Whittaker, R. H. Vegetation of the Siskiyou mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol. Monogr. 30, 279–338 (1960).
Wilson, R. J., Thomas, C. D., Fox, R., Roy, D. B. & Kunin, W. E. Spatial patterns in species distributions reveal biodiversity change. Nature 432, 393–396 (2004).
Google Scholar
Newbold, T. et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520, 45–50 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ings, T. C. et al. Ecological networks—beyond food webs. J. Anim. Ecol. 78, 253–269 (2009).
Google Scholar
Dunne, J. A. & Williams, R. J. Cascading extinctions and community collapse in model food webs. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 364, 1711–1723 (2009).
Leclère, D. et al. Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy. Nature 585, 551–556 (2020).
Google Scholar
Vellend, M. The Theory of Ecological Communities Vol. 57 229 (Princeton University Press, 2016).
Altermatt, F. Diversity in riverine metacommunities: a network perspective. Aquat. Ecol. 47, 365–377 (2013).
Peterson, E. E. et al. Modelling dendritic ecological networks in space: an integrated network perspective. Ecol. Lett. 16, 707–719 (2013).
Google Scholar
Tonkin, J. D. et al. The role of dispersal in river network metacommunities: patterns, processes, and pathways. Freshw. Biol. 63, 141–163 (2018).
Muneepeerakul, R. et al. Neutral metacommunity models predict fish diversity patterns in Mississippi-Missouri basin. Nature 453, 220–222 (2008).
Google Scholar
Besemer, K. et al. Headwaters are critical reservoirs of microbial diversity for fluvial networks. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280, 20131760 (2013).
Google Scholar
Finn, D. S., Bonada, N., Múrria, C. & Hughes, J. M. Small but mighty: headwaters are vital to stream network biodiversity at two levels of organization. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 30, 963–980 (2011).
Altermatt, F., Seymour, M. & Martinez, N. River network properties shape α-diversity and community similarity patterns of aquatic insect communities across major drainage basins. J. Biogeogr. 40, 2249–2260 (2013).
Harvey, E., Gounand, I., Fronhofer, E. A. & Altermatt, F. Disturbance reverses classic biodiversity predictions in river-like landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 285, 20182441 (2018).
Tylianakis, J. M., Laliberté, E., Nielsen, A. & Bascompte, J. Conservation of species interaction networks. Biol. Conserv. 143, 2270–2279 (2010).
Thompson, R. M. et al. Food webs: reconciling the structure and function of biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 689–697 (2012).
Google Scholar
Woodward, G. & Hildrew, A. G. Food web structure in riverine landscapes. Freshw. Biol. 47, 777–798 (2002).
Williams, R. J. & Martinez, N. D. Limits to trophic levels and omnivory in complex food webs: theory and data. Am. Nat. 163, 458–468 (2004).
Google Scholar
Thompson, R. M. & Townsend, C. R. The effect of seasonal variation on the community structure and food-web attributes of two streams: implications for food-web science. Oikos 87, 75–88 (1999).
Wood, S. A., Russell, R., Hanson, D., Williams, R. J. & Dunne, J. A. Effects of spatial scale of sampling on food web structure. Ecol. Evol. 5, 3769–3782 (2015).
Google Scholar
Tylianakis, J. M. & Morris, R. J. Ecological networks across environmental gradients. Annu. Rev. Ecol., Evolution, Syst. 48, 25–48 (2017).
Romanuk, T. N. et al. The structure of food webs along river networks. Ecography 29, 3–10 (2006).
Olivier, P. et al. Exploring the temporal variability of a food web using long‐term biomonitoring data. Ecography 42, 2107–2121 (2019).
Poisot, T., Canard, E., Mouillot, D., Mouquet, N. & Gravel, D. The dissimilarity of species interaction networks. Ecol. Lett. 15, 1353–1361 (2012).
Google Scholar
Delmas, E. et al. Analysing ecological networks of species interactions. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12433 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tavares-Cromar, A. F. & Williams, D. D. The importance of temporal resolution in food web analysis: Evidence from a detritus-based stream. Ecol. Monogr. 66, 91–113 (1996).
Poisot, T., Stouffer, D. B. & Gravel, D. Beyond species: why ecological interaction networks vary through space and time. Oikos 124, 243–251 (2015).
Thomsen, P. F. & Willerslev, E. Environmental DNA—an emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 183, 4–18 (2015).
Deiner, K., Fronhofer, E. A., Mächler, E., Walser, J.-C. & Altermatt, F. Environmental DNA reveals that rivers are conveyer belts of biodiversity information. Nat. Commun. 7, 12544 (2016).
Google Scholar
Dunne, J. A. In Ecological Networks: Linking Structure and Dynamics (eds. Pascual, J. A. & Dunne, J. A.) 27–86 (University Press, 2006).
Neff, F. et al. Changes in plant-herbivore network structure and robustness along land-use intensity gradients in grasslands and forests. Sci Adv 7, eabf3985 (2021).
O’Connor, M. J. et al. Unveiling the food webs of tetrapods across Europe through the prism of the Eltonian niche. J. Biogeogr. 47, 181–192 (2020).
Pellissier, L. et al. Comparing species interaction networks along environmental gradients. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 93, 785–800 (2018).
Google Scholar
Saravia, L. A. et al. Ecological network assembly: how the regional metaweb influences local food webs. BioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/340430 (2021).
Blackman, R. C. et al. Mapping biodiversity hotspots of fish communities in subtropical streams through environmental DNA. Sci. Rep. 4, e65352 (2021).
Baselga, A. & Orme, C. D. L. betapart: an R package for the study of beta diversity: Betapart package. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 808–812 (2012).
Seymour, M. et al. Executing multi-taxa eDNA ecological assessment via traditional metrics and interactive networks. Sci. Total Environ. 729, 138801 (2020).
Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, S. & Mariani, S. Sifting environmental DNA metabarcoding data sets for rapid reconstruction of marine food webs. Fish Fish 22, 822–833 (2021).
Zhang, Y. et al. Holistic pelagic biodiversity monitoring of the Black Sea via eDNA metabarcoding approach: From bacteria to marine mammals. Environ. Int. 135, 105307 (2020).
Google Scholar
Altermatt, F. et al. Uncovering the complete biodiversity structure in spatial networks: the example of riverine systems. Oikos 129, 607–618 (2020).
Widder, S. et al. Fluvial network organization imprints on microbial co-occurrence networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12799–12804 (2014).
Google Scholar
Seymour, M. et al. Environmental DNA provides higher resolution assessment of riverine biodiversity and ecosystem function via spatio-temporal nestedness and turnover partitioning. Commun. Biol. 4, 512 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mächler, E. et al. Assessing different components of diversity across a river network using eDNA. Environ. DNA 1, 290–301 (2019).
Peralta-Maraver, I., López-Rodríguez, M. J. & de Figueroa, J. M. T. Structure, dynamics and stability of a Mediterranean river food web. Mar. Freshw. Res. 68, 484–495 (2017).
Woodward, G. et al. Ecological networks in a changing climate. Ecol. Netw. 42, 71–138 (2010).
Kondoh, M., Kato, S. & Sakato, Y. Food webs are built up with nested subwebs. Ecology 91, 3123–3130 (2010).
Google Scholar
Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R. & Cushing, C. E. The River Continuum Concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37, 130–137 (1980).
Power, M. E. & Dietrich, W. E. Food webs in river networks. Ecol. Res. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0912-3814.2002.00503.x (2002).
Montoya, D., Yallop, M. L. & Memmott, J. Functional group diversity increases with modularity in complex food webs. Nat. Commun. 6, 7379 (2015).
Google Scholar
Gravel, D., Albouy, C. & Thuiller, W. The meaning of functional trait composition of food webs for ecosystem functioning. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 371, 20150268 (2016).
Ruppert, K. M., Kline, R. J. & Rahman, M. S. Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: a systematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 17, e00547 (2019).
Carraro, L., Mächler, E., Wüthrich, R. & Altermatt, F. Environmental DNA allows upscaling spatial patterns of biodiversity in freshwater ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 11, 3585 (2020).
Google Scholar
Barnes, M. A. & Turner, C. R. The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics. Conserv. Genet. 17, 1–17 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bista, I. et al. Annual time-series analysis of aqueous eDNA reveals ecologically relevant dynamics of lake ecosystem biodiversity. Nat. Commun. 8, 14087 (2017).
Google Scholar
Erickson, R. A., Merkes, C. M., Jackson, C. A., Goforth, R. R. & Amberg, J. J. Seasonal trends in eDNA detection and occupancy of bigheaded carps. J. Gt. Lakes Res. 43, 762–770 (2017).
Troth, C. R., Sweet, M. J., Nightingale, J. & Burian, A. Seasonality, DNA degradation and spatial heterogeneity as drivers of eDNA detection dynamics. Sci. Total Environ. 768, 144466 (2021).
Google Scholar
Thalinger, B. et al. The effect of activity, energy use, and species identity on environmental DNA shedding of freshwater fish. Front. Ecol. Evolution 9, 73 (2021).
Kelly, R. P., Port, J. A., Yamahara, K. M. & Crowder, L. B. Using environmental DNA to census marine fishes in a large mesocosm. PLoS ONE 9, e86175 (2014).
Google Scholar
Leray, M. et al. A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents. Front. Zool. 10, 34 (2013).
Google Scholar
Geller, J., Meyer, C., Parker, M. & Hawk, H. Redesign of PCR primers for mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for marine invertebrates and application in all-taxa biotic surveys. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 13, 851–861 (2013).
Google Scholar
Liu, C. M. et al. BactQuant: An enhanced broad-coverage bacterial quantitative real-time PCR assay. BMC Microbiol. 12, 56 (2012).
Google Scholar
Mansfeldt, C. et al. Microbial community shifts in streams receiving treated wastewater effluent. Sci. Total Environ. 709, 135727 (2020).
Google Scholar
Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010).
Google Scholar
Andrews, S. FASTQC A Quality Control tool for High Throughput Sequence Data (Babraham Institute, 2015).
Magoč, T. & Salzberg, S. L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957–2963 (2011).
Google Scholar
Hänfling, B. et al. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods. Mol. Ecol. 25, 3101–3119 (2016).
Google Scholar
Csárdi, G. & Nepusz, T. The igraph software package for complex network research. Int. J. Complex Syst. 1695, 1–9 (2006).
Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package 2.5-6. https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=vegan (2019).
Tachet, H., Bournaud, M., Richoux, P. & Usseglio-Polatera, P. Invertébrés d’eau douce—systématique, biologie, écologie (CNRS Editions, 2010).
Schmidt-Kloiber, A. & Hering, D. www.freshwaterecology.info—an online tool that unifies, standardises and codifies more than 20,000 European freshwater organisms and their ecological preferences. Ecol. Indic. 53, 271–282 (2015).
Newton, R. J., Jones, S. E., Eiler, A., McMahon, K. D. & Bertilsson, S. A guide to the natural history of freshwater lake bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 75, 14–49 (2011).
Google Scholar
Fortuna, M. A. et al. Nestedness versus modularity in ecological networks: two sides of the same coin? J. Anim. Ecol. 79, 811–817 (2010).
Google Scholar
Johnson, S., Domínguez-García, V., Donetti, L. & Muñoz, M. A. Trophic coherence determines food-web stability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17923–17928 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wootton, K. L. Omnivory and stability in freshwater habitats: Does theory match reality? Freshw. Biol. 62, 821–832 (2017).
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw., Artic. 82, 1–26 (2017).
Lenth, R. V. Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means [R package emmeans version 1.6.1] (2021).
RStudio Team RStudio: Integrated development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA. R version 4.0.4 Retrieved from http://www.rstudio.com/ (2021)
Source: Ecology - nature.com
