Haque, M. N. Dietary manipulation: A sustainable way to mitigate methane emissions from ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 60, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-018-0175-7(2018) (2018).
Google Scholar
IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press (in press).
Lauder, A. R. et al. Offsetting methane emissions—An alternative to emission equivalence metrics. Int. J. Greenh. 12, 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.11.028 (2013).
Google Scholar
Hill, J., McSweeney, C., Wright, A. G., Bishop-Hurley, G. & Kalantar-Zadeh, K. Measuring methane production from ruminants. Trends Biotechnol. 34, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.10.004 (2016).
Google Scholar
Van Zanten, H. H. E. et al. Defining a land boundary for sustainable livestock consumption. Glob Change Biol. 24, 4185–4194. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14321 (2018).
Google Scholar
Naumann, H. D., Tedeschi, L. O., Zeller, W. E. & Huntley, N. F. The role of condensed tannins in ruminant animal production: Advances, limitations and future directions. Rev. Bras. de Zootec. 46, 929–949. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902017001200009 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mueller-Harvey, I. Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health. J. Sci. Food Agric. 86, 2010–2037. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2577 (2006).
Google Scholar
Burggraaf, V. T. et al. Morphology and agronomic performance of white clover with increased flowering and condensed tannin concentration. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 49, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2006.9513704 (2006).
Google Scholar
Einarsson, R. et al. Crop production and nitrogen use in European cropland and grassland 1961–2019. Sci. Data 8, 288. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-01061-z (2021).
Google Scholar
Salminen, J.-P. & Karonen, M. Chemical ecology of tannins and other phenolics: we need a change in approach. Funct. Ecol. 25, 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01826.x (2011).
Google Scholar
Zeller, W. E. Activity, purification, and analysis of condensed tannins: current state of affairs and future endeavors. Crop Sci. 59, 886–904. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2018.05.0323 (2019).
Google Scholar
Barbehenn, R. V. & Peter Constabel, C. Tannins in plant–herbivore interactions. Phytochemistry 72, 1551–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.01.040 (2011).
Google Scholar
Chung, Y. H. et al. Enteric methane emission, diet digestibility, and nitrogen excretion from beef heifers fed sainfoin or alfalfa1. J. Anim. Sci. 91, 4861–4874. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6498 (2013).
Google Scholar
Christensen, R. G. et al. Effects of feeding birdsfoot trefoil hay on neutral detergent fiber digestion, nitrogen utilization efficiency, and lactational performance by dairy cows1. J. Dairy Sci. 98, 7982–7992. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9348 (2015).
Google Scholar
Jonker, A. & Yu, P. The occurrence, biosynthesis, and molecular structure of proanthocyanidins and their effects on legume forage protein precipitation, digestion and absorption in the ruminant digestive tract. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18051105 (2017).
Google Scholar
Barry, T. N. & McNabb, W. C. The implications of condensed tannins on the nutritive value of temperate forages fed to ruminants. Br. J. Nutr. 81, 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114599000501 (1999).
Google Scholar
Verma, S., Taube, F. & Malisch, C. S. Examining the variables leading to apparent incongruity between antimethanogenic potential of tannins and their observed effects in ruminants—A review. Sustainability 13, 2743. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052743 (2021).
Google Scholar
Malisch, C. S. et al. Large variability of proanthocyanidin content and composition in Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia). J. Agric. Food Chem. 63, 10234–10242. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b04946 (2015).
Google Scholar
Verma, S., Salminen, J.-P., Taube, F. & Malisch, C. S. Large inter- and intraspecies variability of polyphenols and proanthocyanidins in eight temperate forage species indicates potential for their exploitation as nutraceuticals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 69, 12445–12455. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.1c03898 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lorenz, H., Reinsch, T., Kluß, C., Taube, F. & Loges, R. Does the admixture of forage herbs affect the yield performance, yield stability and forage quality of a grass clover ley?. Sustainability 12, 5842. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145842 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hofer, D. et al. Yield of temperate forage grassland species is either largely resistant or resilient to experimental summer drought. J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 1023–1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12694 (2016).
Google Scholar
Mueller-Harvey, I. et al. Benefits of condensed tannins in forage legumes fed to ruminants : Importance of structure, concentration and diet compsition. Crop Sci. 59, 861–885. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2017.06.0369 (2017).
Google Scholar
Loza, C. et al. Assessing the potential of diverse forage mixtures to reduce enteric methane emissions in vitro. Animals 11, 1126. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041126 (2021).
Google Scholar
Min, B. R. et al. Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants: A review of plant tannin mitigation options. Anim. Nutr. 6, 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.05.002 (2020).
Google Scholar
van Gastelen, S., Dijkstra, J. & Bannink, A. Are dietary strategies to mitigate enteric methane emission equally effective across dairy cattle, beef cattle, and sheep?. J. Dairy Sci. 102, 6109–6130. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15785 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hatew, B. et al. Relationship between in vitro and in vivo methane production measured simultaneously with different dietary starch sources and starch levels in dairy cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 202, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.01.012 (2015).
Google Scholar
Storm, I. M. L. D., Hellwing, A. L. F., Nielsen, N. I. & Madsen, J. Methods for measuring and estimating methane emission from ruminants. Animals 2, 160–183. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani2020160 (2012).
Google Scholar
Dewhurst, R. J., Delaby, L., Moloney, A., Boland, T. & Lewis, E. Nutritive value of forage legumes used for grazing and silage. Irish J. Agric. Food Res. 48, 167–187 (2009).
Google Scholar
Hakl, J., Fuksa, P., Konečná, J. & Šantrůček, J. Differences in the crude protein fractions of lucerne leaves and stems under different stand structures. Grass Forage Sci. 71, 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12192 (2016).
Google Scholar
Jayanegara, A., Makkar, H. & Becker, K. The use of principal component analysis in identifying and integrating variables related to forage quality and methane production. J. Indones. Trop. Anim. 34, 241–247. https://doi.org/10.14710/jitaa.34.4.241-247 (2009).
Google Scholar
Maccarana, L. et al. Methodological factors affecting gas and methane production during in vitro rumen fermentation evaluated by meta-analysis approach. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 7, 35–35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-016-0094-8 (2016).
Google Scholar
Baruah, L., Malik, P. K., Kolte, A. P., Dhali, A. & Bhatta, R. Methane mitigation potential of phyto-sources from Northeast India and their effect on rumen fermentation characteristics and protozoa in vitro. Vet. World 11, 809–818. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.809-818 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hassanat, F. & Benchaar, C. Assessment of the effect of condensed (acacia and quebracho) and hydrolysable (chestnut and valonea) tannins on rumen fermentation and methane production in vitro. J. Sci. Food Agric. 93, 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5763 (2013).
Google Scholar
Naumann, H. et al. Relationships between structures of condensed tannins from texas legumes and methane production during in vitro rumen digestion. Molecules 23, 2123. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092123 (2018).
Google Scholar
Jayanegara, A., Makkar, H. P. S. & Becker, K. Addition of purified tannin sources and polyethylene glycol treatment on methane emission and rumen fermentation in vitro. Media Peternakan 38, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.5398/medpet.2015.38.1.57 (2015).
Google Scholar
Jayanegara, A., Goel, G., Makkar, H. P. S. & Becker, K. Divergence between purified hydrolysable and condensed tannin effects on methane emission, rumen fermentation and microbial population in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 209, 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.08.002 (2015).
Google Scholar
Hatew, B. et al. Diversity of condensed tannin structures affects rumen in vitro methane production in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) accessions. Grass Forage Sci. 70, 474–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12125 (2015).
Google Scholar
Huyen, N. T. et al. Structural features of condensed tannins affect in vitro ruminal methane production and fermentation characteristics. J. Agric. Sci. 154, 1474–1487. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859616000393 (2016).
Google Scholar
Salami, S. A. et al. Characterisation of the ruminal fermentation and microbiome in lambs supplemented with hydrolysable and condensed tannins. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy061 (2018).
Google Scholar
Salminen, J. P., Karonen, M. & Sinkkonen, J. Chemical ecology of tannins: Recent developments in tannin chemistry reveal new structures and structure-activity patterns. Chem.-Eur. J. 17, 2806–2816. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201002662 (2011).
Google Scholar
Bezabih, M., Pellikaan, W. F., Tolera, A., Khan, N. A. & Hendriks, W. Chemical composition and in vitro total gas and methane production of forage species from the Mid Rift Valley grasslands of Ethiopia. Grass Forage Sci. 69, 635–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12091 (2013).
Google Scholar
Navarrete, S., Kemp, P. D., Pain, S. J. & Back, P. J. Bioactive compounds, aucubin and acteoside, in plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.) and their effect on in vitro rumen fermentation. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 222, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.10.008 (2016).
Google Scholar
Basha, N. A., Scogings, P. F. & Nsahlai, I. V. Effects of season, browse species and polyethylene glycol addition on gas production kinetics of forages in the subhumid subtropical savannah, South Africa. J. Sci. Food Agric. 93, 1338–1348. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5895 (2013).
Google Scholar
O’Donovan, L. & Brooker, J. D. Effect of hydrolysable and condensed tannins on growth, morphology and metabolism of Streptococcus gallolyticus (S. caprinus) and Streptococcus bovis. Microbiology 147, 1025–1033. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-147-4-1025 (2001).
Google Scholar
Bhatta, R. et al. Difference in the nature of tannins on in vitro ruminal methane and volatile fatty acid production and on methanogenic archaea and protozoal populations. J. Dairy Sci. 92, 5512–5522. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1441 (2009).
Google Scholar
Naumann, H. D. et al. Effect of molecular weight and concentration of legume condensed tannins on in vitro larval migration inhibition of Haemonchus contortus. Vet. Parasitol. 199, 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.09.025 (2014).
Google Scholar
Jayanegara, A., Goel, G., Makkar, H.P.S., & Becker, K. Reduction in
methane emissions from ruminants by plant secondary metabolites: Effects of polyphenols and saponins. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Rome, Italy, 151–157. ISBN 978-92-5-106697-3 (2010).
Hatew, B. et al. Impact of variation in structure of condensed tannins from sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) on in vitro ruminal methane production and fermentation characteristics. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 100, 348–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12336 (2016).
Google Scholar
Waghorn, G. C., Douglas, G. B., Niezen, J. H., McNabb, W. C. & Foote, A. G. Forages with condensed tannins-their management and nutritive value for ruminants. Proc. N. Z. Grassl. Assoc., 60, 89−98 (1998).
Woodward, S. L., Waghorn, G. C. & Lassey, K. Early indications that feeding Lotus will reduce methane emissions from ruminants. Proc. N. Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 61, 23–26 (2001).
Molle, G. et al. Responses to condensed tannins of flowering sulla (Hedysarum coronarium L.) grazed by dairy sheep: Part 1: Effects on feeding behaviour, intake, diet digestibility and performance. Livest. Sci. 123, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.11.018 (2009).
Google Scholar
Orlandi, T., Kozloski, G. V., Alves, T. P., Mesquita, F. R. & Ávila, S. C. Digestibility, ruminal fermentation and duodenal flux of amino acids in steers fed grass forage plus concentrate containing increasing levels of Acacia mearnsii tannin extract. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 210, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.09.012 (2015).
Google Scholar
Patra, A. K. & Yu, Z. Effects of adaptation of in vitro rumen culture to garlic oil, nitrate, and saponin and their combinations on methanogenesis, fermentation, and abundances and diversity of microbial populations. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01434 (2015).
Google Scholar
Niderkorn, V. et al. Effect of increasing the proportion of chicory in forage-based diets on intake and digestion by sheep. Animal 13, 718–726. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002185 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lee, J., Hemmingson, N., Minneé, E. & Clark, C. Management strategies for chicory (Cichorium intybus) and plantain (Plantago lanceolata): Impact on dry matter yield, nutritive characteristics, and plant density. Crop Pasture Sci. 66, 168. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP14181 (2015).
Google Scholar
Cong, W.-F., Jing, J., Rasmussen, J., Søegaard, K. & Eriksen, J. Forbs enhance productivity of unfertilised grass-clover leys and support low-carbon bioenergy. Sci. Rep. 7, 1422. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01632-4 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sanderson, M. A., Labreveux, M., Hall, M. H. & Elwinger, G. F. Nutritive value of chicory and English plantain forage. Crop Sci. 43, 1797. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.1797 (2003).
Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. & Lewis, B. A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74, 3583–3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 (1991).
Google Scholar
Engström, M. T. et al. Rapid qualitative and quantitative analyses of proanthocyanidin oligomers and polymers by UPLC-MS/MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 62, 3390–3399. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf500745y (2014).
Google Scholar
Menke, K. & Steingass, H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev. 28, 7–55 (1988).
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).
Venables, B. & Ripley, B. Generalised linear models. In Modern Applied Statistics With S.(4th edition) 183–208 (Springer, 2013).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
