McCutcheon JP, Boyd BM, Dale C. The life of an insect endosymbiont from the cradle to the grave. Curr Biol. 2019;29:R485–95.
Google Scholar
McCutcheon JP, Moran NA. Extreme genome reduction in symbiotic bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10:13–26.
Google Scholar
Latorre A, Manzano-Marin A. Dissecting genome reduction and trait loss in insect endosymbionts. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017;1389:52–75.
Google Scholar
Salje J. Cells within cells: Rickettsiales and the obligate intracellular bacterial lifestyle. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19:375–90.
Google Scholar
Kaur R, Shropshire JD, Cross KL, Leigh B, Mansueto AJ, Stewart V, et al. Living in the endosymbiotic world of Wolbachia: a centennial review. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29:879–93.
Google Scholar
Pilgrim J, Thongprem P, Davison HR, Siozios S, Baylis M, Zakharov EV, et al. Torix Rickettsia are widespread in arthropods and reflect a neglected symbiosis. Gigascience. 2021;10:giab021.
Google Scholar
Pilgrim J, Ander M, Garros C, Baylis M, Hurst GDD, Siozios S. Torix group Rickettsia are widespread in Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), reach high frequency and carry unique genomic features. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19:4238–55.
Google Scholar
Horn M, Fritsche TR, Gautom RK, Schleifer KH, Wagner M. Novel bacterial endosymbionts of Acanthamoeba spp. related to the Paramecium caudatum symbiont Caedibacter caryophilus. Environ Microbiol. 1999;1:357–67.
Google Scholar
Schulz F, Lagkouvardos I, Wascher F, Aistleitner K, Kostanjsek R, Horn M. Life in an unusual intracellular niche: a bacterial symbiont infecting the nucleus of amoebae. ISME J. 2014;8:1634–44.
Google Scholar
Schulz F, Martijn J, Wascher F, Lagkouvardos I, Kostanjsek R, Ettema TJ, et al. A Rickettsiales symbiont of amoebae with ancient features. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:2326–42.
Google Scholar
Hess S, Suthaus A, Melkonian M. “Candidatus Finniella” (Rickettsiales, Alphaproteobacteria), Novel Endosymbionts of Viridiraptorid Amoeboflagellates (Cercozoa, Rhizaria). Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:659–70.
Google Scholar
Castelli M, Sabaneyeva E, Lanzoni O, Lebedeva N, Floriano AM, Gaiarsa S, et al. Deianiraea, an extracellular bacterium associated with the ciliate Paramecium, suggests an alternative scenario for the evolution of Rickettsiales. ISME J. 2019;13:2280–94.
Google Scholar
Floriano AM, Castelli M, Krenek S, Berendonk TU, Bazzocchi C, Petroni G, et al. The genome sequence of “Candidatus Fokinia solitaria”: insights on reductive evolution in Rickettsiales. Genome Biol Evol. 2018;10:1120–6.
Google Scholar
George EE, Husnik F, Tashyreva D, Prokopchuk G, Horak A, Kwong WK, et al. Highly reduced genomes of protist endosymbionts show evolutionary convergence. Curr Biol. 2020;30:925–33.e3.
Google Scholar
Midha S, Rigden DJ, Siozios S, Hurst GDD, Jackson AP. Bodo saltans (Kinetoplastida) is dependent on a novel Paracaedibacter-like endosymbiont that possesses multiple putative toxin-antitoxin systems. ISME J. 2021;15:1680–94.
Google Scholar
Castelli M, Lanzoni O, Giovannini M, Lebedeva N, Gammuto L, Sassera D, et al. ‘Candidatus Gromoviella agglomerans’, a novel intracellular Holosporaceae parasite of the ciliate Paramecium showing marked genome reduction. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2022;14:34–49.
Google Scholar
Klinges JG, Rosales SM, McMinds R, Shaver EC, Shantz AA, Peters EC, et al. Phylogenetic, genomic, and biogeographic characterization of a novel and ubiquitous marine invertebrate-associated Rickettsiales parasite, Candidatus Aquarickettsia rohweri, gen. nov., sp. nov. ISME J. 2019;13:2938–53.
Google Scholar
Kroer P, Kjeldsen KU, Nyengaard JR, Schramm A, Funch P. A novel extracellular gut symbiont in the marine worm Priapulus caudatus (Priapulida) reveals an Alphaproteobacterial symbiont clade of the ecdysozoa. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:539.
Google Scholar
Yurchenko T, Sevcikova T, Pribyl P, El Karkouri K, Klimes V, Amaral R, et al. A gene transfer event suggests a long-term partnership between eustigmatophyte algae and a novel lineage of endosymbiotic bacteria. ISME J. 2018;12:2163–75.
Google Scholar
Ferla MP, Thrash JC, Giovannoni SJ, Patrick WM. New rRNA gene-based phylogenies of the Alphaproteobacteria provide perspective on major groups, mitochondrial ancestry and phylogenetic instability. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e83383.
Google Scholar
Szokoli F, Castelli M, Sabaneyeva E, Schrallhammer M, Krenek S, Doak TG, et al. Disentangling the taxonomy of Rickettsiales and description of two novel symbionts (“Candidatus Bealeia paramacronuclearis” and “Candidatus Fokinia cryptica”) sharing the cytoplasm of the ciliate protist Paramecium biaurelia. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:7236–47.
Google Scholar
Munoz-Gomez SA, Hess S, Burger G, Lang BF, Susko E, Slamovits CH, et al. An updated phylogeny of the Alphaproteobacteria reveals that the parasitic Rickettsiales and Holosporales have independent origins. eLife. 2019;8:e42535.
Google Scholar
Sassera D, Beninati T, Bandi C, Bouman EA, Sacchi L, Fabbi M, et al. ‘Candidatus Midichloria mitochondrii’, an endosymbiont of the tick Ixodes ricinus with a unique intramitochondrial lifestyle. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:2535–40.
Google Scholar
Fokin SI, Görtz HD, Diversity of Holospora bacteria in Paramecium and their characterization. In: Fujishima M, editor. Endosymbionts in Paramecium. Microbiology Monographs, vol 12. Berlin: Springer; 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92677-1_7.
Min CK, Yang JS, Kim S, Choi MS, Kim IS, Cho NH. Genome-based construction of the metabolic pathways of Orientia tsutsugamushi and comparative analysis within the Rickettsiales order. Comp Funct Genomics. 2008;2008:623145.
Google Scholar
Garushyants SK, Beliavskaia AY, Malko DB, Logacheva MD, Rautian MS, Gelfand MS. Comparative genomic analysis of Holospora spp., intranuclear symbionts of paramecia. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:738.
Google Scholar
Boscaro V, Fokin SI, Schrallhammer M, Schweikert M, Petroni G. Revised systematics of Holospora-like bacteria and characterization of “Candidatus Gortzia infectiva”, a novel macronuclear symbiont of Paramecium jenningsi. Microb Ecol. 2013;65:255–67.
Google Scholar
Serra V, Fokin SI, Castelli M, Basuri CK, Nitla V, Verni F, et al. “Candidatus Gortzia shahrazadis”, a novel endosymbiont of Paramecium multimicronucleatum and a revision of the biogeographical distribution of Holospora-like bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1704.
Google Scholar
Takeshita K, Yamada T, Kawahara Y, Narihiro T, Ito M, Kamagata Y, et al. Tripartite symbiosis of an anaerobic scuticociliate with two hydrogenosome-associated endosymbionts, a Holospora-related Alphaproteobacterium and a Methanogenic Archaeon. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85:e00854–19.
Google Scholar
Wang Y, Brune A, Zimmer M. Bacterial symbionts in the hepatopancreas of isopods: diversity and environmental transmission. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007;61:141–52.
Google Scholar
Wang Y, Stingl U, Anton-Erxleben F, Zimmer M, Brune A. ‘Candidatus Hepatincola porcellionum’ gen. nov., sp. nov., a new, stalk-forming lineage of Rickettsiales colonizing the midgut glands of a terrestrial isopod. Arch Microbiol. 2004;181:299–304.
Google Scholar
Fraune S, Zimmer M. Host-specificity of environmentally transmitted Mycoplasma-like isopod symbionts. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:2497–504.
Google Scholar
Dittmer J, Lesobre J, Moumen B, Bouchon D. Host origin and tissue microhabitat shaping the microbiota of the terrestrial isopod Armadillidium vulgare. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;92:fiw063.
Google Scholar
Zimmer M, Topp W. Microorganisms and cellulose digestion in the gut of the woodlouse Porcellio scaber. J Chem Ecol. 1998;24:1397–408.
Google Scholar
Zimmer M, Danko JP, Pennings SC, Danford AR, Ziegler A, Uglow RF, et al. Hepatopancreatic endosymbionts in coastal isopods (Crustacea: Isopoda), and their contribution to digestion. Mar Biol. 2001;138:955–63.
Google Scholar
Bouchon D, Zimmer M, Dittmer J. The terrestrial isopod microbiome: an all-in-one toolbox for animal-microbe interactions of ecological relevance. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1472.
Google Scholar
Dittmer J, Beltran-Bech S, Lesobre J, Raimond M, Johnson M, Bouchon D. Host tissues as microhabitats for Wolbachia and quantitative insights into the bacterial community in terrestrial isopods. Mol Ecol. 2014;23:2619–35.
Google Scholar
Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:3094–100.
Google Scholar
Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017;27:722–36.
Google Scholar
Loman NJ, Quick J, Simpson JT. A complete bacterial genome assembled de novo using only nanopore sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2015;12:733–5.
Google Scholar
Vaser R, Sovic I, Nagarajan N, Sikic M. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res. 2017;27:737–46.
Google Scholar
Wick RR, Holt KE. Polypolish: short-read polishing of long-read bacterial genome assemblies. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022;18:e1009802.
Google Scholar
Bredon M, Dittmer J, Noel C, Moumen B, Bouchon D. Lignocellulose degradation at the holobiont level: teamwork in a keystone soil invertebrate. Microbiome. 2018;6:162.
Google Scholar
Bredon M, Herran B, Bertaux J, Greve P, Moumen B, Bouchon D. Isopod holobionts as promising models for lignocellulose degradation. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020;13:49.
Google Scholar
Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1674–6.
Google Scholar
Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7359.
Google Scholar
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.
Google Scholar
Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:3100–8.
Google Scholar
Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–9.
Google Scholar
Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2020;70:e102.
Google Scholar
Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004;14:1394–403.
Google Scholar
Badawi M, Moumen B, Giraud I, Greve P, Cordaux R. Investigating the molecular genetic basis of cytoplasmic sex determination caused by Wolbachia endosymbionts in terrestrial isopods. Genes. 2018;9:290.
Google Scholar
Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Completing bacterial genome assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing. Microb Genom. 2017;3:e000132.
Google Scholar
Kolmogorov M, Bickhart DM, Behsaz B, Gurevich A, Rayko M, Shin SB, et al. metaFlye: scalable long-read metagenome assembly using repeat graphs. Nat Methods. 2020;17:1103–10.
Google Scholar
Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–9.
Google Scholar
Mistry J, Chuguransky S, Williams L, Qureshi M, Salazar GA, Sonnhammer ELL, et al. Pfam: the protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D412–9.
Google Scholar
Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH. CD-Search: protein domain annotations on the fly. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:W327–31.
Google Scholar
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–10.
Google Scholar
Carver T, Harris SR, Berriman M, Parkhill J, McQuillan JA. Artemis: an integrated platform for visualization and analysis of high-throughput sequence-based experimental data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:464–9.
Google Scholar
Simao FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–2.
Google Scholar
Eren AM, Kiefl E, Shaiber A, Veseli I, Miller SE, Schechter MS, et al. Community-led, integrated, reproducible multi-omics with anvi’o. Nat Microbiol. 2021;6:3–6.
Google Scholar
Cantalapiedra CP, Hernandez-Plaza A, Letunic I, Bork P, Huerta-Cepas J. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:5825–9.
Google Scholar
Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol. 2016;428:726–31.
Google Scholar
Abby SS, Cury J, Guglielmini J, Neron B, Touchon M, Rocha EP. Identification of protein secretion systems in bacterial genomes. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23080.
Google Scholar
Teufel F, Almagro Armenteros JJ, Johansen AR, Gislason MH, Pihl SI, Tsirigos KD, et al. SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40:1023–5.
Google Scholar
Elbourne LD, Tetu SG, Hassan KA, Paulsen IT. TransportDB 2.0: a database for exploring membrane transporters in sequenced genomes from all domains of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D320–4.
Google Scholar
Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel GP, Medema MH, et al. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W29–35.
Google Scholar
Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D490–5.
Google Scholar
Zhang H, Yohe T, Huang L, Entwistle S, Wu P, Yang Z, et al. dbCAN2: a meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W95–101.
Google Scholar
Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A, Liang Y, et al. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W16–21.
Google Scholar
Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 2019;20:238.
Google Scholar
Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–7.
Google Scholar
Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A, et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol. 2020;37:1530–4.
Google Scholar
Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods. 2017;14:587–9.
Google Scholar
Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. Terrace aware data structure for phylogenomic inference from supermatrices. Syst Biol. 2016;65:997–1008.
Google Scholar
Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590–6.
Google Scholar
Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W293–6.
Google Scholar
Schrallhammer M, Castelli M, Petroni G. Phylogenetic relationships among endosymbiotic R-body producer: bacteria providing their host the killer trait. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2018;41:213–20.
Google Scholar
Gillespie JJ, Kaur SJ, Rahman MS, Rennoll-Bankert K, Sears KT, Beier-Sexton M, et al. Secretome of obligate intracellular Rickettsia. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2015;39:47–80.
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
