Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (eds Díaz, S. et al.) (IPBES secretariat, 2019).
Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).
Google Scholar
Adams, W. M. Against Extinction: The Story of Conservation (Earthscan, 2004).
Escobar, A. Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity, conservation, and the political ecology of social movements. J. Polit. Ecol. 5, 53–82 (1998).
Meine, C., Soulé, M. & Noss, R. F. A mission-driven discipline: the growth of conservation biology. Conserv. Biol. 20, 631–651 (2006).
Google Scholar
Sandbrook, C., Fisher, J. A., Holmes, G., Luque-Lora, R. & Keane, A. The global conservation movement is diverse but not divided. Nat. Sustain. 2, 316–323 (2019).
Google Scholar
Takacs, D. The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise (Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1996).
Garland, E. The elephant in the room: confronting the colonial character of wildlife conservation in Africa. Afr. Stud. Rev 51, 51–74 (2008).
Google Scholar
Thekaekara, T. Botswana elephants episode: there’s a colonial underpinning to conservation. DownToEarth (22 July 2020); https://www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/wildlife-and-biodiversity/botswana-elephants-episode-there-s-a-colonial-underpinning-to-conservation-72429
Cronon, W. et al. Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature (WW Norton & Company, 1995).
Stephens, L. et al. Archaeological assessment reveals Earth’s early transformation through land use. Science 365, 897–902 (2019).
Google Scholar
Brockington, D., Duffy, R. & Igoe, J. Nature Unbound: Conservation, Capitalism and the Future of Protected Areas (Earthscan, 2008).
Mace, G. M. Whose conservation? Science 345, 1558–1560 (2014).
Google Scholar
Mace, G. M., Norris, K. & Fitter, A. H. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 19–26 (2012).
Google Scholar
Lele, S., Springate-Baginski, O., Lakerveld, R., Deb, D. & Dash, P. Ecosystem services: origins, contributions, pitfalls, and alternatives. Conserv. Soc. 11, 343–358 (2013).
Google Scholar
Martin, J.-L., Maris, V. & Simberloff, D. S. The need to respect nature and its limits challenges society and conservation science. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6105–6112 (2016).
Google Scholar
Díaz, S. et al. The IPBES Conceptual Framework: connecting nature and people. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain 14, 1–16 (2015).
Google Scholar
Turnhout, E., Waterton, C., Neves, K. & Buizer, M. Rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to ‘living with’. Conserv. Lett. 6, 154–161 (2013).
Google Scholar
Kenter, J. O. et al. Loving the mess: navigating diversity and conflict in social values for sustainability. Sustain. Sci. 14, 1439–1461 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lele, S. From wildlife-ism to ecosystem-service-ism to a broader environmentalism. Environ. Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892920000466 (2020).
Muradian, R. & Pascual, U. A typology of elementary forms of human-nature relations: a contribution to the valuation debate. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain 35, 8–14 (2018).
Google Scholar
Robertson, D. P. & Hull, R. B. Beyond biology: toward a more public ecology for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 15, 970–979 (2001).
Google Scholar
Tallis, H. & Lubchenco, J. Working together: a call for inclusive conservation. Nature 515, 27 (2014).
Google Scholar
Kareiva, P. M., Marvier, M. & Silliman, B. Effective Conservation Science: Data Not Dogma (Oxford Univ. Press, 2018).
Wilshusen, P. R., Brechin, S. R., Fortwangler, C. L. & West, P. C. Reinventing a square wheel: critique of a resurgent “protection paradigm” in international biodiversity conservation. Soc. Nat. Resour. 15, 17–40 (2002).
Google Scholar
Turnhout, E. The politics of environmental knowledge. Conserv. Soc. 16, 363–371 (2018).
Google Scholar
Louder, E. & Wyborn, C. Biodiversity narratives: stories of the evolving conservation landscape. Environ. Conserv. 47, 251–259 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gadgil, M., Seshagiri Rao, P., Utkarsh, G., Pramod, P. & Chhatre, A. New meanings for old knowledge: the people’s biodiversity registers program. Ecol. Appl. 10, 1307–1317 (2000).
Google Scholar
Buijs, A. E., Fischer, A., Rink, D. & Young, J. C. Looking beyond superficial knowledge gaps: understanding public representations of biodiversity. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Manag. 4, 65–80 (2008).
Google Scholar
Wyborn, C. et al. An agenda for research and action towards diverse and just futures for life on Earth. Conserv. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13671 (2020).
Wyborn, C. et al. Imagining transformative biodiversity futures. Nat. Sustain. 3, 670–672 (2020).
Google Scholar
Samper, C. Planetary boundaries: rethinking biodiversity. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 118–119 (2009).
Google Scholar
Mayer, P. Biodiversity: the appreciation of different thought styles and values helps to clarify the term. Restor. Ecol. 14, 105–111 (2006).
Google Scholar
Morar, N., Toadvine, T. & Bohannan, B. J. Biodiversity at twenty-five years: revolution or red herring? Ethics Policy Environ. 18, 16–29 (2015).
Google Scholar
Purvis, A. et al. in Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (eds Brondízio, E. S. et al.) Ch. 2.2 (Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, 2019).
Dasgupta, P. The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review (HM Treasury, 2021).
Perrings, C. Our Uncommon Heritage: Biodiversity Change, Ecosystem Services, and Human Well-Being (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Gowdy, J. M. The value of biodiversity: markets, society, and ecosystems. Land Econ. 73, 25–41 (1997).
Google Scholar
Keulartz, J. Boundary work in ecological restoration. Environ. Phil. 6, 35–55 (2009).
Google Scholar
Chan, K. M. et al. Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 1462–1465 (2016).
Google Scholar
Descola, P. The Ecology of Others (Prickly Paradigm, 2013).
Raffles, R. Intimate knowledge. Int. Soc. Sci. J. 54, 325–335 (2002).
Google Scholar
Tengö, M., Brondizio, E. S., Elmqvist, T., Malmer, P. & Spierenburg, M. Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: the multiple evidence base approach. AMBIO 43, 579–591 (2014).
Google Scholar
Zafra-Calvo, N. et al. Plural valuation of nature for equity and sustainability: insights from the Global South. Glob. Environ. Change 63, 102115 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lele, S., Wilshusen, P., Brockington, D., Seidler, R. & Bawa, K. Beyond exclusion: alternative approaches to biodiversity conservation in the developing tropics. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2, 94–100 (2010).
Google Scholar
Pascual, U. et al. Social equity matters in payments for ecosystem services. BioScience 64, 1027–1036 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wunder, S. et al. From principles to practice in paying for nature’s services. Nat. Sustain. 1, 145–150 (2018).
Google Scholar
Büscher, B. et al. Half-Earth or whole Earth? Radical ideas for conservation, and their implications. Oryx 51, 407–410 (2017).
Google Scholar
Adams, W. M. in The Anthropology of Sustainability, Palgrave Studies in Anthropology of Sustainability (eds Brightman, M. & Lewis, J.) 111–126 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).
Vatn, A. An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal. Ecol. Econ. 68, 2207–2215 (2009).
Google Scholar
Büscher, B., Sullivan, S., Neves, K., Igoe, J. & Brockington, D. Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. Capital. Nat. Social. 23, 4–30 (2012).
Google Scholar
Lliso, B., Mariel, P., Pascual, U. & Engel, S. Increasing the credibility and salience of valuation through deliberation: lessons from the Global South. Glob. Environ. Change 62, 102065 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rudel, T. K., Defries, R., Asner, G. P. & Laurance, W. F. Changing drivers of deforestation and new opportunities for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 23, 1396–1405 (2009).
Google Scholar
Mazor, T. et al. Global mismatch of policy and research on drivers of biodiversity loss. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1071–1074 (2018).
Google Scholar
Maxwell, S. L., Fuller, R. A., Brooks, T. M. & Watson, J. E. Biodiversity: the ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nature 536, 143–145 (2016).
Google Scholar
Folke, C. et al. Transnational corporations and the challenge of biosphere stewardship. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1396–1403 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ceddia, M. G. Investments’ role in ecosystem degradation. Science 368, 377–377 (2020).
Neumann, R. P. Moral and discursive geographies in the war for biodiversity in Africa. Polit. Geogr. 23, 813–837 (2004).
Google Scholar
Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L. T. & Steinberger, J. K. Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nat. Commun. 11, 3107 (2020).
Google Scholar
Svarstad, H., Petersen, L. K., Rothman, D., Siepel, H. & Wätzold, F. Discursive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR. Land Use Policy 25, 116–125 (2008).
Google Scholar
Gari, S. R., Newton, A. & Icely, J. D. A review of the application and evolution of the DPSIR framework with an emphasis on coastal social-ecological systems. Ocean Coast. Manage. 103, 63–77 (2015).
Google Scholar
Muradian, R. et al. Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions. Conserv. Lett. 6, 274–279 (2013).
Google Scholar
Otero, I. et al. Biodiversity policy beyond economic growth. Conserv. Lett. 13, e12713 (2020).
Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. Ø. et al. Toward a normative land systems science. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 38, 1–6 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lele, S. & Kurien, A. Interdisciplinary analysis of the environment: insights from tropical forest research. Environ. Conserv. 38, 211–233 (2011).
Google Scholar
West, S., Haider, L. J., Stålhammar, S. & Woroniecki, S. A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations. Ecosyst. People 16, 304–325 (2020).
Google Scholar
Boivin, N. L. et al. Ecological consequences of human niche construction: examining long-term anthropogenic shaping of global species distributions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6388–6396 (2016).
Google Scholar
Jacobs, S. et al. Use your power for good: plural valuation of nature – the Oaxaca statement. Glob. Sustain. 3, e8 (2020).
Google Scholar
Turnhout, E., Tuinstra, W. & Halffman, W. Environmental Expertise: Connecting Science, Policy and Society (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).
Saberwal, V. & Chhatre, A. Democratizing Nature: Politics, Conservation, and Development in India (Oxford Univ. Press, 2006).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
