in

Detailed analysis of habitat suitability curves for macroinvertebrates and functional feeding groups

[adace-ad id="91168"]
  • Poff, N. L. et al. The natural flow regime: A new paradigm for riverine conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47, 769–784 (1997).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, S. E. & Arthington, A. H. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ. Manage. 30(4), 492–507 (2002).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Olden, J. D. et al. Are large-scale flow experiments informing the science and management of freshwater ecosystems?. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12, 176–185 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L. Beyond the natural flow regime? Broadening the hydro-ecological foundation to meet environmental flows challenges in a non-stationary world. Freshw. Biol. 63, 1011–1021 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Acreman, M. Ethical aspects of water and ecosystems. Water Policy 3, 257–265 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Olden, J. D. & Naiman, R. J. Incorporating thermal regimes into environmental flows assessments: Modifying dam operations to restore freshwater ecosystem integrity. Freshw. Biol. 55, 86–107 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L. & Zimmerman, J. K. H. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: A literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flow. Freshw. Biol. 55, 194–205 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, B. D. & Thomas, G. A. Restoring environmental flows by modifying dam operations. Ecol. Soc. 12(1), 12 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharme, R. E. A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res. Appl. 19, 397–441 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vӧrӧsmarty, C. J. et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 468, 334–334 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Acreman, M. C. & Ferguson, A. J. D. Environmental flows and the European water framework directive. Freshw. Biol. 55, 32–48 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L. & Matthews, J. H. Environmental flows in the Anthropocence: Past progress and future prospects. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5, 667–675 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodoropoulos, C. & Skoulikidis, N. Environmental flows: The European approach through the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC. In Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of the Hellenic Geographical Society 1140–1152 (2015).

  • The Brisbane Declaration. Environmental flows are essential for freshwater ecosystem health and human well-being. In Declaration of the 10th International River Symposium 3–6 (Brisbane, Australia, 2007).

  • Arthington, A. H. et al. The brisbane declaration and global action agenda on environmental flows. Front. Environ. Sci. 6, 45 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. Ecological flows in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. WFD CIS Guidance Document No. 31 (2015).

  • Hirzel, A. H. & Le Lay, G. Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory. J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 1372–1381 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Soberon, J. Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. Ecol. Lett. 10(12), 1115–1123 (2007).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi-Nedushan, B. et al. A review on statistical methods for the evaluation of the aquatic habitat suitability for instream flow assessment. River Res. Applic. 22, 503–523 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolédec, S., Lamouroux, N., Fuchs, U. & Mérigoux, S. Modelling the hydraulic preferences of benthic macroinvertebrates in small European stream. Freshw. Biol. 52, 145–164 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Katopodis, C. Case studies of instream flow modelling for fish habitat in Canadian Prairie Rivers. Can. Water Resour. J. 28, 199–216 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasiewicz, P. Application of MesoHABSIM and target fish community approaches to restoration of the Quinebaug River, Connecticut and Massachusetts, U.S.A. River. Res. Appl. 24, 459–471 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Piniweski, M. et al. Estimation of environmental flows in semi-natural lowland rivers – the Narew basin case study. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 20(5), 1281–1293 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodoropoulos, C., Vourka, A., Skoulikidis, N., Rutschmann, P. & Stamou, A. Evaluating the performance of habitat models for predicting the environmental flow requirements of benthic macroinvertebrates. J. Ecohydraul. 3(1), 30–44 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Y. et al. Evaluating the ecological influence of hydraulic projects: A review of aquatic habitat suitability models. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 68, 748–762 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodoropoulos, C., Skoulikidis, N., Rutschmann, P. & Stamou, A. Ecosystem-based environmental flow assessment in a Greek regulated river with the use of 2D hydrodynamic habitat modelling. River Res. Appl. 34(6), 538–547 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huryn, A. D. & Wallace, J. B. Life history and production of stream insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 45(1), 83–110 (2000).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. B. & Webster, J. R. The role of macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystem function. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 41, 115–139 (1996).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W. Structure and function of stream ecosystems. Bioscience 24, 631–641 (1974).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Covich, A. P., Palmer, M. A. & Crowl, T. A. The role of benthic invertebrates species in freshwater ecosystems. Bioscience 49(2), 119–127 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolédec, S., Statzner, B. & Bournaud, M. Species traits for future biomonitoring across ecoregions: Patterns along a human-impacted river. Freshw. Biol. 42, 737–758 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzin, N. et al. Ecological assessment of running waters: Do macrophytes, macroinvertebrates, diatoms and fish show similar responses to human pressures?. Ecol. Ind. 23, 56–65 (2012).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Statzner, B., Bady, P., Dolédec, S. & Schöll, F. Invertebrate traits for the biomonitoring of large European rivers: An initial assessment of trait patterns in least impacted river reaches. Freshw. Biol. 50, 2136–2161 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jowett, I. G. Hydraulic constraints on habitat suitability for benthic invertebrates in gravel-bed rivers. River Res. Appl. 19, 495–507 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewson, Z. S., James, A. B. W. & Death, R. G. A review of the consequences of decreased flow for instream habitat and macroinvertebrates. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 26, 401–415 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P. J. & Armitage, P. D. Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environ. Manage. 21(2), 203–217 (1997).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolls, R. J., Leigh, C. & Sheldon, F. Mechanistic effects of low-flow hydrology on riverine ecosystems: Ecological principles and consequences of alteration. Freshw. Sci. 31, 1163–1186 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D., Pusch, M. T., Lorenz, S. & Brauns, M. Cascading effects of flow reduction on the benthic invertebrate community in a lowland river. Hydrobiologia 717, 147–159 (2013).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • González, J. M., Recuerda, M. & Elosegi, A. Crowded waters: short-term response of invertebrate drift to water abstraction. Hydrobiologia 819, 39–51 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jowett, I. G., Richardson, J., Biggs, B. J. F., Hickey, C. W. & Quinn, J. M. Microhabitat preferences of benthic invertebrates and the development of generalised Deleatidium spp habitat suitability curves, applied to four New Zealand rivers. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 25(2), 187–199 (1991).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamouroux, N. et al. The generality of abundance-environment relationships in microhabitats: A comment on Lancaster and Downes (2009). River Res. Appl. 26, 915–920 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mérigoux, S. & Dolédec, S. Hydraulic requirements of stream communities: A case study on invertebrates. Freshw. Biol. 49, 600–613 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, J. & Downes, B. J. Linking the hydraulic world of individual organisms to ecological processes: Putting ecology into ecohydraulics. River Res. Appl. 26, 385–403 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, J. & Hildrew, A. G. Flow refugia and the microdistribution of lotic macroinvertebrates. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 12(4), 385–393 (1993).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. & Olden, J. D. Evaluating transferability of flow–ecology relationships across space, time and taxonomy. Freshw. Biol. 63, 817–830 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., Cai, Q., Fu, X. & Liu, J. Construction of habitat suitability models (HSMs) for benthic macroinvertebrate and their applications to instream environmental flows: A case study in Xiangxi River of Three Gorges Reservior region China. Prog. Nat. Sci. 19, 359–367 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Growns, I. O. & Davis, J. A. Longitudinal changes in near-bed flows and macroinvertebrate communities in a western Australian stream. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 13, 417–438 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, K. A., Hayes, J. W., Jowett, I. G. & Olsen, D. A. Habitat suitability curves for benthic macroinvertebrates from a small New Zealand river. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 49, 178–191 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovee, K. D. et al. Stream Habitat Analysis using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. USGS Inf. Technol. Rep. 1998–0004, 1–130 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conallin, J., Boegh, E. & Jensen, J. K. Instream physical habitat modelling types: An analysis as stream hydromorphological modelling tools for EU water resource managers. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 8, 93–107 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L., Tharme, R. E. & Arthington, A. H. Evolution of environmental flows assessment science, principles, and methodologies. In Water for the Environment: Policy, Science, and Integrated Management (eds Horne, A. et al.) 203–236 (Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, 2017).

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovee, K.D. Development and evaluation of habitat suitability criteria for use in the instream flow incremental methodology. Washington (DC): USDI Fish and Wildlife Service. Instream Flow Information Paper #21 FWS/OBS-86/7.Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Mid-Continent Ecological Science Centre, Fort Collins, Colorado (1986).

  • Vismara, R., Azzellino, A., Bosi, R., Crosa, G. & Gentili, G. Preference curves for brown trout (Salmo trutta fario L.) in the River Adda, Northern Italy: comparing univariate and multivariate approaches. Regul. River 17, 37–50 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nestler, J. M., Milhous, R. T., Payne, T. R. & Smith, D. L. History and review of the habitat suitability criteria curve in applied aquatic ecology. River Res. Appl. 35, 1155–1180 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodoropoulos, C., Skoulikidis, N., Stamou, A. & Dimitriou, E. Spatiotemporal variation in benthic-invertebrates-based physical Habitat modelling: Can we use generic instead of local and season-specific habitat suitability criteria?. Water 10, 1508 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gąbka, M., Jakubas, E., Janiak, T. & Golski, J. Rzeki Wełna i Flinta – charakterystyka obiektów badań, ich położenie i granice zlewni. In Koncepcja lasu Modelowego w Zarządzaniu i Ochronie Różnorodności Biologicznej rzek Wełny i Flinty(Wielkopolska (eds Batora, J. et al.) 21–30 (Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartkowski, T. Rozwój polodowcowej sieci hydrograficznej w Wielkopolsce Środkowej (Zeszyty Naukowe UAM 8, 1957).

  • Paluch, J. Wpływ działalności spółek wodnych istniejących w XIX i na początku wieku XX na terenie zlewni rzeki Wełny na stan jej hydrografii i stosunków wodnych. In Proceedings of the conference “Ecological problems of the Vełna River basin – status and directions of measures 2–26 (Wągrowiec, 2009).

  • Jakubas, E. et al. Ocena stanu ekologicznego i zmian hydromorfologicznych rzek Wełny i Flinty. In Koncepcja lasu Modelowego w Zarządzaniu i Ochronie Różnorodności Biologicznej rzek Wełny i Flinty (Wielkopolska) (eds Batora, J. et al.) 141–150 (Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Szoszkiewicz, K. et al. Podręcznik oceny wód płynących w oparciu o Hydromorfologiczny Indeks Rzeczny (Inspekcja Ochrony Środowiska, Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska, 2017).

  • Emery, J. C. et al. Classifying the hydraulic performance of riffle–pool bedforms for habitat assessment and river rehabilitation design. River Res. Appl. 19, 533–549 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, M., Pander, J. & Geist, J. Taxonomic sufficiency in freshwater ecosystems: Effects of taxonomic resolution, functional traits, and data transformation. Freshw. Sci. 32(3), 762–778 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Kloiber, A., Graf, W., Lorenz, A. & Moog, O. The AQEM/STAR taxalist – a pan-European macro-invertebrate ecological database and taxa inventory. Hydrobiologia 566, 325–342 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. & Warwick, R. M. Changes in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation 2nd edn. (Plymout, PRIMER-E (Plymouth Marine Laboratory, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vimos-Lojano, D., Hampel, H., Vázquez, R. F. & Martínez-Capel, F. Community structure and functional feeding groups of macroinvertebrates in pristine Andean streams under different vegetation cover. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 20(3), 357–368 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. & Gorley, R. PRIMER v6: User Manual/Tutorial (Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (https://www.R-project.org/, 2020)

  • Oksanen, F. J., et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package Version 2.4–3. (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan, 2017)

  • Jowett, I.G., Hayes, J.W. & Duncan, M.J. A guide to instream habitat survey methods and analysis. NIWA Science and Technology Series No. 54 (2008).

  • Manly, B. F. J., McDonald, L. L. & Thomas, D. L. Resource Selection by Animals (Chapman and Hall, London, 1993).

    Book 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bis, B. & Mikulec, A. Przewodnik do oceny stanu ekologicznego rzek na podstawie makrobezkręgowców bentosowych (Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska, 2013).

  • Grygoruk, M. et al. Revealing the influence of hyporheic water exchange on the composition and abundance of bottom-dwelling macroinvertebrates in a temperate lowland river. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 442, 37. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2021036 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Degani, G. et al. Relationships between current velocity, depth and the invertebrate community in a stable river system. Hydrobiologia 263, 163–172 (1993).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti, G. A., Entrekin, S. A., Griffiths, N. & Tiegs, S. Coarse Particulate Organic Matter: Storage, Transport, and Retention. In Methods Ecosystem Function Vol. 2 (eds Lamberti, G. A. & Hauer, F. R.) 55–69 (Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, N., Riis, T., Suren, A. M. & Baattrup-Pedersen, A. Distribution of invertebrates within beds of two morphologically contrasting stream macrophyte species. Fundam. Appl. Limnol. 183(4), 309–321 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, J., Verdonschot, R. C. M., Schoelynck, J., Verdonschot, P. F. M. & Meire, P. The role of macrophyte structural complexity and water flow velocity in determining the epiphytic macroinvertebrate community composition in a lowland stream. Hydrobiologia 806, 157–173 (2018).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. A. & Nestler, J. M. Instream flow studies in perspective. Regul. Rivers Res. Manage. 2, 93–101 (1988).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, H. R., Byrom, A. E. & Chadderton, W. L. A Critique of IFIM —Instream Habitat Simulation in the New Zealand Context (Department of Conservation, 2003).

  • Stamou, A. et al. Determination of environmental flows in rivers using an integrated hydrological-hydrodynamic-habitat modelling approach. J. Environ. Manage. 209, 273–285 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. F., Blackburn, J. H., Clarke, R. T. & Furse, M. T. Macroinvertebrate-habitat associations in lowland rivers and their relevance to conservations. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. Verh. 25, 1515–1518 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leszczyńska, J., Głowacki, Ł & Grzybkowska, M. Factors shaping species richness and biodiversity of riverine macroinvertebrate assemblages at the local and regional scale. Community Ecol. 18(3), 227–236 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. A., Crawford, D. J. & Addison, D. S. An analysis of artificial riffles and enhancement of benthic community diversity by Physical Habitat Simulation (PHABSIM) and direct observation. Regul. Rivers Res. Manage. 14(1), 69–77 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. H. & Sedell, J. R. Detritus processing by macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystems. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 24, 351–377 (1979).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, M. J. et al. River discharge and local-scale physical habitat influence macroinvertebrate LIFE scores. Freshw. Biol. 55, 226–242 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Acreman, M. et al. Environmental flows for natural, hybrid, and novel riverine ecosystems in a changing world. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12(8), 466–473 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourdan, J. et al. Effects of changing climate on European stream invertebrate communities: a long-term data analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 621, 588–599 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarremejane, R. et al. Climate-driven hydrological variability determines inter-annual changes in stream invertebrate community assembly. Oikos 127, 1586–1595 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Floury, M., Usseglio-Polatera, P., Ferreol, M., Delattre, C. & Souchon, Y. Global climate change in large European rivers: Long-term effects on macroinvertebrate communities and potential local confounding factors. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 1085–1099 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Domisch, S., Jähnig, S. C. & Haase, P. Climate-change winners and losers: Stream macroinvertebrates of a submontane region in Central Europe. Freshw. Biol. 56, 2009–2020 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Donald Sadoway wins European Inventor Award for liquid metal batteries

    A nitrite-oxidising bacterium constitutively consumes atmospheric hydrogen