Modelling microbenthic O2 export
We explored how microbial processes and export fluxes of their metabolic substrates and products from ancient benthic photosynthetic ecosystems were influenced by daylength, environmental conditions and various regulatory mechanisms of photosynthetic production and respiration using an in silico microbenthic model. Model scenarios were constructed and simulated using MicroBenthos software12. MicroBenthos model definitions and parameters for the described scenarios are provided with this article. The software and usage instructions are available at https://microbenthos.readthedocs.io.
The modelling framework is an adaptation of de Wit et al.61. Briefly, benthic systems are constructed as a diffusive–reactive system in a 1D computational domain, with discrete cells used to represent the spatial distribution of the state and parameter variables. While the study by de Wit et al.61 focused on biomass growth running over long simulation times, our interest was to study the dynamics of process rates and solute fluxes over diel timescales. Therefore, we set a fixed biomass for the microbial groups, added a water subdomain on top of the sediment as a diffusive boundary layer and ran simulations until a diel steady state was reached (5 days). Our model domain used 5 µm cells, with an 8 mm sedimentary subdomain and 1 mm diffusive boundary layer of water on top. O2 and sulfide concentrations were the state variables that we solved for. Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) was expressed as a percent of the maximum intensity at the diel zenith, and followed a cosinusoidal pattern similar to that of diel insolation dynamics.
Raero and SOX were formulated to occur throughout the sediment. Microbial groups (cyanobacteria and SRB) were represented as biomass distributions in the sediment subdomain, and biomass-dependent metabolism kinetics were expressed as multiplications of the response functions of salient environmental and state variables. Coupled partial differential equations of the state variables (O2 and H2S) were composed from the reaction terms that accounted for sediment porosity and were solved with finite-volume numerical approximations62.
Our in silico mat allowed us to explore how diffusive mass transfer shapes the interplay between illumination dynamics, gross production and consumption rates, and diel O2 export. The effect of daylength was studied by varying the period of the illumination from 12 h to 24 h, the range of estimated daylengths over Earth’s history after the earliest estimates for the origin of OP63. We report the calculated average diel net export and process rates in units of mmol m−2 h−1 because the hour is the largest temporal unit unaffected by changes in the Earth’s rotation and thus allows for comparison across daylengths.
First, we explored the simplest case of O2 production, which is with light availability. Two microbial processes were considered: OP performed by cyanobacteria and Raero. The parameters for the biotic reactions were re-expressed as a biomass-specific maximal yield (Qmax). A fundamental assumption is that the photosynthesis rate is strictly correlated to the instantaneous photon flux:
$${rm{OP}} = Q_{{rm{max}}}times {rm{biomass}}times {rm{sat}}left( {{rm{PAR}},,K_{{rm{PAR}}}} right),$$
(1)
where sat is a Michaelis–Menten function with KPAR = 15% and the cyanobacterial biomass with a log-normal distribution with a peak value of 12 mg cm−3 at 0.5 mm depth (Supplementary Video 1). The only source of O2 is OP, and the sinks are aerobic (sedimentary) respiration (Raero). For the production and consumption rates of Corg, we assumed a stoichiometry of:
$${mathrm{H}}_2{mathrm{O}} + {mathrm{CO}}_2 to {mathrm{O}}_2 + {mathrm{CH}}_2{mathrm{O}}$$
(2)
with respect to O2 cycling rates, where CH2O refers to one Corg equivalent. Assuming that Corg is predominantly particulate, with negligible diffusional transport, diel Corg burial was thus calculated as:
$${mathrm{C}}_{{mathrm{org}}} {mathrm{buried}} = smallint {mathrm{OP}}-smallint {mathrm{R}}_{{mathrm{aero}}},$$
(3)
where ∫OP and ∫Raero are the diel depth-integrated rates of O2 production and consumption and are equivalent to Corg production and consumption according to equation (2). Thus, diel burial can also be represented through the export flux of O2 at the top and bottom interfaces of the sedimentary domain:
$${mathrm{C}}_{{mathrm{org}}} {mathrm{buried}} = {mathrm{O}}_{2} {mathrm{export}} = smallint {mathrm{OP}}-smallint {mathrm{R}}_{{mathrm{aero}}},$$
(4)
which allowed us to assess the dynamic steady state of the diel model when the average diel depth-integrated rates equalled the export fluxes.
To calibrate the O2 productivity for unitless PAR intensities, we determined the Qmax that caused a maximum O2 export that corresponded to the median maximal flux from illuminated benthic photosynthetic systems13. A Qmax of 4.0022 mmol g−1 h−1 produced the target export flux of 5.76 mmol m−2 h−1 under a sedimentary respiration load of 0.1 mM h−1. Note that by calibrating the productivity to the maximum diel illumination, the model represents a ‘mean solar day’ of a given Earth year59. This allowed us to disentangle the effect of daylength from geological-scale changes in the insolation intensity, such as in the ‘faint young Sun’ paradigm reviewed thoroughly by Feulner23, or changes in the solar spectrum related to atmospheric composition64.
Next, we explored the effect of Ranaero on the daylength dependency of the process rates and export fluxes. We used the example of sulfate reduction performed by SRB with a log-normal biomass distribution with a peak value of 2 mg cm−3 (Supplementary Video 1). The Ranaero rate was either defined as a constant rate process for the scenario ‘OP SRB constant’ as:
$${mathrm{R}}_{{rm{anaero}}} = Q_{{rm{max}}}times{rm{biomass}}$$
(5)
or as an O2– and H2S-sensitive process as:
$$begin{array}{rcl}{mathrm{R}}_{{rm{anaero}}} & = & Q_{{rm{max}}} times {rm{biomass}}times {rm{inhibition}}([{rm{O}}_2],,K_{{rm{max}},{{rm{O}}_2}},,K{_{{rm{half}},{{rm{O}}_2}})} && times {rm{inhibition}}left( [{{rm{H}}_2{rm{S}}],,K_{{rm{max}},{rm{H}}_2{rm{S}}},,K_{{rm{half}},{rm{H}}_2{rm{S}}}} right)end{array}$$
(6)
where inhibition is a function of the local H2S and O2 concentration (x) of the form:
$$frac{{K_{{rm{max}}} – x}}{{2times K_{{rm{max}}} – K_{{rm{half}}} – x}}$$
(7)
when x < Kmax and 0 when x ≥ Kmax. Inhibition factors chosen for both scenarios with O2– and H2S-sensitive SRB (‘OP SRB’ and ‘OP SRB inhibited’) were 3 mM for (K_{{rm{max}},{rm{H}}_2{rm{S}}}), 0.5 mM for (K_{{rm{half}},{rm{H}}_2{rm{S}}}) and 1 µM for (K_{{rm{half}},{rm{O}}_2}). (K_{{rm{max}},{rm{O}}_2}) was 0.8 mM for the scenario with a moderate inhibition, ‘OP SRB’, and 0.3 mM for the scenario with a strong inhibition, ‘OP SRB inhibited’.
SOX was formulated as:
$${rm{SOX}} = ktimes {rm{O}}_2times{rm{H}}_2{rm{S}},$$
(8)
where k = 351 l mol−1 h−1 (ref. 65). For Ranaero we assumed the stoichiometry:
$${{mathrm{SO}}_4}^{2 – } + 2{mathrm{CH}}_2{mathrm{O}} to {mathrm{H}}_2{mathrm{S}} + 2{mathrm{CO}}_2 + 2{mathrm{H}}_2{mathrm{O}},$$
(9)
and therefore calculated diel burial as:
$${mathrm{C}}_{{mathrm{org}}} {mathrm{buried}} = smallint {mathrm{OP}}-smallint {mathrm{R}}_{{mathrm{aero}}}-2timessmallint {mathrm{R}}_{{mathrm{anaero}}},$$
(10)
where ∫Ranaero is the depth-integrated rate of sulfide production by SRB. The export flux of O2 is shaped by mat-intrinsic rates of Raero, OP and SOX according to:
$${mathrm{O}}_{2} {mathrm{export}} = smallint {mathrm{OP}}-smallint {mathrm{R}}_{{mathrm{aero}}}-smallint {mathrm{SOX}},$$
(11)
where ∫SOX is the depth-integrated rate of O2 consumption by SOX. Assuming the complete oxidation of H2S to sulfate, H2S export can be formulated as:
$${mathrm{H}}_2{mathrm{S}} {{rm{export}}} = smallint {mathrm{R}}_{{mathrm{anaero}}}-0.5timessmallint{mathrm{SOX}}.$$
(12)
According to equations (10)–(12), diel burial can thus be represented as:
$${mathrm{C}}_{{mathrm{org}}} {mathrm{buried}} = {mathrm{O}}_2 {mathrm{export}}-2times {mathrm{H}}_2{mathrm{S}} {{mathrm{export}}}$$
(13)
This illustrates that the control of diel burial is related to the export of O2 and the reduced product of Ranaero (such as H2S), as the former is an equivalent source and the latter an equivalent sink of Corg within the mat. This means that an increase in O2 export would not result in an increase of burial if H2S export increased proportionally in terms of Corg equivalents.
To calibrate the productivity for SRB scenarios, we determined values of Qmax for OP and SRB, which yielded the target maximum export flux of 5.76 mmol m−2 h−1 at 24 h under 250 µM O2 boundary conditions and negligible burial fluxes at 18 h under anoxic boundary conditions, that is, in pre-GOE conditions (see Supplementary Data 1 for model parameters).
We tested the sensitivity of diel burial to O2 concentration in the water column (0–250 µM) for all three SRB scenarios. For the least O2-sensitive scenario (‘OP SRB’), we also tested sensitivity of burial to gross productivity by varying the maximal photosynthetic yield Qmax over the range 0.5–10 mmol g−1 h−1. Note that the variation in Qmax can be considered equivalent to variations in other factors that influence gross production, such as nutrient supply and irradiance levels.
We then explored the effect of AP and reductant supply to the mat. Reductants that served as electron donors for AP were available in Precambrian phototrophic habitats, and supported diverse forms of photosynthesis even after the GOE and the evolution of OP66,67,68. Although the extent and ecological niches of AP and OP over Earth’s history remain unclear, AP and OP probably co-existed, with spatially and temporally variable partitioning of the total GPP between them69. Analogous to modern systems, the partitioning probably depended on the limiting factors of both metabolisms, such as light and nutrients, with AP additionally limited by electron donor supply, and on the onset of novel evolutionary avenues or geochemical transitions that facilitated shifts in the outcome of competition.
We implemented this concept by adapting the ‘OP SRB’ scenario to include metabolic flexibility in the modelled photosynthetic community, analogous to cyanobacteria that can partition harvested light energy towards OP and sulfide-driven AP (Extended Data Fig. 4). Transitions between photosynthetic modes are based on the local sulfide and light availability with the rate of OP regulated by the rate of AP20. In this ‘OP SRB + AP’ scenario, the modelled cyanobacteria produced O2 according to:
$$begin{array}{rcl}{rm{OP}} & = & Q_{{rm{max}}}times {rm{biomass}}times{rm{sat}}({rm{PAR}},,K_{{rm{PAR}}}) && timesleft( {1-{rm{normsat}}left( {{rm{H}}_2{rm{S}},,{rm{H}}_2{rm{S}}_{{rm{thr}}}} right)} right),end{array}$$
(14)
where normsat is a normalized Michaelis–Menten function with a value of 1 for H2S ≥ H2Sthr, where H2Sthr is the threshold sulfide level. Conversely,
$$begin{array}{rcl}{rm{AP}} & = & Q_{rm{max}}times{rm{biomass}}times{rm{sat}}({rm{PAR}},K_{{rm{PAR}}}) && times{rm{normsat}}left. {({rm{H}}_2{rm{S}},,{rm{H}}_2{rm{S}}_{{rm{thr}}})} right)end{array}$$
(15)
The metabolic behavior is such that OP occurs only below H2Sthr, which is light dependent. Below this threshold level, the harvested light energy is partitioned towards AP and OP, with a higher affinity for AP. Above the threshold, only AP occurs and OP is suppressed. The resulting metabolic response is that the sum of OP and AP follows the form of equation (1), whereas Ranaero, Raero, SOX and other processes work as in previous scenarios. The interplay of illumination, mat processes and the resultant depth-resolved dynamics of O2 and H2S under this scenario can be seen in the Supplementary Video 1. Assuming sulfate as the product of AP according to:
$${mathrm{H}}_2{mathrm{S}} + 2{mathrm{CO}}_2 + {mathrm{H}}_2{mathrm{O}} to {{mathrm{SO}}_4}^{2 – } + 2{mathrm{CH}}_2{mathrm{O}},$$
(16)
diel burial in this scenario was calculated as
$${mathrm{C}}_{{mathrm{org}}} {mathrm{buried}} = smallint {mathrm{OP}} + smallint {mathrm{AP}}-smallint {mathrm{R}}_{{mathrm{aero}}}-2times smallint {mathrm{R}}_{{mathrm{anaero}}},$$
(17)
where ∫AP is the depth-integrated rate of CO2 fixation by AP. As in the other scenarios, diel burial can alternatively be calculated according to equation (13). Values of Qmax for OP and Ranaero were adjusted to produce the same maximum O2 export flux at 24 h (O2 boundary at 250 µM) and diel Corg flux at 21 h (25 µM O2 boundary) as in ‘OP SRB’. This allowed us to establish directly comparable upscaling calculations for global (p{{rm{O}}_2}) at the same areal coverage and diel burial by ‘OP SRB’ and ‘OP SRB + AP’ mats (see below).
Besides the effect of daylength, we also studied the effect of the availability of O2 and H2S as electron donors from the water column on the scenario with AP. Water column O2 levels from 0 to 250 µM and H2S levels from 0 to 20 µM were tested.
Photosynthetic inhibitory mechanisms were also tested by modelling cyanobacteria that exhibit a 30 min recovery time of OP after the local sulfide levels fall below a certain level27.
Microsensor measurements
We sampled cores from cyanobacterial mats that formed in the MIS (Michigan, United States) in October 2015, May 2016 and June 2016. Cores and bottom water sampled from above the mats were transported to the lab in Ann Arbor. Cores were either used directly or kept on the seasonal day–night light cycle at 8 °C until the measurements were made. During the measurements in the cores, a circular flow of the water column above the mat surface was adjusted using peristaltic pumps connected to an external temperature-controlled reservoir of bottom water. Water column O2 and sulfide concentrations were adjusted in this separate reservoir of bottom water using N2, air and neutralized Na2S solution. After adjustment, the reservoir was covered with paraffin oil to prevent gas exchange and maintain constant conditions in the water column. The total sulfide concentration in the water column was regularly checked by subsampling and colorimetric determination according to Cline70. Both the water column reservoir and the core were kept at 10 °C during the measurements.
Illumination was provided by a broadband halogen lamp (Schott KL-1500). In situ spectral light quality was simulated using optical filter foils (Roscolux 375, Rosco Laboratories). The incident irradiance at the surface of the mat was determined with a submerged cosine-corrected quantum sensor connected to a LI-250A light meter (both LI-COR Biosciences GmbH). O2, pH and H2S microsensors with a tip diameter of 10–50 µm and a response time of <1 s were built, calibrated and employed as previously described71,72,73. The microsensor tips were always separated by <500 µm during simultaneous O2, pH and H2S measurements.
The volumetric rates of gross OP were estimated based on the dynamics of O2 concentration after a light–dark shift, as described previously74. Analogously, the volumetric rates of gross AP were calculated from the increase of H2S concentration and pH directly after a light–dark transition (that is, light-driven Stot consumption rates), as previously described26,27,75. Net rates and fluxes were calculated from profiles based on Fick’s laws using diffusion coefficients for O2 and sulfide corrected for temperature and salinity.
From diel export to global oxygenation
We considered that changes in diel O2 and H2S export rates, the difference of which is equivalent to diel benthic Corg burial, interact with global redox controls beyond the mat domain (Extended Data Fig. 1). Namely, we considered atmospheric reduction by volcanism- and metamorphism-derived gases (atmR) and weathering60. Although we assumed a constant flux of reductant (vR) available for atmospheric reduction, weathering is dependent on (p{{rm{O}}_2}) and thus strongly tempers the accumulation of O2 in the atmosphere. As a recent computational Earth rotation model10 predicts a stabilized daylength in the mid-Proterozoic, we started our global calculations by assuming a (p{{rm{O}}_2}) of 0.01–0.1 at the predicted stable 21 h. This (p{{rm{O}}_2}) is the result of the interaction of global sources and sinks (illustrated in Extended Data Fig. 1) according to a simplified version of the formulations (for example, COPSE60,76) of the global O2 budget. Considering an evolution of steady states of (p{{rm{O}}_2}) throughout Earth’s history, we described the (p{{rm{O}}_2}) evolution at a given age as:
$$frac{{mathrm{d}}( {p{{mathrm{O}}_2}})}{{mathrm{d}}t} = {mathrm{pB}} + {mathrm{mB}}-{mathrm{vR}}-left( {0.95 times {mathrm{tB}} + {mathrm{uB}}} right)times{p{{mathrm{O}}_2}}^{0.5},$$
(18)
which provides the steady state (p{{rm{O}}_2}) as:
$$p{{rm{O}}_2} = left( frac{ {{mathrm{pB}} + {mathrm{mB}}-{mathrm{vR}}}}{{0.95 times {mathrm{tB}} + {mathrm{uB}}} } right)^2,$$
(19)
where pB is the global burial flux associated with marine pelagic production, mB is total mat burial flux, vR is the flux of volcanic reductant, tB is the burial flux by terrestrial mats, and uB is an aggregate flux term that captures uplift forcing, the global Corg reservoir and a weathering constant60.
Changes in any of the global fluxes would therefore result in new steady state (p{{rm{O}}_2}). For the total marine burial (pelagic pB and coastal benthic mB – tB) we assumed modern values throughout the Precambrian60. Beyond the marine realm, we considered the possible existence of terrestrial mats43, which would have further boosted global GPP and Corg burial, but would have also been more susceptible to weathering (tB in Extended Data Fig. 1). For these terrestrial mats, we assumed the same regulation mechanisms of export fluxes as those for coastal benthic mats and considered that AP might have been driven by reductant supplied from Ranaero, but we did not explore the effects of external reductant availability for terrestrial mats. Using our diel mat model output for tB at 21 h daylength and for 5% continental coverage, we then calculated vR for the two (p{{rm{O}}_2}) levels assuming the values for uB from Daines et al.60.
The Earth rotation rate model10 predicts monotonic deceleration before 2.2 Ga followed by a stable daylength of ~21 h due to the atmospheric thermal tide resonance until ~650 Ma, with a subsequent increase towards the modern 24 h daylength10. Starting at 21 h at 2 Gyr, we estimated the effect of the daylength-driven change in the Corg burial from benthic and terrestrial mats, the output of our diel mat model, on (p{{rm{O}}_2}) levels both backwards and forwards in time. The modulation of (p{{rm{O}}_2}) naturally depends on the steepness of the dependence of mat Corg burial on daylength (Fig. 2). However, we limited our analysis to the effect of mats with metabolic regulation from the moderately daylength-sensitive scenarios ‘OP SRB’ and ‘OP SRB + AP’. Scenarios with a steeper dependency of burial on daylength yielded oscillations of (p{{rm{O}}_2}) beyond PAL even due to the minimal variations in daylength within the resonant-locked phase in the mid-Proterozoic10 and therefore had to be excluded from analysis of (p{{rm{O}}_2}) evolution. We additionally included negative feedback effects of increasing (p{{rm{O}}_2}) on the mat Corg burial by dynamically adjusting the O2 boundary conditions in each time step according to the (p{{rm{O}}_2}) calculated from the previous step. To then calculate the quasisteady-state (p{{rm{O}}_2}) level based on changes in the benthic and terrestrial burial, the actual coverage and thus partitioning between the pelagic and benthic burial have to be considered. Reliable estimates for this partitioning are lacking. The presence of pelagic cyanobacteria has persisted since 1.1 Ga (ref. 38). Yet, cyanobacteria in the palaeontological record are primarily benthic, with sparse evidence for pelagic forms39,40,41. Hypotheses for the limited pelagic productivity during the Proterozoic range from an inaccessible, toxic or damaging photic zone to late evolution of a planktonic lifestyle21,66,77. Alternatively, burial of the Corg produced by pelagic cyanobacteria might have been hindered by the small cell sizes, low sinking rates and resultant efficient remineralization within the water column42,78. The preservation of Corg by benthic microbial mats is as uncertain, especially when eroded—on land or in the oceans. In our calculations we considered the terrestrial erosional weathering explicitly (tB in Extended Data Fig. 1), which introduces a strong negative feedback effect on (p{{rm{O}}_2}). This implicitly describes a substantial loss in translation of the diel Corg to long-term burial that we, however, did not explicitly account for. For marine benthic mats we argue that a more direct link between the diel and long-term burial of Corg is plausible given that mats can reach substantial thicknesses when undisturbed (for example, in Solar Lake the thickness is >1 m) (ref. 79) and that mats have a similar remineralization fate as pelagic Corg export when eroded. To address these uncertainties, we considered benthic burial as between 20 and 50% of the total marine burial at 21 h daylength. Note that this partitioning must shift during our simulations over Earth history because benthic (and terrestrial) burial is daylength dependent, whereas we took an ‘all is constant’ approach for pelagic burial and the fraction of weathered diel Corg, as we expected a negligible effect of molecular diffusion and thus daylength on these fluxes.
Source: Ecology - nature.com