Berghauser Pont, M. Y., Perg, P. G., Haupt, P. A. & Heyman, A. A systematic review of the scientifically demonstrated effects of densification. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 588, 052031 (2020).
Cimburova, Z. & Berghauser Pont, M. Location matters: A systematic review of spatial contextual factors mediating ecosystem services of urban trees. Ecosyst. Serv. 50, 101296 (2021).
De Valck, J. et al. Valuing urban ecosystem services in sustainable brownfield redevelopment. Ecosyst. Serv. 35, 139–149 (2019).
Zuzolo, D. et al. Divide et disperda: Thirty years of fragmentation and impacts on the eco-mosaic in the case study of the metropolitan city of Naples. Land 10, 485 (2021).
Nelson, E. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations , edited by Pushpam Kumar, London, Earthscan Publications, United Nations Environment Programme, 2010, xxxix + 410 pp., US$76.95 (hardback), ISBN 978-1-84971-212-5. J. Nat. Resour. Policy Res. 5, 68–70 (2013).
Duraiappah, A. K. et al. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. World Resources Institute vol. 5 http://www.who.int/entity/globalchange/ecosystems/ecosys.pdf (2005).
Cariñanos, P., Casares-Porcel, M. & Quesada-Rubio, J. M. Estimating the allergenic potential of urban green spaces: A case-study in Granada, Spain. Landsc. Urban Plan. 123, 134–144 (2014).
Haase, D. et al. A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio 43, 413–433 (2014).
Google Scholar
Mexia, T. et al. Ecosystem services: Urban parks under a magnifying glass. Environ. Res. 160, 469–478 (2018).
Google Scholar
Brzoska, P., Grunewald, K. & Bastian, O. A multi-criteria analytical method to assess ecosystem services at urban site level, exemplified by two German city districts. Ecosyst. Serv. 49, 101268 (2021).
Zulian, G. et al. Practical application of spatial ecosystem service models to aid decision support. Ecosyst. Serv. 29, 465–480 (2018).
Google Scholar
Balmford, A. et al. Ecology: Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science (80-). 297, 950–953 (2002).
Google Scholar
Koulov, B., Ivanova, E., Borisova, B., Assenov, A. & Ravnachka, A. GIS-based valuation of ecosystem services in mountain regions: A case study of the Karlovo municipality in Bulgaria. One Ecosyst. 2, e14062 (2017).
Robertson, G. P. & Swinton, S. M. Reconciling agricultural productivity and environmental integrity: A grand challenge for agriculture. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3, 38–46 (2005).
Sandhu, H. S., Wratten, S. D., Cullen, R. & Case, B. The future of farming: The value of ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable land. An experimental approach. Ecol. Econ. 64, 835–848 (2008).
Berglihn, E. C. & Gómez-Baggethun, E. Ecosystem services from urban forests: The case of Oslomarka, Norway. Ecosyst. Serv. 51, 101358 (2021).
Nowak, D. J. Understanding i-Tree. (2020). https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-GTR-200.
Selvakumaran, S., Plank, S., Geiß, C., Rossi, C. & Middleton, C. Remote monitoring to predict bridge scour failure using Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) stacking techniques. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 73, 463–470 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gómez-Baggethun, E. & Barton, D. N. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol. Econ. 86, 235–245 (2013).
Gren, Å. & Andersson, E. Being efficient and green by rethinking the urban-rural divide—Combining urban expansion and food production by integrating an ecosystem service perspective into urban planning. Sustain. Cities Soc. 40, 75–82 (2018).
Grêt-Regamey, A., Celio, E., Klein, T. M. & Wissen Hayek, U. Understanding ecosystem services trade-offs with interactive procedural modeling for sustainable urban planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 109, 107–116 (2013).
Bennett, E. M., Peterson, G. D. & Gordon, L. J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol. Lett. 12, 1394–1404 (2009).
Google Scholar
Bradford, J. B. & D’Amato, A. W. Recognizing trade-offs in multi-objective land management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 10, 210–216 (2012).
Cueva, J. et al. Synergies and trade-offs in ecosystem services from urban and peri-urban forests and their implication to sustainable city design and planning. Sustain. Cities Soc. 82, 103903 (2022).
Allocca, V., Coda, S., Calcaterra, D. & De Vita, P. Groundwater rebound and flooding in the Naples’ periurban area (Italy). J. Flood Risk Manag. 15, e12775 (2022).
Padulano, R. et al. Using the present to estimate the future: A simplified approach for the quantification of climate change effects on urban flooding by scenario analysis. Hydrol. Process. 35, e14436 (2021).
D’Amato, G. et al. Allergenic pollen and pollen allergy in Europe. Allergy 62, 976–990 (2007).
Google Scholar
Prigioniero, A., Zuzolo, D., Sciarrillo, R. & Guarino, C. Assessing pollinosis risk in the Vesuvius National Park: A novel approach for Index of Urban Green Zones Allergenicity. Environ. Res. 197, 111063 (2021).
Google Scholar
AgCult 2020 Classifica visitatori 2019: Capodimonte rientra nella classifica dei primi 30 musei d’Italia.
La Valva, V., Guarino, C., De Natale, A., Cuozzo, V., Menale, B. La flora del Parco di Capodimonte di Napoli. in 33–34: 143–177. (Delpinoa, 1992).
Stevens, P. F. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. 2001. http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/. (2017).
James Barth, B., Ian FitzGibbon, S. & Stuart Wilson, R. New urban developments that retain more remnant trees have greater bird diversity. Landsc. Urban Plan. 136, 122–129 (2015).
Heckmann, K. E., Manley, P. N. & Schlesinger, M. D. Ecological integrity of remnant montane forests along an urban gradient in the Sierra Nevada. For. Ecol. Manage. 255, 2453–2466 (2008).
Prigioniero, A. et al. Role of historic gardens in biodiversity-conservation strategy: the example of the Giardino Inglese of Reggia di Caserta (UNESCO) (Italy). Plant Biosyst. 155, 983–993 (2021).
Song, Q., Wang, B., Wang, J. & Niu, X. Endangered and endemic species increase forest conservation values of species diversity based on the Shannon-Wiener index. IForest 9, 469–474 (2016).
Hess, M. C. M., Mesléard, F. & Buisson, E. Priority effects: Emerging principles for invasive plant species management. Ecol. Eng. 127, 48–57 (2019).
Carli, E. et al. Using vegetation dynamics to face the challenge of the conservation status assessment in semi-natural habitats. Rend. Lincei. Sci. Fis. e Nat. 29, 363–374 (2018).
Canedoli, C. et al. Evaluation of ecosystem services in a protected mountain area: Soil organic carbon stock and biodiversity in alpine forests and grasslands. Ecosyst. Serv. 44, 101135 (2020).
FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010. Main report. (2010).
Lindén, L., Riikonen, A., Setälä, H. & Yli-Pelkonen, V. Quantifying carbon stocks in urban parks under cold climate conditions. Urban For. Urban Green. 49, 126633 (2020).
Nowak, D. J., Hirabayashi, S., Bodine, A. & Greenfield, E. Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United States. Environ. Pollut. 193, 119–129 (2014).
Google Scholar
Nowak, D. J., Crane, D. E. & Stevens, J. C. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban For. Urban Green. 4, 115–123 (2006).
Nowak, D. J. & Crane, D. E. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environ. Pollut. 116, 381–389 (2002).
Google Scholar
Kocić, K., Spasić, T., Urošević, M. A. & Tomašević, M. Trees as natural barriers against heavy metal pollution and their role in the protection of cultural heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 15, 227–233 (2014).
Yang, J., McBride, J., Zhou, J. & Sun, Z. The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction. Urban For. Urban Green. 3, 65–78 (2005).
Zupancic, T., Westmacott, C., Bulthuis, M. The impact of green space on heat and air pollution in urban communities: A meta-narrative systematic review (2015).
Cariñanos, P., Adinolfi, C., Díaz de la Guardia, C., De Linares, C. & Casares-Porcel, M. Characterization of Allergen Emission Sources in Urban Areas. J. Environ. Qual. 45, 244–252 (2016).
Google Scholar
D’Auria, A., De Toro, P., Fierro, N. & Montone, E. Integration between GIS and multi-criteria analysis for ecosystem services assessment: A methodological proposal for the National Park of Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni (Italy). Sustain 10, 3329 (2018).
Prigioniero, A., Zuzolo, D., Niinemets, Ü. & Guarino, C. Nature-based solutions as tools for air phytoremediation: A review of the current knowledge and gaps. Environ. Pollut. 277, 116817 (2021).
Google Scholar
Szkop, Z. Evaluating the sensitivity of the i-Tree Eco pollution model to different pollution data inputs: A case study from Warsaw, Poland. Urban For. Urban Green. 55, 126859 (2020).
Tao, J. et al. Elevation-dependent effects of growing season length on carbon sequestration in Xizang Plateau grassland. Ecol. Indic. 110, 105880 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y. et al. Grassland carbon sequestration ability in China: A new perspective from Terrestrial Aridity Zones. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 69, 84–94 (2016).
Gopalakrishnan, V., Hirabayashi, S., Ziv, G. & Bakshi, B. R. Air quality and human health impacts of grasslands and shrublands in the United States. Atmos. Environ. 182, 193–199 (2018).
Google Scholar
Pace, R. et al. Comparing i-Tree eco estimates of particulate matter deposition with leaf and canopy measurements in an urban mediterranean Holm Oak Forest. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 6613–6622 (2021).
Google Scholar
Losos, J. B., Walton, B. M. & Bennett, A. F. Trade-offs between sprinting and clinging ability in Kenyan Chameleons. Funct. Ecol. 7, 281 (1993).
Pretzsch, H., Moser-Reischl, A., Rahman, M. A., Pauleit, S. & Rötzer, T. Towards sustainable management of the stock and ecosystem services of urban trees. From theory to model and application. Trees – Struct. Funct. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-021-02100-3.
Grunewald, K. et al. Lessons learned from implementing the ecosystem services concept in urban planning. Ecosyst. Serv. 49, 101273 (2021).
Baldacchini, C., Sgrigna, G., Clarke, W., Tallis, M. & Calfapietra, C. An ultra-spatially resolved method to quali-quantitative monitor particulate matter in urban environment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 18719–18729 (2019).
Google Scholar
De Luca, P., Guarino, C., Gullo, G., La Valva V., 1992. Il Parco di Capodimonte di Napoli: storia ed attualità. in 33–34: 143–177. (Delpinoa, 1992).
Pignatti, S. Flora d’Italia vol.2. (2017).
Braun-Blanquet, J. Plant Sociology (McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1932).
Catorci, A. et al. Reproductive traits variation in the herb layer of a submediterranean deciduous forest landscape. Plant Ecol. 214, 737–749 (2013).
Šumrada, T. et al. Are result-based schemes a superior approach to the conservation of High Nature Value grasslands? Evidence from Slovenia. Land Use Policy 111, 105749 (2021).
POWO. Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/ (2022).
Bímová, K., Mandák, B. & Kašparová, I. How does Reynoutria invasion fit the various theories of invasibility?. J. Veg. Sci. 15, 495–504 (2004).
Wild, J., Neuhäuslová, Z. & Sofron, J. Changes of plant species composition in the Šumava spruce forests, SW Bohemia, since the 1970s. For. Ecol. Manag. 187, 117–132 (2004).
Damato, G. & Lobefalo, G. Allergenic pollens in the southern Mediterranean area. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 83, 116–122 (1989).
Google Scholar
Cariñanos, P. et al. Assessing allergenicity in urban parks: A nature-based solution to reduce the impact on public health. Environ. Res. 155, 219–227 (2017).
Google Scholar
Cariñanos, P. et al. Estimation of the allergenic potential of urban trees and urban parks: Towards the healthy design of urban green spaces of the future. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 1357 (2019).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com