Golden, C. D. et al. Nutrition: Fall in fish catch threatens human health. Nature 534, 317–320 (2016).
Google Scholar
Halpern, B. S. et al. Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world’s ocean. Nat. Commun. 6, 7615 (2015).
The Ocean Economy in 2030 (OECD, 2016).
Boonstra, W. J., Valman, M. & Björkvik, E. A sea of many colours – how relevant is blue growth for capture fisheries in the global north, and vice versa? Mar. Policy 87, 340–349 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bennett, N. J. et al. Towards a sustainable and equitable blue economy. Nat. Sustain. 2, 991–993 (2019).
Google Scholar
Nash, K. L. et al. Planetary boundaries for a blue planet. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1625–1634 (2017).
Google Scholar
Maxwell, S. M. et al. Cumulative human impacts on marine predators. Nat. Commun. 4, 2688 (2013).
Zero Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (CBD, 2020).
Update of the Zero Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (CBD, 2020).
Mace, G. M. et al. Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss. Nat. Sustain. 1, 448–451 (2018).
Google Scholar
Leclere, D. et al. Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy. Nature 585, 551–556 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bull, J. W. et al. Net positive outcomes for nature. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 4–7 (2020).
Google Scholar
Milner-Gulland, E. J. et al. Four steps for the Earth: mainstreaming the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. One Earth 4, 75–87 (2020).
Google Scholar
Davies, R. W. D., Cripps, S. J. J., Nickson, A. & Porter, G. Defining and estimating global marine fisheries bycatch. Mar. Policy 33, 661–672 (2009).
Google Scholar
Hall, M. A., Alverson, D. L. & Metuzals, K. I. By-catch: problems and solutions. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 41, 204–219 (2000).
Google Scholar
Crowder, L. B. & Murawski, S. A. Fisheries bycatch: implications for management. Fisheries 23, 8–17 (1998).
Google Scholar
Branch, T. A., Rutherford, K. & Hilborn, R. Replacing trip limits with individual transferable quotas: implications for discarding. Mar. Policy 30, 281–292 (2006).
Google Scholar
Lewison, R. L., Crowder, L. B., Read, A. J. & Freeman, S. A. Understanding impacts of fisheries bycatch on marine megafauna. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 598–604 (2004).
Google Scholar
Gilman, E. et al. Reducing sea turtle interactions in the Hawaii-based longline swordfish fishery. Biol. Conserv. 139, 19–28 (2007).
Google Scholar
Watson, J. T., Essington, T. E., Lennert-Cody, C. E. & Hall, M. A. Trade-offs in the design of fishery closures: management of silky shark bycatch in the eastern Pacific Ocean tuna fishery. Conserv. Biol. 23, 626–635 (2009).
Google Scholar
Campbell, L. M. & Cornwell, M. L. Human dimensions of bycatch reduction technology: current assumptions and directions for future research. Endang. Species Res. 5, 325–334 (2008).
Google Scholar
Hall, M. A. On bycatches. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 6, 319–352 (1996).
Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. On models of commercial fishing. J. Polit. Econ. 77, 181–198 (1969).
Google Scholar
Innes, J., Pascoe, S., Wilcox, C., Jennings, S. & Paredes, S. Mitigating undesirable impacts in the marine environment: a review of market-based management measures. Front. Mar. Sci. 2, 76 (2015).
Google Scholar
Nyborg, K. et al. Social norms as solutions. Science 354, 42–43 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bowles, S. & Polanía-Reyes, S. Economic incentives and social preferences: substitutes or complements? J. Econ. Lit. 50, 368–425 (2012).
Google Scholar
Gneezy, U., Meier, S. & Rey-Biel, P. When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior. J. Econ. Perspect. 25, 191–210 (2011).
Google Scholar
Fulton, E. A., Smith, A. D. M., Smith, D. C. & Van Putten, I. E. Human behaviour: the key source of uncertainty in fisheries management. Fish Fish. 12, 2–17 (2011).
Google Scholar
Sumaila, U. R., Lam, V., Le Manach, F., Swartz, W. & Pauly, D. Global fisheries subsidies: an updated estimate. Mar. Policy 69, 189–193 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bladon, A. J., Short, K. M., Mohammed, E. Y. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Payments for ecosystem services in developing world fisheries. Fish Fish. 17, 839–859 (2016).
Google Scholar
Deutza, A. et al. Financing Nature: Closing the Global Biodiversity Financing Gap (The Paulson Institute, The Nature Conservancy, and the Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability, 2020).
Dutton, P. H. & Squires, D. Reconciling biodiversity with fishing: a holistic strategy for Pacific sea turtle recovery. Ocean Dev. Int. Law 39, 200–222 (2008).
Google Scholar
Pascoe, S. et al. Use of incentive-based management systems to limit bycatch and discarding. Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 4, 123–161 (2010).
Google Scholar
Wilcox, C. & Donlan, C. J. Compensatory mitigation as a solution to fisheries bycatch–biodiversity conservation conflicts. Front. Ecol. Environ. 5, 325–331 (2007).
Google Scholar
Dutton, P. H. & Squires, D. in Conservation of Pacific Sea Turtles (eds Dutton, P. H. et al.) 37–59 (Univ. Hawaii Press, 2011).
Sumaila, U. R. et al. Ocean Finance: Financing the Transition to a Sustainable Ocean Economy (World Resources Institute, 2020).
Squires, D., Restrepo, V., Garcia, S. & Dutton, P. Fisheries bycatch reduction within the least-cost biodiversity mitigation hierarchy: conservatory offsets with an application to sea turtles. Mar. Policy 93, 55–61 (2018).
Google Scholar
Finkelstein, M. et al. Evaluating the potential effectiveness of compensatory mitigation strategies for marine bycatch. PLoS ONE 3, e2480 (2008).
Google Scholar
Žydelis, R., Wallace, B. P., Gilman, E. L. & Werner, T. B. Conservation of marine megafauna through minimization of fisheries bycatch. Conserv. Biol. 23, 608–616 (2009).
Google Scholar
Blomquist, J., Bartolino, V. & Waldo, S. Price premiums for providing eco-labelled seafood: evidence from MSC-certified cod in Sweden. J. Agric. Econ. 66, 690–704 (2015).
Google Scholar
Roheim, C. A., Bush, S. R., Asche, F., Sanchirico, J. N. & Uchida, H. Evolution and future of the sustainable seafood market. Nat. Sustain. 1, 392–398 (2018).
Google Scholar
Shumway, N., Watson, J. E. M., Saunders, M. I. & Maron, M. The risks and opportunities of translating terrestrial biodiversity offsets to the marine realm. BioScience 68, 125–133 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bull, J. W. & Strange, N. The global extent of biodiversity offset implementation under no net loss policies. Nat. Sustain. 1, 790–798 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gjertsen, H., Squires, D., Dutton, P. H. & Eguchi, T. Cost-effectiveness of alternative conservation strategies with application to the Pacific leatherback turtle. Conserv. Biol. 28, 140–149 (2014).
Google Scholar
Segerson, K. in Conservation of Pacific Sea Turtles (eds Dutton, P. H. et al.) 370–395 (Univ. Hawaii Press, 2011).
Bull, J. W., Suttle, K. B., Gordon, A., Singh, N. J. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice. Oryx 47, 369–380 (2013).
Google Scholar
zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. The ecological outcomes of biodiversity offsets under ‘no net loss’ policies: a global review. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12664 (2019).
zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. Exploring the ecological outcomes of mandatory biodiversity net gain using evidence from early-adopter jurisdictions in England. Preprint at SocArXiv https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/tw6nr (2021).
Segerson, K. Voluntary approaches to environmental protection and resource management. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 5, 161–180 (2013).
Google Scholar
Kotchen, M. J. Voluntary- and information-based approaches to environmental management: a public economics perspective. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 7, 276–295 (2013).
Google Scholar
Janisse, C., Squires, D., Seminoff, J. A. & Dutton, P. H. in Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management, (eds Grafton, Q. et al.) 231–240 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010).
Squires, D. & Garcia, S. The least-cost biodiversity impact mitigation hierarchy with a focus on marine fisheries and bycatch issues. Conserv. Biol. 32, 989–997 (2018).
Google Scholar
Jacob, C. et al. Marine biodiversity offsets: pragmatic approaches toward better conservation outcomes. Conserv Lett. 13, 1–12 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lent, R. & Squires, D. Reducing marine mammal bycatch in global fisheries: an economics approach. Deep Sea Res. Pt II 140, 268–277 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhou, R. & Segerson, K. Individual vs. collective approaches to fisheries management. Mar. Resour. Econ. 31, 165–192 (2016).
Google Scholar
Yagi, N., Clark, M. L., Anderson, L. G., Arnason, R. & Metzner, R. Applicability of individual transferable quotas (ITQs) in Japanese fisheries: a comparison of rights-based fisheries management in Iceland, Japan, and United States. Mar. Policy 36, 241–245 (2012).
Google Scholar
Kotchen, M. J. & Segerson, K. On the use of group performance and rights for environmental protection and resource management. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 5285–5292 (2019).
Google Scholar
Stewart, A. J. & Plotkin, J. B. Collapse of cooperation in evolving games. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17558–17563 (2014).
Mani, A., Rahwan, I. & Pentland, A. Inducing peer pressure to promote cooperation. Sci. Rep. 3, 1735 (2013).
Google Scholar
Kroeger, T. The quest for the ‘optimal’ payment for environmental services program: ambition meets reality, with useful lessons. Policy Econ. 37, 65–74 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ledoux, L. & Turner, R. K. Valuing ocean and coastal resources: a review of practical examples and issues for further action. Ocean Coast. Manag. 45, 583–616 (2002).
Google Scholar
Booth, H., Squires, D. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. The mitigation hierarchy for sharks: a risk-based framework for reconciling trade-offs between shark conservation and fisheries objectives. Fish Fish. 21, 269–289 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bull, J. W. & Milner-Gulland, E. Choosing prevention or cure when mitigating biodiversity loss: trade-offs under ‘no net loss’ policies. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 354–366 (2020).
Google Scholar
Norton, D. A. & Warburton, B. The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control. Conserv. Biol. 29, 5–11 (2015).
Google Scholar
Holmes, N. D. et al. The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund invasive species eradications on islands. Conserv. Biol. 30, 425–427 (2016).
Google Scholar
Gallagher, A. J. & Hammerschlag, N. Global shark currency: the distribution frequency and economic value of shark ecotourism. Curr. Issues Tour. 14, 797–812 (2011).
Google Scholar
Mustika, P. L. K., Ichsan, M. & Booth, H. The economic value of shark and ray tourism in Indonesia and its role in delivering conservation outcomes. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 261 (2020).
Google Scholar
O’Malley, M. P., Lee-Brooks, K. & Medd, H. B. The global economic impact of manta ray watching tourism. PLoS ONE 8, e65051 (2013).
Google Scholar
Vianna, G. M. S. et al. Shark-diving tourism as a financing mechanism for shark conservation strategies in Malaysia. Mar. Policy 94, 220–226 (2018).
Google Scholar
Swimmer, Y. et al. Sea turtle bycatch mitigation in U.S. longline fisheries. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 260 (2017).
Google Scholar
Croll, D. A. et al. Vulnerabilities and fisheries impacts: the uncertain future of manta and devil rays. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 26, 562–575 (2016).
Google Scholar
Anderson, R. C., Adam, M. S., Kitchen-Wheeler, A. M. & Stevens, G. Extent and economic value of manta ray watching in Maldives. Tour. Mar. Environ. 7, 15–27 (2011).
Google Scholar
Farley, J. Ecosystem services: the economics debate. Ecosyst. Serv. 1, 40–49 (2012).
Google Scholar
Kenter, J. O., Hyde, T., Christie, M. & Fazey, I. The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries—evidence from the Solomon Islands. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 505–521 (2011).
Google Scholar
Gilman, E. et al. Robbing Peter to pay Paul: replacing unintended cross-taxa conflicts with intentional tradeoffs by moving from piecemeal to integrated fisheries bycatch management. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 29, 93–123 (2019).
Google Scholar
Dissou, Y. & Siddiqui, M. S. Can carbon taxes be progressive?. Energy Econ. 42, 88–100 (2014).
Google Scholar
Engel, S., Pagiola, S. & Wunder, S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol. Econ. 65, 663–674 (2008).
Google Scholar
Bene, C. Small-Scale Fisheries: Assessing Their Contribution to Rural Livelihoods in Developing Countries FAO Fisheries Circular No. 1008 (FAO, 2006).
Arlidge, W. N. S. et al. A mitigation hierarchy approach for managing sea turtle captures in small-scale fisheries. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 49 (2020).
Google Scholar
Levi, M., Sacks, A. & Tyler, T. Conceptualizing legitimacy, measuring legitimating beliefs. Am. Behav. Sci. 53, 354–375 (2009).
Google Scholar
Oyanedel, R., Gelcich, S. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Motivations for (non-)compliance with conservation rules by small-scale resource users. Conserv. Lett. 15, e12725 (2020).
Pakiding, F. et al. Community engagement: an integral component of a multifaceted conservation approach for the transboundary western Pacific leatherback. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 756 (2020).
Google Scholar
Long-Term Strategic Directions to the 2050 Vision for Biodiversity, Approaches to Living in Harmony with Nature and Preparation for the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework Report No. CBD/COP/14/9 (CBD, 2018).
Berkes, F. et al. Globalization, roving bandits, and marine resources. Science 311, 1557–1558 (2006).
Google Scholar
Ban, N. C., Adams, V., Pressey, R. L. & Hicks, J. Promise and problems for estimating management costs of marine protected areas. Conserv. Lett. 4, 241–252 (2011).
Google Scholar
Arias, A., Pressey, R. L., Jones, R. E., Álvarez-Romero, J. G. & Cinner, J. E. Optimizing enforcement and compliance in offshore marine protected areas: a case study from Cocos Island, Costa Rica. Oryx 50, 18–26 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bartholomew, D. C. et al. Remote electronic monitoring as a potential alternative to on-board observers in small-scale fisheries. Biol. Conserv. 219, 35–45 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mangi, S. C., Dolder, P. J., Catchpole, T. L., Rodmell, D. & de Rozarieux, N. Approaches to fully documented fisheries: practical issues and stakeholder perceptions. Fish Fish. 16, 426–452 (2015).
Google Scholar
Harper, L. R. et al. Prospects and challenges of environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring in freshwater ponds. Hydrobiologia 826, 25–41 (2019).
Russo, T. et al. All is fish that comes to the net: metabarcoding for rapid fisheries catch assessment. Ecol. Appl. 31, e02273 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cardeñosa, D., Gollock, M. J. & Chapman, D. D. Development and application of a novel real‐time polymerase chain reaction assay to detect illegal trade of the European eel (Anguilla anguilla). Conserv. Sci. Prac. 1, e39 (2019).
Google Scholar
Griffiths, V. F., Bull, J. W., Baker, J. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. No net loss for people and biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 33, 76–87 (2019).
Google Scholar
Milner-Gulland, E. J. et al. Translating the terrestrial mitigation hierarchy to marine megafauna by-catch. Fish Fish. 19, 547–561 (2018).
Google Scholar
Republic of Namibia Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources Annual Report 2012–2013 (MFMR, 2013).
Sanchirico, J. N., Holland, D., Quigley, K. & Fina, M. Catch-quota balancing in multispecies individual fishing quotas. Mar. Policy 30, 767–785 (2006).
Google Scholar
Walker, S. & Townsend, R. Economic analysis of New Zealand’s deemed value system. In Proc. of the Fourteenth Biennial Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics & Trade, July 22–25, 2008, Nha Trang, Vietnam: Achieving a Sustainable Future: Managing Aquaculture, Fishing, Trade and Development 1–11 (Oregon State Univ., 2008).
Sanchirico, J. N. Managing marine capture fisheries with incentive based price instruments. Public Finance Manag. 3, 67–93 (2003).
Pascoe, S., Wilcox, C. & Donlan, C. J. Biodiversity offsets: a cost-effective interim solution to seabird bycatch in fisheries? PLoS ONE 6, e25762 (2011).
Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Z. Controlling stochastic externalities with penalty threats: the case of bycatch. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 18, 93–113 (2016).
Google Scholar
Androkovich, R. A. & Stollery, K. R. A stochastic dynamic programming model of bycatch control in fisheries. Mar. Resour. Econ. 9, 19–30 (1994).
Google Scholar
Herrera, G. E. Stochastic bycatch, informational asymmetry, and discarding. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 49, 463–483 (2005).
Google Scholar
Singh, R. & Weninger, Q. Bioeconomies of scope and the discard problem in multiple-species fisheries. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 58, 72–92 (2009).
Google Scholar
Pascoe, S., Cannard, T. & Steven, A. Offset payments can reduce environmental impacts of urban development. Environ. Sci. Policy 100, 205–210 (2019).
Google Scholar
Schouten, G. & Glasbergen, P. Creating legitimacy in global private governance: the case of the roundtable on sustainable palm oil. Ecol. Econ. 70, 1891–1899 (2011).
Google Scholar
Ruysschaert, D. & Salles, D. in The Anthropology of Conservation NGOs (eds Larsen, P. B. & Brockington, D.) 121–149 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).
Right Whales and Entanglements: More on How NOAA Makes Decisions (NOAA Fisheries, 2019); https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/new-england-mid-atlantic/marine-mammal-protection/right-whales-and-entanglements-more-how-noaa#right-whales-and-the-lobster-fishery
Jouffray, J. B., Crona, B., Wassénius, E., Bebbington, J. & Scholtens, B. Leverage points in the financial sector for seafood sustainability. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax3324 (2019).
Google Scholar
Österblom, H. et al. Emergence of a global science-business initiative for ocean stewardship. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 9038–9043 (2017).
Google Scholar
Deforestation-Free Supply Chains: From Commitments to Action (CDP, 2014).
Donofrio, S., Rothrock, P. & Leonard, J. Supply Change: Tracking Corporate Commitments to Deforestation-Free Supply Chains (Forest Trends, 2017).
Österblom, H. et al. Transnational corporations as ‘keystone actors’ in marine ecosystems. PLoS ONE 10, e0127533 (2015).
Google Scholar
Galland, G., Rogers, A. & Nickson, A. Netting Billions: A Global Valuation of Tuna (The Pew Charitible Trusts, 2016).
Zeller, D., Cashion, T., Palomares, M. & Pauly, D. Global marine fisheries discards: a synthesis of reconstructed data. Fish Fish. 19, 30–39 (2018).
Google Scholar
Balmford, A., Gravestock, P., Hockley, N., McClean, C. J. & Roberts, C. M. The worldwide costs of marine protected areas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 9694–9697 (2004).
Google Scholar
Engel, S. & Palmer, C. Payments for environmental services as an alternative to logging under weak property rights: the case of Indonesia. Ecol. Econ. 65, 799–809 (2008).
Google Scholar
Bonham, C. et al. Conservation trust funds, protected area management effectiveness and conservation outcomes: lessons from the global conservation fund. Parks 20, 89–100 (2014).
Google Scholar
Angelsen, A. et al. (eds) Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options (CIFOR, 2009).
Spergel, B. & Mikitin, K. Practice Standards for Conservation Trust Funds (CFA, 2013).
Progress Summary of 2014–15 ISSF Funded Marine Turtle Projects (ISSF, 2016).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
