuparinen, A. Life-history correlates of extinction risk and recovery potential. Ecol. Appl. 22, 1061–1067 (2012).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Dulvy, N. K. et al. Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays. Elife 3, 1–35 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Cardoso, P. Package ‘red’. 32pp. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/red/red.pdf (2020).

  • 32.

    Pacoureau, N. et al. Half a century of global decline in oceanic sharks and rays. Nature 589, 567–571 (2021).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    IUCN 2021. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021–1. Web page: https://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 7 April 2021.

  • 34.

    European Environment Agency. Red List Index for European species. 23pp. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/red-list-index-for-european-species/red-list-index-for-european (EEA, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2010).

  • 35.

    Bolam, F. C. et al. How many bird and mammal extinctions has recent conservation action prevented?. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.11.943902 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    GFCM. Recommendation GFCM/29/2005/1 on the Management of Certain Fisheries Exploiting Demersal and Deep-Water Species and the Establishment of a Fisheries Restricted Area Below 1000 m. 2pp. https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/mar/soiom-2016-01/other/soiom-2016-01-gfcm-02-en.pdf (2005).

  • 37.

    Morato, T., Watson, R., Pitcher, T. J. & Pauly, D. Fishing down the deep. Fish Fish. 7, 23–33 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Abernethy, K. E., Trebilcock, P., Kebede, B., Allison, E. H. & Dulvy, N. K. Fuelling the decline in UK fishing communities?. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 67, 1076–1085 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Campana, S. E. Transboundary movements, unmonitored fishing mortality, and ineffective international fisheries management pose risks for pelagic sharks in the Northwest Atlantic. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 73, 1599–1607 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Queiroz, N. et al. Global spatial risk assessment of sharks under the footprint of fisheries. Nature 572, 461–466 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Fredston-Hermann, A., Selden, R., Pinsky, M., Gaines, S. D. & Halpern, B. S. Cold range edges of marine fishes track climate change better than warm edges. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 2908–2922 (2020).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Yan, H. F. et al. Overfishing and habitat loss drives range contraction of iconic marine fishes to near extinction. Sci. Adv. 7, 1–11 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    De Oliveira, J. A., Ellis, J. R. & Dobby, H. Incorporating density dependence in pup production in a stock assessment of NE Atlantic spurdog Squalus acanthias. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 70, 1341–1353 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Bailey, D. M., Collins, M. A., Gordon, J. D. M., Zuur, A. F. & Priede, I. G. Long-term changes in deep-water fish populations in the northeast Atlantic: A deeper reaching effect of fisheries?. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 276, 1965–1969 (2009).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    IUCN. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second Edition. iv + 32pp. https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/grid (IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, 2012).

  • 46.

    Godfray, H. C. J. et al. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science (80-. ) 327, 812–818 (2010).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Smith, A. D. M. & Garcia, S. M. Fishery management: Contrasts in the Mediterranean and the Atlantic. Curr. Biol. 24, 810–812 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Caddy, J. F. Practical issues in choosing a framework for resource assessment and management of Mediterranean and Black Sea fisheries. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 10, 83–119 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Colloca, F. et al. Rebuilding Mediterranean fisheries: A new paradigm for ecological sustainability. Fish Fish. 14, 89–109 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Pauly, D. Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 430 (1995).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Brander, K. Disappearance of common skate Raia batis from Irish Sea. Nature 290, 48–49 (1981).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Vasilakopoulos, P., Maravelias, C. D. & Tserpes, G. The alarming decline of Mediterranean fish stocks. Curr. Biol. 24, 1643–1648 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Oliver, S., Braccini, M., Newman, S. J. & Harvey, E. S. Global patterns in the bycatch of sharks and rays. Mar. Policy 54, 86–97 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Harrison, A. L. et al. The political biogeography of migratory marine predators. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1571–1578 (2018).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    White, C. & Costello, C. Close the high seas to fishing?. PLoS Biol. 12, 1–5 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Donald, P. F. et al. International conservation policy delivers benefits for birds in Europe. Science (80-. ) 317, 810–813 (2007).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    Demirel, N., Zengin, M. & Ulman, A. First large-scale eastern Mediterranean and black sea stock assessment reveals a dramatic decline. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 1–13 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    Clarke, M. W. Sharks, skates and rays in the northeast Atlantic: Population status, advice and management. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 25, 3–8 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    Abudaya, M. et al. Speak of the devil ray (Mobula mobular) fishery in Gaza. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 28, 229–239 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 60.

    CMS. Appendices I and II of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS). 16pp. Available at: https://www.cms.int/en/species/appendix-i-ii-cms (2020).

  • 61.

    Jabado, R. W. et al. The Conservation Status of Sharks, Rays, and Chimaeras in the Arabian Sea and Adjacent Waters (Environment Agency – Abu Dhabi, UAE and IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 62.

    Iglésias, S. P., Toulhoat, L. & Sellos, D. Y. Taxonomic confusion and market mislabelling of threatened skates: Important consequences for their conservation status. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 20, 319–333 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 63.

    Ferretti, F., Myers, R. A., Serena, F. & Lotze, H. K. Loss of large predatory sharks from the Mediterranean Sea. Conserv. Biol. 22, 952–964 (2008).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 64.

    Iglésias, S. P. & Mollen, F. H. Cold case: The early disappearance of the Bramble shark (Echinorhinus brucus) in European and adjacent waters. Oceans Past News 10, 1–5 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 65.

    IUCN. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0 (IUCN, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • 66.

    CBD. Indicators for Assessing Progress Towards the 2010 Target: Change in Status of Threatened Species. Convention on Biological Diversity, UNEP/CBD/AHTEG-2010-Ind/1/INF/9. 10pp. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/meetings/TEGIND-01 (2004).

  • 67.

    Brooks, T. M. et al. Harnessing biodiversity and conservation knowledge products to track the Aichi targets and sustainable development goals. Biodiversity 16, 157–174 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 68.

    Bland, L. M. et al. Toward reassessing data-deficient species. Conserv. Biol. 31, 531–539 (2017).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 69.

    Bland, L. M. et al. Cost-effective assessment of extinction risk with limited information. J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 861–870 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 70.

    White, W. T., Kyne, P. M. & Harris, M. Lost before found: A new species of whaler shark Carcharhinus obsolerus from the Western Central Pacific known only from historic records. PLoS ONE 14, 1–24 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 71.

    Mace, G. M. et al. Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss. Nat. Sustain. 1, 448–451 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 72.

    IUCN. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission (IUCN, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • 73.

    Regan, T. J. et al. The consistency of extinction risk classification protocols. Conserv. Biol. 19, 1969–1977 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 74.

    Hiddink, J. G., Shepperson, J., Bater, R., Goonesekera, D. & Dulvy, N. K. Near disappearance of the Angelshark Squatina squatina over half a century of observations. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 1, 1–9 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 75.

    Bom, R. A., van de Water, M., Camphuysen, K. C. J., van der Veer, H. W. & van Leeuwen, A. The historical ecology and demise of the iconic Angelshark Squatina squatina in the southern North Sea. Mar. Biol. 167, 1–10 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 76.

    Shephard, S., Wögerbauer, C., Green, P., Ellis, J. R. & Roche, W. K. Angling records track the near extirpation of angel shark Squatina squatina from two Irish hotspots. Endanger. Species Res. 38, 153–158 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 77.

    Martin, C. S. et al. Spatio-temporal patterns in demersal elasmobranchs from trawl surveys in the eastern English Channel (1988–2008). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 417, 211–228 (2010).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 78.

    Burt, G. J., Ellis, J. R., Harley, B. F. & Kupschus, S. The FV Carhelmar Beam Trawl Survey of the Western English Channel (1989–2011): History of the Survey, Data Availability and the Distribution and Relative Abundance of Fish and Commercial Shellfish. CEFAS, Norwich, UK. Science Series, Technical Report no. 151. 139pp. (2013).

  • 79.

    Marandel, F., Lorance, P. & Trenkel, V. M. Determining long-term changes in a skate assemblage with aggregated landings and limited species data. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 26, 365–373 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 80.

    IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, Version 11. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. 87pp. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf (2014).

  • 81.

    R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: https://www.r-project.org/. (2018).

  • 82.

    Bates, D. et al. Package ‘lme4’. 126pp. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html (2020).

  • 83.

    Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N. J., Saveliev, A. & Smith, G. M. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R Statistics for Biology and Health (Springer, 2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6.

    Book 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • 84.

    Zuur, A. F., Hilbe, J. M. & Ieno, E. N. A Beginner’s Guide to GLM and GLMM with R: A Frequentist and Bayesian Perspective for Ecologists (Highland Statistic Ltd., 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • 85.

    Gelman, A. Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Stat. Med. 27, 2865–2873 (2008).

    MathSciNet 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 86.

    Hurvich, C. M. & Tsai, C.-L. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76, 297–307 (1989).

    MathSciNet 
    MATH 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 87.

    Johnson, J. B. & Omland, K. S. Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 101–108 (2004).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 88.

    Bartoń, K. Package ‘MuMIn’. 75pp. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html (2019).

  • 89.

    John, A. et al. Package ‘car’. 149pp. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/car/index.html (2020).

  • 90.

    Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N. & Smith, G. M. Analysing Ecological Data. Statistics for Biology and Health (Springer, 2007). https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000715.

    Book 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    What will happen to sediment plumes associated with deep-sea mining?

    A new approach to preventing human-induced earthquakes