Ballantyne, G., Baldock, K. C. R., Rendell, L. & Willmer, P. G. Pollinator importance networks illustrate the crucial value of bees in a highly speciose plant community. Sci. Rep. 7, 8389 (2017).
Google Scholar
Smith, M. R., Singh, G. M., Mozaffarian, D. & Myers, S. S. Effect of decreases of animal pollinators on human nutrition and global health: A modeling analysis. Lancet 386, 1964–1972 (2015).
Google Scholar
Jung, C. & Cho, S. Relationship between honey bee population and honey production in Korea: A historical trend analysis. J. Apic. 30(1), 7–12 (2015).
Abrol, D. P. Asiatic Honey Bee Apis cerana: Biodiversity Conservation and Agricultural Production (Springer, 2013).
Google Scholar
Chandel, Y. S., Kumar, A. & Srivastva, S. Comparative performance of Apis mellifera L. vis a vis Apis cerana Fab. on toria (Brassica campestris var Toria) in mid-hill zone of Himachal Pradesh, India. Indian J. Agric. Res. 34, 264–267 (2000).
Feng, M., Ramadan, H., Han, B., Yu, F. & Li, J. Hemolymph proteome changes during worker brood development match the biological divergences between western honey bees (Apis mellifera) and eastern honey bees (Apis cerana). BMC Genomics 15, 563–576 (2014).
Google Scholar
Peng, Y. S., Fang, Y., Xu, S. & Ge, L. The resistance mechanism of the Asian honey bee, Apis cerana Fabr., to an ectoparasitic mite, Varroa jacobsoni Oudemans. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 49, 54–60 (1987).
Google Scholar
McClenaghan, et al. Behavioral responses of honey bees, Apis cerana and Apis mellifera, to Vespa mandarinia marking and alarm pheromones. J. Apic. Res. 58(1), 141–148 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lin, Z. et al. Go east for better honey bee health: Apis cerana is faster at hygienic behavior than A. mellifera. PLoS ONE 11(9), e0162647 (2016).
Google Scholar
Verma, L. R. & Dutta, P. C. Foraging behaviour of Apis cerana indicia and Apis mellifera in pollinating apple flowers. J. Apic. Res. 25, 197–201 (1986).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z. & Tan, K. Comparative analysis of olfactory learning of Apis cerana and Apis mellifera. Apidologie 45(1), 45–52 (2014).
Google Scholar
Beekman, M. & Ratnieks, F. L. W. Long-range foraging by the honey-bee Apis mellifera L.. Funct. Ecol. 14, 490–496 (2000).
Google Scholar
Dyer, F. C. & Seeley, T. D. Dance dialects and foraging range in three Asian honey bee species. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28, 227–233 (1991).
Google Scholar
Koetz, A. H. Ecology, behaviour and control of Apis cerana with a focus on relevance to the Australian incursion. Insects 4(4), 558–592 (2013).
Google Scholar
Joshi, N. C. & Joshi, P. C. Foraging behavior of Apis spp. On apple flowers in a subtropical environment. N. Y. Sci. J. 3(3), 71–76 (2010).
Atwal, A. S. & Sharma, O. P. The dominance of Apis mellifera over Apis indica. Am. Bee J. 111, 343 (1971).
Kato, M., Shibata, A., Yasui, T. & Nagamasu, H. Impact of introduced honey bees, Apis mellifera, upon native bee communities in the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands. Res. Popul. Ecol. 41, 217–228 (1999).
Google Scholar
Thorp, D. W., Wenner, A. M. & Barthell, J. F. Pollen and nectar resource overlap among bees on Santa Cruz Island. MBC Appl. Environ. Sci. 2020, 261–267 (2000).
Yang, G. Harm of introducing the western honey bee Apis mellifera L. to the Chinese honey bee Apis cerana F. and its ecological impact. Acta Entomol. Sin. 48, 401–406 (2005) ((in Chinese)).
Dubois, T., Pasquaretta, C., Barron, A. B., Gautrais, J. & Lihoreau, M. A model of resource partitioning between foraging bees based on learning. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17(7), e1009260 (2021).
Google Scholar
Louveaux, J., Maurizio, A. & Vorwohl, G. Methods of melissopalynology. Bee World 59, 139–153 (1978).
Google Scholar
Hawkins, J., de Vere, N., Griffith, A. & Ford, C. R. Using DNA metabarcoding to Identify the floral composition of honey: A new tool for investigating honey bee foraging preferences. PLoS ONE 10(8), e0134735 (2015).
Google Scholar
Smart, M. D. et al. A Comparison of honey bee-collected pollen from working agricultural lands using light microscopy and its metabarcoding. Environ. Entomol. 46(1), 38–49 (2016).
Keller, A. et al. Evaluating multiplexed next-generation sequencing as a method in palynology for mixed pollen samples. Plant Biol. 17, 558–566 (2015).
Google Scholar
Richardson, R. T. et al. Rank-based characterization of pollen assemblages collected by honey bees using a multi-locus metabarcoding approach. Appl. Plant Sci. 3, 1500043 (2015).
Google Scholar
Sickel, W. et al. Increased efficiency in identifying mixed pollen samples by meta-barcoding with a dual-indexing approach. BMC Ecol. 15, 20 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kress, W. J. & Erickson, D. L. DNA barcodes: Genes, genomics, and bioinformatics. PNAS 105, 2761–2762 (2008).
Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, P. M., Graham, S. W. & Little, D. P. Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode. PLoS ONE 6, e19254 (2011).
Google Scholar
Chen, S. et al. Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS ONE 5, e8613 (2010).
Google Scholar
CBOL Plant Working Group. A DNA barcode for land plants. PNAS 106, 12794–12797 (2009).
Google Scholar
Pornon, A. et al. Using metabarcoding to reveal and quantify plant-pollinator interactions. Sci. Rep. 6, 27282 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bell, K. L. et al. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of pollen DNA metabarcoding using constructed species mixtures. Mol. Ecol. 28(2), 431–455 (2018).
Google Scholar
Baksay, S. et al. Experimental quantificarion of pollen with DNA metabarcoding using ITS1 and trnL. Sci. Rep. 10, 4202 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ghosh, S. & Jung, C. Nutritional value of bee-collected pollens of hardy kiwi, Actinidia arguta (Actinidiaceae) and oak, Quercus sp. (Fagaceae). J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 20(1), 245–251 (2017).
Google Scholar
Brunet, J., Thairu, M. W., Henss, J. M., Link, R. I. & Kluevert, J. A. The effects of flower, floral display, and reward sizes on bumblebee foraging behaviour when pollen is the reward and plants are dichogamous. Int. J. Plant Sci. 176(9), 811–819 (2015).
Google Scholar
de Vere, N. et al. Using DNA metabarcoding to investigate honey bee foraging reveals limited flower use despite high floral availability. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 42838 (2017).
Google Scholar
Barth, O. M. In O polen no mel brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro, Luxor 151 (1989).
Lo, T., Gloag, R. S., Anderson, D. L. & Oldroyd, B. P. A molecular phylogeny of the genus Apis suggests that the giant honey bee of southern India, A. indica Fabricius, are valid species. Syst. Entomol. 35, 226–223 (2010).
Google Scholar
Pirk, C. W. W., Sole, C. L. & Crewe, R. M. Pheromones. In Honey Bees of Asia (eds Hepburn, H. R. & Radloff, S. E.) 207–214 (Springer, Berlin, 2011).
Google Scholar
Theisen-Jones, H. & Bienefeld, K. The Asian honey bee (Apis cerana) is significantly in decline. Bee World 93, 90–97 (2016).
Google Scholar
Sakagami, S. F. Some interspecific relations between Japanese and European honey bees. J. Anim. Ecol. 28, 51–68 (1959).
Google Scholar
Thomson, D. Competitive interactions between the invasive European honey bee and native bumble bees. Ecology 85, 458–470 (2004).
Google Scholar
Brosi, B. J. & Briggs, H. M. Single pollinator species losses reduce floral fidelity and plant reproductive function. PNAS 110(32), 13044–13048 (2013).
Google Scholar
Iwasaki, J. M. et al. Floral usage partitioning and competition between social (Apis mellifera, Bombus terrestris) and solitary bees in New Zealand: Niche partitioning via floral preferences?. Austral Ecol. 43(8), 937–948 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rodrigues, C. S., Ferasso, D. C., Mossi, A. J. & Coelho, G. C. Pollen resources partitioning of stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) from the southern Atlantic forest Acta Scientiarum. Biol. Sci. 42, e48714 (2020).
Lucas, A. et al. Floral resource partitioning by individuals within generalised hoverfly pollination networks revealed by DNA metabarcoding. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 5133 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lucek, K. et al. Metabarcoding of honey to assess differences in plant-pollinator interactions between urban and non-urban sites. Apidologie 50, 317–329 (2019).
Google Scholar
Tatsuno, M. & Osawa, N. Flower visitation patterns of the coexisting honey bees Apis cerana japonica and Apis mellifera (Hymentoptera: Apidae). Entomol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12206 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kuang, B. Y. & Kuang, H. O. Biology of the Honey bee (Yunnan Science and Technology Press, 2002) ([In Chines]).
Ghorab, A. et al. Sensorial, melissopalynological and physico-chemical characteristics of honey from Babors Kabylia’s region (Algeria). Foods 10, 225 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sasaki, M. In Bee’s eye view of flowering plants: Nectar- and pollen-source plants and related honey bee products. Kaiyusha, Tokyo, Japan (2010).
Simpson, M. G. Diversity and classification of flowering plant: Eudicots. Plant Syst. 2010, 275–448 (2010).
Google Scholar
Wilms, W. & Wiechers, B. Floral resource partitioning between native Melipona bees and the introduced Africanized honey bee in the Brazilian Atlantic rain forest. Apidologie 28, 339–355 (1997).
Google Scholar
Klein, S. et al. Honey bees increase their foraging performance and frequency of pollen trips through experience. Sci. Rep. 9, 6778 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bovo, S. et al. Shotgun metagenomics of honey DNA: Evaluation of a methodological approach to describe a multikingdom honey bee derived environmental DNA signature. PLoS ONE 13(10), e0205575 (2018).
Google Scholar
Prosser, S. W. J. & Hebert, P. D. N. Rapid identification of the botanical and entomological sources of honey using DNA metabarcoding. Food Chem. 214, 183–191 (2017).
Google Scholar
Dhaliwai, H. S. & Sharma, P. L. Foraging range of the Indian honey bee. J. Apic. Res. 13, 137–141 (1974).
Google Scholar
ESRI. ArcGis Pro (Version 10.6); ESRI Inc.: Redlands, CA, USA (2020).
Palmieri, L., Bozza, E. & Giongo, L. Soft fruit traceability in food matrices using real-time PCR. Nutrients 1, 316–328 (2009).
Google Scholar
Kress, W. J. et al. Plant DNA barcodes and a community phylogeny of a tropical forest dynamics plot in Panama. PNAS 106, 18621–18626 (2009).
Google Scholar
Kress, J. W. & Erickson, L. D. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: The coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS ONE 2(6), 1–10 (2007).
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30(15), 2114–2120 (2014).
Google Scholar
Rognes, T., Flouri, T., Nichols, B., Quince, C. & Mahé, F. VSEARCH: A versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4, e2584 (2016).
Google Scholar
Joshi, N. A. & Fass, J. N. Sickle: A sliding-window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files (Version 1.33). https://github.com/najoshi/sickle (2011).
Boyer, F. et al. OBITools: A Unix-inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. Res. 16, 176–182 (2016).
Google Scholar
Altschul, S. F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402 (1997).
Google Scholar
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.gbif.org/tool/81287/r-a-language-andenvironment-for-statistical-computing (2022).
Bosch, J., Retana, J. & Cerdá, X. Flowering phenology, floral traits and pollinator composition in a herbaceous Mediterranean plant community. Oecologia 109, 583–591 (1997).
Google Scholar
Endress, P. K. Flower structure and trends of evolution in eudicots and their major subclades. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 97(4), 541–583 (2010).
Google Scholar
Gómez, J. M., Torices, R., Lorite, J., Klingenberg, C. P. & Perfectti, F. The role of pollinators in the evolution of corolla shape variation, disparity and integration in a highly diversified plant family with a conserved floral bauplan. Ann. Bot. 117, 899–904 (2016).
Google Scholar
Watts, S., Dormann, C. F., González, M. M. & Ollerton, J. The influence of floral traits on specialization and modularity of plant-pollinator networks in a biodiversity hotspot in the Peruvian Andes. Ann. Bot. 118, 415–429 (2016).
Google Scholar
Lee, C. B. Coloured Flora of Korea. Hyangmunsa, Seoul, Republic of Korea (2003).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
