Mendes, R. et al. Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science 32, 1097–1100 (2011).
Google Scholar
Bender, S. F., Wagg, C. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. An underground revolution: Biodiversity and soil ecological engineering for agricultural sustainability. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 440–452 (2016).
Google Scholar
Busby, P. E. et al. Research priorities for harnessing plant microbiomes in sustainable agriculture. PLOS Biol. 15, e2001793 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sergaki, C., Lagunas, B., Lidbury, I., Gifford, M. L. & Schäfer, P. Challenges and approaches in microbiome research: From fundamental to applied. Front Plant Sci. 9, 1205 (2018).
Google Scholar
Toju, H. et al. Core microbiomes for sustainable agroecosystems. Nat. Plants. 4, 247–257 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bonfante, P. & Anca, I.-A. Plants, mycorrhizal fungi, and bacteria: A network of interactions. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 63, 363–383 (2009).
Google Scholar
Hiruma, K. et al. Root endophyte colletotrichum tofieldiae confers plant fitness benefits that are phosphate status dependent. Cell 165, 464–474 (2016).
Google Scholar
Calvo, P., Nelson, L. & Kloepper, J. W. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil 383, 3–41 (2014).
Google Scholar
Vorholt, J. A., Vogel, C., Carlström, C. I. & Müller, D. B. Establishing causality: Opportunities of synthetic communities for plant microbiome research. Cell Host Microbe 22, 142–155 (2017).
Google Scholar
Howden, S. M. et al. Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19691–19696 (2007).
Google Scholar
Robertson, G. P. & Vitousek, P. M. nitrogen in agriculture: Balancing the cost of an essential resource. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34, 97–125 (2009).
Google Scholar
Elser, J. & Bennett, E. Phosphorus cycle: A broken biogeochemical cycle. Nature 478, 29–31 (2011).
Google Scholar
Dangl, J. L., Horvath, D. M. & Staskawicz, B. J. Pivoting the plant immune system from dissection to deployment. Science 341, 746–751 (2013).
Google Scholar
Hassani, M. A., Durán, P. & Hacquard, S. Microbial interactions within the plant holobiont. Microbiome 6, 58 (2018).
Google Scholar
Qiu, Z., Egidi, E., Liu, H., Kaur, S. & Singh, B. K. New frontiers in agriculture productivity: Optimised microbial inoculants and in situ microbiome engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 37, 107371 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wei, Z. et al. Initial soil microbiome composition and functioning predetermine future plant health. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw0759 (2019).
Google Scholar
Xiong, W. et al. Rhizosphere protists are key determinants of plant health. Microbiome 8, 27 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shade, A. & Handelsman, J. Beyond the Venn diagram: The hunt for a core microbiome. Environ. Microbiol. 14, 4–12 (2012).
Google Scholar
Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. J. & Bakker, P. A. H. M. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 17, 478–486 (2012).
Google Scholar
Risely, A. Applying the core microbiome to understand host–microbe systems. J. Anim. Ecol. 89, 1549–1558 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lundberg, D. S. et al. Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature 488, 86–90 (2012).
Google Scholar
Bulgarelli, D. et al. Structure and function of the bacterial root microbiota in wild and domesticated barley. Cell Host Microbe 17, 392–403 (2015).
Google Scholar
Xu, J. et al. The structure and function of the global citrus rhizosphere microbiome. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–10 (2018).
Google Scholar
Walters, W. A. et al. Large-scale replicated field study of maize rhizosphere identifies heritable microbes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 7368–7373 (2018).
Google Scholar
Pérez-Jaramillo, J. E. et al. Deciphering rhizosphere microbiome assembly of wild and modern common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in native and agricultural soils from Colombia. Microbiome 7, 114 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ofek-Lalzar, M. et al. Niche and host-associated functional signatures of the root surface microbiome. Nat. Commun. 5, 1–9 (2014).
Google Scholar
Marasco, R., Rolli, E., Fusi, M., Michoud, G. & Daffonchio, D. Grapevine rootstocks shape underground bacterial microbiome and networking but not potential functionality. Microbiome 6, 3 (2018).
Google Scholar
Jin, T. et al. Taxonomic structure and functional association of foxtail millet root microbiome. Gigascience 6, 1–12 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gottel, N. R. et al. Distinct microbial communities within the endosphere and rhizosphere of Populus deltoides roots across contrasting soil types. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 5934–5944 (2011).
Google Scholar
Edwards, J. et al. Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, E911–E920 (2015).
Google Scholar
Mendes, L. W., Kuramae, E. E., Navarrete, A. A., Van Veen, J. A. & Tsai, S. M. Taxonomical and functional microbial community selection in soybean rhizosphere. ISME J. 8, 1577–1587 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hamonts, K. et al. Field study reveals core plant microbiota and relative importance of their drivers. Environ. Microbiol. 20, 124–140 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cheng, Z. et al. Revealing the Variation and Stability of Bacterial Communities in Tomato Rhizosphere Microbiota. Microorganisms 8, 170 (2020).
Google Scholar
Donn, S., Kirkegaard, J. A., Perera, G., Richardson, A. E. & Watt, M. Evolution of bacterial communities in the wheat crop rhizosphere. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 610–621 (2015).
Google Scholar
Simonin, M. et al. Influence of plant genotype and soil on the wheat rhizosphere microbiome: Identification of a core microbiome across eight African and European soils. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 96, fiaa67 (2019).
Schlatter, D. C., Yin, C., Hulbert, S. & Paulitz, T. C. Core rhizosphere microbiomes of dryland wheat are influenced by location and land use history. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 86, e02135-e2219 (2020).
Google Scholar
Douglas, G. M. et al. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 685–688 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Sato, Y., Furumichi, M. & Tanabe, M. KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D109–D114 (2012).
Google Scholar
Lemanceau, P., Blouin, M., Muller, D. & Moënne-Loccoz, Y. Let the core microbiota be functional. Trends Plant Sci. 22, 583–595 (2017).
Google Scholar
Klassen, J. L. Defining microbiome function. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 864–869 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ranjard, L. et al. Turnover of soil bacterial diversity driven by wide-scale environmental heterogeneity. Nat. Commun. 4, 1–10 (2013).
Google Scholar
Haichar, F. E. Z. et al. Plant host habitat and root exudates shape soil bacterial community structure. ISME J. 2, 1221–1230 (2008).
Google Scholar
Bulgarelli, D. et al. Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota. Nature 488, 91–95 (2012).
Google Scholar
Turner, T. R., James, E. K. & Poole, P. S. The plant microbiome. Genome Biol. 14, 1–10 (2013).
Google Scholar
Vandenkoornhuyse, P., Quaiser, A., Duhamel, M., Le Van, A. & Dufresne, A. The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. New Phytol. 206, 1196–1206 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wu, Z. et al. Environmental factors shaping the diversity of bacterial communities that promote rice production. BMC Microbiol. 18, 51 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yan, Y., Kuramae, E. E., De Hollander, M., Klinkhamer, P. G. L. & Van Veen, J. A. Functional traits dominate the diversity-related selection of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere. ISME J. 11, 56–66 (2017).
Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. E., Kent, A. D., Brisson, V. L. & Gaudin, A. C. M. Agricultural management and plant selection interactively affect rhizosphere microbial community structure and nitrogen cycling. Microbiome 7, 146 (2019).
Google Scholar
van der Heijden, M. G. A. & Hartmann, M. Networking in the plant microbiome. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002378 (2016).
Google Scholar
Agler, M. T. et al. Microbial hub taxa link host and abiotic factors to plant microbiome variation. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002352 (2016).
Google Scholar
Louca, S. et al. Function and functional redundancy in microbial systems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 936–943 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lozupone, C. A., Stombaugh, J. I., Gordon, J. I., Jansson, J. K. & Knight, R. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature 489, 220–230 (2012).
Google Scholar
United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (2020).
Stams, A. J. & Plugge, C. M. Electron transfer in syntrophic communities of anaerobic bacteria and archaea. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 7, 568–577 (2009).
Google Scholar
IPCC. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme IGES (2019).
Kuan, K. B., Othman, R., Rahim, K. A. & Shamsuddin, Z. H. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation to enhance vegetative growth, nitrogen fixation and nitrogen remobilisation of maize under greenhouse conditions. PLoS ONE 11, e0152478 (2016).
Google Scholar
Singh, R. P. & Jha, P. N. The multifarious PGPR Serratia marcescens CDP-13 augments induced systemic resistance and enhanced salinity tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLoS ONE 11, e0155026 (2016).
Google Scholar
Sathya, A., Vijayabharathi, R. & Gopalakrishnan, S. Plant growth-promoting actinobacteria: A new strategy for enhancing sustainable production and protection of grain legumes. 3 Biotech 7, 102 (2017).
Google Scholar
Verbon, E. H. & Liberman, L. M. Beneficial microbes affect endogenous mechanisms controlling root development. Trends Plant Sci. 21, 218–229 (2016).
Google Scholar
Yang, P., Yu, S., Cheng, L. & Ning, K. Meta-network: Optimized species-species network analysis for microbial communities. BMC Genom. 20, 187 (2019).
Google Scholar
Smith, S. A. & Brown, J. W. Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny. Am. J. Bot. 105, 1–13 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L. & Schulze-Lefert, P. Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 807–838 (2013).
Google Scholar
Müller, D. B., Vogel, C., Bai, Y. & Vorholt, J. A. The plant microbiota: Systems-level insights and perspectives. Annu. Rev. Genet. 50, 211–234 (2016).
Google Scholar
Grossmann, G. et al. The RootChip: An integrated microfluidic chip for plant science. Plant Cell 23, 4234–4240 (2011).
Google Scholar
Massalha, H., Korenblum, E., Malitsky, S., Shapiro, O. H. & Aharoni, A. Live imaging of root-bacteria interactions in a microfluidics setup. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 4549–4554 (2017).
Google Scholar
Aßhauer, K. P., Wemheuer, B., Daniel, R. & Meinicke, P. Tax4Fun: Predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data. Bioinformatics 31, 2882–2884 (2015).
Google Scholar
Sun, S., Jones, R. B. & Fodor, A. A. Inference-based accuracy of metagenome prediction tools varies across sample types and functional categories. Microbiome 8, 46 (2020).
Google Scholar
Choi, J. et al. Strategies to improve reference databases for soil microbiomes. ISME J. 11, 829–834 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lopes, L. D., Pereira e Silva, M. C. & Andreote, F. D. Bacterial abilities and adaptation toward the rhizosphere colonization. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1341 (2016).
Google Scholar
Staley, C. et al. Core functional traits of bacterial communities in the Upper Mississippi River show limited variation in response to land cover. Front. Microbiol. 5, 414 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bolnick, D. I. et al. Individual diet has sex-dependent effects on vertebrate gut microbiota. Nat. Commun. 5, 4500 (2014).
Google Scholar
Goodrich, J. K. et al. Human genetics shape the gut microbiome. Cell 159, 789–799 (2014).
Google Scholar
Button, K. S. et al. Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 365 (2013).
Google Scholar
Jervis-Bardy, J. et al. Deriving accurate microbiota profiles from human samples with low bacterial content through post-sequencing processing of Illumina MiSeq data. Microbiome 3, 19 (2015).
Google Scholar
Schöler, A., Jacquiod, S., Vestergaard, G., Schulz, S. & Schloter, M. Analysis of soil microbial communities based on amplicon sequencing of marker genes. Biol. Fertil. Soils 53, 485–489 (2017).
Google Scholar
Vestergaard, G., Schulz, S., Schöler, A. & Schloter, M. Making big data smart: How to use metagenomics to understand soil quality. Biol. Fertil. Soils 53, 479–484 (2017).
Google Scholar
Venturi, V. & Keel, C. Signaling in the rhizosphere. Trends Plant Sci. 21, 187–198 (2016).
Google Scholar
Boylen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable, and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).
Google Scholar
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2 paper supplementary information: High resolution sample inference from amplicon data. Nat. Methods. 13, 581–583 (2016).
Google Scholar
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2013).
Google Scholar
Bokulich, N. A. et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 6, 90 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lozupone, C. & Knight, R. UniFrac: A new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 8228–8235 (2005).
Google Scholar
Paradis, E. & Schliep, K. Phylogenetics ape 5.0: An environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35, 526–528 (2018).
Google Scholar
McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. Waste not, want not: Why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003531 (2014).
Google Scholar
Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods. 7, 335–336 (2010).
Google Scholar
Parks, D. H., Tyson, G. W., Hugenholtz, P. & Beiko, R. G. Genome analysis STAMP: Statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics 30, 3123–3124 (2014).
Google Scholar
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 57, 289–300 (1995).
Google Scholar
Yurgel, S. N., Nearing, J. T., Douglas, G. M. & Langille, M. G. I. Metagenomic functional shifts to plant induced environmental changes. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1682 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16, 111–120 (1980).
Google Scholar
Kumar, S., Stecher, G. & Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874 (2016).
Google Scholar
Brisson, V., Schmidt, J., Northen, T. R., Vogel, J. P. & Gaudin, A. A new method to correct for habitat filtering in microbial correlation networks. Front. Microbiol. 10, 585 (2019).
Google Scholar
Reshef, D. N. et al. Detecting novel associations in large data sets. Science 334, 1518–1524 (2011).
Google Scholar
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: A software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).
Google Scholar
Banerjee, S., Thrall, P. H., Bissett, A., Heijden, M. G. A. & Richardson, A. E. Linking microbial co-occurrences to soil ecological processes across a woodland-grassland ecotone. Ecol. Evol. 8, 8217–8230 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gu, Y. et al. Long-term fertilization structures bacterial and archaeal communities along soil depth gradient in a paddy soil. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1516 (2017).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
