Donato, D. C. et al. Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat. Geosci. 4, 293–297 (2011).
Google Scholar
Carrasquilla-Henao, M. & Juanes, F. Mangroves enhance local fisheries catches: a global meta-analysis. Fish Fish 18, 79–93 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hochard, J. P., Hamilton, S. & Barbier, E. B. Mangroves shelter coastal economic activity from cyclones. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 12232–12237 (2019).
Google Scholar
Spalding, M. & Parrett, C. L. Global patterns in mangrove recreation and tourism. Mar. Policy 110, 103540 (2019).
Google Scholar
Goldberg, L., Lagomasino, D., Thomas, N. & Fatoyinbo, T. Global declines in human‐driven mangrove loss. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 5844–5855 (2020).
Google Scholar
Thomas, N. et al. Distribution and drivers of global mangrove forest change, 1996–2010. PLoS ONE 12, e0179302 (2017).
Google Scholar
Maiti, S. K. & Chowdhury, A. Effects of anthropogenic pollution on mangrove biodiversity: a review. J. Environ. Prot. 4, 1428–1434 (2013).
Google Scholar
Saintilan, N. et al. Thresholds of mangrove survival under rapid sea level rise. Science 368, 1118–1121 (2020).
Google Scholar
Worthington, T. & Spalding, M. Mangrove Restoration Potential: A Global Map Highlighting A Critical Opportunity (Apollo – University of Cambridge Repository, 2018).
Bosire, J. O. et al. Functionality of restored mangroves: a review. Aquat. Bot. 89, 251–259 (2008).
Google Scholar
Lewis, R. R. Ecological engineering for successful management and restoration of mangrove forests. Ecol. Eng. 24, 403–418 (2005).
Google Scholar
Howard, R. J. et al. Hydrologic restoration in a dynamic subtropical mangrove-to-marsh ecotone: hydrologic restoration in a mangrove-marsh ecotone. Restor. Ecol. 25, 471–482 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kamali, B. & Hashim, R. Mangrove restoration without planting. Ecol. Eng. 37, 387–391 (2011).
Google Scholar
Dung, L. V., Tue, N. T., Nhuan, M. T. & Omori, K. Carbon storage in a restored mangrove forest in Can Gio Mangrove Forest Park, Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Ecol. Manag. 380, 31–40 (2016).
Google Scholar
Das, S. Ecological restoration and livelihood: contribution of planted mangroves as nursery and habitat for artisanal and commercial fishery. World Dev. 94, 492–502 (2017).
Google Scholar
Deng, J. et al. An evaluation on the bioavailability of heavy metals in the sediments from a restored mangrove forest in the Jinjiang Estuary, Fujian, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 180, 501–508 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rahman, M. M. & Mahmud, Md. A. Economic feasibility of mangrove restoration in the Southeastern Coast of Bangladesh. Ocean Coast. Manag. 161, 211–221 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bullock, J. M., Aronson, J., Newton, A. C., Pywell, R. F. & Rey-Benayas, J. M. Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 541–549 (2011).
Google Scholar
Ellison, A. M. Mangrove restoration: do we know enough? Restor. Ecol. 8, 219–229 (2000).
Google Scholar
Iftekhar. Functions and development of reforested mangrove areas: a review. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Manag. 4, 1–14 (2008).
Google Scholar
Lewis, R. Mangrove Restoration: Costs And Benefits Of Successful Ecological Restoration. p. 4–8 (Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, Stockholm, 2001).
Altman, N. & Krzywinski, M. Analyzing outliers: influential or nuisance? Nat. Methods 13, 281–282 (2016).
Google Scholar
Himes-Cornell, A., Grose, S. O. & Pendleton, L. Mangrove ecosystem service values and methodological approaches to valuation: where do we stand? Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 376 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chowdhury, A., Naz, A., Bhattacharyya, S. & Sanyal, P. Cost–benefit analysis of ‘Blue Carbon’ sequestration by plantation of few key mangrove species at Sundarban Biosphere Reserve, India. Carbon. Manag. 9, 575–586 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sillanpää, M., Vantellingen, J. & Friess, D. A. Vegetation regeneration in a sustainably harvested mangrove forest in West Papua, Indonesia. Ecol. Manag. 390, 137–146 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sasmito, S. D. et al. Effect of land‐use and land‐cover change on mangrove blue carbon: a systematic review. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 4291–4302 (2019).
Google Scholar
Meli, P., Rey Benayas, J. M., Balvanera, P. & Martínez Ramos, M. Restoration enhances wetland biodiversity and ecosystem service supply, but results are context-dependent: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9, e93507 (2014).
Google Scholar
Barral, M. P., Rey Benayas, J. M., Meli, P. & Maceira, N. O. Quantifying the impacts of ecological restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecosystems: a global meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 202, 223–231 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ren, Y., Lü, Y. & Fu, B. Quantifying the impacts of grassland restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in China: a meta-analysis. Ecol. Eng. 95, 542–550 (2016).
Google Scholar
Lu, W. et al. Changes in carbon pool and stand structure of a native subtropical mangrove forest after inter-planting with exotic species Sonneratia apetala. PLoS ONE 9, e91238 (2014).
Google Scholar
Li, W. et al. Effect of mangrove restoration on crab burrow density in Luoyangjiang Estuary. For. Ecosyst. 2, 21 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Shen, C., Ren, H., Wang, J. & Han, W. Estimating change in sedimentary organic carbon content during mangrove restoration in southern china using carbon isotopic measurements. Pedosphere 22, 58–66 (2012).
Google Scholar
Feng, J. et al. Effects of exotic and native mangrove forests plantation on soil organic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus contents and pools in Leizhou, China. CATENA 180, 1–7 (2019).
Google Scholar
Leung, J. Y. S. Habitat heterogeneity affects ecological functions of macrobenthic communities in a mangrove: implication for the impact of restoration and afforestation. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 4, 423–433 (2015).
Google Scholar
Peters, J. R., Yeager, L. A. & Layman, C. A. Comparison of fish assemblages in restored and natural mangrove habitats along an urban shoreline. Bull. Mar. Sci. 91, 125–139 (2015).
Google Scholar
Chen, G., Gao, M., Pang, B., Chen, S. & Ye, Y. Top-meter soil organic carbon stocks and sources in restored mangrove forests of different ages. Ecol. Manag. 422, 87–94 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cameron, C., Hutley, L. B., Friess, D. A. & Brown, B. Community structure dynamics and carbon stock change of rehabilitated mangrove forests in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Ecol. Appl. 29, e01810 (2019).
Ashton, E. C., Hogarth, P. J. & Macintosh, D. J. A comparison of brachyuran crab community structure at four mangrove locations under different management systems along the Melaka Straits-Andaman Sea Coast of Malaysia and Thailand. Estuaries 26, 1461–1471 (2003).
Google Scholar
Peralta-Milan, S. A. & Salmo, S. G. III Evaluating patterns of fish assemblage changes from different-aged reforested mangroves in lingayen gulf. J. Environ. Sci. Manag. 16, 11–19 (2013).
Alongi, D. M. Present state and future of the world’s mangrove forests. Environ. Conserv. 29, 331–349 (2002).
Google Scholar
Lee, S. Y., Hamilton, S., Barbier, E. B., Primavera, J. & Lewis, R. R. Better restoration policies are needed to conserve mangrove ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 870–872 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bai, J. et al. Mangrove diversity enhances plant biomass production and carbon storage in Hainan island, China. Funct. Ecol. 35, 774–786 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kirui, B., Kairo, J., Skov, M., Mencuccini, M. & Huxham, M. Effects of species richness, identity and environmental variables on growth in planted mangroves in Kenya. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 465, 1–10 (2012).
Google Scholar
Zimmer, M. In Threats to Mangrove Forests. (eds Makowski, C. & Finkl, C. W.) (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York, 2018).
Fazlioglu, F. & Chen, L. Introduced non-native mangroves express better growth performance than co-occurring native mangroves. Sci. Rep. 10, 3854 (2020).
Google Scholar
He, Z. et al. Colonization by native species enhances the carbon storage capacity of exotic mangrove monocultures. Carbon Balance Manag. 15, 28 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kodikara, K. A. S., Mukherjee, N., Jayatissa, L. P., Dahdouh-Guebas, F. & Koedam, N. Have mangrove restoration projects worked? An in-depth study in Sri Lanka: evaluation of mangrove restoration in Sri Lanka. Restor. Ecol. 25, 705–716 (2017).
Google Scholar
Thornton, A. Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 53, 207–216 (2000).
Google Scholar
Song, F., Hooper & Loke, Y. Publication bias: what is it? How do we measure it? How do we avoid it? Open Access J. Clin. Trials 5, 71–81 (2013).
Møller, A. P. & Jennions, M. D. Testing and adjusting for publication bias. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 580–586 (2001).
Google Scholar
Salem, M. E. & Mercer, D. E. The economic value of mangroves: a meta-analysis. Sustainability 4, 359–383 (2012).
Google Scholar
Lahjie, A. M., Nouval, B., Lahjie, A. A., Ruslim, Y. & Kristiningrum, R. Economic valuation from direct use of mangrove forest restoration in Balikpapan Bay, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. F1000Research 8, 9 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hutchison, J., Spalding, M. & zu Ermgassen, P. The Role of Mangroves in Fisheries Enhancement (The Nature Conservancy and Wetlands International, 2014).
Bayraktarov, E. et al. The cost and feasibility of marine coastal restoration. Ecol. Appl. 26, 1055–1074 (2016).
Google Scholar
Taillardat, P., Thompson, B. S., Garneau, M., Trottier, K. & Friess, D. A. Climate change mitigation potential of wetlands and the cost-effectiveness of their restoration. Interface Focus 10, 20190129 (2020).
Google Scholar
De Groot, R. S. et al. Benefits of investing in ecosystem restoration: investing in ecosystem restoration. Conserv. Biol. 27, 1286–1293 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ellison, A. M., Felson, A. J. & Friess, D. A. Mangrove rehabilitation and restoration as experimental adaptive management. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 327 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jakovac, C. C. et al. Costs and carbon benefits of mangrove conservation and restoration: a global analysis. Ecol. Econ. 176, 106758 (2020).
Google Scholar
Waltham, N. J. et al. UN decade on ecosystem restoration 2021–2030—what chance for success in restoring coastal ecosystems? Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 71 (2020).
Google Scholar
United Nations. Sustainable Development. Blue Economy Concept Paper (2014).
UNEP. Blue Economy: Sharing Success Stories to Inspire Change (UNEP Regional Seas Report and Studies, 2015).
Mcleod, E. et al. A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 552–560 (2011).
Google Scholar
CBD. Zero Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2020).
Taillardat, P., Friess, D. A. & Lupascu, M. Mangrove blue carbon strategies for climate change mitigation are most effective at the national scale. Biol. Lett. 14, 20180251 (2018).
Google Scholar
IUCN & Ramsar. The Community of Ocean Action for Mangroves –Towards the Implementation of SDG14 (Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, 2019).
International Council for Science (ICSU). A Guide to SDG Interactions: From Science To Implementation (International Council for Science, Paris, 2017).
Spalding, M. D. et al. The role of ecosystems in coastal protection: Adapting to climate change and coastal hazards. Ocean Coast. Manag. 90, 50–57 (2014).
Google Scholar
Aronson, J. et al. Are socioeconomic benefits of restoration adequately quantified? a meta-analysis of recent papers (2000-2008) in Restoration Ecology and 12 other scientific Journals. Restor. Ecol. 18, 143–154 (2010).
Google Scholar
Cooke, S. J. et al. Evidence-based restoration in the Anthropocene-from acting with purpose to acting for impact: evidence-based restoration. Restor. Ecol. 26, 201–205 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lovelock, C. E. & Brown, B. M. Land tenure considerations are key to successful mangrove restoration. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1135–1135 (2019).
Google Scholar
Thompson, B. S., Clubbe, C. P., Primavera, J. H., Curnick, D. & Koldewey, H. J. Locally assessing the economic viability of blue carbon: a case study from Panay Island, the Philippines. Ecosyst. Serv. 8, 128–140 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wylie, L., Sutton-Grier, A. E. & Moore, A. Keys to successful blue carbon projects: lessons learned from global case studies. Mar. Policy 65, 76–84 (2016).
Google Scholar
Peng, Y., Li, X., Wu, K., Peng, Y. & Chen, G. Effect of an integrated mangrove-aquaculture system on aquacultural health. Front. Biol. China 4, 579–584 (2009).
Google Scholar
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. & Altman, D. G., The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6, e1000097 (2009).
Google Scholar
Betran, A. P. et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod. Health 12, 57 (2015).
Google Scholar
Mupepele, A. C., Walsh, J. C., Sutherland, W. J. & Dormann, C. F. An evidence assessment tool for ecosystem services and conservation studies. Ecol. Appl. 26, 1295–1301 (2016).
Google Scholar
Field, C. B. et al. Mangrove biodiversity and ecosystem function. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 7, 3 (1998).
Google Scholar
Nakagawa, S. & Santos, E. S. A. Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis. Evol. Ecol. 26, 1253–1274 (2012).
Google Scholar
Koricheva, J. & Gurevitch, J. Uses and misuses of meta-analysis in plant ecology. J. Ecol. 102, 828–844 (2014).
Google Scholar
Noble, D. W. A., Lagisz, M., O’dea, R. E. & Nakagawa, S. Nonindependence and sensitivity analyses in ecological and evolutionary meta-analyses. Mol. Ecol. 26, 2410–2425 (2017).
Google Scholar
Greenland, S. et al. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 31, 337–350 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hoekstra, R., Finch, S., Kiers, H. A. L. & Johnson, A. Probability as certainty: dichotomous thinking and the misuse of p values. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13, 1033–1037 (2006).
Google Scholar
Nakagawa, S. & Cuthill, I. C. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol. Rev. 82, 591–605 (2007).
Google Scholar
Hedges, L. & Olkin, I. Statistical Methods For Meta-analysis (Academic Press, Orlando, 1985).
Thompson, S. G. & Higgins, J. P. T. How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Stat. Med. 21, 1559–1573 (2002).
Google Scholar
Cook, R. D. & Weisberg, S. Residuals and Influence in Regression (Chapman and Hall, New York, 1982).
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M. & Minder, C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315, 629–634 (1997).
Google Scholar
Nakagawa, S., Noble, D. W. A., Senior, A. M. & Lagisz, M. Meta-evaluation of meta-analysis: ten appraisal questions for biologists. BMC Biol. 15, 18 (2017).
Google Scholar
Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor Package. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–48 (2010).
van der Ploeg, S., De Groot, D. & Wang, Y. The TEEB Valuation Database: Overview Of Structure, Data And Results (Foundation for Sustainable Development, Wageningen, 2010).
Mukherjee, N. et al. Ecosystem service valuations of mangrove ecosystems to inform decision making and future valuation exercises. PLoS ONE 9, e107706 (2014).
Google Scholar
Corlett, R. T. Impacts of warming on tropical lowland rainforests. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 606–613 (2011).
Google Scholar
Møller, A. P., Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. Direct and indirect tests for publication bias: asymmetry and sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 70, 497–506 (2005).
Google Scholar
Bayraktarov, E. et al. Priorities and motivations of marine coastal restoration. Res. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 484 (2020).
Google Scholar
Konno, K. et al. Ignoring non‐English‐language studies may bias ecological meta‐analyses. Ecol. Evol. 10, 6373–6384 (2020).
Google Scholar
van Aert, R. C. M., Wicherts, J. M. & van Assen, M. A. L. M. Conducting meta-analyses based on p values: reservations and recommendations for applying p-Uniform and p-Curve. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11, 713–729 (2016).
Google Scholar
Terrin, N., Schmid, C. H., Lau, J. & Olkin, I. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity. Stat. Med. 22, 2113–2126 (2003).
Google Scholar
Giri, C. et al. Global Distribution of Mangroves USGS. UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) https://doi.org/10.34892/1411-W728 (2011).
Cook, B. G., Cook, L. & Therrien, W. J. Group-difference effect sizes: gauging the practical importance of findings from group-experimental research. Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract. 33, 56–63 (2018).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
