Rockström, J. et al. Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio 46, 4–17 (2017).
Google Scholar
Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347, 1259855 (2015).
Google Scholar
Campbell, B. M. et al. Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries. Ecol. Soc. 22, 8 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hazell, P. & Wood, S. Drivers of change in global agriculture. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 495–515 (2008).
Google Scholar
Lehmann, P. et al. Complex responses of global insect pests to climate warming. Front. Ecol. Environ. 18, 141–150 (2020).
Google Scholar
Foley, J. A. et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011).
Google Scholar
Springmann, M. et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature 562, 519–525 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hunter, M. C., Smith, R. G., Schipanski, M. E., Atwood, L. W. & Mortensen, D. A. Agriculture in 2050: recalibrating targets for sustainable intensification. Bioscience 67, 386–391 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005); http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf
Bommarco, R., Kleijn, D. & Potts, S. G. Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 230–238 (2013).
Google Scholar
Kleijn, D. et al. Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 154–166 (2018).
Google Scholar
Pingali, P. L. Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12302–12308 (2012).
Google Scholar
Wezel, A. et al. Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. Sustain. Agric. 2, 27–43 (2009).
Garnett, T. et al. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: premises and policies. Science 341, 33–34 (2013).
Google Scholar
Lipper, L. et al. Climate-smart agriculture for food security. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 1068–1072 (2014).
Google Scholar
Tittonell, P. Ecological intensification of agriculture—sustainable by nature. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 8, 53–61 (2014).
Google Scholar
Jenkinson, D. S. The impact of humans on the nitrogen cycle, with focus on temperate arable agriculture. Plant Soil 228, 3–15 (2001).
Google Scholar
Verheijen, F. G. A., Jones, R. J. A., Rickson, R. J. & Smith, C. J. Tolerable versus actual soil erosion rates in Europe. Earth Sci. Rev. 94, 23–38 (2009).
Google Scholar
Peoples, M. B. et al. in Agroecosystem Diversity: Reconciling Contemporary Agriculture and Environmental Quality (eds Lemaire, G. et al.) 123–142 (Academic Press, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811050-8.00008-X
Storkey, J., Bruce, T., McMillan, V. & Neve, P. in Agroecosystem Diversity: Reconciling Contemporary Agriculture and Environmental Quality (eds Lemaire, G. et al.) 199–209 (Academic Press, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811050-8.00012-1
Schröder, J. Revisiting the agronomic benefits of manure: a correct assessment and exploitation of its fertilizer value spares the environment. Bioresour. Technol. 96, 253–261 (2005).
Google Scholar
Mhlanga, B., Ercoli, L., Pellegrino, E., Onofri, A. & Thierfelder, C. The crucial role of mulch to enhance the stability and resilience of cropping systems in southern Africa. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 41, 29–43 (2021).
Google Scholar
Barrett, C. B. & Bevis, L. E. M. The self-reinforcing feedback between low soil fertility and chronic poverty. Nat. Geosci. 8, 907–912 (2015).
Google Scholar
Tittonell, P. & Giller, K. E. When yield gaps are poverty traps: the paradigm of ecological intensification in African smallholder agriculture. Field Crops Res. 143, 76–90 (2013).
Google Scholar
Sandén, T. et al. European long-term field experiments: knowledge gained about alternative management practices. Soil Use Manage. 34, 167–176 (2018).
Google Scholar
Storkey, J. et al. The unique contribution of Rothamsted to ecological research at large temporal scales. Adv. Ecol. Res. 55, 3–42 (2016).
Google Scholar
Johnston, A. E. & Poulton, P. R. The importance of long-term experiments in agriculture: their management to ensure continued crop production and soil fertility; the Rothamsted experience. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 69, 113–125 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bowles, T. M. et al. Long-term evidence shows that crop-rotation diversification increases agricultural resilience to adverse growing conditions in North America. One Earth 2, 284–293 (2020).
Marini, L. et al. Crop rotations sustain cereal yields under a changing climate. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 124011 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lal, R. Carbon emission from farm operations. Environ. Int. 30, 981–990 (2004).
Google Scholar
Cordell, D., Drangert, J. O. & White, S. The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Glob. Environ. Change 19, 292–305 (2009).
Google Scholar
Lechenet, M., Dessaint, F., Py, G., Makowski, D. & Munier-Jolain, N. Reducing pesticide use while preserving crop productivity and profitability on arable farms. Nat. Plants 3, 17008 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bedoussac, L. et al. Ecological principles underlying the increase of productivity achieved by cereal-grain legume intercrops in organic farming. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35, 911–935 (2015).
Google Scholar
Storkey, J., Mead, A., Addy, J. & MacDonald, A. J. Agricultural intensification and climate change have increased the threat from weeds. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 2416–2425 (2021).
Google Scholar
Vanlauwe, B. et al. in Integrated Plant Nutrient Management in Sub-Saharan Africa: From Concept to Practice (eds Vanlauwe, B. et al.) 173–184 (CABI, 2002).
Hijbeek, R. et al. Do organic inputs matter—a meta-analysis of additional yield effects for arable crops in Europe. Plant Soil 411, 293–303 (2017).
Google Scholar
Thierfelder, C. & Wall, P. C. Effects of conservation agriculture techniques on infiltration and soil water content in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Soil Tillage Res. 105, 217–227 (2009).
Google Scholar
Gentile, R., Vanlauwe, B., Chivenge, P. & Six, J. Interactive effects from combining fertilizer and organic residue inputs on nitrogen transformations. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40, 2375–2384 (2008).
Google Scholar
Mupangwa, W. et al. Maize yields from rotation and intercropping systems with different legumes under conservation agriculture in contrasting agro-ecologies. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 306, 107170 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pittelkow, C. M. et al. Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature 517, 365–368 (2015).
Google Scholar
Steward, P. R. et al. The adaptive capacity of maize-based conservation agriculture systems to climate stress in tropical and subtropical environments: a meta-regression of yields. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 251, 194–202 (2018).
Google Scholar
Pittelkow, C. M. et al. When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis. Field Crops Res. 183, 156–168 (2015).
Google Scholar
Sun, W. et al. Climate drives global soil carbon sequestration and crop yield changes under conservation agriculture. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3325–3335 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kirkegaard, J. A. et al. Sense and nonsense in conservation agriculture: principles, pragmatism and productivity in Australian mixed farming systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 187, 133–145 (2014).
Google Scholar
Thierfelder, C. et al. Complementary practices supporting conservation agriculture in southern Africa. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 38, 16–37 (2018).
Google Scholar
Alignier, A. et al. Configurational crop heterogeneity increases within-field plant diversity. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 654–663 (2020).
Google Scholar
Liebman, M. et al. Ecologically sustainable weed management: how do we get from proof-of-concept to adoption? Ecol. Appl. 26, 1352–1369 (2016).
Google Scholar
Giller, K. E. The food security conundrum of sub-Saharan Africa. Glob. Food Sec. 26, 100431 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
Google Scholar
Addy, J. W. G., Ellis, R. H., Macdonald, A. J., Semenov, M. A. & Mead, A. Changes in agricultural climate in South-Eastern England from 1892 to 2016 and differences in cereal and permanent grassland yield. Agric. For. Meteorol. 308–309, 108560 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S. & Baayen, H. Parsimonious mixed models. Preprint at https://arXiv.org/abs/1506.04967v2 (2018).
MacLaren, C., Glendining, M., Poulton, P., Macdonald, A. & Clark, S. Woburn Ley-Arable Experiment: Yields of Wheat as First Test Crop, 1976–2018 (e-RA Rothamsted, 2022); https://doi.org/10.23637/wrn3-wheat7618-01 .
Lenth, R. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means: R package version 1.7.2 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (2020).
Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–48 (2010).
Google Scholar
Lajeunesse, M. J. On the meta-analysis of response ratios for studies with correlated and multi-group designs. Ecology 92, 2049–2055 (2011).
Google Scholar
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, 2016).
Crain, C. M., Kroeker, K. & Halpern, B. S. Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1304–1315 (2008).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
