Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. (World Resources Institute, 2005).
Moran, D. & Kanemoto, K. Identifying species threat hotspots from global supply chains. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0023 (2017).
Newbold, T. Future effects of climate and land-use change on terrestrial vertebrate community diversity under different scenarios. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 285, 20180792 (2018).
Newbold, T. et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520, 45–50 (2015).
Google Scholar
Newbold, T. et al. Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Science (80-.). 353, 288–291 (2016).
Google Scholar
Verones, F., Moran, D., Stadler, K., Kanemoto, K. & Wood, R. Resource footprints and their ecosystem consequences. Sci. Rep. 7, 40743 (2017).
Google Scholar
United Nations. Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1 (United Nations, 2015).
Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science (80-.). 366, eaax3100 (2019).
Lenzen, M. et al. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486, 109–112 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hellweg, S. & Milà i Canals, L. Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science (80-.). 344, 1109–1113 (2014).
Google Scholar
Chaudhary, A. & Brooks, T. M. National Consumption and Global Trade Impacts on Biodiversity. World Dev. 121, 178–187 (2019).
Pereira, H. M., Ziv, G. & Miranda, M. Countryside Species-Area Relationship as a Valid Alternative to the Matrix-Calibrated Species-Area Model. Conserv. Biol. 28, 874–876 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lomolino, M. V & Heaney, L. R. Frontiers of Biogeography: New Directions in the Geography of Nature. (Sinauer Associates Inc. Publishers, 2004).
World Wildlife Fund. WildFinder: Online database of species distributions. http://www.worldwildlife.org/WildFinder (2006).
BirdLife International. IUCN Red List for birds. http://www.birdlife.org (2019).
IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-1 https://www.iucnredlist.org (2021).
Curran, M. et al. Toward Meaningful End Points of Biodiversity in Life Cycle Assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 70–79 (2011).
Google Scholar
Woods, J. S. et al. Ecosystem quality in LCIA: status quo, harmonization, and suggestions for the way forward. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 23, 1995–2006 (2018).
Google Scholar
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P. & Schapire, R. E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Modell. 190, 231–259 (2006).
Merow, C., Smith, M. J. & Silander, J. A. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography (Cop.). 36, 1058–1069 (2013).
Araújo, M. B. et al. Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments. Sci. Adv. 5, eaat4858 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zurell, D. et al. A standard protocol for reporting species distribution models. Ecography (Cop.). 43, 1261–1277 (2020).
Brummitt, R. K., Pando, F., Hollis, S. & Brummitt, N. A. World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions. International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases (TDWG) https://www.tdwg.org/standards/wgsrpd/ (2001).
GBIF. The Global Biodiversity Information Facility: What is GBIF? https://www.gbif.org/what-is-gbif (2021).
Phillips, S. J., Dudík, M. & Schapire, R. E. Maxent software for modeling species niches and distributions (Version 3.4.0). http://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/ (2016).
Phillips, S. J., Dudík, M. & Schapire, R. E. A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. Proc. Twenty-first Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. 655–662 (2004).
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., Dudík, M., Schapire, R. E. & Blair, M. E. Opening the black box: an open-source release of Maxent. Ecography (Cop.). 40, 887–893 (2017).
Reddy, S. & Dávalos, L. M. Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa. J. Biogeogr. 30, 1719–1727 (2003).
Hortal, J., Jiménez-Valverde, A., Gómez, J. F., Lobo, J. M. & Baselga, A. Historical bias in biodiversity inventories affects the observed environmental niche of the species. Oikos 117, 847–858 (2008).
Isaac, N. J. B. & Pocock, M. J. O. Bias and information in biological records. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 115, 522–531 (2015).
Feeley, K. J. & Silman, M. R. Keep collecting: accurate species distribution modelling requires more collections than previously thought. Divers. Distrib. 17, 1132–1140 (2011).
Radosavljevic, A. & Anderson, R. P. Making better Maxent models of species distributions: complexity, overfitting and evaluation. J. Biogeogr. 41, 629–643 (2014).
ter Steege, H. et al. Hyperdominance in the Amazonian Tree Flora. Science (80-.). 342, 1243092 (2013).
Kuipers, K. J. J., Hellweg, S. & Verones, F. Potential Consequences of Regional Species Loss for Global Species Richness: A Quantitative Approach for Estimating Global Extinction Probabilities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 4728–4738 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gade, A. L., Hauschild, M. Z. & Laurent, A. Globally differentiated effect factors for characterising terrestrial acidification in life cycle impact assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 761, 143280 (2021).
Google Scholar
Géron, C. et al. Urban alien plants in temperate oceanic regions of Europe originate from warmer native ranges. Biol. Invasions 23, 1765–1779 (2021).
Mair, L. et al. A metric for spatially explicit contributions to science-based species targets. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 836–844 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A., de la Torre, J. & Scott, B. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. Zookeys 150, 117–126 (2011).
Cardoso, P. red – an R package to facilitate species red list assessments according to the IUCN criteria. Biodivers. Data J. 5, e20530 (2017).
Lee, C. K. F., Keith, D. A., Nicholson, E. & Murray, N. J. Redlistr: tools for the IUCN Red Lists of ecosystems and threatened species in R. Ecography (Cop.). 42, 1050–1055 (2019).
Bachman, S., Walker, B., Barrios, S., Copeland, A. & Moat, J. Rapid Least Concern: towards automating Red List assessments. Biodivers. Data J. 8 (2020).
POWO. Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/ (2021).
Chamberlain, S. et al. taxize: Taxonomic information from around the web. R package version 0.9.98. https://github.com/ropensci/taxize (2020).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria https://www.r-project.org/ (2021).
ITIS. Integrated Taxonomic Information System. https://www.itis.gov/ (2021).
Wickham, H. rvest: Easily Harvest (Scrape) Web Pages. R package version 0.3.5. https://cran.r-project.org/package=rvest (2019).
Desmet, P. & Page, R. WGSRPD. GitHub repository https://github.com/tdwg/wgsrpd (2018).
Chamberlain, S. et al. rgbif: Interface to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility API. R package version 3.6.0. https://cran.r-project.org/package=rgbif (2021).
GBIF. GBIF Occurrence Download. https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.uvd56q (2021).
Winkler, K., Fuchs, R., Rounsevell, M. & Herold, M. Global land use changes are four times greater than previously estimated. Nat. Commun. 12, 2501 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sippel, S., Meinshausen, N., Fischer, E. M., Székely, E. & Knutti, R. Climate change now detectable from any single day of weather at global scale. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 35–41 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hijmans, R. J. raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. R package version 3.0-7. https://cran.r-project.org/package=raster (2019).
Hernandez, P. A., Graham, C. H., Master, L. L. & Albert, D. L. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography (Cop.). 29, 773–785 (2006).
Pearson, R. G., Raxworthy, C. J., Nakamura, M. & Townsend Peterson, A. Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. J. Biogeogr. 34, 102–117 (2006).
Phillips, S. J. & Dudík, M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography (Cop.). 31, 161–175 (2008).
Elith, J. et al. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers. Distrib. 17, 43–57 (2011).
Anderson, R. P. & Raza, A. The effect of the extent of the study region on GIS models of species geographic distributions and estimates of niche evolution: preliminary tests with montane rodents (genus Nephelomys) in Venezuela. J. Biogeogr. 37, 1378–1393 (2010).
Själander, M., Jahre, M., Tufte, G. & Reissmann, N. EPIC: An Energy-Efficient, High-Performance GPGPU Computing Research Infrastructure. arXiv 1–4 (2019).
Hijmans, R. J., Phillips, S., Leathwick, J. & Elith, J. dismo: Species Distribution Modeling. R package version 1.1-4. https://cran.r-project.org/package=dismo (2017).
Muscarella, R. et al. ENMeval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for Maxent ecological niche models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 1198–1205 (2014).
Karger, D. N. et al. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Sci. Data 4, 170122 (2017).
Google Scholar
Karger, D. N. et al. Data from: Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Dryad, Dataset https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.kd1d4 (2018).
ESA. Land Cover CCI Product User Guide Version 2. Tech. Rep. http://maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/download.php (2017).
Aiello-Lammens, M. E., Boria, R. A., Radosavljevic, A., Vilela, B. & Anderson, R. P. spThin: an R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models. Ecography (Cop.). 38, 541–545 (2015).
Akaike, H. Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. in 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory (eds. Petrov, B. N. & Csaki, F.) 267–281 (Akademia Kiado, 1973).
Hurvich, C. M. & Tsai, C.-L. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76, 297–307 (1989).
Google Scholar
Sugiura, N. Further analysts of the data by akaike’ s information criterion and the finite corrections. Commun. Stat. – Theory Methods 7, 13–26 (1978).
Google Scholar
Morales, N. S., Fernández, I. C. & Baca-González, V. MaxEnt’s parameter configuration and small samples: are we paying attention to recommendations? A systematic review. PeerJ 5, e3093 (2017).
Google Scholar
Shcheglovitova, M. & Anderson, R. P. Estimating optimal complexity for ecological niche models: A jackknife approach for species with small sample sizes. Ecol. Modell. 269, 9–17 (2013).
Warren, D. L. & Seifert, S. N. Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: the importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecol. Appl. 21, 335–342 (2011).
Google Scholar
Moran, P. A. P. Notes on Continuous Stochastic Phenomena. Biometrika 37, 17 (1950).
Google Scholar
Borgelt, J., Sicacha-Parada, J., Skarpaas, O. & Verones, F. Native range estimates for red-listed vascular plants. Dryad, Dataset https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.qbzkh18h9 (2022).
Sing, T., Sander, O., Beerenwinkel, N. & Lengauer, T. ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R. Bioinformatics 21, 3940–3941 (2005).
Google Scholar
Grau, J., Grosse, I. & Keilwagen, J. PRROC: computing and visualizing precision-recall and receiver operating characteristic curves in R. Bioinformatics 31, 2595–2597 (2015).
Google Scholar
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S. & Sturdivant, R. X. Applied Logistic Regression. The Statistician 45 (Wiley, 2013).
Lobo, J. M., Jiménez-Valverde, A. & Real, R. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 17, 145–151 (2008).
Sofaer, H. R., Hoeting, J. A. & Jarnevich, C. S. The area under the precision‐recall curve as a performance metric for rare binary events. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 565–577 (2019).
Meyer, C., Weigelt, P. & Kreft, H. Multidimensional biases, gaps and uncertainties in global plant occurrence information. Ecol. Lett. 19, 992–1006 (2016).
Google Scholar
Caudullo, G., Welk, E. & San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. Chorological maps for the main European woody species. Data Br. 12, 662–666 (2017).
Rivers, M. C. Laburnum anagyroides. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T79919483A79919650 https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.T79919483A79919650.en (2017).
Botanic Gardens Conservation International Group & IUCN SSC Global Tree Specialist. Terminalia macrostachya. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T150118895A150118897 https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T150118895A150118897.en (2019).
Heil, K., Terry, M. & Corral-Díaz, R. Mammillaria grahamii (amended version of 2013 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T152723A121546147 https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.T152723A121546147.en (2017).
Brooker, M. & Kleinig, D. Field Guide to Eucalypts. (Bloomings Books, 2006).
Koopman, M. M. A synopsis of the Malagasy endemic genus Megistostegium Hochr. (Hibisceae, Malvaceae). Adansonia 33, 101–113 (2011).
World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Memecylon elegantulum. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 1998: e.T32597A9713234 https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.1998.RLTS.T32597A9713234.en (1998).
Landrum, L. R. A revision of the Psidium salutare complex (Myrtaceae). SIDA, Contrib. to Bot. 20, 1449–1469 (2003).
Tropical Plants Database. Ken Fern. tropical.theferns.info https://tropical.theferns.info/viewtropical.php?id=Psidium+salutare (2021).
Bernal, R., Gradstein, S. R. & Celis, M. Siparuna conica S.S.Renner & Hausner. Catálogo de plantas y líquenes de Colombia http://catalogoplantasdecolombia.unal.edu.co (2015).
Renner, S. S. & Hausner, G. New Species of Siparuna (Monimiaceae) II. Seven New Species from Ecuador and Colombia. Missouri Bot. Gard. Press 6, 103–116 (1996).
Melendo, M., Giménez, E., Cano, E., Mercado, F. G. & Valle, F. The endemic flora in the south of the Iberian Peninsula: taxonomic composition, biological spectrum, pollination, reproductive mode and dispersal. Flora – Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 198, 260–276 (2003).
Chari, L. D., Martin, G. D., Steenhuisen, S.-L., Adams, L. D. & Clark, V. R. Biology of Invasive Plants 1. Pyracantha angustifolia (Franch.) C.K. Schneid. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 13, 120–142 (2020).
Sasidharan, N. Amomum pterocarpum Thwaites. India Biodiversity Portal https://indiabiodiversity.org/species/show/258864#habitat-and-distribution (2013).
Contu, S. Amomum pterocarpum. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e.T44393013A44450020 https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-1.RLTS.T44393013A44450020.en (2013).
Babyrose Devi, N., Das, A. & Singh, P. Amomum Pterocarpum (Zingiberaceae): a new record in the flora of Manipur. Int. J. Adv. Res. 6, 546–549 (2018).
Jetz, W., Sekercioglu, C. H. & Watson, J. E. M. Ecological correlates and conservation implications of overestimating species geographic ranges. Conserv. Biol. 22, 110–9 (2008).
Google Scholar
Gibbs, D. & Khela, S. Magnolia pugana. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014: e.T194806A2363344 https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2014-1.RLTS.T194806A2363344.en (2014).
Sayer, C. Vallesia glabra. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T62543A72668627 https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-2.RLTS.T62543A72668627.en (2015).
Sánchez Gómez, P., Stevens, D., Fennane, M., Gardner, M. & Thomas, P. Tetraclinis articulata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011: e.T30318A9534227 https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011-2.RLTS.T30318A9534227.en (2011).
Google Scholar
Stritch, L., Roy, S., Shaw, K. & Wilson, B. Corylus cornuta (errata version published in 2017). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T194448A115337731 https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T194448A2336319.en (2016).
Olson, D. M. et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 51, 933–938 (2001).
Rivers, M. C. Cotoneaster cambricus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T102827479A102827485 https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.T102827479A102827485.en (2017).
RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA http://www.rstudio.com/ (2021).
Bivand, R., Keitt, T. & Rowlingson, B. rgdal: Bindings for the ‘Geospatial’ Data Abstraction Library. https://cran.r-project.org/package=rgdal (2019).
Bivand, R. & Lewin-Koh, N. maptools: Tools for Handling Spatial Objects. R package version 0.9-5. https://cran.r-project.org/package=maptools/ (2019).
Bivand, R. & Rundel, C. rgeos: Interface to Geometry Engine – Open Source (‘GEOS’). R package version 0.5-1. https://cran.r-project.org/package=rgeos (2019).
Bivand, R. S., Pebesma, E. & Gómez-Rubio, V. Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R. (Springer New York, 2013).
Phillips, S. J. & Elith, J. POC plots: calibrating species distribution models with presence-only data. Ecology 91, 2476–2484 (2010).
Google Scholar
Hurlbert, A. H. & Jetz, W. Species richness, hotspots, and the scale dependence of range maps in ecology and conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 13384–13389 (2007).
Google Scholar
Jetz, W., McPherson, J. M. & Guralnick, R. P. Integrating biodiversity distribution knowledge: toward a global map of life. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 151–159 (2012).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
