United Nations. World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248 (UN-DESA, 2017).
Costello, C. et al. The future of food from the sea. Nature 588, 95–100 (2020).
Google Scholar
IPCC. IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (2019).
FAO. Mapping Supply and Demand for Animal-Source Foods to 2030 (2011).
Foley, J. A. et al. Global consequences of land use. Science 309, 570–574 (2005).
Google Scholar
DeFries, R. S., Rudel, T., Uriarte, M. & Hansen, M. Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nat. Geosci. 3, 178–181 (2010).
Google Scholar
Rockström, J. et al. Future water availability for global food production: the potential of green water for increasing resilience to global change. Water Resour. Res. 45, W00A12 (2009).
Google Scholar
IPCC. IPCC Special Report on Climate Change and Land (2019).
Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360, 987–992 (2018).
Google Scholar
FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020: Sustainability in Action (2020).
Bryndum‐Buchholz, A. et al. Twenty-first-century climate change impacts on marine animal biomass and ecosystem structure across ocean basins. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 459–472 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cheung, W. W. L., Dunne, J., Sarmiento, J. L. & Pauly, D. Integrating ecophysiology and plankton dynamics into projected maximum fisheries catch potential under climate change in the Northeast Atlantic. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 68, 1008–1018 (2011).
Google Scholar
Froehlich, H. E., Gentry, R. R. & Halpern, B. S. Global change in marine aquaculture production potential under climate change. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1745–1750 (2018).
Google Scholar
Handisyde, N., Telfer, T. C. & Ross, L. G. Vulnerability of aquaculture-related livelihoods to changing climate at the global scale. Fish Fish. 18, 466–488 (2017).
Google Scholar
Szuwalski, C. S. & Hollowed, A. B. Climate change and non-stationary population processes in fisheries management. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 73, 1297–1305 (2016).
Google Scholar
Pinsky, M. L. et al. Preparing ocean governance for species on the move. Science 360, 1189–1191 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gaines, S. D. et al. Improved fisheries management could offset many negative effects of climate change. Sci. Adv. 4, eaao1378 (2018).
Google Scholar
Free, C. M. et al. Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries. PLoS ONE 15, e0224347 (2020).
Google Scholar
Clapp, J. Food self-sufficiency: making sense of it, and when it makes sense. Food Policy 66, 88–96 (2017).
Google Scholar
Barange, M., Bahri, T., Beveridge, M. & Cochrane, K. L. Impacts of Climate Change on Fisheries and Aquaculture: Synthesis of Current Knowledge, Adaptation and Mitigation Options. Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 627 (FAO, 2018).
Lester, S. E. et al. Marine spatial planning makes room for offshore aquaculture in crowded coastal waters. Nat. Commun. 9, 945 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cottrell, R. S., Blanchard, J. L., Halpern, B. S., Metian, M. & Froehlich, H. E. Global adoption of novel aquaculture feeds could substantially reduce forage fish demand by 2030. Nat. Food 1, 301–308 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hua, K. et al. The future of aquatic protein: implications for protein sources in aquaculture diets. One Earth 1, 316–329 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chavanne, H. et al. A comprehensive survey on selective breeding programs and seed market in the European aquaculture fish industry. Aquacult. Int. 24, 1287–1307 (2016).
Google Scholar
Troell, M., Jonell, M. & Henriksson, P. J. G. Ocean space for seafood. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1224–1225 (2017).
Google Scholar
European Union. Commission Regulation (EC) No 710/2009 of 5 August 2009 Amending Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007, as regards laying down detailed rules on organic aquaculture animal and seaweed production. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/710/oj (2009).
Golden, C. D. et al. Aquatic foods to nourish nations. Nature 598, 315–320 (2021).
Google Scholar
Davies, I. P. et al. Governance of marine aquaculture: pitfalls, potential, and pathways forward. Mar. Policy 104, 29–36 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gentry, R. R. et al. Exploring the potential for marine aquaculture to contribute to ecosystem services. Rev. Aquacult. 12, 499–512 (2020).
Google Scholar
Troell, M. et al. Ecological engineering in aquaculture — potential for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) in marine offshore systems. Aquaculture 297, 1–9 (2009).
Google Scholar
Froehlich, H. E., Jacobsen, N. S., Essington, T. E., Clavelle, T. & Halpern, B. S. Avoiding the ecological limits of forage fish for fed aquaculture. Nat. Sustain. 1, 298–303 (2018).
Google Scholar
Øverland, M., Mydland, L. T. & Skrede, A. Marine macroalgae as sources of protein and bioactive compounds in feed for monogastric animals. J. Sci. Food Agric. 99, 13–24 (2019).
Google Scholar
Besson, M. et al. Environmental impacts of genetic improvement of growth rate and feed conversion ratio in fish farming under rearing density and nitrogen output limitations. J. Clean. Prod. 116, 100–109 (2016).
Google Scholar
Froehlich, H. E., Runge, C. A., Gentry, R. R., Gaines, S. D. & Halpern, B. S. Comparative terrestrial feed and land use of an aquaculture-dominant world. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5295–5300 (2018).
Google Scholar
Aguilar-Manjarrez, J., Soto, D., Brummett, R. E. Aquaculture Zoning, Site Selection and Area Management under the Ecosystem Approach to Aquaculture (FAO, 2017).
Soto, D. et al. In Impacts Of Climate Change on Fisheries and Aquaculture: Synthesis of Current Knowledge, Adaptation and Mitigation Options Ch. 26 (FAO, 2018).
Darwin, C. The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication (John Murray, 1868).
Gjedrem, T., Robinson, N. & Rye, M. The importance of selective breeding in aquaculture to meet future demands for animal protein: a review. Aquaculture 350–353, 117–129 (2012).
Google Scholar
Antonello, J. et al. Estimates of heritability and genetic correlation for body length and resistance to fish pasteurellosis in the gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.). Aquaculture 298, 29–35 (2009).
Google Scholar
Saillant, E., Dupont-Nivet, M., Haffray, P. & Chatain, B. Estimates of heritability and genotype–environment interactions for body weight in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) raised under communal rearing conditions. Aquaculture 254, 139–147 (2006).
Google Scholar
Klinger, D. H., Levin, S. A. & Watson, J. R. The growth of finfish in global open-ocean aquaculture under climate change. Proc. R. Soc. B 284, 20170834 (2017).
Google Scholar
Salayo, N. D., Perez, M. L., Garces, L. R. & Pido, M. D. Mariculture development and livelihood diversification in the Philippines. Mar. Policy 36, 867–881 (2012).
Google Scholar
Boyce, D. G., Lotze, H. K., Tittensor, D. P., Carozza, D. A. & Worm, B. Future ocean biomass losses may widen socioeconomic equity gaps. Nat. Commun. 11, 2235 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sumaila, U. R. et al. Benefits of the Paris Agreement to ocean life, economies, and people. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau3855 (2019).
Google Scholar
United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (United Nations, 2017).
Hilborn, R. et al. Effective fisheries management instrumental in improving fish stock status. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 2218–2224 (2020).
Google Scholar
Free, C. M. et al. Impacts of historical warming on marine fisheries production. Science 363, 979–983 (2019).
Google Scholar
Costello, C. et al. Global fishery prospects under contrasting management regimes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5125–5129 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ye, Y. & Gutierrez, N. L. Ending fishery overexploitation by expanding from local successes to globalized solutions. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0179 (2017).
Google Scholar
Leape, J. et al. Technology, Data and New Models for Sustainably Managing Ocean Resources (World Resources Institute, 2020).
Anderson, C. R. et al. Scaling up from regional case studies to a global harmful algal bloom observing system. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 250 (2019).
Google Scholar
Dunn, D. C., Maxwell, S. M., Boustany, A. M. & Halpin, P. N. Dynamic ocean management increases the efficiency and efficacy of fisheries management. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 668–673 (2016).
Google Scholar
FAO. Aquaculture Development: 7. Aquaculture Governance and Sector Development (2017).
Oyinlola, M. A., Reygondeau, G., Wabnitz, C. C. C., Troell, M. & Cheung, W. W. L. Global estimation of areas with suitable environmental conditions for mariculture species. PLoS ONE 13, e0191086 (2018).
Google Scholar
Jackson, A. Fish in-fish out ratio explained. Aquacult. Eur. 34, 5–10 (2009).
Tacon, A. G. J. & Metian, M. Feed matters: satisfying the feed demand of aquaculture. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquacult. 23, 1–10 (2015).
Google Scholar
Tacon, A. G. J. & Metian, M. Global overview on the use of fish meal and fish oil in industrially compounded aquafeeds: trends and future prospects. Aquaculture 285, 146–158 (2008).
Google Scholar
World Bank. Population, Total (2020); https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL
Edwards, P., Zhang, W., Belton, B. & Little, D. C. Misunderstandings, myths and mantras in aquaculture: its contribution to world food supplies has been systematically over reported. Mar. Policy 106, 103547 (2019).
Google Scholar
Roberts, P. Conversion Factors for Estimating the Equivalent Live Weight of Fisheries Products (The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1998).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).
Kaschner, K. et al. AquaMaps: Predicted Range Maps for Aquatic Species https://www.aquamaps.org/ (2019).
García Molinos, J. et al. Climate velocity and the future global redistribution of marine biodiversity. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 83–88 (2016).
Google Scholar
Cashion, T., Le Manach, F., Zeller, D. & Pauly, D. Most fish destined for fishmeal production are food-grade fish. Fish Fish. 18, 837–844 (2017).
Google Scholar
Froehlich, H. E., Gentry, R. R. & Halpern, B. S. Synthesis and comparative analysis of physiological tolerance and life-history growth traits of marine aquaculture species. Aquaculture 460, 75–82 (2016).
Google Scholar
Thorson, J. T., Munch, S. B., Cope, J. M. & Gao, J. Predicting life history parameters for all fishes worldwide. Ecol. Appl. 27, 2262–2276 (2017).
Google Scholar
Froese, R. & Pauly, D. FishBase http://www.fishbase.org (2021).
Palomares, M. & Pauly, D. SeaLifeBase http://www.sealifebase.org (2019).
FAO. Cultured Aquatic Species (2019).
Dunne, J. P. et al. GFDL’s ESM2 global coupled climate–carbon Earth system models. Part I: physical formulation and baseline simulation characteristics. J. Clim. 25, 6646–6665 (2012).
Google Scholar
Dunne, J. P. et al. GFDL’s ESM2 global coupled climate–carbon Earth system models. Part II: carbon system formulation and baseline simulation characteristics. J. Clim. 26, 2247–2267 (2013).
Google Scholar
Song, Z. et al. Centuries of monthly and 3-hourly global ocean wave data for past, present, and future climate research. Sci. Data 7, 226 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gentry, R. R. et al. Mapping the global potential for marine aquaculture. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1317–1324 (2017).
Google Scholar
Barton, A. et al. Impacts of coastal acidification on the Pacific Northwest shellfish industry and adaptation strategies implemented in response. Oceanography 25, 146–159 (2015).
Google Scholar
Froehlich, H. E., Smith, A., Gentry, R. R. & Halpern, B. S. Offshore aquaculture: I know it when I see it. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 154 (2017).
Google Scholar
World Bank. Adjusted Net National Income per Capita (Current US$) (2019); https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.ADJ.NNTY.PC.CD
World Bank. Pump Price for Diesel Fuel (US$ per liter) (2019); https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EP.PMP.DESL.CD
Piburn, J. wbstats: programmatic access to the World Bank API. R package v.1.0.4 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/wbstats/index.html (2018).
Rubino, M. (ed.) Offshore Aquaculture in the United States: Economic Considerations, Implications & Opportunities NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS F/SPO-103 (US Department of Commerce, 2008).
Jackson, A. & Newton, R. Project to Model the Use of Fisheries By-products in the Production of Marine Ingredients, with Special Reference to the Omega 3 Fatty Acids EPA and DHA (Institute Of Aquaculture, University Of Stirling And IFFO, 2016).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
