Sol, D., Bacher, S., Reader, S. M. & Lefebvre, L. Brain size predicts the success of mammal species introduced into novel environments. Am. Nat. 172(Suppl. 1), S63–S71 (2008).
Google Scholar
González-Lagos, C., Sol, D. & Reader, S. M. Large-brained mammals live longer. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 1064–1074 (2010).
Google Scholar
Gonda, A., Herczeg, G. & Merilä, J. Evolutionary ecology of intraspecific brain size variation: A review. Ecol. Evol. 3(8), 2751–2764 (2013).
Google Scholar
Benson-Amram, S., Dantzer, B., Stricker, G., Swanson, E. M. & Holekamp, K. E. Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores. PNAS 113(9), 2532–2537 (2016).
Google Scholar
Näslund, J., Aarestrup, K., Thomassen, S. T. & Johnsson, J. I. Early enrichment effects on brain development in hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): No evidence for a critical period. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 69(9), 1481–1490 (2012).
Google Scholar
Logan, C. J., Kruuk, L. E. B., Stanley, R., Thompson, A. M. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. Endocranial volume is heritable and is associated with longevity and fitness in a wild mammal. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3(12), 160622 (2016).
Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, N., Kitchener, A. C., Gilissen, E. & MacDonald, D. W. Brain size of the lion (Panthera leo) and the tiger (P. tigris): Implications for intrageneric phylogeny, intraspecific differences and the effects of captivity. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 98, 85–93 (2009).
Google Scholar
Turschwell, M. P. & White, C. R. The effects of laboratory housing and spatial enrichment on brain size and metabolic rate in the eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki. Biol. Open. 5(3), 205–210 (2016).
Google Scholar
Welniak-Kaminska, M. et al. Volumes of brain structures in captive wild-type and laboratory rats: 7T magnetic resonance in vivo automatic atlas-based study. PLoS ONE 14(4), e0215348 (2019).
Google Scholar
Guay, P. J., Parrott, M. & Selwood, L. Captive breeding does not alter brain volume in a marsupial over a few generations. Zoo Biol. 31, 82–86 (2012).
Google Scholar
Isler, K. et al. Endocranial volumes of primate species: Scaling analyses using a comprehensive and reliable data set. J. Hum. Evol. 55(6), 967–978 (2008).
Google Scholar
Burns, J. G., Saravanan, A. & Rodd, F. H. Rearing environment affects the brain size of guppies: Lab-reared guppies have smaller brains than wild-caught guppies. Ethol. 115(2), 122–133 (2009).
Google Scholar
Kruska, D. On the evolutionary significance of encephalization in some eutherian mammals: Effects of adaptive radiation, domestication, and feralization. Brain Behav. Evol. 65(2), 73–108 (2005).
Google Scholar
Logan, C. J. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. Validating methods for estimating endocranial volume in individual red deer (Cervus elaphus). Behav. Processes. 92, 143–146 (2013).
Google Scholar
Colby, A. E., Kimock, C. M. & Higham, J. P. Endocranial volume is variable and heritable, but not related to fitness, in a free-ranging primate. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–11 (2021).
Google Scholar
Stuermer, I. W. & Wetzel, W. Early experience and domestication affect auditory discrimination learning, open field behaviour and brain size in wild Mongolian gerbils and domesticated Laboratory gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus forma domestica). Behav. Brain Res. 173, 11–21 (2006).
Google Scholar
Agnvall, B., Bélteky, J. & Jensen, P. Brain size is reduced by selection for tameness in red junglefowl-correlated effects in vital organs. Sci. Rep. 7(3306), 1–7 (2017).
Google Scholar
Röhrs, M. & Ebinger, P. Wild is not really wild: Brain weight of wild and domestic mammals. Berl. Munch. Tierarztliche Wochenschrift. 112(6–7), 234–238 (1999).
Smith, B. P., Lucas, T. A., Norris, R. M. & Henneberg, M. Brain size/body weight in the dingo (Canis dingo): Comparisons with domestic and wild canids. Aust. J. Zool. 65(5), 292–301 (2017).
Google Scholar
Roberts, T., McGreevy, P. & Valenzuela, M. Human induced rotation and reorganization of the brain of domestic dogs. PLoS ONE 5(7), e11946 (2010).
Google Scholar
Pollen, A. A. et al. Environmental complexity and social organization sculpt the brain in Lake Tanganyikan cichlid fish. Brain Behav. Evol. 70, 21–39 (2007).
Google Scholar
Kihslinger, R. L., Lema, S. C. & Nevitt, G. A. Environmental rearing conditions produce forebrain differences in wild Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 145(2), 145–151 (2006).
Google Scholar
Guay, P. J. & Iwaniuk, A. N. Captive breeding reduces brain volume in waterfowl (Anseriformes). Condor 110(2), 276–284 (2008).
Google Scholar
Diamond, M. C., Ingham, C. A., Johnson, R. E., Bennett, E. L. & Rosenzweig, M. R. Effects of environment on morphology of rat cerebral cortex and hippocampus. J. Neurobiol. 7, 75–85 (1976).
Google Scholar
Courtney Jones, S. K., Munn, A. J. & Byrne, P. G. Effect of captivity on morphology: Negligible changes in external morphology mask significant changes in internal morphology. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5(5), 1–13 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kruska, D. & Röhrs, M. Comparative-quantitative investigations on brains of feral pigs from the Galapagos Islands and of European domestic pigs. Z. Anat. Entwicklungsgesch. 144(1), 61–73 (1974).
Google Scholar
Kruska, D. Changes of brain size in Tylopoda during phylogeny and caused by domestication. Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 75, 173–183 (1982).
Groves, C. P. Skull-changes due to captivity in certain Equidae. Z. Säugetierkd. 31, 44–46 (1966).
Groves, C. P. The skulls of Asian rhinoceroses: Wild and captive. Zoo Biol. 1, 251–261 (1982).
Google Scholar
Hollister, N. Some effects of environment and habit on captive lions. Proc. US. Natl. Mus. 53, 177–193 (1917).
Google Scholar
Price, E. O. Behavioral development in animals undergoing domestication. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 65(3), 245–271 (1999).
Google Scholar
Wolff, J. Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen (A. Hirchwild, 1892).
Herring, S. W. Formation of the vertebrate face: Epigenetic and functional influences. Am. Zool. 33, 472–483 (1993).
Google Scholar
Wroe, S. & Milne, N. Convergence and remarkably consistent constraint in the evolution of carnivore skull shape. Evol. 61(5), 1251–1260 (2007).
Google Scholar
Damasceno, E. M., Hingst-Zaher, E. & Astúa, D. Bite force and encephalization in the Canidae (Mammalia: Carnivora). J. Zool. 290(4), 246–254 (2013).
Google Scholar
Van Valkenburgh, B. Deja vu: the evolution of feeding morphologies in the Carnivora. Integr. Comp. Biol. 47, 147–163 (2007).
Google Scholar
Van Valkenburgh, B. Carnivore dental adaptations and diet: A study of trophic diversity within guilds in Carnivore behavior, ecology, and evolution (ed. Gittleman, J. L.) 410–436 (Springer Science & Business Media, 1989).
Slater, G. J., Dumont, E. R. & Van Valkenburgh, B. Implications of predatory specialization for cranial form and function in canids. J. Zool. 278(3), 181–188 (2009).
Google Scholar
Michaud, M., Veron, G. & Fabre, A. C. Phenotypic integration in feliform carnivores: Covariation patterns and disparity in hypercarnivores versus generalists. Evol. 74(12), 2681–2702 (2020).
Google Scholar
O’Regan, H. J. & Kitchener, A. C. The effects of captivity on the morphology of captive, domesticated and feral mammals. Mamm. Rev. 35, 215–230 (2005).
Google Scholar
Kapoor, V., Antonelli, T., Parkinson, J. A. & Hartstone-Rose, A. Oral health correlates of captivity. Res. Vet. Sci. 107, 213–219 (2016).
Google Scholar
Mitchell, D. R., Wroe, S., Ravosa, M. J. & Menegaz, R. A. More challenging diets sustain feeding performance: Applications toward the captive rearing of wildlife. Integr. Org. Biol. 3, 1–13 (2021).
Curtis, A. A., Orke, M., Tetradis, S. & Van Valkenburgh, B. Diet-related differences in craniodental morphology between captive-reared and wild coyotes, Canis latrans (Carnivora: Canidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 123(3), 677–693 (2018).
Google Scholar
Siciliano-Martina, L., Light, J. E. & Lawing, A. M. Cranial morphology of captive mammals: A meta-analysis. Front. Zool. 18(4), 1–13 (2021).
Corruccini, R. S. & Beecher, R. M. Occlusal variation related to soft diet in a nonhuman primate. Science 218, 74–75 (1982).
Google Scholar
Ramirez Rozzi, F. V., González-José, R. & Pucciarelli, H. M. Cranial growth in normal and low-protein-fed Saimiri An environmental heterochrony. J. Hum. Evol. 49(4), 515–535 (2005).
Google Scholar
Taylor, A. B. & van Schaik, C. P. Variation in brain size and ecology in Pongo. J. Hum. Evol. 52, 59–71 (2007).
Google Scholar
AZA Canid TAG. Large Canid (Canidae) Care Manual. (Association of Zoos and Aquariums, 2012).
Mexican Wolf Species Survival Plan. Mexican Gray Wolf Husbandry Manual: Guidelines for Captive Management (2009 edition). (Mexican Wolf Species Survival Plan and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2009).
Carrera, R. et al. Comparison of Mexican wolf and coyote diets in Arizona and New Mexico. The J. Wildl. Manag. 72(2), 376–381 (2008).
Google Scholar
Reed, J. E. et al. Diets of free-ranging Mexican gray wolves in Arizona and New Mexico. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 34(4), 1127–1133 (2006).
Google Scholar
Kazimierska, K., Biel, W. & Witkowicz, R. Mineral composition of cereal and cereal-free dry dog foods versus nutritional guidelines. Molecules 25(21), 1–24 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pezzali, J. G. & Aldrich, C. G. Effect of ancient grains and grain-free carbohydrate sources on extrusion parameters and nutrient utilization by dogs. J. Anim. Sci. 98(2), 3758–3767 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hartstone-Rose, A., Selvey, H., Villari, J. R., Atwell, M. & Schmidt, T. The three-dimensional morphological effects of captivity. PLoS ONE 9(11), 1–15 (2014).
Google Scholar
Siciliano-Martina, L., Light, J. E. & Lawing, A. M. Changes in canid cranial morphology induced by captivity and conservation implications. Biol. Conserv. 257, 109143 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hedrick, P. W. & Fredrickson, R. Genetic rescue guidelines with examples from Mexican wolves and Florida panthers. Conserv. Genet. 11(2), 615–626 (2010).
Google Scholar
Greely, S. E. Mexican Wolf, Canis lupus baileyi, International Studbook 2018. Palm Desert, California. (2018).
Kalinowski, S. T., Hedrick, P. W. & Miller, P. S. No inbreeding depression observed in Mexican and red wolf captive breeding programs. Conserv. Biol. 13(6), 1371–1377 (1999).
Google Scholar
Sakai, S. T., Whitt, B., Arsznov, B. M. & Lundrigan, B. L. Endocranial development in the coyote (Canis latrans) and gray wolf (Canis lupus): A computed tomographic study. Brain Behav. Evol. 91(2), 1–18 (2018).
Google Scholar
Van Valkenburgh, B. Skeletal and dental predictors of body mass in carnivores in Body size in mammalian paleobiology: estimation and biological implications (eds. Damuth, J. & MacFadden, B. J.) (Cambridge University Press, 1990).
Rohlf, F. J. TPSDig2: a program for landmark development and analysis (2001).
Siciliano-Martina, L., Light, J. E., Riley, D. G. & Lawing, A. M. One of these wolves is not like the other: morphological effects and conservation implications of captivity in Mexican wolves. Anim. Conserv. 25, 77–90 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zelditch, M. L., Donald, L., Swiderski, H., Sheets, D. & Fink, W. L. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. (Elsevier Academic Press, 2004).
Coster, A. pedigree: Pedigree functions. R package version 1.4 (2013).
Traylor-Holzer, K. (ed.). PMx user’s manual. Version 1.0. Apple Valley, MN: IUCN SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group. (2011).
Thomason, J. J. Cranial strength in relation to estimated biting forces in some Mammals. Can. J. Zool. 69, 2326–2333 (1991).
Google Scholar
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 9(7), 676–682 (2012).
Google Scholar
R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. (2020).
Cofran, Z. Brain size growth in wild and captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Am. J. Primat. 80(7), 1–8 (2018).
Google Scholar
Witzenberger, K. A. & Hochkirch, A. Ex situ conservation genetics: A review of molecular studies on the genetic consequences of captive breeding programmes for endangered animal species. Biodivers. Conserv. 20(9), 1843–1861 (2011).
Google Scholar
Gómez-Sánchez, D. et al. On the path to extinction: Inbreeding and admixture in a declining grey wolf population. Mole. Ecol. 27(18), 3599–3612 (2018).
Google Scholar
Elbroch, M. Animal skulls: a guide to North American species. (Stackpole Books, 2006).
Conde, D. A., Flesness, N., Colchero, F., Jones, O. R. & Scheuerlein, A. An emerging role of zoos to conserve biodiversity. Science 331, 1390–1391 (2011).
Google Scholar
Prado, E. L. & Dewey, K. G. Nutrition and brain development in early life. Nutr. Rev. 72(4), 267–284 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hecht, E. E. et al. Neuromorphological changes following selection for tameness and aggression in the Russian farm-fox experiment. J. Neurosci. 41(28), 6144–6156 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bennett, E. L., Rosenzweig, M. R. & Diamond, M. C. Rat brain: Effects of environmental enrichment on wet and dry weights. Science 163(3869), 825–826 (1969).
Google Scholar
Cummins, R. A., Walsh, R. N., Budtz-Olsen, O. E., Konstantinos, T. & Horsfall, C. R. Environmentally-induced changes in the brains of elderly rats. Nature 243(5409), 516–518 (1973).
Google Scholar
Welch, B. L., Brown, D. G., Welch, A. S. & Lin, D. C. Isolation, restrictive confinement or crowding of rats for one year. I. Weight, nucleic acids and protein of brain regions. Brain Res. 75, 71–84 (1974).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
