FOREST EUROPE. State of Europe’s Forests (Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, Bratislava, 2020).
Gamfeldt, L. et al. Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nat. Commun. 4, 1–8 (2013).
Brockerhoff, E. G. et al. Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Biodiv. Conserv. 26, 3005–3035 (2017).
Mori, A. S., Lertzman, K. P. & Gustafsson, L. Biodiversity and ecosystem services in forest ecosystems: a research agenda for applied forest ecology. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 12–27 (2017).
Forzieri, G. et al. Emergent vulnerability to climate-driven disturbances in European forests. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–12 (2021).
Senf, C. & Seidl, R. Mapping the forest disturbance regimes of Europe. Nat. Sustain. 4, 63–70 (2021).
Talluto, M. V., Boulangeat, I., Vissault, S., Thuiller, W. & Gravel, D. Extinction debt and colonization credit delay range shifts of eastern North American trees. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1–6 (2017).
Zhu, K., Woodall, C. W. & Clark, J. S. Failure to migrate: lack of tree range expansion in response to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 1042–1052 (2012).
Google Scholar
Williams, J. W., Ordonez, A. & Svenning, J.-C. A unifying framework for studying and managing climate-driven rates of ecological change. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 17–26 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jump, A. S. & Penuelas, J. Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1010–1020 (2005).
Google Scholar
Saltré, F. et al. Climate or migration: what limited European beech post-glacial colonization? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 1217–1227 (2013).
Svenning, J.-C. & Skov, F. Limited filling of the potential range in European tree species. Ecol. Lett. 7, 565–573 (2004).
Pedlar, J. H. et al. Placing forestry in the assisted migration debate. BioScience 62, 835–842 (2012).
Overpeck, J. T. & Breshears, D. D. The growing challenge of vegetation change. Science 372, 786–787 (2021).
Google Scholar
Strona, G. et al. Far from naturalness: How much does spatial ecological structure of European tree assemblages depart from potential natural vegetation? Plos One 11, e0165178 (2016).
Google Scholar
Giesecke, T. et al. Postglacial change of the floristic diversity gradient in Europe. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–7 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kaplan, J. O., Krumhardt, K. M. & Zimmermann, N. The prehistoric and preindustrial deforestation of Europe. Quat. Sci. Rev. 28, 3016–3034 (2009).
Google Scholar
Sabatini, F. M. et al. Where are Europe’s last primary forests? Divers. Distrib. 24, 1426–1439 (2018).
Nabuurs, G.-J. et al. Next-generation information to support a sustainable course for European forests. Nat. Sustain. 2, 815–818 (2019).
Williams, J. W., Jackson, S. T. & Kutzbach, J. E. Projected distributions of novel and disappearing climates by 2100 AD. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 5738–5742 (2007).
Google Scholar
Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al. Assisted colonization and rapid climate change. Science 321, 345–346 (2008).
Google Scholar
Jandl, R., Spathelf, P., Bolte, A. & Prescott, C. E. Forest adaptation to climate change – is non-management an option? Ann. For. Sci. 76, 1–13 (2019).
Dyderski, M. K., Paź, S., Frelich, L. E. & Jagodziński, A. M. How much does climate change threaten European forest tree species distributions? Glob. Change Biol. 24, 1150–1163 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hanewinkel, M., Cullmann, D. A., Schelhaas, M.-J., Nabuurs, G.-J. & Zimmermann, N. E. Climate change may cause severe loss in the economic value of European forest land. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 203–207 (2013).
Google Scholar
Thurm, E. A. et al. Alternative tree species under climate warming in managed European forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 430, 485–497 (2018).
Thuiller, W., Lavorel, S., Araújo, M. B., Sykes, M. T. & Prentice, I. C. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102, 8245–8250 (2005).
Google Scholar
Isbell, F. et al. Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes. Nature 526, 574–577 (2015).
Google Scholar
Morin, X. et al. Long-term response of forest productivity to climate change is mostly driven by change in tree species composition. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–12 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hisano, M., Searle, E. B. & Chen, H. Y. Biodiversity as a solution to mitigate climate change impacts on the functioning of forest ecosystems. Biol. Rev. 93, 439–456 (2018).
Google Scholar
Messier, C. et al. The functional complex network approach to foster forest resilience to global changes. For. Ecosyst. 6, 1–16 (2019).
Di Sacco, A. et al. Ten golden rules for reforestation to optimize carbon sequestration, biodiversity recovery and livelihood benefits. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 1328–1348 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jacob, D. et al. EURO-CORDEX: new high-resolution climate change projections for European impact research. Reg. Environ. Change 14, 563–578 (2014).
Buras, A. & Menzel, A. Projecting tree species composition changes of European forests for 2061–2090 under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1986 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chakraborty, D., Móricz, N., Rasztovits, E., Dobor, L. & Schueler, S. Provisioning forest and conservation science with high-resolution maps of potential distribution of major European tree species under climate change. Ann. For. Sci. 78, 1–18 (2021).
Noce, S., Collalti, A. & Santini, M. Likelihood of changes in forest species suitability, distribution, and diversity under future climate: The case of Southern Europe. Ecol. Evol. 7, 9358–9375 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hickler, T. et al. Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation model. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 50–63 (2012).
Takolander, A., Hickler, T., Meller, L. & Cabeza, M. Comparing future shifts in tree species distributions across Europe projected by statistical and dynamic process-based models. Reg. Environ. Change 19, 251–266 (2019).
Chen, M. et al. Global land use for 2015–2100 at 0.05 resolution under diverse socioeconomic and climate scenarios. Sci. Data 7, 1–11 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mauri, A., Strona, G. & San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. EU-Forest, a high-resolution tree occurrence dataset for Europe. Sci. Data 4, 1–8 (2017).
Strona, G., Mauri, A. & San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. A high-resolution pan-European tree occurrence dataset. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3288407.v1 (2016).
Benito-Garzón, M. & Fernández-Manjarrés, J. F. Testing scenarios for assisted migration of forest trees in Europe. New For. 46, 979–994 (2015).
Thuiller, W., Lavorel, S., Sykes, M. T. & Araújo, M. B. Using niche-based modelling to assess the impact of climate change on tree functional diversity in Europe. Divers. Distrib. 12, 49–60 (2006).
Robinet, C. et al. A suite of models to support the quantitative assessment of spread in pest risk analysis. PLoS ONE 7, 10 (2012).
European Commission. The European Green Deal. (Publications office of the European Union, 2019).
European Commission. EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, Bringing nature back into our lives. (Publications office of the European Union, 2020).
European Commission. A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. (Publications office of the European Union, 2018).
European Commission. New EU Forest Strategy for 2030. (Publications office of the European Union, 2021).
Thuiller, W., Lafourcade, B., Engler, R. & Araújo, M. B. BIOMOD–a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography 32, 369–373 (2009).
ICP Forests. International Co-operative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests. http://icp-forests.net/ (2019).
Zając, A., Zając, M., Tertil, R. & Harman, I. Atlas rozmieszczenia roślin naczyniowych w Polsce–Distribution Atlas of Vascular Plants in Poland. (Nakladem Pracowni Chorologii Komputerowej Instytutu Botaniki Uniwersytetu – Laboratory of Computer Corology – Institute of Botany – Jagiellonian University, 2001).
Gschwantner, T. et al. Common tree definitions for national forest inventories in Europe. Silva Fennica 43, 303–321 (2009).
Rivers, M. et al. European Red List of Trees. (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, 2019).
Rocchini, D. et al. Anticipating species distributions: Handling sampling effort bias under a Bayesian framework. Sci. Total Environ. 584, 282–290 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bartlein, P. J., Prentice, I. C. & Webb III, T. Climatic response surfaces from pollen data for some eastern North American taxa. J. Biogeogr. 35–57 (1986).
Woodward, F. I. & Woodward, F. Climate and plant distribution. (Cambridge University Press, 1987).
Harrison, S. et al. Towards a global scheme of plant functional types for ecosystem modelling, palaeoecology and climate impact research. J Veg Sci 21, 300–317 (2009).
Thuiller, W. BIOMOD–optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change. Glob. Change Biol. 9, 1353–1362 (2003).
Google Scholar
Prentice, I. C. et al. Special paper: a global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. J. Biogeogr. 117–134 (1992).
Pouteau, R. et al. Potential alien ranges of European plants will shrink in the future, but less so for already naturalized than for not yet naturalized species. Divers. Distrib. 27, 2063–2076 (2021).
Naimi, B. USDM: Uncertainty analysis for species distribution models. https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/usdm/versions/ (2015).
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).
Title, P. O. & Bemmels, J. B. ENVIREM: an expanded set of bioclimatic and topographic variables increases flexibility and improves performance of ecological niche modeling. Ecography 41, 291–307 (2018).
Teutschbein, C. & Seibert, J. Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: Review and evaluation of different methods. J. Hydrol. 456, 12–29 (2012).
Google Scholar
Ekström, M., Grose, M. R. & Whetton, P. H. An appraisal of downscaling methods used in climate change research. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 6, 301–319 (2015).
Beck, H. E. et al. Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci. Data 5, 1–12 (2018).
Google Scholar
Baker, B., Diaz, H., Hargrove, W. & Hoffman, F. Use of the Köppen–Trewartha climate classification to evaluate climatic refugia in statistically derived ecoregions for the People’s Republic of China. Clim. Change 98, 113–131 (2010).
Google Scholar
Barredo, J. I., Caudullo, G. & Dosio, A. Mediterranean habitat loss under future climate conditions: Assessing impacts on the Natura 2000 protected area network. Appl. Geogr. 75, 83–92 (2016).
Klausmeyer, K. R. & Shaw, M. R. Climate change, habitat loss, protected areas and the climate adaptation potential of species in Mediterranean ecosystems worldwide. PloS One 4, e6392 (2009).
Google Scholar
Tabor, K. & Williams, J. W. Globally downscaled climate projections for assessing the conservation impacts of climate change. Ecol. Appl. 20, 554–565 (2010).
Google Scholar
Collins, M. et al. Long-term climate change: projections, commitments and irreversibility. in Climate Change 2013-The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 1029–1136 (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
Hengl, T. et al. SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS One 12, e0169748 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L. et al. Consensus forecasting of species distributions: The effects of niche model performance and niche properties. PloS One 10, e0120056 (2015).
Google Scholar
Merow, C., Smith, M. J. & Silander, J. A. Jr. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 36, 1058–1069 (2013).
Barbet-Massin, M., Jiguet, F., Albert, C. H. & Thuiller, W. Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many? Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 327–338 (2012).
De Jong, R., Verbesselt, J., Zeileis, A. & Schaepman, M. E. Shifts in global vegetation activity trends. Remote Sens. 5, 1117–1133 (2013).
Google Scholar
Engler, R. & Guisan, A. MigClim: predicting plant distribution and dispersal in a changing climate. Divers. Distrib. 15, 590–601 (2009).
Engler, R., Hordijk, W. & Guisan, A. The MIGCLIM R package–seamless integration of dispersal constraints into projections of species distribution models. Ecography 35, 872–878 (2012).
Merow, C., Wilson, A. M. & Jetz, W. Integrating occurrence data and expert maps for improved species range predictions. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 243–258 (2017).
Caudullo, G., Welk, E. & San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. Chorological maps for the main European woody species. Data Brief 12, 662–666 (2017).
Google Scholar
Euro+Med. Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/ (2019).
Summers, D. M., Bryan, B. A., Crossman, N. D. & Meyer, W. S. Species vulnerability to climate change: impacts on spatial conservation priorities and species representation. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 2335–2348 (2012).
Google Scholar
García-Valdés, R., Zavala, M. A., Araujo, M. B. & Purves, D. W. Chasing a moving target: Projecting climate change-induced shifts in non-equilibrial tree species distributions. J. Ecol. 101, 441–453 (2013).
Lischke, H., Zimmermann, N. E., Bolliger, J., Rickebusch, S. & Löffler, T. J. TreeMig: a forest-landscape model for simulating spatio-temporal patterns from stand to landscape scale. Ecol. Model. 199, 409–420 (2006).
Tamme, R. et al. Predicting species’ maximum dispersal distances from simple plant traits. Ecology 95, 505–513 (2014).
Google Scholar
Thomson, F. J., Letten, A. D., Tamme, R., Edwards, W. & Moles, A. T. Can dispersal investment explain why tall plant species achieve longer dispersal distances than short plant species? New Phytol. 217, 407–415 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kattge, J. et al. TRY plant trait database–enhanced coverage and open access. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 119–188 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mauri, A., Girardello, M. & Strona, G. EU-Trees4F. A dataset on the future distribution of European tree species, figshare, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5525688 (2021).
Vítková, M., Müllerová, J., Sádlo, J., Pergl, J. & Pyšek, P. Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) beloved and despised: A story of an invasive tree in Central Europe. For. Ecol. Manag. 384, 287–302 (2017).
Muscarella, R. et al. ENM eval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for Maxent ecological niche models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 1198–1205 (2014).
Allouche, O., Tsoar, A. & Kadmon, R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 1223–1232 (2006).
Fitzpatrick, M. C. & Hargrove, W. W. The projection of species distribution models and the problem of non-analog climate. Biodivers. Conserv. 18, 2255–2261 (2009).
Elith, J. et al. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers. Distrib. 17, 43–57 (2011).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2020).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
