Bascompte, J. & Jordano, P. Mutualistic Networks (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2013).
Cordeiro, N. J. & Howe, H. F. Forest fragmentation severs mutualism between seed dispersers and an endemic African tree. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 14052–14056 (2003).
Google Scholar
Wandrag, E. M., Dunham, A. E., Duncan, R. P. & Rogers, H. S. Seed dispersal increases local species richness and reduces spatial turnover of tropical tree seedlings. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 10689–10694 (2017).
Google Scholar
Fahrig, L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 487–515 (2003).
Fahrig, L. Ecological responses to habitat fragmentation per se. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 48, 1–23 (2017).
Haddad, N. M. et al. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500052 (2015).
Google Scholar
Fricke, E. C. & Svenning, J. C. Accelerating homogenization of the global plant-frugivore meta-network. Nature 585, 74–78 (2020).
Google Scholar
Fontúrbel, F. E. et al. Meta-analysis of anthropogenic habitat disturbance effects on animal-mediated seed dispersal. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 3951–3960 (2015).
Poisot, T. et al. Global knowledge gaps in species interaction networks data. J. Biogeogr. 48, 1552–1563 (2021).
Hortal, J. et al. Seven shortfalls that beset large-scale knowledge of biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46, 523–549 (2015).
Magrach, A., Laurance, W. F., Larrinaga, A. R. & Santamaria, L. Meta-analysis of the effects of forest fragmentation on interspecific interactions. Conserv. Biol. 28, 1342–1348 (2014).
Google Scholar
Pocock, M. J. O., Evans, D. M. & Memmott, J. The robustness and restoration of a network of ecological networks. Science 335, 973–977 (2012).
Google Scholar
Tylianakis, J. M., Didham, R. K., Bascompte, J. & Wardle, D. A. Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1351–1363 (2008).
Google Scholar
de Assis Bomfim, J., Guimarães, P. R. Jr., Peres, C. A., Carvalho, G. & Cazetta, E. Local extinctions of obligate frugivores and patch size reduction disrupt the structure of seed dispersal networks. Ecography 41, 1899–1909 (2018).
Emer, C. et al. Seed dispersal networks in tropical forest fragments: Area effects, remnant species, and interaction diversity. Biotropica 52, 81–89 (2020).
Evans, D. M., Pocock, M. J. O. & Memmott, J. The robustness of a network of ecological networks to habitat loss. Ecol. Lett. 16, 844–852 (2013).
Google Scholar
Grass, I., Jauker, B., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T. & Jauker, F. Past and potential future effects of habitat fragmentation on structure and stability of plant-pollinator and host-parasitoid networks. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1408–1417 (2018).
Google Scholar
Neff, F. M. et al. Changes in plant-herbivore network structure and robustness along land-use intensity gradients in grasslands and forests. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf3985 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dunne, J. A., Williams, R. J. & Martinez, N. D. Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance. Ecol. Lett. 5, 558–567 (2002).
James, A., Pitchford, J. W. & Plank, M. J. Disentangling nestedness from models of ecological complexity. Nature 487, 227–230 (2012).
Google Scholar
Jordano, P. Patterns of mutualistic interactions in pollination and seed dispersal: connectance, dependence asymmetries, and coevolution. Am. Nat. 129, 657–677 (1987).
Vieira, M. C. & Almeida-Neto, M. A simple stochastic model for complex coextinctions in mutualistic networks: robustness decreases with connectance. Ecol. Lett. 18, 144–152 (2015).
Google Scholar
Olesen, J. M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y. L. & Jordano, P. The modularity of pollination networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19891–19896 (2007).
Google Scholar
Gilarranz, L. J., Rayfield, B., Liñán-Cembrano, G., Bascompte, J. & Gonzalez, A. Effects of network modularity on the spread of perturbation impact in experimental metapopulations. Science 357, 199–201 (2017).
Google Scholar
Liu, H. et al. Geographic variation in the robustness of pollination networks is mediated by modularity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30, 1447–1460 (2021).
Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., Melián, C. J. & Olesen, J. M. The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9383–9387 (2003).
Google Scholar
Bastolla, U. et al. The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity. Nature 458, 1018–1020 (2009).
Google Scholar
Memmott, J., Waser, N. M. & Price, M. V. Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proc. R. Soc. B. 271, 2605–2611 (2004).
Google Scholar
Delmas, E. et al. Analysing ecological networks of species interactions. Biol. Rev. 9, 16–36 (2019).
Fortuna, M. A. et al. Nestedness versus modularity in ecological networks: two sides of the same coin? J. Anim. Ecol. 79, 811–817 (2010).
Google Scholar
Song, C., Rohr, R. P. & Saavedra, S. Why are some plant-pollinator networks more nested than others? J. Anim. Ecol. 86, 1417–1424 (2017).
Google Scholar
Schleuning, M., Böhning-Gaese, K., Dehling, D. M. & Burns, K. C. At a loss for birds: insularity increases asymmetry in seed-dispersal networks. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 385–394 (2014).
Aizen, M. A., Sabatino, M. & Tylianakis, J. M. Specialization and rarity predict nonrandom loss of interactions from mutualist networks. Science 335, 1486–1489 (2012).
Google Scholar
Fortuna, M. A. & Bascompte, J. Habitat loss and the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Ecol. Lett. 9, 278–283 (2006).
Spiesman, B. J. & Inouye, B. D. Habitat loss alters the architecture of plant-pollinator interaction networks. Ecology 94, 2688–2696 (2013).
Google Scholar
Traveset, A. et al. Bird-flower visitation networks in the Galápagos unveil a widespread interaction release. Nat. Commun. 6, 6376 (2015).
Google Scholar
Thébault, E. & Fontaine, C. Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks. Science 329, 853–856 (2010).
Google Scholar
Monteiro, E. C. S., Pizo, M. A., Vancine, M. H. & Ribeiro, M. C. Forest cover and connectivity have pervasive effects on the maintenance of evolutionary distinct interactions in seed dispersal networks. Oikos 2022, e08240 (2022).
Whittaker, R. J., Fernández-Palacios, J. M., Matthews, T. J., Borregaard, M. K. & Triantis, K. A. Island biogeography: taking the long view of nature’s laboratories. Science 357, eaam8326 (2017).
Google Scholar
Vizentin-Bugoni, J. et al. Structure, spatial dynamics, and stability of novel seed dispersal mutualistic networks in Hawai’i. Science 364, 78–82 (2019).
Google Scholar
Diamond, J. Dammed experiments! Science 294, 1847–1848 (2001).
Google Scholar
Jones, I. L., Bunnefeld, N., Jump, A. S., Peres, C. A. & Dent, D. H. Extinction debt on reservoir land-bridge islands. Biol. Conserv. 199, 75–83 (2016).
Wu, J., Huang, J., Han, X., Xie, Z. & Gao, X. Three-Gorges dam–experiment in habitat Fragmentation? Science 300, 1239–1240 (2003).
Google Scholar
Wilson, M. C. et al. Habitat fragmentation and biodiversity conservation: key findings and future challenges. Landsc. Ecol. 31, 219–227 (2016).
Trøjelsgaard, K. et al. Island biogeography of mutualistic interaction networks. J. Biogeogr. 40, 2020–2031 (2013).
Emer, C., Venticinque, E. M. & Fonseca, C. R. Effects of dam-induced landscape fragmentation on amazonian ant-plant mutualistic networks. Conserv. Biol. 27, 763–773 (2013).
Google Scholar
Zhu, C. et al. Arboreal camera trapping: a reliable tool to monitor plant-frugivore interactions in the trees on large scales. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 8, 92–104 (2022).
Zhu, C., Li, W., Wang, D., Ding, P. & Si, X. Plant-frugivore interactions revealed by arboreal camera trapping. Front. Ecol. Environ. 19, 149–151 (2021).
Galiana, N. et al. The spatial scaling of species interaction networks. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 782–790 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hanski, I., Zurita, G. A., Bellocq, M. I. & Rybicki, J. Species-fragmented area relationship. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12715–12720 (2013).
Google Scholar
Sugiura, S. Species interactions-area relationships: biological invasions and network structure in relation to island area. Proc. R. Soc. B. 277, 1807–1815 (2010).
Google Scholar
Galiana, N. et al. Ecological network complexity scales with area. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 307–314 (2022).
Google Scholar
Santos, M., Cagnolo, L., Roslin, T., Marrero, H. J. & Vázquez, D. P. Landscape connectivity explains interaction network patterns at multiple scales. Ecology 100, e02883 (2019).
Google Scholar
Si, X., Pimm, S. L., Russell, G. J. & Ding, P. Turnover of breeding bird communities on islands in an inundated lake. J. Biogeogr. 41, 2283–2292 (2014).
Si, X. et al. Functional and phylogenetic structure of island bird communities. J. Anim. Ecol. 86, 532–542 (2017).
Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, J. S. Functional redundancy in ecology and conservation. Oikos 98, 156–162 (2002).
Sebastián-González, E. Drivers of species’ role in avian seed-dispersal mutualistic networks. J. Anim. Ecol. 86, 878–887 (2017).
Google Scholar
Donoso, I. et al. Downsizing of animal communities triggers stronger functional than structural decay in seed-dispersal networks. Nat. Commun. 11, 1582 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kaiser-Bunbury, C. N., Muff, S., Memmott, J., Müller, C. B. & Caflisch, A. The robustness of pollination networks to the loss of species and interactions: a quantitative approach incorporating pollinator behaviour. Ecol. Lett. 13, 442–452 (2010).
Google Scholar
Dalsgaard, B. et al. Opposed latitudinal patterns of network-derived and dietary specialization in avian plant-frugivore interaction systems. Ecography 40, 1395–1401 (2017).
Borrvall, C., Ebenman, B. & Jonsson, T. Biodiversity lessens the risk of cascading extinction in model food webs. Ecol. Lett. 3, 131–136 (2000).
Liao, J. et al. Robustness of metacommunities with omnivory to habitat destruction: disentangling patch fragmentation from patch loss. Ecology 98, 1631–1639 (2017).
Google Scholar
Rumeu, B. et al. Predicting the consequences of disperser extinction: richness matters the most when abundance is low. Funct. Ecol. 31, 1910–1920 (2017).
Wong, B. B. M. & Candolin, U. Behavioral responses to changing environments. Behav. Ecol. 26, 665–673 (2015).
Betts, M. G. et al. Extinction filters mediate the global effects of habitat fragmentation on animals. Science 366, 1236–1239 (2019).
Google Scholar
Menke, S., Böhning-Gaese, K. & Schleuning, M. Plant-frugivore networks are less specialized and more robust at forest–farmland edges than in the interior of a tropical forest. Oikos 121, 1553–1566 (2012).
Redhead, J. W. et al. Potential landscape-scale pollinator networks across Great Britain: structure, stability and influence of agricultural land cover. Ecol. Lett. 21, 1821–1832 (2018).
Google Scholar
Si, X. et al. The importance of accounting for imperfect detection when estimating functional and phylogenetic community structure. Ecology 99, 2103–2112 (2018).
Google Scholar
Schoereder, J. H. et al. Should we use proportional sampling for species-area studies? J. Biogeogr. 31, 1219–1226 (2004).
Liu, J. et al. The distribution of plants and seed dispersers in response to habitat fragmentation in an artificial island archipelago. J. Biogeogr. 46, 1152–1162 (2019).
Olson, E. R. et al. Arboreal camera trapping for the Critically Endangered greater bamboo lemur Prolemur simus. Oryx 46, 593–597 (2012).
Li, H.-D. et al. The functional roles of species in metacommunities, as revealed by metanetwork analyses of bird-plant frugivory networks. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1252–1262 (2020).
Google Scholar
Snow, B. & Snow, D. Birds and berries: a study of an ecological interaction (T & AD Poyser, Calton, 1988).
Si, X., Kays, R. & Ding, P. How long is enough to detect terrestrial animals? Estimating the minimum trapping effort on camera traps. PeerJ 2, e374 (2014).
Google Scholar
Vázquez, D. P. et al. Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks. Oikos 116, 1120–1127 (2007).
Chao, A. & Jost, L. Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology 93, 2533–2547 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hsieh, T. C., Ma, K. H. & Chao, A. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1451–1456 (2016).
Beckett, S. J. Improved community detection in weighted bipartite networks. R. Soc. Open. Sci. 3, 140536 (2016).
Google Scholar
Almeida-Neto, M. & Ulrich, W. A straightforward computational approach for measuring nestedness using quantitative matrices. Environ. Modell. Softw. 26, 173–178 (2011).
Scherber, C. et al. Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment. Nature 468, 553–556 (2010).
Google Scholar
Schleuning, M. et al. Ecological networks are more sensitive to plant than to animal extinction under climate change. Nat. Commun. 7, 13965 (2016).
Google Scholar
Humphreys, A. M., Govaerts, R., Ficinski, S. Z., Nic Lughadha, E. & Vorontsova, M. S. Global dataset shows geography and life form predict modern plant extinction and rediscovery. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1043–1047 (2019).
Google Scholar
Dirzo, R. et al. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345, 401–406 (2014).
Google Scholar
Rogers, H. S., Donoso, I., Traveset, A. & Fricke, E. C. Cascading impacts of seed disperser loss on plant communities and ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 52, 641–666 (2021).
Dormann, C. F., Gruber, B. & Fründ, J. Introducing the bipartite package: analysing ecological networks. R News 8, 8–11 (2008).
Patefield, W. M. Algorithm AS 159: An efficient method of generating random R × C tables with given row and column totals. Appl. Stat. 30, 91–97 (1981).
Lefcheck, J. S. piecewiseSEM: piecewise structural equation modelling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 573–579 (2016).
Kabacoff, R. R in Action: Data Analysis and Graphics with R (Manning Publications Co, 2015).
R Core Team. R: A Language And Environment For Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
