Cardillo, M. & Meijaard, E. Are comparative studies of extinction risk useful for conservation? Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 167–171 (2012).
Google Scholar
Mace, G. M., Norris, K. & Fitter, A. H. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 19–26 (2012).
Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O. & Ludwig, C. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration. Anthr. Rev. 2, 81–98 (2015).
Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Sci. (80-.). 366, eaax3100 (2019).
Google Scholar
Newbold, T. et al. Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Sci. (80-.) 353, 288–291 (2016).
Google Scholar
Pimm, S. L. et al. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Sci. (80-.). 344, 1246752–1246752 (2014).
Google Scholar
IPBES. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Zenodo (2019) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831674.
Barnosky, A. D. et al. Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature 471, 51–57 (2011).
Google Scholar
Rodrigues, A., Pilgrim, J., Lamoreux, J., Hoffmann, M. & Brooks, T. The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 71–76 (2006).
Google Scholar
Mace, G. M. et al. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN’s system for classifying threatened species. Conserv. Biol. 22, 1424–1442 (2008).
Google Scholar
Mora, C., Tittensor, D. P., Adl, S., Simpson, A. G. B. & Worm, B. How many species are there on Earth and in the Ocean? PLoS Biol. 9, e1001127 (2011).
Google Scholar
Purvis, A. & Hector, A. Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature 405, 212–219 (2000).
Google Scholar
Bachman, S. P. et al. Progress, challenges and opportunities for Red Listing. Biol. Conserv. 234, 45–55 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rondinini, C., Di Marco, M., Visconti, P., Butchart, S. H. M. & Boitani, L. Update or outdate: long-term viability of the IUCN red list. Conserv. Lett. 7, 126–130 (2014).
Google Scholar
IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-2. https://www.iucnredlist.org (2021).
Cazalis, V. et al. Bridging the research-implementation gap in IUCN Red List assessments. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 359–370 (2022).
Google Scholar
IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee. Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Committee. Downloadable from https://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf vol. 15 (2022).
Bland, L. M. et al. Toward reassessing data‐deficient species. Conserv. Biol. 31, 531–539 (2017).
Google Scholar
Butchart, S. H. M. & Bird, J. P. Data Deficient birds on the IUCN Red List: What don’t we know and why does it matter? Biol. Conserv. 143, 239–247 (2010).
Google Scholar
Zhao, L. et al. Spatial knowledge deficiencies drive taxonomic and geographic selectivity in data deficiency. Biol. Conserv. 231, 174–180 (2019).
Google Scholar
Parsons, E. C. M. Why IUCN should replace “Data Deficient” conservation status with a precautionary “Assume Threatened” Status—A Cetacean Case Study. Front. Mar. Sci. 3, 2015–2017 (2016).
Roberts, D. L., Taylor, L. & Joppa, L. N. Threatened or Data Deficient: assessing the conservation status of poorly known species. Divers. Distrib. 22, 558–565 (2016).
Google Scholar
Jetz, W. & Freckleton, R. P. Towards a general framework for predicting threat status of data-deficient species from phylogenetic, spatial and environmental information. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 370, 20140016 (2015).
Google Scholar
Howard, S. D. & Bickford, D. P. Amphibians over the edge: silent extinction risk of Data Deficient species. Divers. Distrib. 20, 837–846 (2014).
Google Scholar
Jarić, I., Courchamp, F., Gessner, J. & Roberts, D. L. Potentially threatened: a Data Deficient flag for conservation management. Biodivers. Conserv. 25, 1995–2000 (2016).
Google Scholar
Mair, L. et al. A metric for spatially explicit contributions to science-based species targets. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 836–844 (2021).
Google Scholar
Butchart, S. H. M. et al. Measuring Global Trends in the status of biodiversity: red list indices for birds. PLoS Biol. 2, e383 (2004).
Google Scholar
United Nations. Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1 (2015).
Butchart, S. H. M. et al. Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 360, 255–268 (2005).
Google Scholar
Lenzen, M. et al. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486, 109–112 (2012).
Google Scholar
Moran, D. & Kanemoto, K. Identifying species threat hotspots from global supply chains. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0023 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mooers, A. Ø., Faith, D. P. & Maddison, W. P. Converting endangered species categories to probabilities of extinction for Phylogenetic Conservation Prioritization. PLoS One 3, e3700 (2008).
Google Scholar
Runting, R. K., Phinn, S., Xie, Z., Venter, O. & Watson, J. E. M. Opportunities for big data in conservation and sustainability. Nat. Commun. 11, 2003 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hochkirch, A. et al. A strategy for the next decade to address data deficiency in neglected biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 35, 502–509 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hino, M., Benami, E. & Brooks, N. Machine learning for environmental monitoring. Nat. Sustain 1, 583–588 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wearn, O. R., Freeman, R. & Jacoby, D. M. P. Responsible AI for conservation. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 72–73 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bland, L. M. et al. Cost-effective assessment of extinction risk with limited information. J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 861–870 (2015).
Google Scholar
Bland, L. M. & Böhm, M. Overcoming data deficiency in reptiles. Biol. Conserv. 204, 16–22 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bland, L. M., Collen, B., Orme, C. D. L. & Bielby, J. Predicting the conservation status of data-deficient species. Conserv. Biol. 29, 250–259 (2015).
Google Scholar
Luiz, O. J., Woods, R. M., Madin, E. M. P. & Madin, J. S. Predicting IUCN extinction risk categories for the World’s Data Deficient Groupers (Teleostei: Epinephelidae). Conserv. Lett. 9, 342–350 (2016).
Google Scholar
Stévart, T. et al. A third of the tropical African flora is potentially threatened with extinction. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax9444 (2019).
Google Scholar
Darrah, S. E., Bland, L. M., Bachman, S. P., Clubbe, C. P. & Trias-Blasi, A. Using coarse-scale species distribution data to predict extinction risk in plants. Divers. Distrib. 23, 435–447 (2017).
Google Scholar
Walls, R. H. L. & Dulvy, N. K. Tracking the rising extinction risk of sharks and rays in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Sci. Rep. 11, 15397 (2021).
Google Scholar
Walls, R. H. L. & Dulvy, N. K. Eliminating the dark matter of data deficiency by predicting the conservation status of Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea sharks and rays. Biol. Conserv. 246, 108459 (2020).
Google Scholar
IUCN. Species Information Service. Version 2020-3. https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/spatial-data-download (2021).
IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020-3. https://www.iucnredlist.org (2020).
Böhm, M. et al. The conservation status of the world’s reptiles. Biol. Conserv. 157, 372–385 (2013).
Google Scholar
Dulvy, N. K. et al. Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays. Elife 3, 1–34 (2014).
Google Scholar
Selig, E. R. et al. Global priorities for Marine biodiversity conservation. PLoS One 9, e82898 (2014).
Google Scholar
O’Hara, C. C., Afflerbach, J. C., Scarborough, C., Kaschner, K. & Halpern, B. S. Aligning marine species range data to better serve science and conservation. PLoS One 12, e0175739 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R. A., Goetsch Mittermeier, C., Gil, P. R. & Wilson, E. O. Megadiversity: Earth’s Biologically Wealthiest Nations. CEMEX (2005).
Chamberlain, S. rredlist: ‘IUCN’ Red List Client. R package version 0.7.0. (2020).
GBIF. The Global Biodiversity Information Facility: What is GBIF? https://www.gbif.org/what-is-gbif (2021).
OBIS. Ocean Biodiversity Information System. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO. www.obis.org. (2021).
Chamberlain, S. et al. rgbif: Interface to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility API. R package version 3.6.0. https://cran.r-project.org/package=rgbif (2021).
Provoost, P. & Bosch, S. robis: Ocean Biodiversity Information System (OBIS) Client. R package version 2.3.9. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=robis. (2020).
Pereira, H. M., Navarro, L. M. & Martins, I. S. Global biodiversity change: the bad, the good, and the unknown. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37, 25–50 (2012).
Google Scholar
Karger, D. N. et al. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Sci. Data 4, 170122 (2017).
Google Scholar
Karger, D. N. et al. Data from: Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Dryad, Dataset https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.kd1d4 (2018).
ESA. Land Cover CCI Product User Guide Version 2. Tech. Rep. http://maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/download.php (2017).
Venter, O. et al. Global terrestrial Human Footprint maps for 1993 and 2009. Sci. Data 3, 160067 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. M., Oakleaf, J. R., Theobald, D. M., Baruch‐Mordo, S. & Kiesecker, J. Managing the middle: a shift in conservation priorities based on the global human modification gradient. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25, 811–826 (2019).
Google Scholar
Seto, K. C., Guneralp, B. & Hutyra, L. R. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 109, 16083–16088 (2012).
Google Scholar
UNEP-WCMC & IUCN. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN www.protectedplanet.net (2021).
Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Sci. (80-.) 342, 850–853 (2013).
Google Scholar
Tuanmu, M. N. & Jetz, W. A global, remote sensing-based characterization of terrestrial habitat heterogeneity for biodiversity and ecosystem modelling. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 1329–1339 (2015).
Google Scholar
Maggi, F., Tang, F. H. M., la Cecilia, D. & McBratney, A. PEST-CHEMGRIDS, global gridded maps of the top 20 crop-specific pesticide application rates from 2015 to 2025. Sci. Data 6, 170 (2019).
Google Scholar
Byers, L. et al. A Global Database of Power Plants. World Resour. Inst. 1–18 (2019).
Mulligan, M., van Soesbergen, A. & Sáenz, L. GOODD, a global dataset of more than 38,000 georeferenced dams. Sci. Data 7, 31 (2020).
Google Scholar
Boulay, A.-M. et al. The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE). Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 23, 368–378 (2018).
Google Scholar
Barbarossa, V. et al. Erratum: FLO1K, global maps of mean, maximum and minimum annual streamflow at 1 km resolution from 1960 through 2015. Sci. Data 5, 180078 (2018).
Google Scholar
Barbarossa, V. et al. Impacts of current and future large dams on the geographic range connectivity of freshwater fish worldwide. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 117, 3648–3655 (2020).
Google Scholar
Domisch, S., Amatulli, G. & Jetz, W. Near-global freshwater-specific environmental variables for biodiversity analyses in 1 km resolution. Sci. Data 2, 150073 (2015).
Google Scholar
Reid, A. J. et al. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol. Rev. 94, 849–873 (2019).
Google Scholar
Dudgeon, D. et al. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol. Rev. 81, 163 (2006).
Google Scholar
Schlossberg, S., Chase, M. J., Gobush, K. S., Wasser, S. K. & Lindsay, K. State-space models reveal a continuing elephant poaching problem in most of Africa. Sci. Rep. 10, 10166 (2020).
Google Scholar
Burn, R. W., Underwood, F. M. & Blanc, J. Global trends and factors associated with the illegal killing of Elephants: a hierarchical Bayesian Analysis of Carcass Encounter Data. PLoS One 6, e24165 (2011).
Google Scholar
Hauenstein, S., Kshatriya, M., Blanc, J., Dormann, C. F. & Beale, C. M. African elephant poaching rates correlate with local poverty, national corruption and global ivory price. Nat. Commun. 10, 2242 (2019).
Google Scholar
UNDP. Human Development Report 2020. The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene. New York. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-2020. (2020).
Transparency International. Corruption Perceptions Index 2020. (2020).
Early, R. et al. Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nat. Commun. 7, 12485 (2016).
Google Scholar
Halpern, B. S. et al. Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world’s ocean. Nat. Commun. 6, 7615 (2015).
Google Scholar
Halpern, B. S. et al. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Sci. (80-.) 319, 948–952 (2008).
Google Scholar
Assis, J. et al. Bio‐ORACLE v2.0: extending marine data layers for bioclimatic modelling. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 277–284 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tyberghein, L. et al. Bio-ORACLE: a global environmental dataset for marine species distribution modelling. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 272–281 (2012).
Google Scholar
Zizka, A., Silvestro, D., Vitt, P. & Knight, T. M. Automated conservation assessment of the orchid family with deep learning. Conserv. Biol. 35, 897–908 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hastie, T., Friedman, J. & Tibshirani, R. The Elements of Statistical Learning. The Elements of Statistical Learning vol. 27 (Springer New York, 2001).
Kampichler, C., Wieland, R., Calmé, S., Weissenberger, H. & Arriaga-Weiss, S. Classification in conservation biology: a comparison of five machine-learning methods. Ecol. Inform. 5, 441–450 (2010).
Google Scholar
LeDell, E. et al. h2o: R Interface for the ‘H2O’ Scalable Machine Learning Platform. R package version 3.36.0.4. https://github.com/h2oai/h2o-3 (2022).
H2O.ai. H2O AutoML. https://docs.h2o.ai/h2o/latest-stable/h2o-docs/automl.html (2022).
Cutler, D. R. et al. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88, 2783–2792 (2007).
Google Scholar
Kuhn, M. Building Predictive Models in R using the caret Package. J. Stat. Softw. 28, 1–26 (2008).
Google Scholar
Kursa, M. B. & Rudnicki, W. R. Feature selection with the Boruta package. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–13 (2010).
Google Scholar
Harrell Jr, F. E. Hmisc: Harrell miscellaneous. R package version 4.5-0. (2021).
van der Laan, M. J., Polley, E. C. & Hubbard, A. E. Super Learner. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 6 (2007).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria https://www.r-project.org/ (2021).
RStudio Team. RStudio: integrated development environment for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA http://www.rstudio.com/ (2021).
Hijmans, R. J. raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. R package version 3.0-7. https://cran.r-project.org/package=raster (2019).
Bivand, R., Keitt, T. & Rowlingson, B. rgdal: Bindings for the ‘Geospatial’ Data Abstraction Library. https://cran.r-project.org/package=rgdal (2019).
Bivand, R. & Lewin-Koh, N. maptools: Tools for Handling Spatial Objects. R package version 0.9-5. https://cran.r-project.org/package=maptools/ (2019).
Bivand, R. & Rundel, C. rgeos: Interface to Geometry Engine – Open Source (‘GEOS’). R package version 0.5-1. https://cran.r-project.org/package=rgeos (2019).
Bivand, R. S., Pebesma, E. & Gómez-Rubio, V. Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R. (Springer New York, 2013).
Pebesma, E. Simple features for R: standardized support for Spatial Vector Data. R. J. 10, 439 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ross, N. Fasterize: Fast Polygon to Raster Conversion. R package version 1.0.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fasterize (2020).
Microsoft Corporation & Weston, S. doParallel: Foreach Parallel Adaptor for the ‘parallel’ Package. R package version 1.0.16. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=doParallel (2020).
Wickham, H. stringr: simple, consistent wrappers for common string operations. R package version 1.4.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stringr (2019).
Tuszynski, J. caTools: tools: Moving Window Statistics, GIF, Base64, ROC AUC, etc. R package version 1.18.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caTools (2021).
Wickham, H. et al. Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686 (2019).
Dragulescu, A. & Arendt, C. xlsx: Read, Write, Format Excel 2007 and Excel 97/2000/XP/2003 Files. R package version 0.6.5. (2020).
Wickham, H. & Bryan, J. readxl: Read Excel Files. R package version 1.3.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readxl (2019).
ESRI. ArcGIS Pro version 2.9.0. https://www.esri.com/en-us/home (2022).
Kuhn, M. caret: Classification and Regression Training. R package version 6.0-86. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caret (2020).
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer, NY (2016).
Wilke, C. O. ggridges: Ridgeline Plots in ‘ggplot2’. R package version 0.5.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggridges (2021).
South, A. rnaturalearth: World Map Data from Natural Earth. R package version 0.1.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rnaturalearth (2017).
Garnier, S. viridis: Default Color Maps from ‘matplotlib’. R package version 0.5.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=viridis (2018).
Borgelt, J. jannebor/dd_forecast: Code for study ‘More than half of Data Deficient species predicted to be threatened by extinction’ (v1.0.1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6627688.Zenodo (2022).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
