Newbold, T. et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520, 45–50 (2015).
Google Scholar
Newbold, T. et al. Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Science 353, 288–291 (2016).
Google Scholar
Maxwell, S. L., Fuller, R. A., Brooks, T. M. & Watson, J. E. M. Biodiversity: the ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nature 536, 143 (2016).
Google Scholar
Betts, M. G. et al. Global forest loss disproportionately erodes biodiversity in intact landscapes. Nature 547, 441–444 (2017).
Google Scholar
Haddad, N. M. et al. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500052 (2015).
Google Scholar
Fahrig, L. Ecological responses to habitat fragmentation per se. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 48, 1–23 (2017).
Fletcher, R. J. et al. Is habitat fragmentation good for biodiversity? Biol. Conserv. 226, 9–15 (2018).
Fahrig, L. Habitat fragmentation: a long and tangled tale. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 28, 33–41 (2019).
Fahrig, L. et al. Is habitat fragmentation bad for biodiversity? Biol. Conserv. 230, 179–186 (2019).
Miller-Rushing, A. J. et al. How does habitat fragmentation affect biodiversity? A controversial question at the core of conservation biology. Biol. Conserv. 232, 271–273 (2019).
Fahrig, L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 487–515 (2003).
Fahrig, L. Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis. J. Biogeogr. 40, 1649–1663 (2013).
Hanski, I. Habitat fragmentation and species richness. J. Biogeogr. 42, 989–993 (2015).
Pfeifer, M. et al. Creation of forest edges has a global impact on forest vertebrates. Nature 551, 187–191 (2017).
Google Scholar
Betts, M. G. et al. Extinction filters mediate the global effects of habitat fragmentation on animals. Science 366, 1236–1239 (2019).
Google Scholar
Pardini, R. et al. Beyond the fragmentation threshold hypothesis: regime shifts in biodiversity across fragmented landscapes. PLoS ONE 5, e13666 (2010).
Google Scholar
Villard, M.-A. & Metzger, J. P. Beyond the fragmentation debate: a conceptual model to predict when habitat configuration really matters. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 309–318 (2014).
Prugh, L. R., Hodges, K. E., Sinclair, A. R. E. & Brashares, J. S. Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20770–20775 (2008).
Google Scholar
Franklin, J. F. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Importance of matrix habitats in maintaining biological diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 349–350 (2009).
Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. The Theory of Island Biogeography (Princeton University Press, 1967).
Haila, Y. A conceptual genealogy of fragmentation research: from island biogeography to landscape ecology. Ecol. Appl. 12, 321–334 (2002).
Watson, D. M. A conceptual framework for studying species composition in fragments, islands and other patchy ecosystems. J. Biogeogr. 29, 823–834 (2002).
Watson, J. E. M., Whittaker, R. J. & Freudenberger, D. Bird community responses to habitat fragmentation: how consistent are they across landscapes? J. Biogeogr. 32, 1353–1370 (2005).
Mendenhall, C. D., Karp, D. S., Meyer, C. F. J., Hadly, E. A. & Daily, G. C. Predicting biodiversity change and averting collapse in agricultural landscapes. Nature 509, 213–217 (2014).
Google Scholar
Daily, G. C., Ceballos, G., Pacheco, J., Suzán, G. & Sánchez‐Azofeifa, A. Countryside biogeography of Neotropical mammals: conservation opportunities in agricultural landscapes of Costa Rica. Conserv. Biol. 17, 1814–1826 (2003).
Green, R. E., Cornell, S. J., Scharlemann, J. P. W. & Balmford, A. Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 307, 550–555 (2005).
Google Scholar
Perfecto, I. & Vandermeer, J. Biodiversity conservation in tropical agroecosystems. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1134, 173–200 (2008).
Google Scholar
Law, E. A. & Wilson, K. A. Providing context for the land-sharing and land-sparing debate. Conserv. Lett. 8, 404–413 (2015).
Phalan, B. T. What have we learned from the land sparing-sharing model? Sustainability 10, 1760 (2018).
Balmford, B., Green, R. E., Onial, M., Phalan, B. & Balmford, A. How imperfect can land sparing be before land sharing is more favourable for wild species? J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 73–84 (2019).
Prevedello, J. A. & Vieira, M. V. Does the type of matrix matter? A quantitative review of the evidence. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 1205–1223 (2010).
Ferreira, A. S., Peres, C. A., Bogoni, J. A. & Cassano, C. R. Use of agroecosystem matrix habitats by mammalian carnivores (Carnivora): a global-scale analysis. Mammal. Rev. 48, 312–327 (2018).
Battin, J. When good animals love bad habitats: ecological traps and the conservation of animal populations. Conserv. Biol. 18, 1482–1491 (2004).
Martin, L. J., Blossey, B. & Ellis, E. Mapping where ecologists work: biases in the global distribution of terrestrial ecological observations. Front. Ecol. Environ. 10, 195–201 (2012).
Di Marco, M., Ferrier, S., Harwood, T. D., Hoskins, A. J. & Watson, J. E. M. Wilderness areas halve the extinction risk of terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 573, 582–585 (2019).
Google Scholar
Fahrig, L. et al. Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol. Lett. 14, 101–112 (2011).
Google Scholar
Arroyo‐Rodríguez, V. et al. Designing optimal human-modified landscapes for forest biodiversity conservation. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1404–1420 (2020).
Google Scholar
Purvis, A., Gittleman, J. L., Cowlishaw, G. & Mace, G. M. Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 267, 1947–1952 (2000).
Google Scholar
Fisher, D. O., Blomberg, S. P. & Owens, I. P. F. Extrinsic versus intrinsic factors in the decline and extinction of Australian marsupials. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 270, 1801–1808 (2003).
Cardillo, M. et al. Multiple causes of high extinction risk in large mammal species. Science 309, 1239–1241 (2005).
Google Scholar
Davidson, A. D., Hamilton, M. J., Boyer, A. G., Brown, J. H. & Ceballos, G. Multiple ecological pathways to extinction in mammals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10702–10705 (2009).
Google Scholar
Di Marco, M., Collen, B., Rondinini, C. & Mace, G. M. Historical drivers of extinction risk: using past evidence to direct future monitoring. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282, 20150928 (2015).
Di Marco, M., Venter, O., Possingham, H. P. & Watson, J. E. M. Changes in human footprint drive changes in species extinction risk. Nat. Commun. 9, 4621 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rondinini, C., Marco, M. D., Visconti, P., Butchart, S. H. M. & Boitani, L. Update or outdate: long-term viability of the IUCN Red List. Conserv. Lett. 7, 126–130 (2014).
Bland, L. M. et al. Cost-effective assessment of extinction risk with limited information. J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 861–870 (2015).
Crooks, K. R. et al. Quantification of habitat fragmentation reveals extinction risk in terrestrial mammals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7635–7640 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lucas, P. M., González‐Suárez, M. & Revilla, E. Range area matters, and so does spatial configuration: predicting conservation status in vertebrates. Ecography 42, 1103–1114 (2019).
Arregoitia, L. D. V. Biases, gaps, and opportunities in mammalian extinction risk research. Mammal. Rev. 46, 17–29 (2016).
Rondinini, C. et al. Global habitat suitability models of terrestrial mammals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 366, 2633–2641 (2011).
Venter, O. et al. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat. Commun. 7, 12558 (2016).
Google Scholar
Williams, B. A. et al. Change in terrestrial human footprint drives continued loss of intact ecosystems. One Earth 3, 371–382 (2020).
Tucker, M. A. et al. Moving in the Anthropocene: global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements. Science 359, 466–469 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M. et al. The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science 330, 1503–1509 (2010).
Google Scholar
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn 45, 5–32 (2001).
Google Scholar
Laurance, W. F. Ecological correlates of extinction proneness in Australian tropical rain forest mammals. Conserv. Biol. 5, 79–89 (1991).
Viveiros de Castro, E. B. & Fernandez, F. A. S. Determinants of differential extinction vulnerabilities of small mammals in Atlantic forest fragments in Brazil. Biol. Conserv. 119, 73–80 (2004).
Reider, I. J., Donnelly, M. A. & Watling, J. I. The influence of matrix quality on species richness in remnant forest. Landsc. Ecol. 33, 1147–1157 (2018).
Ewers, R. M. & Didham, R. K. Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol. Rev. 81, 117–142 (2006).
Google Scholar
Schipper, J. et al. The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: diversity, threat, and knowledge. Science 322, 225–230 (2008).
Google Scholar
Tracewski, Ł. et al. Toward quantification of the impact of 21st-century deforestation on the extinction risk of terrestrial vertebrates. Conserv. Biol. 30, 1070–1079 (2016).
Google Scholar
Cardillo, M. et al. The predictability of extinction: biological and external correlates of decline in mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 275, 1441–1448 (2008).
Murray, K. A., Arregoitia, L. D. V., Davidson, A., Marco, M. D. & Fonzo, M. M. I. D. Threat to the point: improving the value of comparative extinction risk analysis for conservation action. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 483–494 (2014).
Google Scholar
Rondinini, C., Wilson, K. A., Boitani, L., Grantham, H. & Possingham, H. P. Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning. Ecol. Lett. 9, 1136–1145 (2006).
Google Scholar
Galán-Acedo, C. et al. The conservation value of human-modified landscapes for the world’s primates. Nat. Commun. 10, 152 (2019).
Google Scholar
Watling, J. I., Nowakowski, A. J., Donnelly, M. A. & Orrock, J. L. Meta-analysis reveals the importance of matrix composition for animals in fragmented habitat. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20, 209–217 (2011).
Fahrig, L. & Rytwinski, T. Effects of roads on animal abundance: an empirical review and synthesis. Ecol. Soc. 14, 21 (2009).
Woinarski, J. C. Z., Burbidge, A. A. & Harrison, P. L. Ongoing unraveling of a continental fauna: decline and extinction of Australian mammals since European settlement. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4531–4540 (2015).
Google Scholar
May, S. A. & Norton, T. W. Influence of fragmentation and disturbance on the potential impact of feral predators on native fauna in Australian forest ecosystems. Wildl. Res 23, 387–400 (1996).
Peres, C. A. Synergistic effects of subsistence hunting and habitat fragmentation on Amazonian Forest vertebrates. Conserv. Biol. 15, 1490–1505 (2001).
Laurance, W. F. & Useche, D. C. Environmental synergisms and extinctions of tropical species. Conserv. Biol. 23, 1427–1437 (2009).
Google Scholar
Côté, I. M., Darling, E. S. & Brown, C. J. Interactions among ecosystem stressors and their importance in conservation. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 283, 20152592 (2016).
Didham, R. K., Kapos, V. & Ewers, R. M. Rethinking the conceptual foundations of habitat fragmentation research. Oikos 121, 161–170 (2012).
Ruffell, J., Banks‐Leite, C. & Didham, R. K. Accounting for the causal basis of collinearity when measuring the effects of habitat loss versus habitat fragmentation. Oikos 125, 117–125 (2016).
Morante‐Filho, J. C. et al. Direct and cascading effects of landscape structure on tropical forest and non-forest frugivorous birds. Ecol. Appl. 28, 2024–2032 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sodhi, N. S., Koh, L. P., Brook, B. W. & Ng, P. K. L. Southeast Asian biodiversity: an impending disaster. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 654–660 (2004).
Google Scholar
Bland, L. M., Collen, B., Orme, C. D. L. & Bielby, J. Predicting the conservation status of data-deficient species. Conserv. Biol. 29, 250–259 (2015).
Google Scholar
Segan, D. B., Murray, K. A. & Watson, J. E. M. A global assessment of current and future biodiversity vulnerability to habitat loss–climate change interactions. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 5, 12–21 (2016).
Maron, M., Simmonds, J. S. & Watson, J. E. M. Bold nature retention targets are essential for the global environment agenda. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1194–1195 (2018).
Google Scholar
IUCN. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-1. (2021).
IUCN. A global standard for the identification of Key Biodiversity Areas. Version 1.0. (IUCN, Gland, 2016).
Crooks, K. R., Burdett, C. L., Theobald, D. M., Rondinini, C. & Boitani, L. Global patterns of fragmentation and connectivity of mammalian carnivore habitat. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 366, 2642–2651 (2011).
Ripple, W. J., Bradshaw, G. A. & Spies, T. A. Measuring forest landscape patterns in the cascade range of Oregon, USA. Biol. Conserv. 57, 73–88 (1991).
Li, B.-L. & Archer, S. Weighted mean patch size: a robust index for quantifying landscape structure. Ecol. Model. 102, 353–361 (1997).
Di Marco, M., Rondinini, C., Boitani, L. & Murray, K. A. Comparing multiple species distribution proxies and different quantifications of the human footprint map, implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 165, 203–211 (2013).
IUCN. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012-1. (2012).
Cutler, D. R. et al. Random forests for Classification in ecology. Ecology 88, 2783–2792 (2007).
Google Scholar
Jetz, W., Carbone, C., Fulford, J. & Brown, J. H. The scaling of animal space use. Science 306, 266–268 (2004).
Google Scholar
McNab, B. K. The influence of food habits on the energetics of eutherian mammals. Ecol. Monogr. 56, 1–19 (1986).
Tucker, M. A., Ord, T. J. & Rogers, T. L. Evolutionary predictors of mammalian home range size: body mass, diet and the environment. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 1105–1114 (2014).
Murphy, M. A., Evans, J. S. & Storfer, A. Quantifying Bufo boreas connectivity in Yellowstone National Park with landscape genetics. Ecology 91, 252–261 (2010).
Google Scholar
Allouche, O., Tsoar, A. & Kadmon, R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 1223–1232 (2006).
Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. (Academic Press, 1988).
ESRI. ArcGIS Pro version 2.8.2, https://www.esri.com/en-us/home (2021).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (2017).
Liaw, A. & Wiener, M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2, 18–22 (2002).
Kuhn, M. Building predictive models in R using the caret package. J. Stat. Softw. 28, 1–26 (2008).
Molnar, C. & Schratz, P. iml: Interpretable Machine Learning. R package version 0.10.1, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=iml (2020).
Torchiano, M. effsize: Efficient Effect Size Computation. R package version 0.8.1, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=effsize (2020).
Chamberlain, S. rredlist: ‘IUCN’ Red List Client. R package version 0.7.0, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rredlist (2020).
Smith, F. A. et al. Body mass of late Quaternary mammals. Ecology 84, 3403–3403 (2003).
Jones, K. E. et al. PanTHERIA: a species-level database of life history, ecology, and geography of extant and recently extinct mammals. Ecology 90, 2648–2648 (2009).
Tacutu, R. et al. Human ageing genomic resources: integrated databases and tools for the biology and genetics of ageing. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D1027–D1033 (2013).
Google Scholar
Verde Arregoitia, L. D., Blomberg, S. P. & Fisher, D. O. Phylogenetic correlates of extinction risk in mammals: species in older lineages are not at greater risk. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 280, 20131092 (2013).
Faurby, S. et al. PHYLACINE 1.2: the phylogenetic atlas of mammal macroecology. Ecology 99, 2626–2626 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wilman, H. et al. EltonTraits 1.0: species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology 95, 2027–2027 (2014).
Kissling, W. D. et al. Establishing macroecological trait datasets: digitalization, extrapolation, and validation of diet preferences in terrestrial mammals worldwide. Ecol. Evol. 4, 2913–2930 (2014).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
