Schoener, T. W. Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am. Nat. 122, 240–285 (1983).
Google Scholar
Keddy, P. A. Competition 2nd edn. (Kluwer, 2001).
Google Scholar
Kotler, B. P. & Brown, J. S. Environmental heterogeneity and the coexistence of desert rodents. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19, 281–307 (1988).
Google Scholar
Kronfeld-Schor, N. & Dayan, T. Partitioning of time as an ecological resource. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 153–181 (2003).
Google Scholar
Connell, J. H. On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. Am. Nat. 122, 661–696 (1983).
Google Scholar
Adler, P. B. et al. Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition. Ecol. Lett. 21, 1319–1329 (2018).
Google Scholar
Morris, D. W. Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection. Oecologia 136, 1–13 (2003).
Google Scholar
Barkae, E. D., Abramsky, Z. & Ovadia, O. Can models of density-dependent habitat selection be applied for trap-building predators?. Popul. Ecol. 56, 175–184 (2014).
Google Scholar
Halliday, W. D. & Blouin-Demers, G. Red flour beetles balance thermoregulation and food acquisition via density-dependent habitat selection. J. Zool. 294, 198–205 (2014).
Google Scholar
Tregenza, T. Building on the ideal free distribution. Adv. Ecol. Res. 26, 253–307 (1995).
Google Scholar
Kingsolver, J. G. & Pfennig, D. W. Individual-level selection as a cause of Cope’s rule of phyletic size increase. Evolution 58, 1608–1612 (2004).
Google Scholar
Alatalo, R. V. & Moreno, J. Body size, interspecific interactions, and use of foraging sites in tits (Paridae). Ecology 68, 1773–1777 (1987).
Google Scholar
Honěk, A. Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66, 483–492 (1993).
Google Scholar
Sokolovska, N., Rowe, L. & Johansson, F. Fitness and body size in mature odonates. Ecol. Entomol. 25, 239–248 (2000).
Google Scholar
Werner, E. E. & Anholt, B. R. Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. Am. Nat. 142, 242–272 (1993).
Google Scholar
Blanckenhorn, W. U. The evolution of body size: What keeps organisms small?. Q. Rev. Biol. 75, 385–407 (2000).
Google Scholar
Gotthard, K. Increased risk of predation as a cost of high growth rate: an experimental test in a butterfly. J. Anim. Ecol. 69, 896–902 (2000).
Google Scholar
Van Buskirk, J. Competition, cannibalism, and size class dominance in a dragonfly. Oikos 65, 455–464 (1992).
Google Scholar
Fincke, O. M. Larval behaviour of a giant damselfly: Territoriality or size-dependent dominance?. Anim. Behav. 51, 77–87 (1996).
Google Scholar
Hopper, K. R., Crowley, P. H. & Kielman, D. Density dependence, hatching synchrony, and within-cohort cannibalism in young dragonfly larvae. Ecology 77, 191–200 (1996).
Google Scholar
Eitam, A., Blaustein, L. & Mangel, M. Density and intercohort priority effects on larval Salamandra salamandra in temporary pools. Oecologia 146, 36–42 (2005).
Google Scholar
Barkae, E. D., Scharf, I. & Ovadia, O. A stranger is tastier than a neighbor: cannibalism in Mediterranean and desert antlion populations. Behav. Ecol. 28, 69–76 (2017).
Google Scholar
Alford, R. A. & Wilbur, H. M. Priority effects in experimental pond communities: competition between Bufo and Rana. Ecology 66, 1097–1105 (1985).
Google Scholar
Dayton, G. H. & Fitzgerald, L. A. Priority effects and desert anuran communities. Can. J. Zool. 83, 1112–1116 (2005).
Google Scholar
Louette, G. & De Meester, L. Predation and priority effects in experimental zooplankton communities. Oikos 116, 419–426 (2007).
Google Scholar
Geange, S. W. & Stier, A. C. Order of arrival affects competition in two reef fishes. Ecology 90, 2868–2878 (2009).
Google Scholar
Huey, R. B. & Pianka, E. R. Ecological consequences of foraging mode. Ecology 62, 991–999 (1981).
Google Scholar
Shine, R. & Li-Xin, S. Arboreal ambush site selection by pit-vipers Gloydius shedaoensis. Anim. Behav. 63, 565–576 (2002).
Google Scholar
Clark, R. W. Feeding experience modifies the assessment of ambush sites by the timber rattlesnake, a sit-and-wait predator. Ethology 110, 471–483 (2004).
Google Scholar
Tsairi, H. & Bouskila, A. Ambush site selection of a desert snake (Echis coloratus) at an oasis. Herpetologica 60, 13–23 (2004).
Google Scholar
Scharf, I., Lubin, Y. & Ovadia, O. Foraging decisions and behavioural flexibility in trap-building predators: a review. Biol. Rev. 86, 626–639 (2011).
Google Scholar
Blamires, S. J. Biomechanical costs and benefits of sit-and-wait foraging traps. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 66, 5–14 (2020).
Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. et al. Holes in the doughnut theory: the dispersion of ant-lions. Brenesia 14, 13–46 (1978).
Farji-Brener, A. G., Carvajal, D., Gei, M. G., Olano, J. & Sanchez, J. D. Direct and indirect effect of soil structure on the density of an antlion larva in a tropical dry forest. Ecol. Entomol. 33, 183–188 (2008).
Google Scholar
Lucas, J. R. Metabolic rates and pit-construction costs of two antlion species. J. Anim. Ecol. 54, 295–309 (1985).
Google Scholar
Tanaka, K. Energetic cost of web construction and its effect on web relocation in the web-building spider Agelena limbata. Oecologia 81, 459–464 (1989).
Google Scholar
Lubin, Y., Ellner, S. & Kotzman, M. Web relocation and habitat selection in desert widow spider. Ecology 74, 1915–1928 (1993).
Google Scholar
Loria, R., Scharf, I., Subach, A. & Ovadia, O. The interplay between foraging mode, habitat structure, and predator presence in antlions. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 1185–1192 (2008).
Google Scholar
Griffiths, D. Interference competition in ant-lion (Macroleon quinquemaculatus) larvae. Ecol. Entomol. 17, 219–226 (1992).
Google Scholar
Heiling, A. M. & Herberstein, M. E. The importance of being larger: intraspecific competition for prime web sites in orb-web spiders (Araneae, Araneidae). Behaviour 136, 669–677 (1999).
Google Scholar
Rayor, L. S. & Uetz, G. W. Trade-offs in foraging success and predation risk with spatial position in colonial spiders. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27, 77–85 (1990).
Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. Prey capture and competition in the ant lion. Biotropica 6, 187–193 (1974).
Google Scholar
Rao, D. Experimental evidence for the amelioration of shadow competition in an orb-web spider through the ‘ricochet’ effect. Ethology 115, 691–697 (2009).
Google Scholar
Scharf, I. Factors that can affect the spatial positioning of large and small individuals in clusters of sit-and-wait predators. Am. Nat. 195, 649–663 (2020).
Google Scholar
Matsura, T. & Takano, H. Pit-relocation of antlion larvae in relation to their density. Res. Popul. Ecol. 31, 225–234 (1989).
Google Scholar
Griffiths, D. Intraspecific competition in larvae of the ant-lion Morter sp. and interspecific interactions with Macroleon quinquemaculatus. Ecol. Entomol. 16, 193–201 (1991).
Google Scholar
Wise, D. H. Cannibalism, food limitation, intraspecific competition, and the regulation of spider populations. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51, 441–465 (2006).
Google Scholar
Klokočovnik, V., Veler, E. & Devetak, D. Antlions in interaction: confrontation of two competitors in limited space. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 66, 73–81 (2020).
Google Scholar
Buddle, C. M., Walker, S. E. & Rypstra, A. L. Cannibalism and density-dependent mortality in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). Can. J. Zool. 81, 1293–1297 (2003).
Google Scholar
Ovadia, O., Scharf, I., Barkae, E. D., Levi, T. & Alcalay, Y. Asymmetrical intra-guild predation and niche differentiation in two pit-building antlions. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 66, 82–90 (2020).
Google Scholar
Devetak, D. Wormlion Vermileo vermileo (L.) (Diptera: Vermileonidae) in Slovenia and Croatia. Ann. Ser. Hist. Nat. 18, 283–286 (2008).
Dor, R., Rosenstein, S. & Scharf, I. Foraging behaviour of a neglected pit-building predator: the wormlion. Anim. Behav. 93, 69–76 (2014).
Google Scholar
Miler, K., Yahya, B. E. & Czarnoleski, M. Substrate moisture, particle size and temperature preferences of trap-building larvae of sympatric antlions and wormlions from the rainforest of Borneo. Ecol. Entomol. 44, 488–493 (2019).
Google Scholar
Miler, K., Yahya, B. E. & Czarnoleski, M. Different predation efficiencies of trap-building larvae of sympatric antlions and wormlions from the rainforest of Borneo. Ecol. Entomol. 43, 255–262 (2018).
Google Scholar
Franks, N. R., Worley, A., Falkenberg, M., Sendova-Franks, A. B. & Christensen, K. Digging the optimum pit: antlions, spirals and spontaneous stratification. Proc. R. Soc. B 286, 20190365 (2019).
Google Scholar
Scharf, I., Daniel, A., MacMillan, H. A. & Katz, N. The effect of fasting and body reserves on cold tolerance in 2 pit-building insect predators. Curr. Zool. 63, 287–294 (2017).
Google Scholar
Devetak, D. Substrate particle size-preference of wormlion Vermileo vermileo (Diptera: Vermileonidae) larvae and their interaction with antlions. Eur. J. Entomol. 105, 631–635 (2008).
Google Scholar
Adar, S., Dor, R. & Scharf, I. Habitat choice and complex decision making in a trap-building predator. Behav. Ecol. 27, 1491–1498 (2016).
Google Scholar
Scharf, I. et al. The contribution of shelter from rain to the success of pit-building predators in urban habitats. Anim. Behav. 142, 139–145 (2018).
Google Scholar
Katz, N., Pruitt, J. N. & Scharf, I. The complex effect of illumination, temperature, and thermal acclimation on habitat choice and foraging behavior of a pit-building wormlion. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 71, 137 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bar-Ziv, M. A., Bega, D., Subach, A. & Scharf, I. Wormlions prefer both fine and deep sand but only deep sand leads to better performance. Curr. Zool. 65, 393–400 (2019).
Google Scholar
Abramoff, M. D., Magalhaes, P. J. & Ram, S. J. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophoton. Int. 11, 36–42 (2004).
Ovadia, O. & Abramsky, Z. Density-dependent habitat selection: evaluation of the isodar method. Oikos 73, 86–94 (1995).
Google Scholar
Jensen, W. E. & Cully, J. F. Density-dependent habitat selection by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) in tallgrass prairie. Oecologia 142, 136–149 (2005).
Google Scholar
Whitham, T. G. The theory of habitat selection: examined and extended using Pemphigus aphids. Am. Nat. 115, 449–466 (1980).
Google Scholar
van Beest, F. M. et al. Increasing density leads to generalization in both coarse-grained habitat selection and fine-grained resource selection in a large mammal. J. Anim. Ecol. 83, 147–156 (2014).
Google Scholar
Mathis, A. Territoriality in a terrestrial salamander: the influence of resource quality and body size. Behaviour 112, 162–175 (1990).
Google Scholar
Croy, M. I. & Hughes, R. N. Effects of food supply, hunger, danger and competition on choice of foraging location by the fifteen-spined stickleback, Spinachia spinachia L. Anim. Behav. 42, 131–139 (1991).
Google Scholar
Davey, A. J. H., Hawkins, S. J., Turner, G. F. & Doncaster, C. P. Size-dependent microhabitat use and intraspecific competition in Cottus gobio. J. Fish Biol. 67, 428–443 (2005).
Google Scholar
Abrahams, M. V. Patch choice under perceptual constraints: a cause for departures from an ideal free distribution. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19, 409–415 (1986).
Google Scholar
Sutherland, W. J., Townsend, C. R. & Patmore, J. M. A test of the ideal free distribution with unequal competitors. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 23, 51–53 (1988).
Google Scholar
McClure, M. S. Spatial distribution of pit-making ant lion larvae (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae): density effects. Biotropica 8, 179–183 (1976).
Google Scholar
Rayor, L. S. & Uetz, G. W. Age-related sequential web building in the colonial spider Metepeira incrassata (Araneidae): an adaptive spacing strategy. Anim. Behav. 59, 1251–1259 (2000).
Google Scholar
Yip, E. C., Levy, T. & Lubin, Y. Bad neighbors: hunger and dominance drive spacing and position in an orb-weaving spider colony. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 71, 128 (2017).
Google Scholar
Murcia, C. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 58–62 (1995).
Google Scholar
Minias, P., Janiszewski, T. & Lesner, B. Center-periphery gradients of chick survival in the colonies of Whiskered Terns Chlidonias hybrida may be explained by the variation in the maternal effects of egg size. Acta Ornithol. 48, 179–186 (2013).
Google Scholar
Geange, S. W. & Stier, A. C. Priority effects and habitat complexity affect the strength of competition. Oecologia 163, 111–118 (2010).
Google Scholar
Hallander, H. Prey, cannibalism and microhabitat selection in the wolf spiders Pardosa chelata OF Müller and P. pullata Clerck. Oikos 21, 337–340 (1970).
Google Scholar
Skevington, J. H. & Dang, P. T. Exploring the diversity of flies (Diptera). Biodiversity 3, 3–27 (2002).
Google Scholar
Scharf, I., Silberklang, A., Avidov, B. & Subach, A. Do pit-building predators prefer or avoid barriers? Wormlions’ preference for walls depends on light conditions. Sci. Rep. 10, 10928 (2020).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
