Nash, R. Wilderness and the American Mind (Yale University Press, 1982).
Kirchhoff, T. & Vicenzotti, V. A historical and systematic survey of European perceptions of wilderness. Environ. Values 23, 443–464 (2014).
Google Scholar
Aplet, G., Thomson, J. & Wilbert, M. Indicators of wildness: Using attributes of the land to assess the context of wilderness in Wilderness Science in a Time of Change (eds. McCool, S.F., Cole, D.N., Borrie, W.T., O’Loughlin, J.) 89–98 (USDA Forest Service, RMRS-P-15-Vol-2, 2000).
Watson, J. E. et al. Catastrophic declines in wilderness areas undermine global environment targets. Curr. Biol. 26, 2929–2934 (2016).
Google Scholar
Watson, J. E. et al. Protect the last of the wild. Nature 563, 27–30 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hayward, M. W. et al. Reintroducing rewilding to restoration: Rejecting the search for novelty. Biol. Conserv. 233, 255–259 (2019).
Google Scholar
Perino, A. et al. Rewilding complex ecosystems. Science 364, eaav5570 (2019).
Google Scholar
Soulé, M. & Noss, R. Rewilding and biodiversity: Complementary goals for continental conservation. Wild Earth 8, 18–28 (1998).
Torres, A. et al. Measuring rewilding progress. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 373, 20170433 (2018).
Google Scholar
Díaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).
Google Scholar
Fish, R., Church, A. & Winter, M. Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosyst. Serv. 21B, 208–217 (2016).
Google Scholar
Nilsson, K. et al. Forests, Trees and Human Health (Springer, 2011).
Google Scholar
Cheesbrough, A. E., Garvin, T. & Nykiforuk, C. I. J. Everyday wild: Urban natural areas, health, and well-being. Health Place 56, 43–52 (2019).
Google Scholar
Child, M. F. Wildness, infinity and freedom. Ecol. Econ. 186, 107055 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lev, E., Kahn, P. H. Jr., Chen, H. & Esperum, G. Relatively wild urban parks can promote human resilience and flourishing: A case study of Discovery Park, Seattle, Wasshington. Front. Sustain. Cities 2, 2 (2020).
Google Scholar
Venter, O. et al. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat. Commun. 7, 12558 (2016).
Google Scholar
Watson, J. E. et al. The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 599–610 (2018).
Google Scholar
Giergiczny, M., Czajkowski, M., Żylicz, T. & Angelstam, P. Choice experiment assessment of public preferences for forest structural attributes. Ecol. Econ. 119, 8–23 (2015).
Google Scholar
Sabatini, F. M. et al. Where are Europe’s last primary forests?. Divers. Distrib. 24, 1426–1439 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kirby, K. & Watkins, C. Europe’s changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes. CABI (2015).
Schirpke, U., Meisch, C. & Tappeiner, U. Symbolic species as a cultural ecosystem service in the European Alps: Insights and open issues. Landsc. Ecol. 33, 711–730 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bruskotter, J. T. & Wilson, R. S. Determining where the wild things will be: Using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores. Conserv. Lett. 7, 158–165 (2014).
Google Scholar
Chapron, G. et al. Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science 346, 1517–1519 (2014).
Google Scholar
Cimatti, M. et al. Large carnivore expansion in Europe is associated with human population density and land cover changes. Divers. Distrib. 27, 602–617 (2021).
Google Scholar
Røskaft, E., Händel, B., Bjerke, T. & Kaltenborn, B. P. Human attitudes towards large carnivores in Norway. Wildl. Biol. 13, 172–186 (2007).
Google Scholar
Arbieu, U. et al. Attitudes towards returning wolves (Canis lupus) in Germany: Exposure, information sources and trust matter. Biol. Conserv. 234, 202–210 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gundersen, V. S. & Frivold, L. H. Public preferences for forest structures: A review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Urban For. Urban Green. 7, 241–258 (2008).
Google Scholar
Filyushkina, A., Agimass, F., Lundhede, T., Strange, N. & Jacobsen, J. B. Preferences for variation in forest characteristics: Does diversity between stands matter?. Ecol. Econ. 140, 22–29 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lozano, J. et al. Human-carnivore relations: A systematic review. Biol. Conserv. 237, 480–492 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rode, J., Flinzberger, L., Karutz, R., Berghöfer, A. & Schröter-Schlaack, C. Why so negative? Exploring the socio-economic impacts of large carnivores from a European perspective. Biol. Conserv. 255, 108918 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gren, M., Häggmark-Svensson, T., Elofsson, K. & Engelmann, M. Economics of wildlife management—An overview. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 64, 1–6 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. Biophilia and the conservation ethic in The Biophilia Hypothesis (eds. Kellert, S.R. & Wilson, E.O.) 31–41 (Island Press, 1993).
Thompson, S. C. G. & Barton, M. A. Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. J. Environ. Psychol. 14, 149–157 (1994).
Google Scholar
Kaltenborn, B. P. & Bjerke, T. Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landsc. Urban Plan. 59, 1–11 (2002).
Google Scholar
Bjerke, T. & Kaltenborn, B. P. The relationship of ecocentric and anthropocentric motives to attitudes toward large carnivores. J. Environ. Psychol. 19, 415–421 (1999).
Google Scholar
Johansson, M., Ferreira, I. A., Støen, O. G., Frank, J. & Flykt, A. Targeting human fear of large carnivores—Many ideas but few known effects. Biol. Conserv. 201, 261–269 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bauer, N., Wallner, A. & Hunziker, M. The change of European landscapes: Human–nature relationships, public attitudes towards rewilding, and the implications for landscape management in Switzerland. J. Environ. Manag. 90, 2910–2920 (2009).
Google Scholar
Arts, K., Fischer, A. & Van der Wal, R. The promise of wilderness between paradise and hell: A cultural-historical exploration of a Dutch National Park. Landsc. Res. 37, 239–256 (2012).
Google Scholar
De Groot, W. T. & van den Born, R. J. G. Visions of nature and landscape preferences:an exploration in the Netherlands. Landsc. Urban Plan. 63, 127–138 (2003).
Google Scholar
Bombieri, G. et al. Brown bear attacks on humans: A worldwide perspective. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–10 (2019).
Google Scholar
Johansson, M., Sjöström, M., Karlsson, J. & Brännlund, R. Is human fear affecting public willingness to pay for the management and conservation of large carnivores?. Soc. Nat. Resour. 25, 610–620 (2012).
Google Scholar
Dressel, S., Sandström, C. & Ericsson, G. A meta-analysis of studies on attitudes toward bears and wolves across Europe 1976–2012. Conserv. Biol. 29, 565–574 (2015).
Google Scholar
Trajçe, A. et al. All carnivores are not equal in the rural people’s view. Should we develop conservation plans for functional guilds or individual species in the face of conflicts?. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 19, e00677 (2019).
Google Scholar
Eriksson, M., Sandström, C. & Ericsson, G. Direct experience and attitude change towards bears and wolves. Wildl. Biol. 21, 131–137 (2015).
Google Scholar
Methorst, J., Arbieu, U., Bonn, A., Böhning-Gaese, K. & Müller, T. Non-material contributions of wildlife to human well-being: A systematic review. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 093005 (2020).
Google Scholar
Russell, R. et al. Humans and nature: How knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 38, 473–502 (2013).
Google Scholar
Maller, C., Mumaw, L. & Cooke, B. Health and social benefits of living with ‘wild’ nature in Rewilding (eds. Pettorelli, N., Durant, S. M. & du Toit, J. T.) 165–181 (Cambridge University Press, 2019).
Nevin, O. T., Swain, P. & Convery, I. Bears, place-making, and authenticity in British Columbia. Nat. Areas J. 34, 216–221 (2014).
Google Scholar
Schnitzler, A. Towards a new European wilderness: Embracing unmanaged forest growth and the decolonisation of nature. Landsc. Urban Plan. 126, 74–80 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hensher, D., Rose, J. & Greene, D. Applied Choice Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Google Scholar
Johnston, R. J. et al. Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 4, 319–405 (2017).
Riera, P. et al. Non-market valuation of forest goods and services: Good practice guidelines. J. For. Econ. 18, 259–270 (2012).
Larsen, J. B. & Nielsen, A. B. Nature-based forest management: Where are we going? Elaborating forest development types in and with practice. For. Ecol. Manag. 238, 107–117 (2007).
Google Scholar
Ferrini, S. & Scarpa, R. Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 53, 342–363 (2007).
Google Scholar
McFadden, D. The measurement of urban travel demand. J. Public Econ. 3, 303–328 (1974).
Google Scholar
Train, K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
