Cardinale, B. J. et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59–67 (2012).
Google Scholar
Gadgil, M., Berkes, F. & Folke, C. Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio 22, 151–156 (1993).
Gadgil, M., Berkes, F. & Folke, C. Indigenous knowledge: from local to global. Ambio 50, 967–969 (2021).
Google Scholar
The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for the Americas. IPBES https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3236252 (2018).
Claes, J. et al. Valuing nature conservation: a methodology for quantifying the benefits of protecting the planet’s natural capital (McKinsey & Company, 2020).
Retsa, A., Schelske, O., Wilke, B., Rutherford, G. & de Jong, R. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a business case for re/insurance (Swiss Re, 2020).
Petersson, M. & Stoett, P. Lessons learnt in global biodiversity governance. Int. Environ. Agreem. Polit. Law Econ. 22, 333–352 (2022).
Dasgupta, P. The economics of biodiversity: the Dasgupta review. GOV.UK www.gov.uk/official-documents. (2021).
Furumo, P. R. & Lambin, E. F. Scaling up zero-deforestation initiatives through public-private partnerships: a look inside post-conflict Colombia. Glob. Environ. Change 62, 1–13 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hale, T. & Roger, C. Orchestration and transnational climate governance. Rev. Int. Organ. 9, 59–82 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ring, I. & Barton, D. N. Economic instruments in policy mixes for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem governance. in Handbook of Ecological Economics (eds Martinez-Alier, J. & Muradian, R.) Ch, 17 (Edward Elgar, 2015).
Von Essen, M. & Lambin, E. Jurisdictional approaches to sustainable resource use. Front. Ecol. Environ. 19, 159–167 (2021).
Google Scholar
Taylor, C., Pollard, S., Rocks, S. & Angus, A. Selecting policy instruments for better environmental regulation: a critique and future research agenda. Environ. Policy Gov. 22, 268–292 (2012).
Google Scholar
Ring, I. & Schröter-Schlaack, C. Instrument mixes for biodiversity policies. POLICYMIX Report https://policymix.nina.no (2011).
Howlett, M. & Rayner, J. Design principles for policy mixes: cohesion and coherence in ‘new governance arrangements’. Policy Soc. 26, 1–18 (2007).
Soulé, M. The “new conservation”. Conserv. Biol. 27, 895–897 (2013).
Google Scholar
Mace, G. M. Whose conservation? Science 345, 1558–1560 (2014).
Google Scholar
Runhaar, H., Driessen, P. & Uittenbroek, C. Towards a systematic framework for the analysis of environmental policy integration. Environ. Policy Gov. 24, 233–246 (2014).
Google Scholar
Visseren-Hamakers, I. J. Integrative governance: the relationships between governance instruments taking center stage. Environ. Plan. C. Polit. Space 36, 1341–1354 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lafferty, W. & Hovden, E. Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework. Environ. Polit. 12, 1–22 (2003).
Google Scholar
Milner-Gulland, E. J. et al. Four steps for the Earth: mainstreaming the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. One Earth 4, 75–87 (2021).
Google Scholar
Decision adopted by the conference of the parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. 14/3 Mainstreaming biodiversity in the energy and mining, infrastructure, manufacturing and processing sectors. Convention on Biological Diversity https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-03-en.pdf (2018).
Update of the zero draft of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. Convention on Biological Diversity https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/3064/749a/0f65ac7f9def86707f4eaefa/post2020-prep-02-01-en.pdf (2020).
Whitehorn, P. R. et al. Mainstreaming biodiversity: a review of national strategies. Biol. Conserv. 235, 157–163 (2019).
Google Scholar
Alpízar, F. et al. Mainstreaming of natural capital and biodiversity into planning and decision-making: cases from Latin America and the Caribbean (IDB, 2020).
Daily, G. Nature’s Services (Island Press, 1997).
Hill, R. et al. Working with indigenous, local and scientific knowledge in assessments of nature and nature’s linkages with people. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 43, 8–20 (2020).
Google Scholar
Baptiste, B. et al. Greening peace in Colombia. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1–3 (2017).
Google Scholar
Biodiversidad en cifras. Instituto Alexander von Humboldt https://cifras.biodiversidad.co/ (2022).
Censo nacional de población y vivienda. Estadísticas para grupos étnicos. DANE https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/demografia-y-poblacion/grupos-etnicos/informacion-tecnica (2018).
Boyd, E., Corbera, E. & Estrada, M. UNFCCC negotiations (pre-Kyoto to COP-9): what the process says about the politics of CDM-sinks. Int. Environ. Agreem. Polit. Law Econ. 8, 95–112 (2008).
Alvarez, C. F. et al. Evaluación nacional de biodiversidad y servicios ecosistémicos: resumen para tomadores de decisión. Instituto Alexander von Humboldt. http://www.humboldt.org.co/images/pdf/10721/RTDFinalv290621.pdf (2021).
Lambin, E. F. et al. Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions. Glob. Environ. Change 28, 129–140 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hoban, S. et al. Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved. Biol. Conserv. 248, 108654 (2020).
Google Scholar
Laikre, L. Genetic diversity is overlooked in international conservation policy implementation. Conserv. Genet. 11, 349–354 (2010).
Google Scholar
Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. Resolución 1912 del 15 de Septiembre de 2017, listado de especies silvestres amenazadas de la diversidad biológica colombiana continental y marino costera en el territorio nacional. (2017). https://www.minambiente.gov.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/resolucion-1912-de-2017.pdf
Newton, A. C. Biodiversity risks of adopting resilience as a policy goal. Conserv. Lett. 9, 369–376 (2016).
Google Scholar
Jeanrenaud, S. Changing people/nature representations in international conservation discourses. IDS Bull. 33, 111–122 (2002).
Google Scholar
Louder, E. & Wyborn, C. Biodiversity narratives: stories of the evolving conservation landscape. Environ. Conserv. 47, 251–259 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bonilla-Mejía, L. & Higuera-Mendieta, I. Protected areas under weak institutions: evidence from Colombia. World Dev. 122, 585–596 (2019).
Google Scholar
African Development Bank Group et al. Joint statement by the Multilateral Development Banks at Paris, COP21. European Investment Bank https://www.eib.org/attachments/press/joint-mdb-statement-climate_nov-28_final.pdf (2021).
Smith, T. et al. Biodiversity means business: reframing global biodiversity goals for the private sector. Conserv. Lett. 13, e12690 (2020).
Google Scholar
Friedman, K., Garcia, S. M. & Rice, J. Mainstreaming biodiversity in fisheries. Mar. Policy 95, 209–220 (2018).
Google Scholar
Turismo de naturaleza, oportunidad para conocer y proteger la biodiversidad de Colombia. MADS https://www.minambiente.gov.co/negocios-verdes/turismo-de-naturaleza-oportunidad-para-conocer-y-proteger-la-biodiversidad-de-colombia/ (2022).
Pacheco, P., Schoneveld, G., Dermawan, A., Komarudin, H. & Djama, M. Governing sustainable palm oil supply: disconnects, complementarities, and antagonisms between state regulations and private standards. Regul. Gov. 14, 568–598 (2020).
Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J. Developments in intergovernmental relations: towards multi-level governance. Policy Polit. 29, 131–135 (2001).
Google Scholar
Lustig, N. Fiscal redistribution in middle income countries. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. 171 (2015).
Mooney, H. A. & Cleland, E. E. The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5446–5451 (2001).
Google Scholar
Rule of law index 2020. World Justice Project https://worldjusticeproject.org/sites/default/files/documents/WJP-ROLI-2020-Online_0.pdf (2020).
Recommendation of the council on policy coherence for sustainable development OECD/LEGAL/0381. OECD https://www.oecd.org/gov/pcsd/recommendation-on-policy-coherence-for-sustainable-development-eng.pdf (2019).
Arellana, J., Oviedo, D., Guzman, L. A. & Alvarez, V. Urban transport planning and access inequalities: a tale of two Colombian cities. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100554 (2020).
Leyes | Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. MADS https://www.minambiente.gov.co/index.php/normativa/leyes (2021).
Cavelier Adarve, I. & Rodríguez Becerra, M. in Nuevos Enfoques para el Estudio de las Relaciones Internacionales de Colombia (eds Tickner A.B. & Bitar, S.) Ch. 4 (Ediciones Uniandes-Universidad de los Andes, 2017).
Política Nacional para la Gestión Integral de la biodiversidad y los Servicios Ecosistémicos (PNGIBSE) MADS (2012). https://www.minambiente.gov.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Poli%CC%81tica-Nacional-de-Gestio%CC%81n-Integral-de-la-Biodiver.pdf
Potts, J., Wenban-Smith, M. & Turley, L. State of sustainability initiatives review: standards and the extractive economy (IISD, 2018).
Junguito Bonnet, R. El papel de los gremios en la economía colombiana. Rev. Desarro. Soc. 82, 103–131 (2019).
Google Scholar
Savvidou, G., Dzebo, A. & Atteridge, A. Aid Atlas: new tool to visualize development finance flows. JSTOR https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep22982 (2019).
BIOFIN- Movilizando recursos para la biodiversidad en Colombia, plan financiero. UNDP https://www.biofin.org/sites/default/files/content/knowledge_products/Plan%20Financiero%20Movilizando%20recursos%20para%20la%20biodiversidad%20en%20Colombia.pdf (2018).
Echeverri, A. et al. Data for: a policy mix approach to biodiversity governance in Colombia (Dryad, 2022).
Gibbs, G. Analyzing Qualitative Data (SAGE Publications, 2007).
Maxwell, J. A. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach (SAGE Publications, 2012).
Gould, R. K. et al. A protocol for eliciting nonmaterial values through a cultural ecosystem services frame. Conserv. Biol. 29, 575–586 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kremen, C. Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecol. Lett. 8, 468–479 (2005).
Google Scholar
Robinson, J. G. Ethical pluralism, pragmatism, and sustainability in conservation practice. Biol. Conserv. 144, 958–965 (2011).
Google Scholar
Sandbrook, C. What is conservation? Oryx 49, 565–566 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ricotta, C. et al. Measuring the functional redundancy of biological communities: a quantitative guide. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1386–1395 (2016).
Google Scholar
Dı́az, S. & Cabido, M. Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 646–655 (2001).
Google Scholar
Laliberté, E. & Legendre, P. A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology 91, 299–305 (2010).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
