in

Macroecological distributions of gene variants highlight the functional organization of soil microbial systems

  • 1.

    Gupta A, Sharma VK. Using the taxon-specific genes for the taxonomic classification of bacterial genomes. BMC Genom. 2015;16:1–15.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Gil R, Silva FJ, Pereto J, Moya A. Determination of the Core of a Minimal Bacterial Gene Set. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004;68:518–37.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Mira A, Martín-Cuadrado AB, D’Auria G, Rodríguez-Valera F. The bacterial pan-genome: a new paradigm in microbiology. Int Microbiol. 2010;13:45–57.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Escalas A, Troussellier M, Yuan T, Bouvier T, Bouvier C, Mouchet MA, et al. Functional diversity and redundancy across fish gut, sediment and water bacterial communities. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19:3268–82.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Jurburg SD, Salles JF. Functional Redundancy and Ecosystem Function — The Soil Microbiota as a Case Study. In: Lo Y-H, Blanco JA, Shovonlal R, editors. Biodiversity in Ecosystems—Linking Structure and Function. BoD–Books on Demand; 2015. p. 29–49.

  • 6.

    Louca S, Polz MF, Mazel F, Albright MBN, Huber JA, O’Connor MI, et al. Function and functional redundancy in microbial systems. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018;2:936–43.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Polz MF, Hunt DE, Preheim SP, Weinreich DM. Patterns and mechanisms of genetic and phenotypic differentiation in marine microbes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006;361:2009–21.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Young JPW. Bacteria Are Smartphones and Mobile Genes Are Apps. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:931–2.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Boon E, Meehan CJ, Whidden C, Wong DHJ, Langille MGI, Beiko RG. Interactions in the microbiome: communities of organisms and communities of genes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014;38:90–118.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Escalas A, Hale L, Voordeckers JW, Yang Y, Firestone MK, Alvarez-Cohen L, et al. Microbial Functional Diversity: from Concepts to Applications. Ecol Evol. 2019;5:12000–16.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Barberán A, Casamayor EO, Fierer N. The microbial contribution to macroecology. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:1–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Shade A, Dunn RR, Blowes SA, Keil P, Bohannan BJM, Herrmann M, et al. Macroecology to Unite All Life, Large and Small. Trends Ecol Evol. 2018;33:731–44.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Chase AB, Martiny JB. The importance of resolving biogeographic patterns of microbial microdiversity. Microbiol Aust. 2018;1:5–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Shoemaker WR, Locey KJ, Lennon JT. A macroecological theory of microbial biodiversity. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:e1450v4.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Bachy C, Worden AZ. Microbial ecology: finding structure in the rare biosphere. Curr Biol. 2014;24:R315–R317.

  • 16.

    Lynch MDJ, Neufeld JD. Ecology and exploration of the rare biosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13:217–29.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Pedrós-Alió C. The Rare Bacterial Biosphere. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2012;4:449–66.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Rabinowitz D. Seven forms of rarity and their frequency in the flora of the British Isles. In: Soulé ME, editors. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates; Massachusetts; 1986.

  • 19.

    McGeoch MA, Gaston KJ. Occupancy frequency distributions: patterns, artefacts and mechanisms. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002;77:311–31.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Blackburn TM, Cassey P, Gaston KJ. Variations on a theme: Sources of heterogeneity in the form of the interspecific relationship between abundance and distribution. J Anim Ecol. 2006;75:1426–39.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Buckley HL, Freckleton RP. Understanding the role of species dynamics in abundance-occupancy relationships. J Ecol. 2010;98:645–58.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM, Greenwood JJD, Gregory RD, Quinn RM, Lawton JH. Abundance-occupancy relationships. J Appl Ecol. 2000;37:39–59.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Miranda LE, Killgore KJ. Abundance–occupancy patterns in a riverine fish assemblage. Freshw Biol. 2019;64:2221–33.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Suhonen J, Jokimäki J. Temporally stable species occupancy frequency distribution and abundance-occupancy relationship patterns in urban wintering bird assemblages. Front Ecol Evol. 2019;7:129.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Webb TJ, Barry JP, McClain CR. Abundance–occupancy relationships in deep sea wood fall communities. Ecography. 2017;40:1339–47.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Amend AS, Oliver TA, Amaral-Zettler LA, Boetius A, Fuhrman JA, Horner-Devine MC, et al. Macroecological patterns of marine bacteria on a global scale. J Biogeogr. 2013;40:800–11.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Barberán A, Bates ST, Casamayor EO, Fierer N. Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities. ISME J. 2012;6:343–51.

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Barnes CJ, Burns CA, van der Gast CJ, McNamara NP, Bending GD. Spatio-temporal variation of core and satellite arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus communities in Miscanthus giganteus. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Fillol M, Auguet JC, Casamayor EO, Borrego CM. Insights in the ecology and evolutionary history of the Miscellaneous Crenarchaeotic Group lineage. ISME J. 2016;10:665–77.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Jeanbille M, Gury J, Duran R, Tronczynski J, Agogué H, Saïd OBen, et al. Response of core microbial consortia to chronic hydrocarbon contaminations in coastal sediment habitats. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Lindh MV, Sjöstedt J, Ekstam B, Casini M, Lundin D, Hugerth LW, et al. Metapopulation theory identifies biogeographical patterns among core and satellite marine bacteria scaling from tens to thousands of kilometers. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19:1222–36.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Logares R, Audic SS, Bass D, Bittner L, Boutte C, Christen R, et al. Patterns of Rare and Abundant Marine Microbial Eukaryotes. Curr Biol. 2014;24:813–21.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Michelland R, Thioulouse J, Kyselková M, Grundmann GL. Bacterial Community Structure at the Microscale in Two Different Soils. Micro Ecol. 2016;72:717–24.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Unterseher M, Jumpponen A, Öpik M, Tedersoo L, Moora M, Dormann CF, et al. Species abundance distributions and richness estimations in fungal metagenomics – Lessons learned from community ecology. Mol Ecol. 2011;20:275–85.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Grime JP. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: Immediate, filter and founder effects. J Ecol. 1998;86:902–10.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Grime JP. Dominant and subordinate components of plant communities: implications for succession, sta- bility and diversity. In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ, editors. Colonization, Succession and Stability. Oxford:Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1984. p. 413–28.

  • 37.

    Hanski I. Dynamics of Regional Distribution: the Core and Satellite Species Hypothesis. Oikos. 1982;38:210.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Magurran AE, Henderson PA. Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions. Nature. 2003;422:714–6.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Newton R, Shade A. Lifestyles of rarity: understanding heterotrophic strategies to inform the ecology of the microbial rare biosphere. Aquat Micro Ecol. 2016;78:51–63.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Shade A, Jones SE, Caporaso JG, Handelsman J, Knight R, Fierer N, et al. Conditionally rare taxa disproportionately contribute to temporal changes in microbial diversity. MBio. 2014;5:e01371–14.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Shade A, Gilbert JA. Temporal patterns of rarity provide a more complete view of microbial diversity. Trends Microbiol. 2015;23:335–40.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Koch AL. Oligotrophs versus copiotrophs. BioEssays. 2001;23:657–61.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Cobo-Simón M, Tamames J. Relating genomic characteristics to environmental preferences and ubiquity in different microbial taxa. BMC Genom. 2017;18:1–11.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Tu Q, Yu H, He Z, Deng Y, Wu L, Van Nostrand JD, et al. GeoChip 4: a functional gene-array-based high-throughput environmental technology for microbial community analysis. Mol Ecol Resour. 2014;14:914–28.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Xu X, Wang N, Lipson D, Sinsabaugh R, Schimel J, He L, et al. Microbial macroecology: in search of mechanisms governing microbial biogeographic patterns. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2020;29:1870–86.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Reich PB, Knops J, Tilman D, Craine J, Ellsworth D, Tjoelker M, et al. Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition. Nature. 2001;410:809–12.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Field CB, Chapin FS, Chiariello NK, Holland EA, Mooney HA. The Jasper Ridge CO2 Experiment: Design and Motivation. In: Mooney HA, Koch GW, (Editors). Carbon Dioxide and Terrestrial Ecosystems. San Diego, California: Academic Press; 1996. p. 121–45.

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Luo C, Rodriguez-R LM, Johnston ER, Wu L, Cheng L, Xue K, et al. Soil microbial community responses to a decade of warming as revealed by comparative metagenomics. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:1777–86.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Mauritz M, Bracho R, Celis G, Hutchings J, Natali SM, Pegoraro E, et al. Nonlinear CO2 flux response to 7 years of experimentally induced permafrost thaw. Glob Chang. Biol. 2017;23:3646–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Natali SM, Schuur EAG, Mauritz M, Schade JD, Celis G, Crummer KG, et al. Permafrost thaw and soil moisture driving CO2 and CH4 release from upland tundra. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2015;120:525–37.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Yang Y, Gao Y, Wang S, Xu D, Yu H, Wu L, et al. The microbial gene diversity along an elevation gradient of the Tibetan grassland. ISME J. 2014;8:430–40.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Yang Y, Wu L, Lin Q, Yuan M, Xu D, Yu H, et al. Responses of the functional structure of soil microbial community to livestock grazing in the Tibetan alpine grassland. Glob Chang Biol. 2013;19:637–48.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Zhang Y, Cong J, Lu H, Li G, Xue Y, Deng Y, et al. Soil bacterial diversity patterns and drivers along an elevational gradient on Shennongjia Mountain, China. Micro Biotechnol. 2015;8:739–46.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Zhang Y, Cong J, Lu H, Deng Y, Liu X, Zhou J, et al. Soil bacterial endemism and potential functional redundancy in natural broadleaf forest along a latitudinal gradient. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–8.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    Paula FS, Rodrigues JLM, Zhou J, Wu L, Mueller RC, Mirza BS, et al. Land use change alters functional gene diversity, composition and abundance in Amazon forest soil microbial communities. Mol Ecol. 2014;23:2988–99.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Rodrigues JLM, Pellizari VH, Mueller R, Baek K, Jesus EDC, Paula FS, et al. Conversion of the Amazon rainforest to agriculture results in biotic homogenization of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:988–93.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    He Z, Deng Y, Van Nostrand JD, Tu QC, Xu MY, Hemme CL, et al. GeoChip 3.0 as a high-throughput tool for analyzing microbial community composition, structure and functional activity. Isme J. 2010;4:1167–79.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    He Z, Gentry TJ, Schadt CW, Wu L, Liebich J, Chong SC, et al. GeoChip: a comprehensive microarray for investigating biogeochemical, ecological and environmental processes. ISME J. 2007;1:67–77.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    Li X, He Z, Zhou J. Selection of optimal oligonucleotide probes for microarrays using multiple criteria, global alignment and parameter estimation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:6114–23.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 60.

    Tu Q, He Z, Deng Y, Zhou J. Strain/species-specific probe design for microbial identification microarrays. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:5085–8.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 61.

    Wu L, Liu X, Schadt CW, Zhou J. Microarray-based analysis of subnanogram quantities of microbial community DNAs by using whole-community genome amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:4931–41.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 62.

    Wu L, Liu X, Schadt CW, Zhou J. Microarray-based analysis of subnanogram quantities of microbial community DNAs by using whole-community genome amplification. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2006;72:4931–41.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 63.

    Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’hara RB, et al. Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package, version. 2013;2:1–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • 64.

    Anderson MJ, Bueno AS. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 2001;26:32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • 65.

    Crow EL, Patil GP. Applications in Ecology. In: Cros E, Shimizu K, editors. Lognormal Distributions. New York and Basel:Marcel Dekker; 1988. p. 303–30.

  • 66.

    Ser-Giacomi E, Zinger L, Malviya S, De Vargas C, Karsenti E, Bowler C, et al. Ubiquitous abundance distribution of non-dominant plankton across the global ocean. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018;2:1243–9.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 67.

    Wu L, Ning D, Zhang B, Li Y, Zhang P, Shan X, et al. Global diversity and biogeography of bacterial communities in wastewater treatment plants. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:1183–95.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 68.

    Locey KJ, Lennon JT. Scaling laws predict global microbial diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113:5970–5.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 69.

    Louca S, Mazel F, Doebeli M, Parfrey LW. A census-based estimate of Earth’s bacterial and archaeal diversity. PLoS Biol. 2019;2:1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • 70.

    Tokeshi M. Dynamics of distribution in animal communities: theory and analysis. Res Popul Ecol (Kyoto). 1992;34:249–73.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 71.

    Logares R, Deutschmann IM, Junger PC, Giner CR, Krabberød AK, Schmidt TSB, et al. Disentangling the mechanisms shaping the surface ocean microbiota. Microbiome. 2020;8:55.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 72.

    Azovsky A, Mazei Y. Do microbes have macroecology? Large-scale patterns in the diversity and distribution of marine benthic ciliates. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2013;22:163–72.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 73.

    Noguez AM, Arita HT, Escalante AE, Forney LJ, García-Oliva F, Souza V. Microbial macroecology: highly structured prokaryotic soil assemblages in a tropical deciduous forest. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2005;14:241–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 74.

    Thompson LR, Sanders JG, McDonald D, Amir A, Ladau J, Locey KJ, et al. A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity. Nature. 2017;551:457–63.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 75.

    Papp L, Izsák J, Papp L, Izsak J. Bimodality in Occurrence Classes: a Direct Consequence of Lognormal or Logarithmic Series Distribution of Abundances- A Numerical Experimentation. Oikos. 1997;79:191.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 76.

    Verberk WCEP, van der Velde G, Esselink H. Explaining abundance-occupancy relationships in specialists and generalists: A case study on aquatic macroinvertebrates in standing waters. J Anim Ecol. 2010;79:589–601.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 77.

    Liao J, Cao X, Zhao L, Wang J, Gao Z, Wang MC, et al. The importance of neutral and niche processes for bacterial community assembly differs between habitat generalists and specialists. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;92:fiw174.

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 78.

    Slatyer RA, Hirst M, Sexton JP. Niche breadth predicts geographical range size: a general ecological pattern. Ecol Lett. 2013;16:1104–14.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 79.

    Fierer N, Barberán A, Laughlin DC. Seeing the forest for the genes: using metagenomics to infer the aggregated traits of microbial communities. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:1–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 80.

    Rivett DW, Bell T. Abundance determines the functional role of bacterial phylotypes in complex communities. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3:767–72.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 81.

    Wertz S, Degrange V, Prosser JI, Poly F, Commeaux C, Guillaumaud N, et al. Decline of soil microbial diversity does not influence the resistance and resilience of key soil microbial functional groups following a model disturbance. Environ Microbiol. 2007;9:2211–9.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 82.

    Wertz S, Degrange V, Prosser JI, Poly F, Commeaux C, Freitag T, et al. Maintenance of soil functioning following erosion of microbial diversity. Environ Microbiol. 2006;8:2162–9.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 83.

    Mendes LW, Tsai SM, Navarrete AA, de Hollander M, van Veen JA, Kuramae EE. Soil-Borne microbiome: linking diversity to function. Micro Ecol. 2015;70:255–65.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 84.

    Sunagawa S, Coelho LP, Chaffron S, Kultima JR, Labadie K, Salazar G, et al. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome – SM. Science. 2015;348:1261359–1261359.

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 85.

    Wohl DL, Arora S, Gladstone JR. Functional redundancy supports biodiversity and ecosystem function in a cloased and constant environment. Ecology. 2008;85:1534–40.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 86.

    Kurm V, Geisen S, Gera Hol WH. A low proportion of rare bacterial taxa responds to abiotic changes compared with dominant taxa. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21:750–8.

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 87.

    Bergkessel M, Basta DW, Newman DK. The physiology of growth arrest: Uniting molecular and environmental microbiology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:549–62.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 88.

    Hofer U. Life in the slow lane. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;26:266–7.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • 89.

    Baho DL, Peter H, Tranvik LJ. Resistance and resilience of microbial communities – Temporal and spatial insurance against perturbations. Environ Microbiol. 2012;9:2283–92.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 90.

    Jousset A, Bienhold C, Chatzinotas A, Gallien L, Gobet A, Kurm V, et al. Where less may be more: how the rare biosphere pulls ecosystems strings. ISME J. 2017;11:853–62.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 91.

    Aanderud ZT, Jones SE, Fierer N, Lennon JT. Resuscitation of the rare biosphere contributes to pulses of ecosystem activity. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1–11.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 92.

    Lawson CE, Strachan BJ, Hanson NW, Hahn AS, Hall ER, Rabinowitz B, et al. Rare taxa have potential to make metabolic contributions in enhanced biological phosphorus removal ecosystems. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17:4979–93.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 93.

    Zhou J, He Z, Yang Y, Deng Y, Tringe SG, Alvarez-Cohen L. High-throughput metagenomic technologies for complex microbial community analysis: open and closed formats. MBio. 2015;6:e02288–14.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 94.

    Zhou J, Wu L, Deng Y, Zhi X, Jiang YH, Tu Q, et al. Reproducibility and quantitation of amplicon sequencing-based detection. ISME J. 2011;5:1303–13.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 95.

    Shi Z, Yin H, Van Nostrand JD, Voordeckers JW, Tu Q, Deng Y, et al. Functional Gene Array-Based Ultrasensitive and Quantitative Detection of Microbial Populations in Complex Communities. mSystems. 2019;4:99–117.

    Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Dynamic carbon flux network of a diverse marine microbial community

    Genetic purging in captive endangered ungulates with extremely low effective population sizes