in

Lessons from COVID-19 for wildlife ranching in a changing world

  • Pascual, U. et al. Biodiversity and the challenge of pluralism. Nat. Sustain. 4, 567–572 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, G. S. The relevance and resilience of protected areas in the Anthropocene. Anthropocene 13, 46–56 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, G. S. et al. Understanding protected area resilience: a multi-scale, social-ecological approach. Ecol. Appl. 25, 299–319 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, E. C. & Mehrabi, Z. Half Earth: promises, pitfalls, and prospects of dedicating half of Earth’s land to conservation. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 38, 22–30 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden Kroner, R. E. et al. The uncertain future of protected lands and waters. Science 364, 881–886 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey, R., Oldekop, J. & Holmes, G. Conservation and social outcomes of private protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 35, 1098–1110 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney, G. G. et al. Biodiversity needs every tool in the box: use OECMs. Nature 595, 646–649 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen, C. & Merenlender, A. M. Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people. Science 362, eaau6020 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, W. A. et al. South Africa’s private wildlife ranches protect globally significant populations of wild ungulates. Biodivers. Conserv. 30, 4111–4135 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, B. A., Musengezi, J., Parent, G. D. & Child, G. F. T. The economics and institutional economics of wildlife on private land in Africa. Pastoralism 2, 18 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiffner, C. et al. Community-based wildlife management area supports similar mammal species richness and densities compared to a national park. Ecol. Evol. 10, 480–492 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, R. et al. Complementary benefits of tourism and hunting to communal conservancies in Namibia. Conserv. Biol. 30, 628–638 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, J., Sadler, J. & Evans, J. Exploring the role of private wildlife ranching as a conservation tool in South Africa: stakeholder perspectives. Ecol. Soc. 13, 43 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamal, S., Grodzińska-Jurczak, M. & Brown, G. Conservation on private land: a review of global strategies with a proposed classification system. J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 58, 576–597 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogar, E., Pecl, G. & Mustonen, T. Science must embrace traditional and indigenous knowledge to solve our biodiversity crisis. One Earth 3, 162–165 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, A. & Cumming, G. S. The contribution of land tenure diversity to the spatial resilience of protected area networks. People Nat. 1, 331–346 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, R. et al. Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37, 421–448 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, G. & Collier, J. Change and identity in complex systems. Ecol. Soc. 10, 29 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, T. H. et al. Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 673–684 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, P. & McCabe, J. T. Response diversity and resilience in social–ecological systems. Curr. Anthropol. 54, 114–143 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, H. S., Knight, M., Jones, P. & Balfour, D. Private rhino conservation: diverse strategies adopted in response to the poaching crisis. Conserv. Lett. 13, e12741 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M. & Abel, N. From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4, 765–781 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, K., De Vos, A., Clements, H. S., Biggs, D. & Biggs, R. Impacts of a trophy hunting ban on private land conservation in South African biodiversity hotspots. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2, e214 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Travel & Tourism Council. The Economic Impact of Global Wildlife Tourism (WTTC, 2019).

  • Lindsey, P. et al. Conserving Africa’s wildlife and wildlands through the COVID-19 crisis and beyond. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1300–1310 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambira, W. L., Stone, L. S. & Pagiwa, V. Botswana nature-based tourism and COVID-19: transformational implications for the future. Dev. South. Afr. 39, 51–67 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudzengi, B. K., Gandiwa, E., Muboko, N. & Mutanga, C. N. Innovative community ecotourism coping and recovery strategies to COVID-19 pandemic shocks: the case of Mahenye. Dev. South. Afr. 39, 68–83 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Waithaka, J. et al. Impacts of COVID-19 on protected and conserved areas: a global overview and regional perspectives. Parks 27, 41–56 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. K. S. et al. Sustainability of protected areas: vulnerabilities and opportunities as revealed by COVID-19 in a national park management agency. Biol. Conserv. 255, 108985 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller-Rushing, A. J. et al. COVID-19 pandemic impacts on conservation research, management, and public engagement in US national parks. Biol. Conserv. 257, 109038 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstan, R. H. et al. Envisioning a resilient future for biodiversity conservation in the wake of the COVID‐19 pandemic. People Nat. 3, 990–1013 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, W. A., Lindsey, P. A., Nicholson, S. K., Relton, C. & Davies-Mostert, H. T. Jobs, game meat and profits: the benefits of wildlife ranching on marginal lands in South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 245, 108561 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chidakel, A., Eb, C. & Child, B. The comparative financial and economic performance of protected areas in the Greater Kruger National Park, South Africa: functional diversity and resilience in the socio-economics of a landscape-scale reserve network.J. Sustain. Tour. 28, 1100–1119 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Saayman, M., van der Merwe, P. & Saayman, A. The economic impact of trophy hunting in the South African wildlife industry. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 16, e00510 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. A political economy of land reform in South Africa. Rev. Afr. Polit. Econ. 31, 213–227 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkhize, N. Game farm conversions and the land question: unpacking present contradictions and historical continuities in farm dwellers’ tenure insecurity in Cradock. J. Contemp. Afr. Stud. 32, 207–219 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakholi, L. Conservation labour geographies: subsuming regional labour into private conservation spaces in South Africa. Geoforum 123, 1–11 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, F. Power battles on South African trophy-hunting farms: farm workers, resistance and mobility in the Karoo. J. Contemp. Afr. Stud. 34, 165–181 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, B. & Barnes, G. The conceptual evolution and practice of community-based natural resource management in southern Africa: past, present and future. Environ. Conserv. 37, 283–295 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, H. S., Baum, J. & Cumming, G. S. Money and motives: an organizational ecology perspective on private land conservation. Biol. Conserv. 197, 108–115 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Merwe, P., Saayman, A. & Jacobs, C. Assessing the economic impact of COVID-19 on the private wildlife industry of South Africa. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 28, e01633 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, H. S. & Cumming, G. S. Traps and transformations influencing the financial viability of tourism on private-land conservation areas. Conserv. Biol. 32, 424–436 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterbach, C. W., Whitesell, C. & Somers, M. J. Wildlife abundance and diversity as indicators of tourism potential in northern Botswana. PLoS ONE 10, e0135595 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Minin, E., Fraser, I., Slotow, R. & MacMillan, D. C. Understanding heterogeneous preference of tourists for big game species: implications for conservation and management. Anim. Conserv. 16, 249–258 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, H. S., Biggs, R. & Cumming, G. S. Cross-scale and social–ecological changes constitute main threats to private land conservation in South Africa. J. Environ. Manag. 274, 111235 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, C. et al. Integrating cultural and natural heritage approaches to marine protected areas in the MENA region. Mar. Policy 132, 104676 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Munasinghe, H. The politics of the past: constructing a national identity through heritage conservation. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 11, 251–260 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, K. et al. Strengthening the global system of protected areas post-2020: a perspective from the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas. Parks 36, 281–296 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kerkhoff, L. et al. Towards future-oriented conservation: managing protected areas in an era of climate change. Ambio 48, 699–713 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, A. et al. Pathogens, disease, and the social–ecological resilience of protected areas. Ecol. Soc. 21, 20 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, J. et al. Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. Ambio 32, 389–396 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom, D. M., Galindo, F. A. & Murgueitio, E. Sustainable, efficient livestock production with high biodiversity and good welfare for animals. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20132025 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • IPBES Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES Secretariat, 2019).

  • Marnewick, D., Jonas, H. & Stevens, C. Site-level Methodology for Identifying Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs) Draft Version 1.0 (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland; 2020).

  • Nalau, J., Becken, S. & Mackey, B. Ecosystem-based adaptation: a review of the constraints. Environ. Sci. Policy 89, 357–364 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartung, C. et al. Open Data Kit: tools to build information services for developing regions. In Proc. 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ed Unwin, T.) pp 1–12 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, United States; 2010).

  • Oksanen, A. J. et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R version 2.6–2 (2022). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/vegan.pdf

  • Ward, J. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58, 236–244 (1963).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Maechler, M. et al. Cluster: Finding Groups in Data. R version 2.0.3 (2015). https://cran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2015-11-17/web/packages/cluster/cluster.pdf

  • R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Contrasting sea ice conditions shape microbial food webs in Hudson Bay (Canadian Arctic)

    Doubling down on sustainability innovation in Kendall Square