Faith, D. P. et al. Evosystem services: an evolutionary perspective on the links between biodiversity and human well-being. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sust. 2, 66–74 (2010).
Google Scholar
Cámara-Leret, R. et al. Fundamental species traits explain provisioning services of tropical American palms. Nat. Plants 3, 16220 (2017).
Google Scholar
Oka, C., Aiba, M. & Nakashizuka, T. Phylogenetic clustering in beneficial attributes of tree species directly linked to provisioning, regulating and cultural ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 96, 477–495 (2019).
Google Scholar
Faith, D. P. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61, 1–10 (1992).
Google Scholar
Vane-Wright, R. I., Humphries, C. J. & Williams, P. H. What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55, 235–254 (1991).
Google Scholar
Crozier, R. H. Genetic diversity and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 61, 11–15 (1992).
Google Scholar
Tucker, C. M. et al. Assessing the utility of conserving evolutionary history. Biol. Rev. 94, 1740–1760 (2019).
Google Scholar
Owen, N. R., Gumbs, R., Gray, C. L. & Faith, D. P. Global conservation of phylogenetic diversity captures more than just functional diversity. Nat. Commun. 10, 859 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mazel, F. et al. Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably. Nat. Commun. 9, 2888 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mazel, F. et al. Reply to: ‘Global conservation of phylogenetic diversity captures more than just functional diversity’. Nat. Commun. 10, 858 (2019).
Google Scholar
Forest, F. et al. Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. Nature 445, 757–760 (2007).
Google Scholar
Cook, F. E. M. Economic Botany Data Collection Standard (International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases for Plant Sciences, Royal Botanic Gardens, UK, 1995).
Smith, S. A. & Brown, J. W. Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny. Am. J. Bot. 105, 302–314 (2018).
Google Scholar
Jin, Y. & Qian, H. V. PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants. Ecography 42, 1353–1359 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mabberley, D. J. Mabberley’s Plant-book: A Portable Dictionary of Plants, Their Classification and Uses 4th edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017).
Cox, P. A. Will tribal knowledge survive the millennium? Science 287, 44–45 (2000).
Google Scholar
Cámara-Leret, R., Paniagua-Zambrana, N., Balslev, H. & Macía, M. J. Ethnobotanical knowledge is vastly under-documented in northwestern South America. PLoS ONE 9, e85794 (2014).
Google Scholar
Cámara-Leret, R. & Dennehy, Z. Information gaps in indigenous and local knowledge for science-policy assessments. Nat. Sustain. 2, 736–741 (2019).
Google Scholar
Novotny, V. et al. Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest. Nature 416, 841–844 (2002).
Google Scholar
Gilbert, G. S., Magarey, R., Suiter, K. & Webb, C. O. Evolutionary tools for phytosanitary risk analysis: phylogenetic signal as a predictor of host range of plant pests and pathogens. Evol. Appl. 5, 869–878 (2012).
Google Scholar
Calatayud, J. et al. Geography and major host evolutionary transitions shape the resource use of plant parasites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 9840–9845 (2016).
Google Scholar
Pecl, G. T. et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 355, eai9214 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lehmann, P. et al. Complex responses of global insect pests to climate warming. Front. Ecol. Environ. 18, 141–150 (2020).
Google Scholar
de Lucena, R. F. P. et al. The ecological apparency hypothesis and the importance of useful plants in rural communities from Northeastern Brazil: an assessment based on use value. J. Environ. Manag. 96, 106–115 (2012).
Google Scholar
Menendez-Baceta, G. et al. The importance of cultural factors in the distribution of medicinal plant knowledge: a case study in four Basque regions. J. Ethnopharmacol. 161, 116–127 (2015).
Google Scholar
Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A. & Donoghue, M. J. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 475–505 (2002).
Google Scholar
Global Information on Scoping for the Thematic Assessment of Sustainable Use of Wild Species (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, 2018); https://ipbes.net/sustainable-use-wild-species-assessment
Karki, M., Senaratna Sellamuttu, S., Okayasu, S. & Suzuki, W. (eds) Regional Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for Asia and the Pacific (Secretariat of the IPBES, 2018).
Pardo-de-Santayana, M. & Macía, M. The benefits of traditional knowledge. Nature 518, 487–488 (2015).
Google Scholar
Díaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).
Google Scholar
Antonelli, A. et al. State of the World’s Plants and Fungi 2020 (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 2020).
Ulian, T. et al. Unlocking plant resources to support food security and promote sustainable agriculture. Plants People Planet 2, 421–445 (2020).
Google Scholar
Plants of the World Online (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 2021); http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/
Zanne, A. E. et al. Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature 506, 89–92 (2014).
Google Scholar
The Plant List, version 1.1 (The Plant List, 2013); http://www.theplantlist.org/
Rangel, T. F. et al. Phylogenetic uncertainty revisited: implications for ecological analyses. Evolution 69, 1301–1312 (2015).
Google Scholar
Federhen, S. The NCBI taxonomy database. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D136–D143 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hörandl, E. & Stuessy, T. F. Paraphyletic groups as natural units of biological classification. Taxon 59, 1641–1653 (2010).
Google Scholar
Revell, L. J. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223 (2012).
Google Scholar
Rodrigues, A. S. L. & Gaston, K. J. Maximising phylogenetic diversity in the selection of networks of conservation areas. Biol. Conserv. 105, 103–111 (2002).
Google Scholar
Bordewich, M., Rodrigo, A. G. & Semple, C. Selecting taxa to save or sequence: desirable criteria and a greedy solution. Syst. Biol. 57, 825–834 (2008).
Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. Theor. Biol. 13, 131–144 (1966).
Google Scholar
Kembel, S. W. Disentangling niche and neutral influences on community assembly: assessing the performance of community phylogenetic structure tests. Ecol. Lett. 12, 949–960 (2009).
Google Scholar
R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).
Kembel, S. W. et al. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26, 1463–1464 (2010).
Google Scholar
Brummitt, R. K. World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions 2nd edn (International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases for Plant Sciences, 2001).
Baselga, A. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19, 134–143 (2010).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
